Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Amodiaquine and Amodiaquine-Artesunate

A Randomized, Double Blind Trial on the Efficacy and Safety of Amodiaquine-Artesunate and Amodiaquine Alone in the Treatment of Children With Uncomplicated Falciparum Malaria

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00238017
Enrollment
400
Registered
2005-10-13
Start date
2005-10-31
Completion date
2005-12-31
Last updated
2006-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malaria

Keywords

malaria, amodiaquine, artesunate, safety, efficacy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of two antimalarial drug regimes, namely amodiaquine versus amodiaquine-artesunate, in the treatment of children with uncomplicated malaria. Also, genetic host factors which might influence efficacy and/or safety will be examined.

Detailed description

Malaria remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality among children in sub-Saharan Africa. Current malaria control largely consists of rapid treatment of patients. Amodiaquine-artesunate and other combinatory treatment regimes including amodiaquine are now being introduced as first-line antimalarial drugs in several African countries. However, data on the efficacy and safety of amodiaquine and amodiaquine-artesunate are scarce. In addition, there is evidence that common genetic host factors, e.g. sickle cell trait, may influence efficacy and safety of these drugs. To examine efficacy and safety of the named drugs as well as a potential influence of genetic host factors on these outcomes a randomized, double blind trial among 400 children with uncomplicated malaria is performed in northern Ghana.

Interventions

DRUGamodiaquine-artesunate versus amodiaquine

Sponsors

University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana
CollaboratorOTHER
Kintampo Health Research Centre, Ghana
CollaboratorOTHER
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Months to 59 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male and female outpatients aged 6 to 59 months * Body weight \>5 kg * Uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria * Mono-infection with P. falciparum with an asexual parasite density between 2,000 to 200,000 parasites/μl * Axillary temperature ≥37.5°C * Ability to tolerate oral therapy * Informed consent by the legal representative of the subject * Residence in study area

Exclusion criteria

* Previous participation in this clinical trial * Haemoglobin \<5 mg/dl * Mixed plasmodial infection * Danger signs (unable to drink; repeated vomiting; recent history of convulsions;lethargic or unconscious state; unable to stand up or to sit) and signs of severe malaria as defined by WHO. * Any other severe underlying disease (cardiac, renal, hepatic diseases, malnutrition, known HIV infection) * Concomitant disease masking assessment of response * History of allergy or intolerance against study medications

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Parasitological and clinical cure rates by days 14 and 28
Parasite and fever clearance times
Carrier rates of sexual parasite stages at days 7, 14 and 28
Incidence rates of adverse events

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence rate of haematological and biochemical evidence of drug-induced toxicity
Primary endpoints in children with and without various genetic host factors

Countries

Ghana

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026