Skip to content

Syringe or Continuous Amnioreduction for Symptomatic Polyhydramnios. A Prospective Randomized Study.

DRAINAGE AMNIOTIQUE A LA SERINGUE OU PAR ASPIRATION CONTINUE DANS LES HYDRAMNIOS SYMPTOMATIQUES. ETUDE PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISEE.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00236340
Enrollment
80
Registered
2005-10-12
Start date
2002-01-31
Completion date
2005-02-28
Last updated
2025-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Polyhydramnios

Keywords

Amniodrainage, Pregnancy, Amniocentesis

Brief summary

To compare the efficiency and maternal and fetal tolerance of two techniques of amnioreduction used in cases of symptomatic second and third trimester polyhydramnios: syringe manual aspiration technique (S group) and continuous suction technique (C group) set to - 250 mmHg

Detailed description

Polyhydramnios is defined as more than 2 liters of amniotic fluid. Ultrasound diagnosis is made either by measurement of a deepest vertical pocket exceeding 8 cm, or by use of an amniotic fluid index (AFI) exceeding 25 cm. Potential complications of polyhydramnios are preterm labor, premature rupture of membranes, altered utero-placental perfusion, and maternal discomfort. Amniodrainage has become an established technique to improve maternal comfort and reduce the risks of severe polyhydramnios in both singleton and twin pregnancies, decreasing uterine contractility, as well as over-stretching of membranes and uterus. It also acts on the pathological processes of twin to twin transfusion syndrome. Several techniques are used to reduce symptomatic polyhydramnios. Passive gravitational drainage is long, does not allow to evacuate larger amounts of amniotic fluid and continuous maternal and fetal monitoring is difficult. The standard syringe technique is often a source of discomfort for both the patient and the operator. Continuous aspiration is faster and limits patient's discomfort. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency and maternal and fetal tolerance of these two latter techniques of amnioreduction. A preliminary study permitted to assess the depression value created at the tip of the needle during amniodrainage: the syringe aspiration technique showed large depression variations from 0 to - 300 millimeters of mercury (mmHg). The continuous wall suction was thus chosen to be set to - 250 mmHg: depression at the needle's tip didn't vary during the procedure.

Interventions

DEVICESyringe aspiration

It consists of performing successive aspirations using a 50ml syringe connected to the needle by a flexible tube.

The tubing is connected to the centralized suction system by continuous vacuum, the value of the applied vacuum is 250mmHg

Sponsors

Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Pregnant women with abdomen discumfort and ultrasound diagnosis of polyhydramnios (AFI\>25cm) * Single or twin pregnancies

Exclusion criteria

* Multiple pregnancy (more than 3 fetuses) * Maternal history of placental abruptio * Fetus with IUGR * Pregnancy complicated with pre-eclampsia * Unability to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
maternal pain (Analogic visual scale)After drainage

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Duration of the drainageAfter drainage
Uterine activityAfter drainage
Volume of amniotic fluid drainedAfter drainage
Clinical Retroplacental HaematomeAfter drainage
Histological analysis of the placentasAfter drainage
Recording of Foetal Heart RateAfter drainage

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026