Hypercholesterolemia
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of the study is to determine whether an Internet based compliance tool is superior to common diet counselling in patients with hypercholesterolemia.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Available personal mailbox and access to the Internet * Primary hypercholesterolemia with CV risk \> 20% over 10 years judged by the investigator or a history of ischemic heart disease or other established atherosclerotic disease (claudicatio intermittens, apoplexia cerebri (ischaemic stroke)) or stable diabetes mellitus * Fasting LDL-C level \> 3.2 mmol/L
Exclusion criteria
* Known heterozygous or homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia or known type III hyperlipoproteinaemia (familial dysbetalipoproteinaemia) * Documented secondary hypercholesterolemia of any cause except stable diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2) * History of serious adverse effect or hypersensitivity reactions to statins, in particular any history of myopathy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The primary endpoint is the number and percentage of subjects from each group (rosuvastatin or rosuvastatin + a compliance enhancement tool) who reached the DSAM LDL-C target goal (LDL-C < 3.0 mmol/L) after 6 months therapy (24 weeks). | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Compliance with study drug assessed by tablet count data | — |
| Number and percentage of subjects increasing rosuvastatin dosage from 10 mg to 20 mg at week 12 | — |
| Number and percentage of subjects within the DSAM LDL-C target goal after 3 months therapy | — |
| Change in weight after 6 months therapy | — |
| Change in waistline after 6 months therapy | — |
| Percentage change in TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, TG from week 0 to week 24 | — |
Countries
Denmark