Skip to content

Brain and Coordination Changes Induced By Robotics and FES Treatment Following Stroke

CNS Plasticity Induced By Motor Learning Technologies Following Stroke

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00237744
Enrollment
40
Registered
2005-10-12
Start date
2005-04-30
Completion date
2011-09-30
Last updated
2014-10-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Stroke, Cerebrovascular Accident, Stroke

Keywords

Motor Learning, Rehabilitation, Robotics, Therapeutic Electric Stimulation

Brief summary

The long-range goal of this work is to identify how to target treatment so that the brain is functionally re-organized to produce movement. This study will compare treatment response to robotics versus functional neuromuscular stimulation.

Detailed description

Methods. Up to ninety-six chronic stroke subjects (\> 12 months post stroke) will be randomized to one of the treatment groups: Wrist/hand Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES)+whole arm motor learning group; shoulder/elbow robotics + whole arm motor learning group; and whole arm motor learning group. For all groups, treatment will offered 5 hrs/day, 5 days/week, for 12 weeks. All three treatment groups will receive motor learning therapy. For the Wrist/hand FES+whole arm motor learning group, there will be the addition of FES during treatment. For the Shoulder/elbow robotics + whole arm motor learning group there will be the addition of robotics training. Outcome measures will be collected at weeks 1, 6, 12, and three months after the end of treatment. Measures will include muscle strength (Manual Muscle Testing); coordination of joint movement (Fugl-Meyer Coordination Scale); motor control of target acquisition, pathway maintenance; and smoothness of movement (robotics measures); performance of 13 functional tasks (Arm Motor Ability Test); and quality of life (Stroke Impact Scale). Measures of brain function will be non-invasive and will include cognitive planning time, cognitive effort level, and location of brain activity during simple shoulder and arm movements. Changes in brain function measures will reflect plasticity or adaptability in response to treatment.

Interventions

DEVICERobotics training for shoulder elbow.

training utilizing a robot to assist with movement practice

DEVICESurface Functional Neuromuscular Stimulation

training utilizing FNS to assist with movement practice

OTHERwhole arm motor learning

intervention utilizing motor learning training principles to perform part and whole task practice of meaningful everyday functional tasks.

Sponsors

US Department of Veterans Affairs
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Medically stable and at least 12 months post stroke. * Difficulty using upper limb for functional tasks. * Age \>21 years

Exclusion criteria

uncontrolled, chronic medical condition

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
AMATprior to treatment and following 3 months of treatmentThe AMAT is a measure of complex functional task performance of a variety of specified tasks and is measured in seconds summed across the various tasks. A higher score is indicative of decreased performance on the measure. A max score of 3000 seconds would indicate inability to perform any portion of the test.
M1 Activation Absolute Change Scoreat baseline and following 3 months of treatmentA measure of brain activation change in the area of M1 following intervention (pre to post intervention). A number greater than 0 indicates a change in brain activation in the area of M1. The maximum voxel activation for a healthy adult in the studied region of Interest (M1) is 659.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited by word of mouth and from an advertisement flyer.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Shoulder/Elbow Robotics + Whole Arm Motor Learning
Subjects \> 6 months following first stroke with diminished upper limb strength, coordination and function, and impairment of shoulder/elbow \> wrist hand.
11
Wrist/Hand FES + Whole Arm Motor Learning
Subjects \> 6 months following first stroke with diminished upper limb strength, coordination and function, and impairment of wrist hand \>shoulder/elbow
11
Whole Arm Motor Learning
Subjects \> 6 months following first stroke with diminished upper limb strength, coordination and function, and impairment of shoulder/elbow=wrist hand
18
Total40

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject310

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicShoulder/Elbow Robotics + Whole Arm Motor LearningWrist/Hand FES + Whole Arm Motor LearningWhole Arm Motor LearningTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants2 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
9 Participants9 Participants13 Participants31 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
11 participants11 participants18 participants40 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants5 Participants4 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants6 Participants14 Participants28 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 110 / 110 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 110 / 110 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

AMAT

The AMAT is a measure of complex functional task performance of a variety of specified tasks and is measured in seconds summed across the various tasks. A higher score is indicative of decreased performance on the measure. A max score of 3000 seconds would indicate inability to perform any portion of the test.

Time frame: prior to treatment and following 3 months of treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Shoulder/Elbow Robotics+Whole Arm Motor LearningAMATPre Treatment AMAT1693 secondsStandard Deviation 631
Shoulder/Elbow Robotics+Whole Arm Motor LearningAMATPost Treatment AMAT1386 secondsStandard Deviation 572
Wrist/Hand FES+Whole Arm Motor LearningAMATPre Treatment AMAT1693 secondsStandard Deviation 947
Wrist/Hand FES+Whole Arm Motor LearningAMATPost Treatment AMAT1341 secondsStandard Deviation 900
Whole Arm Motor Learning GroupAMATPre Treatment AMAT1556 secondsStandard Deviation 703
Whole Arm Motor Learning GroupAMATPost Treatment AMAT1187 secondsStandard Deviation 703
Primary

M1 Activation Absolute Change Score

A measure of brain activation change in the area of M1 following intervention (pre to post intervention). A number greater than 0 indicates a change in brain activation in the area of M1. The maximum voxel activation for a healthy adult in the studied region of Interest (M1) is 659.

Time frame: at baseline and following 3 months of treatment

Population: This is a sub sample of subjects eligible to undergo fMRI testing. A total of 23 subjects were eligible (5 subjects in the wrist/hand FES+ whole arm motor learning group; 8 subjects in the shoulder/elbow robotics+whole arm motor learning group and 10 subjects in the Whole arm motor learning group).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Shoulder/Elbow Robotics+Whole Arm Motor LearningM1 Activation Absolute Change Score359.6 voxelsStandard Deviation 323.3
Wrist/Hand FES+Whole Arm Motor LearningM1 Activation Absolute Change Score489.88 voxelsStandard Deviation 505.8
Whole Arm Motor Learning GroupM1 Activation Absolute Change Score429.7 voxelsStandard Deviation 327.2

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026