Skip to content

Home or Home-like Hospital Birth

Home or Home-like Hospital Birth for Low-risk Nulliparae: Does it Matter?

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00237601
Enrollment
500
Registered
2005-10-12
Start date
2006-01-31
Completion date
2008-12-31
Last updated
2010-04-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pregnancy

Keywords

Home birth, Hospital birth, Midwifery, Effectivity, Efficiency

Brief summary

In the Netherlands, which has about 200.000 births per year, maternity care is provided by midwives or general practitioners unless medical reasons necessitate specialist obstetric care. Women with low risk pregnancies are free to decide where to give birth, attended by their midwife or general practitioner, at home or in the hospital, from which they are then discharged within 24 hours. In the Netherlands these hospital births are referred to as poliklinische bevallingen (i.e. outpatient deliveries) to indicate that they do not involve formal hospitalisation, or as verplaatste thuisbevalling (i.e. relocated home births) to indicate that they are supervised by the same caregivers as the home births without involvement of specialist obstetricians. In the last two decades a marked increase in the referral rate to obstetricians during childbirth has occurred, especially for nulliparae, both in planned home births and planned hospital births (outpatient deliveries). 90% from all primigravidae will start their pregnancy under care of the primary caregiver (midwife of general practitioner). During the pregnancy 30% will be referred to the secondary caregiver (obstetrician specialist). The other 60% will start labor guided by the primary caregiver. More than 50% of these women will be referred to the obstetrician during labor. Despite this unique situation of the Dutch maternity care, the differences between home and hospital birth (outpatient deliveries) with regard to effectivity and efficiency have never been investigated. It is also unclear if pregnant women are informed about a 50% risk of being transported to the secondary caregiver/ hospital during labor at home. Neither do we know what their experiences are. This study aims to investigate the differences between home and hospital deliveries under care of the primary caregiver with regard to effectivity (costs) and efficiency (patient satisfaction) of care.

Interventions

OTHERobstetric care

Sponsors

School for Midwifery Maastricht
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Maastricht University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Primiparae * No medical indication for specialistic care * The pregnant woman will be able to give birth at home or at a hospital * The woman and her partner will be fluent in the Dutch language

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
primary outcome: referral rate to secondary care, preferences of women and partners with regard to place of birth. Secondary outcome: costs of home birth and hospital births satisfaction of obstetric care

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026