Skip to content

PROACT - Pre-Operative Arimidex Compared To Tamoxifen

A Randomised, Double-blind, Study Comparing ARIMIDEX™ With NOLVADEX™ as Neo-adjuvant and Adjuvant Treatment in Post-menopausal Women With Large Operable (T2 (≥3cm), T3, N0-2, M0) or Potentially-operable, Locally Advanced (T4b, N0-2, M0), ER+ and/or PR+ Breast Cancer.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00232661
Enrollment
452
Registered
2005-10-05
Start date
2000-08-31
Completion date
2007-12-31
Last updated
2010-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare tamoxifen, versus a newer treatment, ARIMIDEX, which we already know to be well tolerated. The main objectives of this research study are to see whether using these drugs will shrink down tumours before surgery and to see if any shrinkage in the tumour affects the extent of surgery that is required.

Interventions

DRUGARIMIDEX (anastrazole)
DRUGNOLVADEX (tamoxifen)

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Operable or potentially operable breast cancer * Invasive breast cancer proven to be hormone-sensitive (ER+/PR+) * Patients who might benefit from endocrine treatment prior to surgery * Postmenopausal * Signed written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Inoperable breast cancer * Patient unwilling to undergo surgery * Any reason why the patient may not be able to conform to study requirements * Any previous treatment for breast cancer * Previous Tamoxifen use as a part of breast cancer prevention trials * Not willing to stop taking drugs that affect sex-hormones such as HRT * Previous history of breast cancer * Previous history of invasive malignancy within the last 10 years * Any other severe disease that may prevent surgery, place the patient at risk, or influence the study results * Treatment with an experimental drug within the last 3 months * Risk of transmitting HIV, Hepatitis B or C

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Objective tumour responseAssessed at 3 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Extent of breast surgeryAssessed at 3 months
Extent of axillary down-stagingAssessed at 3 months
Clinical ultrasound response versus clinical caliper responseAssessed at 3 months
SafetyAssessed up to 5 years + 30 days
Pathological responseAssessed at 3 months
Health economics outcomesAssessed up to 30 days post-surgery
Quality of Life assessmentsAssessed at 3 months
Effect of ethnicity with respect to baseline patient and tumour characteristics, safety and objective tumour response rateAssessed up to 5 years + 30 days
Recurrence-free survival and survivalAssessed up to 5 years
Complications due to surgeryAssessed up to 30 days post-surgery

Countries

Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Czechia, France, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026