Skip to content

Electrophysiologically Guided PAcing Site Selection Study

Investigational New Drug Application/ Investigational Device Exemption Information

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00239226
Acronym
EPASS
Enrollment
102
Registered
2005-10-14
Start date
2005-11-30
Completion date
2009-03-31
Last updated
2013-11-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation, Sinus Arrhythmia

Keywords

atrial fibrillation, interatrial septum, atrial pacing, symptomatic sinus node dysfunction,, pacemaker indication class I

Brief summary

This study is a long-term, prospective, and controlled evaluation of the incidence of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with severe intra-right atrial conduction delay paced with preventive algorithms at the interatrial septum (IAS) versus right atrial appendage (RAA).

Detailed description

The EPASS is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, and controlled study. Prior to entering the study, the patient should be informed and provide a written consent. In addition, the patient should meet all selection criteria. The Investigator has to check that all selection criteria are satisfied. Then the patient undergoes pacemaker implantation, receiving a pacemaker model T70 or Selection 9000 (or later version). Patients eligible for the study are enrolled and submitted to the evaluation of intra-light atrial conduction delay before device implantation. Besides, they are assigned to the group with severe RA conduction delay or with normal conduction delay. The randomization of the pacing site for both groups depends on the value of right atrial conduction delay, together with the associated diseases of the patients, sex and age. After implantation, a stabilization phase of 3-5 weeks is required to stabilize the leads: during this period the physician can optimize the device parameters. Neither the data regarding AF episodes nor cardioversion are collected. At the end of the stabilization phase the patient undergoes the 1st study follow-up and starts the monitoring period lasting 2 years. Regular follow-ups and data collection are scheduled every 6 months.

Interventions

PROCEDUREIAS pacing - study group

site of implant and permanent pacing

PROCEDUREIAS pacing control group

site of implant and permanent pacing

PROCEDUREPacing RAA study group

site of implant and permanent pacing

PROCEDUREPacing RAA control group

site of implant and permanent pacing

Sponsors

Medtronic
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Medtronic BRC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Symptomatic sinus node dysfunction * More than 18 years old * Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Less than 18 years old * Pregnancy * Anamnestic transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke * Neoplastic or any other severe disease reducing life expectancy * Heart surgery in the last 3 months * Left atrial diameter \> 55mm, determined in the parasternal long-axis view (during either sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation) * Participation in other studies

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) After a Mean Follow-up of 15±7 Months: Comparison Between IAS and RAA Pacing in the Study Group1 yearPersistent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) incidence

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Number of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Episodes: Comparison Between All GroupsJanuary 2009
Number of Patients With Permanent Atrial Fibrillation (AF)January 2009
Symptom Scale Questionnaire: Comparison Between All GroupsJanuary 2009
Number of Cardioversion: Comparison Between All GroupsJanuary 2009
Ventricular Pacing PercentageJanuary 2009
Time to First Persistent Episode of Atrial Fibrillation (AF)January 2009
Number of Episodes/DayJanuary 2009
AF BurdenJanuary 2009
Heart Failure: Comparison Between All GroupsJanuary 2009

Countries

Italy

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Enrollment: november 2005 - may 2008 Sites:Ospedale P. Cosma Camposampiero-Ospedale Civile ULSS 13 Mirano-Ospdale Civile,Como-Ospedale Cisanello,Pisa-CRN,Pisa-Ospedale civile, Livorno-Ospedale Molinette, Torino-Presidi Ospedalieri Riuniti,Borgomanero-Ospedale San Pietro Igneo, Fucecchio-Azienda Ospedaliera di Desenzano del Garda Desenzano

Participants by arm

ArmCount
IAS Pacing Study Group
Patients with with severe conduction delay (Delta CTos \>50 ms, Study Group) randomized to interatrial septum (IAS) pacing.
30
IAS Pacing Control Group
Patients without severe conduction delay (Delta CTos \<50 ms, Control Group) randomized to interatrial septum (IAS) pacing.
18
RAA Pacing Study Group
Patients with severe conduction delay (Delta CTos \>50 ms, Study Group) randomized to right atrial appendage (RAA) pacing.
37
RAA Pacing Control Group
Patients without severe conduction delay (Delta CTos \<50 ms, Control Group) randomized to right atrial appendage (RAA) pacing.
17
Total102

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1010
Overall StudypermAF during stabilization period0003

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIAS Pacing Control GroupRAA Pacing Study GroupIAS Pacing Study GroupRAA Pacing Control GroupTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
18 Participants29 Participants28 Participants17 Participants92 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants8 Participants2 Participants0 Participants10 Participants
Age Continuous79 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
75 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
75 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
81 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
77 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
Region of Enrollment
Italy
18 participants37 participants30 participants17 participants102 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants21 Participants18 Participants10 Participants58 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants16 Participants12 Participants7 Participants44 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 290 / 180 / 360 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 291 / 182 / 360 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) After a Mean Follow-up of 15±7 Months: Comparison Between IAS and RAA Pacing in the Study Group

Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) incidence

Time frame: 1 year

Population: 97 pts completed the study after a mean fu period of 15±7 months.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
IAS Pacing Study GroupNumber of Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) After a Mean Follow-up of 15±7 Months: Comparison Between IAS and RAA Pacing in the Study Group2 Number of patients with persistent AF
IAS Pacing Control GroupNumber of Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) After a Mean Follow-up of 15±7 Months: Comparison Between IAS and RAA Pacing in the Study Group2 Number of patients with persistent AF
RAA Pacing Study GroupNumber of Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) After a Mean Follow-up of 15±7 Months: Comparison Between IAS and RAA Pacing in the Study Group9 Number of patients with persistent AF
RAA Pacing Control GroupNumber of Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) After a Mean Follow-up of 15±7 Months: Comparison Between IAS and RAA Pacing in the Study Group2 Number of patients with persistent AF
p-value: 0.047Log Rank
Secondary

AF Burden

Time frame: January 2009

Secondary

Heart Failure: Comparison Between All Groups

Time frame: January 2009

Secondary

Number of Cardioversion: Comparison Between All Groups

Time frame: January 2009

Secondary

Number of Episodes/Day

Time frame: January 2009

Secondary

Number of Patients With Permanent Atrial Fibrillation (AF)

Time frame: January 2009

Secondary

Number of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Episodes: Comparison Between All Groups

Time frame: January 2009

Secondary

Symptom Scale Questionnaire: Comparison Between All Groups

Time frame: January 2009

Secondary

Time to First Persistent Episode of Atrial Fibrillation (AF)

Time frame: January 2009

Secondary

Ventricular Pacing Percentage

Time frame: January 2009

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 28, 2026