Atrial Fibrillation, Sinus Arrhythmia
Conditions
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, interatrial septum, atrial pacing, symptomatic sinus node dysfunction,, pacemaker indication class I
Brief summary
This study is a long-term, prospective, and controlled evaluation of the incidence of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with severe intra-right atrial conduction delay paced with preventive algorithms at the interatrial septum (IAS) versus right atrial appendage (RAA).
Detailed description
The EPASS is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, and controlled study. Prior to entering the study, the patient should be informed and provide a written consent. In addition, the patient should meet all selection criteria. The Investigator has to check that all selection criteria are satisfied. Then the patient undergoes pacemaker implantation, receiving a pacemaker model T70 or Selection 9000 (or later version). Patients eligible for the study are enrolled and submitted to the evaluation of intra-light atrial conduction delay before device implantation. Besides, they are assigned to the group with severe RA conduction delay or with normal conduction delay. The randomization of the pacing site for both groups depends on the value of right atrial conduction delay, together with the associated diseases of the patients, sex and age. After implantation, a stabilization phase of 3-5 weeks is required to stabilize the leads: during this period the physician can optimize the device parameters. Neither the data regarding AF episodes nor cardioversion are collected. At the end of the stabilization phase the patient undergoes the 1st study follow-up and starts the monitoring period lasting 2 years. Regular follow-ups and data collection are scheduled every 6 months.
Interventions
site of implant and permanent pacing
site of implant and permanent pacing
site of implant and permanent pacing
site of implant and permanent pacing
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Symptomatic sinus node dysfunction * More than 18 years old * Signed informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* Less than 18 years old * Pregnancy * Anamnestic transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke * Neoplastic or any other severe disease reducing life expectancy * Heart surgery in the last 3 months * Left atrial diameter \> 55mm, determined in the parasternal long-axis view (during either sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation) * Participation in other studies
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) After a Mean Follow-up of 15±7 Months: Comparison Between IAS and RAA Pacing in the Study Group | 1 year | Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) incidence |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Number of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Episodes: Comparison Between All Groups | January 2009 |
| Number of Patients With Permanent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) | January 2009 |
| Symptom Scale Questionnaire: Comparison Between All Groups | January 2009 |
| Number of Cardioversion: Comparison Between All Groups | January 2009 |
| Ventricular Pacing Percentage | January 2009 |
| Time to First Persistent Episode of Atrial Fibrillation (AF) | January 2009 |
| Number of Episodes/Day | January 2009 |
| AF Burden | January 2009 |
| Heart Failure: Comparison Between All Groups | January 2009 |
Countries
Italy
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Enrollment: november 2005 - may 2008 Sites:Ospedale P. Cosma Camposampiero-Ospedale Civile ULSS 13 Mirano-Ospdale Civile,Como-Ospedale Cisanello,Pisa-CRN,Pisa-Ospedale civile, Livorno-Ospedale Molinette, Torino-Presidi Ospedalieri Riuniti,Borgomanero-Ospedale San Pietro Igneo, Fucecchio-Azienda Ospedaliera di Desenzano del Garda Desenzano
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| IAS Pacing Study Group Patients with with severe conduction delay (Delta CTos \>50 ms, Study Group) randomized to interatrial septum (IAS) pacing. | 30 |
| IAS Pacing Control Group Patients without severe conduction delay (Delta CTos \<50 ms, Control Group) randomized to interatrial septum (IAS) pacing. | 18 |
| RAA Pacing Study Group Patients with severe conduction delay (Delta CTos \>50 ms, Study Group) randomized to right atrial appendage (RAA) pacing. | 37 |
| RAA Pacing Control Group Patients without severe conduction delay (Delta CTos \<50 ms, Control Group) randomized to right atrial appendage (RAA) pacing. | 17 |
| Total | 102 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | permAF during stabilization period | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | IAS Pacing Control Group | RAA Pacing Study Group | IAS Pacing Study Group | RAA Pacing Control Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 18 Participants | 29 Participants | 28 Participants | 17 Participants | 92 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 0 Participants | 8 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Age Continuous | 79 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6 | 75 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7 | 75 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7 | 81 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5 | 77 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7 |
| Region of Enrollment Italy | 18 participants | 37 participants | 30 participants | 17 participants | 102 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 9 Participants | 21 Participants | 18 Participants | 10 Participants | 58 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 9 Participants | 16 Participants | 12 Participants | 7 Participants | 44 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 29 | 0 / 18 | 0 / 36 | 0 / 14 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 29 | 1 / 18 | 2 / 36 | 0 / 14 |
Outcome results
Number of Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) After a Mean Follow-up of 15±7 Months: Comparison Between IAS and RAA Pacing in the Study Group
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) incidence
Time frame: 1 year
Population: 97 pts completed the study after a mean fu period of 15±7 months.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| IAS Pacing Study Group | Number of Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) After a Mean Follow-up of 15±7 Months: Comparison Between IAS and RAA Pacing in the Study Group | 2 Number of patients with persistent AF |
| IAS Pacing Control Group | Number of Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) After a Mean Follow-up of 15±7 Months: Comparison Between IAS and RAA Pacing in the Study Group | 2 Number of patients with persistent AF |
| RAA Pacing Study Group | Number of Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) After a Mean Follow-up of 15±7 Months: Comparison Between IAS and RAA Pacing in the Study Group | 9 Number of patients with persistent AF |
| RAA Pacing Control Group | Number of Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) After a Mean Follow-up of 15±7 Months: Comparison Between IAS and RAA Pacing in the Study Group | 2 Number of patients with persistent AF |
AF Burden
Time frame: January 2009
Heart Failure: Comparison Between All Groups
Time frame: January 2009
Number of Cardioversion: Comparison Between All Groups
Time frame: January 2009
Number of Episodes/Day
Time frame: January 2009
Number of Patients With Permanent Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Time frame: January 2009
Number of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Episodes: Comparison Between All Groups
Time frame: January 2009
Symptom Scale Questionnaire: Comparison Between All Groups
Time frame: January 2009
Time to First Persistent Episode of Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Time frame: January 2009
Ventricular Pacing Percentage
Time frame: January 2009