Osteopenia, Osteoporosis
Conditions
Keywords
Osteoporosis, Wrist fractures, Knowledge translation, Implementation, Educational reminder
Brief summary
To evaluate the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention (reminder and educational material) in improving the evaluation of osteoporosis follow-up care of post-menopausal women with wrist fractures by their primary care physicians. The intervention is directed at improving the gap in continuity of care between emergency/fracture clinics and family physicians, and reducing knowledge gaps.
Detailed description
Numerous studies have demonstrated that women with wrist fractures have lower bone mineral density. Despite new guidelines for the care of such women, research has shown that they are not generally evaluated for osteoporosis. This care gap exists although it is known that wrist fractures are an important marker for subsequent fractures, such as a hip fracture, which represents a significant socio-economic burden to society. Comparison: Cluster randomized trial of women and their physicians, both of whom receive educational material and reminder on post fracture osteoporosis evaluation. Comparison is to women and their physicians who receive standard post fracture information. Family practices are randomized to intervention or non-intervention group.
Interventions
PROCEDUREEducational Material and Reminder
Family practices were randomly assigned to intervention or usual care. The intervention was a mailed reminder with a summary of osteoporosis screening and treatment guidelines sent to the GP and a letter and educational package for the women.
Sponsors
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
Queen's University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Postmenopausal women with low trauma distal radius fracture (confirmed by x-ray). 2. Can be taking Didrocal (etidronate), Miacalcin (calcitonin),or hormone replacement therapy .
Exclusion criteria
1. Women with fractures of the elbow, mid radius, scaphoid, or injury to wrists (without actual fracture). 2. Significant cognitive impairment (which would preclude them from filling out simple questionnaires). 3. Women already taking osteoporosis therapy, ie. either Fosamax (alendronate), Actonel (risedronate), or the selective estrogen receptor modulator, Evista (raloxifene).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Proportion of women who are prescribed anti-osteoporosis therapy within 6 months of sustaining a forearm fracture. | 6 months |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Women's knowledge about osteoporosis and fractures (Osteoporosis Knowledge Questionnaire). | 6 months |
| Proportion of women in whom a bone density scan is ordered and the proportion of women who receive counseling advice about osteoporosis from their family physicians. | 6 months |
Countries
Canada
Outcome results
None listed