Breast Cancer Invasive Nos, Stage 0 Breast Carcinoma
Conditions
Keywords
invasive breast cancer, in situ breast cancer, radioguided seed localization, nonpalpable tumour, needle localization, margin status
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a new surgical technique (radioguided seed localization) for localizing nonpalpable breast tumours is better than the standard technique (needle localization).
Detailed description
Most breast cancers are removed by partial mastectomy/lumpectomy. The most important factor in ensuring that the cancer does not return in the breast is to ensure that it is completely removed during surgery. Complete removal is dependent on having a rim of normal tissue (clear margin) surrounding the cancer. If the margin is positive, or the cancer recurs, more surgery or mastectomy is required. Approximately one third of breast cancers are detected by mammograms or ultrasounds and cannot be felt by patients or physicians. Accordingly, a localization technique is required to help the surgeon to find and remove the cancer. The current technique (needle localization) has a higher chance of having cancer cells at the margin. This is a study about a surgical technique. The objective of this comparison study is to determine whether a new technique (radioguided seed localization) is a better way to remove nonpalpable breast cancers. The main objective of this study is to determine if the new technique generates fewer positive margins compared to the standard technique. An improved technique would benefit thousands of women every year.
Interventions
radio-labelled (I-125) titanium seed inserted via needle into nonpalpable breast lesion and gamma probe used to guide surgery
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Histologically confirmed invasive or in situ breast carcinoma * Nonpalpable breast tumour * Candidate for breast conserving surgery (BCS) based on clinical and radiologic evaluation
Exclusion criteria
* Histological confirmation more than 3 months from enrollment * Pregnancy or lactation * Contraindication to BCS or patient requests mastectomy * Age less than 18 years * Male patient
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Compare the number of positive margins following excision of the nonpalpable breast tumours for the two different surgical techniques | immediate post-operative pathology results |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Compare procedure times, complications and volume of tissue excised for both techniques | intra-operative |
Countries
Canada