Skip to content

Study Comparing Tigecycline and Vancomycin With Aztreonam in Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Tigecycline With Those of Vancomycin With Aztreonam to Treat Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections in Hospitalized Patients.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00228410
Enrollment
503
Registered
2005-09-28
Start date
2002-11-30
Completion date
2003-12-31
Last updated
2013-02-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Skin Diseases, Infectious

Keywords

Skin Infections, Skin Disease

Brief summary

To compare the safety and the efficacy of tigecycline to vancomycin with aztreonam in treating hospitalized patients with complicated skin and/or skin structure infections.

Interventions

DRUGTigecycline
DRUGvancomycin with aztreonam

Sponsors

Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Anticipated need for intravenous antibiotic therapy of 5 days or longer. * Patients known or suspected to have a complicated skin and skin structure infection. Complicated skin/skin structure infection includes infections either involving deeper soft tissue or requiring significant surgical intervention or a significant underlying disease state (such as diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, peripheral neuropathy, lower venous insufficiency) that complicates response to treatment. Other inclusion applies

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with any concomitant condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude an evaluation of a response or make it unlikely that the contemplated course of therapy could be completed. * Patients with severely impaired arterial blood supply and insufficiency such that the likelihood of amputation of the infected anatomical site within one month is likely. * Infected diabetic foot ulcers or decubitus ulcers where the infection is present for greater than one week's duration or chronically infected decubitus ulcers in patients who can not be compliant with measures necessary for chronic wound healing. * Necrotizing fasciitis or gangrene. Other exclusion applies.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary efficacy endpoint was the clinical response in the co-primary populations of the clinically evaluable (CE) and clinical modified intent-to-treat (c-mITT) subjects at the test-of-cure assessment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Safety assessments included a physical examination and daily recording of vital signs (temperature, heart rate, blood pressure).

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026