Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of CryoCor™ Cryoablation for PAF

A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the CryoCor(TM)Cardiac Cryoablation System for the Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00231296
Enrollment
174
Registered
2005-10-04
Start date
2004-11-30
Completion date
2009-03-31
Last updated
2017-05-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

cryoablation, atrial fibrillation

Brief summary

A multi-center, randomized, controlled study of cryoablation vs medical management for the treatment of PAF

Detailed description

The purpose of this prospective, randomized multi-center clinical study is to establish the benefits of the CryoCor(TM) Cardiac Cryoablation System for treating symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) in comparison to treatment with anti-arrhythmic medications alone. This study also evaluates the safety profile of the CryoCor(TM) Cardiac Cryoablation System when used in this same setting.

Interventions

DEVICECardiac CryoCor Cryoablation System

Treatment with CryoCor Cardiac Cryoablation system

DRUGMedical management

Medical management- treatment with standard medical therapy, which includes anti-arrhythmic medications

Sponsors

Boston Scientific Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* At least 3 episodes of PAF within 6 months * Refractory to at least one drug * Therapeutic anticoagulation * Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Persistent AF * Structural heart disease * Prior ablation * Contraindication present

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Safety profile of intervention12 months
Recurrence of PAF12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in QOL as measured by Arrhythmia Severity scale12 monthsChanges compared to baseline will be measured over a period of 12 months
Change in QOL as measured by SF-36 Health Survey12 monthsChanges compared to baseline will be measured over a period of 12 months
Time to treatment failure, post resolution periodPost resolution period (12 months follow-up)Time to treatment failure, defined as event monitor documented recurrent atrial fibrillation, post resolution period.
Change in luminal PV measurements6 months
Change in QOL as measured by Symptom Checklist12 monthsChanges compared to baseline will be measured over a period of 12 months

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026