Skip to content

Double or Single Dose Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Diabetic Patients With de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions

A Randomized Feasibility Study of the Double Dose or Single Dose Sirolimus-Eluting BX VELOCITY Balloon-Expandable Stent for the Treatment of Diabetic Patients With de Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions(3D)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00233714
Acronym
3D
Enrollment
56
Registered
2005-10-06
Start date
2003-05-31
Completion date
2009-11-30
Last updated
2009-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Brief summary

The main objective of this study is to assess safety and effectiveness of double dose sirolimus-eluting Bx VELOCITY stents in diabetic patients with a de novo native coronary lesion, as compared to single dose sirolimus-eluting Bx VELOCITY™ stents.

Interventions

Single dose Sirolimus-Eluting coronary stent

Sponsors

Cordis US Corp.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. The patient must be minimum 18 years of age; 2. Patients must be previously diagnosed with diabetes with documented treatment with insulin, oral medications, or diet for a minimum of 3 months; 3. Diagnosis of angina pectoris as defined by Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification (CCS I, II, III, IV) OR unstable angina pectoris (Braunwald Classification B&C, I-II-III) OR patients with documented silent ischemia; 4. Treatment of one lesion in a native coronary artery. The treated lesion will be the one with the highest % diameter stenosis by visual estimate. Additional study stents may be used for procedural complications such as dissections. Multivessel treatment is permissible in non-target vessels; however, additional lesions may only be treated with commercial stents. If other non-target lesions are treated with commercial stents during the index procedure, they must be successfully treated prior to the study lesion; 5. The target vessel is 2.5 mm and 3.5mm in diameter (visual estimate); 6. The target lesion is \<30 mm in length (visual estimate) located in a native coronary artery; 7. Target lesion stenosis is \>50% and \<100% (TIMI I) (visual estimate);

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient has experienced a Q-wave or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction with documented total CK\>2 times normal within the preceding 24 hours and the CK and CK-MB enzymes remains above normal at the time of treatment; 2. Patients admitted for treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis \> 2 times in the past six months (Brittle Diabetics); 3. Ejection fraction 30%; 4. Impaired renal function (creatinine \> 2.0 mg/dL);

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary endpoint is in-stent late lumen loss as measured by QCA at 6 months post-procedure.6 months post-procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 30 days, 6 months, 12 months and 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-procedure.30 days, 6 months, 12 months and 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-procedure
Target vessel failure (TVF) defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization at 30 days, 6 months, 12 months and 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-procedure.30 days, 6 months, 12 months and 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-procedure
Device success defined as achievement of a final residual diameter stenosis of <50% (by QCA), using the assigned device only. If QCA is not available, the visual estimate of diameter stenosis is used.During Index Procedure
Lesion success defined as the attainment of <50% residual stenosis (by QCA) using any percutaneous method.During Index Procedure
Procedure success defined as achievement of a final diameter stenosis of <50% (by QCA) using any percutaneous method, without the occurrence of death, MI, or repeat revascularization of the target lesion during the hospital stay.During the hospital stay
Composite of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) defined as death, myocardial infarction (Q wave and non-Q wave), emergent bypass surgery, or repeat target lesion revascularization at 30 days, 6 months, 12 months and 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-procedure.30 days, 6 months, 12 months and 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-procedure
In-stent and in-lesion mean percent diameter stenosis (%DS) and minimal lumen. diameter (MLD) measured by QCA post-procedure and at 6 months and 2 years.post-procedure and at 6 months and 2 years
In-lesion late lumen loss measured by QCA at 6 months and 2 years.6 months and 2 years
Stent lumen and stent obstruction volume by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) at post-procedure and 6 months and 2 years.post-procedure 6 months and 2 years.
Glycemic control as measured by HbA1c at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months.baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months
C-reactive protein levels measured at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months related to patient outcomes.baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months
In-stent and in-lesion binary restenosis (> 50% diameter stenosis) as measured by QCA at 6 months and 2 years.6 months and 2 years

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026