Skip to content

Treatment for Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease (BMT CTN 0302)

Initial Systemic Treatment of Acute GVHD: A Phase II Randomized Trial Evaluating Etanercept, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF), Denileukin Diftitox (ONTAK), and Pentostatin in Combination With Corticosteroids (BMT CTN #0302)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00224874
Enrollment
180
Registered
2005-09-23
Start date
2005-09-30
Completion date
2012-06-30
Last updated
2021-11-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Graft vs Host Disease, Immune System Disorders

Keywords

Acute Graft vs Host Disease, GVHD

Brief summary

The study is a randomized Phase II, four arm treatment trial. The primary purpose of the study is to define new agents with promising activity against acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) suitable for testing against corticosteroids alone in a subsequent Phase III trial.

Detailed description

BACKGROUND: Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is the major complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation. Acute GVHD produces significant morbidity and complicates patient management resulting in organ toxicity, frequent infections, malnutrition, and substantial delay in recovery from transplantation. Corticosteroids have been the primary therapy for acute GVHD for over three decades. Various additional immunosuppressive strategies have been tested as GVHD therapy but neither anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG), CD5-immunotoxins, IL-1 antagonists nor other agents have been demonstrably helpful in either control of GVHD symptoms or improvement in survival. Published response rates of complete response (CR) to acute GVHD therapy with corticosteroids range from 25-41%. These rates will be used as benchmarks for assessing efficacy of promising new agents. New immunosuppressive agents and strategies are required to improve the management of GVHD and decrease the toxicities of the immunosuppressive regimens. DESIGN NARRATIVE: In this trial, patients with newly diagnosed acute GVHD will be randomly assigned to receive corticosteroids plus one of four new agents (etanercept, MMF, denileukin diftitox \[Ontak\], and pentostatin). A control arm of only corticosteroids will not be employed. Each agent will be assessed for safety and efficacy (at least 35% complete remission \[CR\] rate at Day 28 of therapy can be expected from previously untreated patients).

Interventions

DRUGEtanercept

Etanercept \[25 mg subcutaneously twice weekly for up to 4 weeks; discontinue if in complete response by 4 weeks\].

DRUGMycophenolate Mofetil

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) \[20 mg/kg (maximum 1 gm) orally or intravenously twice daily; continue through prednisone taper, then taper MMF over 4 weeks\].

Denileukin Diftitox (ONTAK®) \[9 mcg/kg intravenously Days 1, 3, 5, 15, 17, 19\].

DRUGPentostatin

Pentostatin \[1.5 mg/m2 daily for 3 days; Days 1-3 and repeat Days 15-17

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network
CollaboratorNETWORK
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant using either bone marrow, peripheral blood stem cells, or cord blood * De novo acute GVHD diagnosed within 48 hours prior to enrollment; biopsy confirmation of GVHD is strongly recommended but not required; enrollment should not be delayed awaiting biopsy or pathology results; the patient must have had no previous systemic immune suppressive therapy given for treatment of acute GVHD except for a maximum 48 hours of prior corticosteroid therapy (at least 1 mg/kg/day methylprednisolone) * Patients that have undergone a scheduled donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) as part of their original transplant therapy plan * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than 500/µL * Clinical status at enrollment to allow tapering of steroids to not less than 1 mg/kg/day methylprednisolone (1.4 mg/kg/day prednisone) at Day 28 of therapy (e.g., persisting malignant disease suggesting the need for accelerated taper of immunosuppression) * Estimated creatinine clearance greater than 30 mL/minute * Assent and educational materials provided to, and reviewed with, patients under the age of 18

Exclusion criteria

* ONTAK, pentostatin, or etanercept given within 7 days of enrollment * Active uncontrolled infection * Patients that have undergone an unscheduled DLI, or DLI that was not part of their original transplant therapy plan * If any prior steroid therapy (for indication other than GVHD), treatment at doses of at least 0.5 mg/kg/day methylprednisolone within 7 days prior to onset of GVHD * Patients unlikely to be available at the transplant center on Day 28 and 56 of therapy * A clinical syndrome resembling de novo chronic GVHD developing at any time after allotransplantation (see Chapter 2 of the BMT CTN Manual of Procedures for details of de novo chronic GVHD) * Other investigational therapeutics for GVHD within 30 days, including agents used for GVHD prophylaxis * Patients who are pregnant, breast feeding, or if sexually active, unwilling to use effective birth control for the duration of the study * Adults unable to provide informed consent * Patients with a history of intolerance to any of the study drugs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Complete Response (CR) at Day 28 of TherapyMeasured at Day 28Complete response at day 28 after randomization. CR was defined as resolution of all signs and symptoms of Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) in all evaluable organs in comparison to Day 1 scoring.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Treatment FailureMeasured at Day 56
Number of Patients With Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD) Flares at Day 90Measured at Day 90Flares were defined as any increase in symptoms of or therapy for acute GVHD after an initial response (i.e., progression from an earlier CR or PR).
Number of Patients Discontinuing Immune Suppression Without FlareMeasured at Days 90, 180, and 270 post-treatmentImmunosuppression discontinuation was defined as the discontinuation of corticosteroids and all additional immunosuppressives, except cyclosporine or tacrolimus, for treatment of acute GVHD without subsequent flare by Day 90 post-initiation of therapy and later by discontinuation of all immunosuppressive medications, including cyclosporine or tacrolimus.
Number of Partial Response (PR), Mixed Response (MR), and ProgressionMeasured at Day 28Partial response, mixed response, and progression at Day 28 after randomization. Partial response was defined as improvement in one or more organs involved with Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) symptoms without progression in others. Mixed response was defined as improvement in one or more organs with deterioration in another organ manifesting symptoms of GVHD or development of symptoms of GVHD in a new organ. Progression was defined as deterioration in at least one organ without any improvement in others.
Number of Patients Surviving at 6 and 9 Months Post RandomizationMeasured at 6 and 9 months
Cumulative Incidence of Systemic InfectionsMeasured at Day 270
Incidence of Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV)-Associated LymphomaMeasured at 9 months
Number of Patients With Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)Measured at 9 monthsNumber of patients with limited and extensive chronic GVHD at 9 months

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Clinic patients were recruited from August 2005 through March 2008.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Etanercept
Patients received 25 mg Etanercept subcutaneously twice weekly for up to 4 weeks; discontinue if in Complete Response (CR) by 4 weeks
46
Mycophenolate Mofetil
Patients received Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) 20 mg/kg (maximum 1 gm) per oral or intravenously twice daily; continue through prednisone taper, then taper MMF over 4 weeks
45
Denileukin Diftitox
Patients received Denileukin Diftitox 9 mcg/kg intravenously over 1 hour on days 1, 3, 5, 15, 17, 19.
47
Pentostatin
Patients received Pentostatin 1.5 mg/m2 intravenously daily on days 1-3 and 15-17.
42
Total180

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject0010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMycophenolate MofetilTotalEtanerceptPentostatinDenileukin Diftitox
Age, Continuous42 years50 years50 years53 years51 years
Conditioning Regimen
Myeloablative
37 participants117 participants29 participants26 participants25 participants
Conditioning Regimen
Non-myeloablative
8 participants61 participants17 participants15 participants21 participants
Conditioning Regimen
Unknown
0 participants2 participants0 participants1 participants1 participants
Donor Status
Related
24 participants83 participants21 participants17 participants21 participants
Donor Status
Unknown
0 participants3 participants1 participants1 participants1 participants
Donor Status
Unrelated
21 participants94 participants24 participants24 participants25 participants
Enrollment Acute GVHD
Grade 0
0 participants1 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants
Enrollment Acute GVHD
Grade I
3 participants23 participants8 participants4 participants8 participants
Enrollment Acute GVHD
Grade II
25 participants99 participants25 participants26 participants23 participants
Enrollment Acute GVHD
Grade III
16 participants54 participants12 participants11 participants15 participants
Enrollment Acute GVHD
Grade IV
1 participants3 participants0 participants1 participants1 participants
MMF Prophylaxis
No
45 participants136 participants32 participants28 participants31 participants
MMF Prophylaxis
Yes
0 participants44 participants14 participants14 participants16 participants
Organ Involvement at Randomization
GI tract, lower
18 participants61 participants12 participants17 participants14 participants
Organ Involvement at Randomization
GI tract, upper
12 participants49 participants10 participants13 participants14 participants
Organ Involvement at Randomization
Liver
7 participants25 participants6 participants5 participants7 participants
Organ Involvement at Randomization
Skin
35 participants140 participants36 participants34 participants35 participants
Primary Disease
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)
9 participants26 participants6 participants7 participants4 participants
Primary Disease
Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) / MDS
21 participants89 participants24 participants20 participants24 participants
Primary Disease
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML)
2 participants5 participants2 participants0 participants1 participants
Primary Disease
Lymphoma
6 participants25 participants5 participants6 participants8 participants
Primary Disease
Other
7 participants35 participants9 participants9 participants10 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants67 Participants16 Participants15 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
28 Participants113 Participants30 Participants27 Participants28 Participants
Stem Cell Type
Bone Marrow
13 participants42 participants5 participants9 participants15 participants
Stem Cell Type
Peripheral Blood
29 participants111 participants36 participants27 participants19 participants
Stem Cell Type
Umbilical Cord Blood
3 participants25 participants5 participants5 participants12 participants
Stem Cell Type
Unknown
0 participants2 participants0 participants1 participants1 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 460 / 450 / 470 / 42
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 462 / 452 / 477 / 42

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Complete Response (CR) at Day 28 of Therapy

Complete response at day 28 after randomization. CR was defined as resolution of all signs and symptoms of Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) in all evaluable organs in comparison to Day 1 scoring.

Time frame: Measured at Day 28

Population: All patients randomized were included in the analysis on an intent-to-treat basis

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptNumber of Complete Response (CR) at Day 28 of Therapy12 participants
Mycophenolate MofetilNumber of Complete Response (CR) at Day 28 of Therapy27 participants
Denileukin DiftitoxNumber of Complete Response (CR) at Day 28 of Therapy25 participants
PentostatinNumber of Complete Response (CR) at Day 28 of Therapy16 participants
Secondary

Cumulative Incidence of Systemic Infections

Time frame: Measured at Day 270

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptCumulative Incidence of Systemic Infections47 percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilCumulative Incidence of Systemic Infections44 percentage of participants
Denileukin DiftitoxCumulative Incidence of Systemic Infections62 percentage of participants
PentostatinCumulative Incidence of Systemic Infections57 percentage of participants
Secondary

Incidence of Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV)-Associated Lymphoma

Time frame: Measured at 9 months

Population: No data collected

Secondary

Number of Partial Response (PR), Mixed Response (MR), and Progression

Partial response, mixed response, and progression at Day 28 after randomization. Partial response was defined as improvement in one or more organs involved with Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) symptoms without progression in others. Mixed response was defined as improvement in one or more organs with deterioration in another organ manifesting symptoms of GVHD or development of symptoms of GVHD in a new organ. Progression was defined as deterioration in at least one organ without any improvement in others.

Time frame: Measured at Day 28

Population: All patients randomized were included in the analysis on an intent-to-treat basis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptNumber of Partial Response (PR), Mixed Response (MR), and ProgressionPartial Response10 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Partial Response (PR), Mixed Response (MR), and ProgressionProgression7 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Partial Response (PR), Mixed Response (MR), and ProgressionMixed Response3 participants
Mycophenolate MofetilNumber of Partial Response (PR), Mixed Response (MR), and ProgressionPartial Response8 participants
Mycophenolate MofetilNumber of Partial Response (PR), Mixed Response (MR), and ProgressionProgression1 participants
Mycophenolate MofetilNumber of Partial Response (PR), Mixed Response (MR), and ProgressionMixed Response4 participants
Denileukin DiftitoxNumber of Partial Response (PR), Mixed Response (MR), and ProgressionMixed Response0 participants
Denileukin DiftitoxNumber of Partial Response (PR), Mixed Response (MR), and ProgressionPartial Response3 participants
Denileukin DiftitoxNumber of Partial Response (PR), Mixed Response (MR), and ProgressionProgression3 participants
PentostatinNumber of Partial Response (PR), Mixed Response (MR), and ProgressionPartial Response10 participants
PentostatinNumber of Partial Response (PR), Mixed Response (MR), and ProgressionProgression4 participants
PentostatinNumber of Partial Response (PR), Mixed Response (MR), and ProgressionMixed Response2 participants
Secondary

Number of Patients Discontinuing Immune Suppression Without Flare

Immunosuppression discontinuation was defined as the discontinuation of corticosteroids and all additional immunosuppressives, except cyclosporine or tacrolimus, for treatment of acute GVHD without subsequent flare by Day 90 post-initiation of therapy and later by discontinuation of all immunosuppressive medications, including cyclosporine or tacrolimus.

Time frame: Measured at Days 90, 180, and 270 post-treatment

Population: All patients randomized were included in the analysis on an intent-to-treat basis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptNumber of Patients Discontinuing Immune Suppression Without FlareDay 907 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Patients Discontinuing Immune Suppression Without FlareDay 27016 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Patients Discontinuing Immune Suppression Without FlareDay 18012 participants
Mycophenolate MofetilNumber of Patients Discontinuing Immune Suppression Without FlareDay 904 participants
Mycophenolate MofetilNumber of Patients Discontinuing Immune Suppression Without FlareDay 27017 participants
Mycophenolate MofetilNumber of Patients Discontinuing Immune Suppression Without FlareDay 18013 participants
Denileukin DiftitoxNumber of Patients Discontinuing Immune Suppression Without FlareDay 1808 participants
Denileukin DiftitoxNumber of Patients Discontinuing Immune Suppression Without FlareDay 905 participants
Denileukin DiftitoxNumber of Patients Discontinuing Immune Suppression Without FlareDay 27010 participants
PentostatinNumber of Patients Discontinuing Immune Suppression Without FlareDay 902 participants
PentostatinNumber of Patients Discontinuing Immune Suppression Without FlareDay 27010 participants
PentostatinNumber of Patients Discontinuing Immune Suppression Without FlareDay 1808 participants
Secondary

Number of Patients Surviving at 6 and 9 Months Post Randomization

Time frame: Measured at 6 and 9 months

Population: All patients randomized were included in the analysis on an intent-to-treat basis

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptNumber of Patients Surviving at 6 and 9 Months Post RandomizationMonth 626 participants
EtanerceptNumber of Patients Surviving at 6 and 9 Months Post RandomizationMonth 922 participants
Mycophenolate MofetilNumber of Patients Surviving at 6 and 9 Months Post RandomizationMonth 929 participants
Mycophenolate MofetilNumber of Patients Surviving at 6 and 9 Months Post RandomizationMonth 632 participants
Denileukin DiftitoxNumber of Patients Surviving at 6 and 9 Months Post RandomizationMonth 628 participants
Denileukin DiftitoxNumber of Patients Surviving at 6 and 9 Months Post RandomizationMonth 924 participants
PentostatinNumber of Patients Surviving at 6 and 9 Months Post RandomizationMonth 624 participants
PentostatinNumber of Patients Surviving at 6 and 9 Months Post RandomizationMonth 921 participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD) Flares at Day 90

Flares were defined as any increase in symptoms of or therapy for acute GVHD after an initial response (i.e., progression from an earlier CR or PR).

Time frame: Measured at Day 90

Population: All patients randomized were included in the analysis on an intent-to-treat basis

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptNumber of Patients With Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD) Flares at Day 9016 participants
Mycophenolate MofetilNumber of Patients With Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD) Flares at Day 9012 participants
Denileukin DiftitoxNumber of Patients With Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD) Flares at Day 9015 participants
PentostatinNumber of Patients With Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD) Flares at Day 9015 participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)

Number of patients with limited and extensive chronic GVHD at 9 months

Time frame: Measured at 9 months

Population: All patients randomized were included in the analysis on an intent-to-treat basis

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptNumber of Patients With Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)11 participants
Mycophenolate MofetilNumber of Patients With Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)19 participants
Denileukin DiftitoxNumber of Patients With Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)15 participants
PentostatinNumber of Patients With Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)12 participants
Secondary

Proportion of Treatment Failure

Time frame: Measured at Day 56

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptProportion of Treatment Failure24 percentage of participants
Mycophenolate MofetilProportion of Treatment Failure9 percentage of participants
Denileukin DiftitoxProportion of Treatment Failure26 percentage of participants
PentostatinProportion of Treatment Failure29 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 3, 2026