Type 2 Diabetes
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate if type 2 diabetics who have inadequate glycemic control on metformin alone, have a similar, or not inferior, glycemic response when treated with the combination of muraglitazar and metformin compared to pioglitazone and metformin.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Type 2 diabetics * HbA1c ≥7.0% and ≤10.0%,currently receiving a stable dose of metformin 1500 to 2550 mg/day for at least 6 weeks prior to screening were enrolled in this study. * Fasting C-peptide ≥1.0 ng/mL * BMI≤41 kg/m2 mean fasting serum trig. ≤600 g/dL
Exclusion criteria
* symptomatic type 2 diabetics with \> 10% weight loss 3 months prior to study * history of diabetic ketoacidosis, hyperosmolar nonketotic coma, insulin therapy, inability to take muraglitazar, pioglitazone, or metformin according to investigator brochure or labeling * History of MI (myocardial infarction), coronary angioplasty or bypass graft(s), valvular disease or repair, unstable angina pectoris, transient ischemic attack (TIA), cerebrovascular attack, or cerebrovascular accident (CVA) within 6 months, congestive heart failure (NYHA Class III and IV, uncontrolled hypertension, history of, or renal disease, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), pulmonary disease, gastrointestinal disease, active liver disease or endocrine disease.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Compare change from basline in HbA1c after 24 weeks and 50 weeks of treatment with muraglitazar + metformin vs. pioglitazone + metformin | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Change in FPG from basline to W24, proportion of subjects receiving therapeutic response at W24, percent change of fasting lipid levels from baseline to W11/12, change in | — |
| hs-CRP from baseline to W24 | — |
Countries
Canada, Mexico, Puerto Rico, United States