Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury, Lung Transplantation
Conditions
Keywords
Lung transplantation, Reperfusion Injury, Survival
Brief summary
The objective of this clinical study was to evaluate whether CXCL8 (CXC ligand 8 \[formerly interleukin (IL)-8\]) inhibition with repertaxin leads to reduced severity of primary graft dysfunction, as the result of improved functional and clinical outcomes in lung transplantation patients. The safety of repertaxin in the specific clinical setting was also evaluated. The ability of repertaxin to reduce target cells (polymorphonuclear leukocyte \[PMN\]) infiltration into the graft was evaluated to confirm its mechanism of action.
Detailed description
This was a phase 2, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group (two arms) study. A total of 100 patients accepted and listed for lung transplantation, who met all of the study inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria described in Sections 9.3.1 and 9.3.2 of this report, were planned to be enrolled in the study. These patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either repertaxin or placebo, by continuous intravenous infusion for a period of 48 hours to start approximately 2 hours before reperfusion of the (first) transplanted lung occurred. The experimental treatment was additional to the standard treatment of lung transplant recipients. An initial 'loading dose' of repertaxin of 4.488 mg/kg body weight/hour was to be administered over 30 minutes followed by a maintenance dose of 2.772 mg/kg body weight/hour lasting 47.5 hours. Placebo was to be volume matched saline. Total infusion volume was not to exceed 500 mL/24 hours. Study medication was to be provided as clear glass class I ampoules, each containing 10 mL of the following products: repertaxin (33 mg/mL aqueous injectable solution) and placebo (9 mg/mL aqueous injectable solution of NaCl). The double-blind was to be maintained for the main part of the study only, i.e. up to the Month 1 (at least 30 days post-transplant) follow-up visit of the last patient in. After database lock of Month 1 data the study proceeded in an open fashion.
Interventions
An initial 'loading dose' of repertaxin was administered over 30 minutes by intravenous infusion followed by a maintenance dose lasting 47.5 hours.The infusion was to start approximately 2 hours prior to the anticipated time of reperfusion and was to continue during the ICU/hospital stay. The study medication was administered as a continuous intravenous infusion into a (high flow) central vein, by an infusion pump adequate to provide reliable infusion rates , as per treatment schedule. Total infusion volume was not to exceed 500 mL/24 hours.
An initial 'loading dose' of placebo was administered over 30 minutes by intravenous infusion followed by a maintenance dose lasting 47.5 hours.The infusion was to start approximately 2 hours prior to the anticipated time of reperfusion and was to continue during the ICU/hospital stay. The placebo was administered as a continuous intravenous infusion into a (high flow) central vein, by an infusion pump adequate to provide reliable infusion rates , as per treatment schedule. Total infusion volume was not to exceed 500 mL/24 hours.
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
All personnel involved and patients participating in the study were to remain blinded to the patient randomization codes with the exception of those involved in packaging and labelling the study medication. After the database lock of data recorded in the main part of the study, corresponding to the Month 1 follow-up visit of the last patient in, the blind code was broken and the study continued in an open fashion.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patients accepted and listed for transplantation due to irreversible, progressive disabling, end-stage pulmonary disease; * Ages 18 to 65 years; * Body weight 30 to 95 kg (inclusive) (i.e. up to 95.99 kg); * Planned isolated (single and bi-lateral) lung transplant from a non-living donor with brain death. This included lobar lung transplant involving excision and sizing of a cadaver donor lobe to meet the thoracic dimension of the recipient before being transplanted; * Normal renal function at the time of transplant as per calculated creatinine clearance (Clcr) 60 mL/min. Creatinine clearance was calculated according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula; * Patient was willing and able to comply with the protocol procedures for the duration of the study, including scheduled follow-up visits and examinations; * Patient gave written informed consent, prior to any study-related procedure not part of normal medical care, with the understanding that consent could be withdrawn by the patient at any time without prejudice to their future medical care.
Exclusion criteria
* Recipients of an intended multiple organ transplant, including heart-lung and liver-lung transplantation; * Recipients of a lung from a living lobar donor; * Recipients of a lung from a non-heart beating donor; * Re-do lung transplantation; * Recipients requiring mechanical ventilation at the time of transplant; * Recipients with an extra-respiratory tract site of infection (positive blood culture(s) and/or fever associated with other signs of systemic sepsis syndrome). The criterion was not meant to exclude bacteraemic cystic fibrosis patients with or without fever, unless they presented with other signs of sepsis; * Recipients with hepatic dysfunction (bilirubin exceeding 3 mg/dL and/or transaminases \>3X upper limit of normal \[ULN\]) at the time of transplant; * Hypersensitivity to: * Ibuprofen or to more than one non steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID); * Medications belonging to the class of sulfonamides, such as sulfamethazine, sulfamethoxazole, sulfasalazine, nimesulide or celecoxib; * Patients simultaneously participating in any other studies involving a study drug to be administered concomitantly with the investigational product and/or a study drug intended to prevent ischemia/reperfusion injury; * Planned use of anli-CD3 monoclonal antibody (Orthoclone OKT3) or alemtuzumab (Campath) induction immunosuppression; * Planned use of sirolimus in the first 3 months after transplantation; * Pregnant or breast-feeding women (NB: pregnancy was lo be avoided in patients or partners during the first month of participation in the study; no other specific warnings were described, considering even stricter general recommendations concerning pregnancy in transplanted patients, the treatment course of the investigational product, its pharmacokinetic profile, and the lack of significant adverse effects on mating performance and fertility in animal studies).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PaO2/FiO2 Ratio at ICU Admission (Time 0) and 24 Hours | At T0 (time of ICU admission) and 24 hours post-ICU admission | The PaO2/FiO2 ratio was calculated to assess the severity of hypoxemia, or low blood oxygen levels. A low PaO2/FiO2 value has been associated with increased mortality and hospital stay in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). It was calculated by dividing the partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2) by the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2). A normal P/F ratio was typically above 300, and a lower ratio indicates a greater severity of hypoxemia. As the Pa02/Fi02 ratio was dependent on altitude, data were corrected for altitude in the analyses of corrected data. The correction factor is defined as (Pressure at Denver)/(Pressure at sea level) = 633/760 = 0.8329; PaO2 values were corrected as follows: Corrected value = measured value/0.8329 |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | At ICU admission (T0), 24, 48 and 72 hours post-ICU admission | PGD after lung transplantation ranged from mild to severe depending on the level of hypoxaemia and lung injury post-transplant. PGD score was calculated according to the scoring system below: Grade 0 PaO2/FiO2 \>=300 mmHg; no radiographic infiltrates (RI); Grade 1 PaO2/FiO2 \>=300mmHg + RI consistent with pulmonary oedema; Grade 2 200 mmHg \<=PaO2/FiO2 \<=300 mm Hg + RI consistent with pulmonary oedema; Grade 3 PaO2/FiO2 \< 200 mm Hg + RI consistent with pulmonary oedema. The higher the score, the worse the outcome. Any patient with no infiltrate on chest X-rays was automatically Grade 0. If the patient was on nasal cannula for oxygen or FiO2 \<0.3, the patient was graded as 0 or 1, based on chest X-rays. Any patient on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was Grade 3. Any subject mechanically ventilated with FiO2 greater than 0.5 or requiring nitric oxide beyond 48 hours from the time of transplant was Grade 3. |
| Time to Freedom From Mechanical Ventilation | At 24, 48, 72 hours post ICU admission | Time to freedom from mechanical ventilation was defined as time between admission to the ICU and the initial time of first extubation (breathing off mechanical ventilation without a tube) which was maintained for more than 24 hours. This number was measured in hours and was derived as (date/time of extubation-date/time of ICU admission)/3600. The longer the time, the worst the outcome.Time to freedom from mechanical ventilation, if greater than 1 month (720 hours), was censored to 720 hours. Patients re-transplanted were censored at the date/time of re-transplant. Herein differences in the time to freedom from mechanical ventilation were reported between placebo and repertaxin. |
| Probability of Death During Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay at Different Timepoints | At 24, 48, 72 hours post ICU admission | The duration of ICU stay, in term of hours, at different timepoints, in both placebo and repertaxin groups, was measured. The longer the ICU stay, the worse the outcome. mean event probability (death) and its standard error (SE) at each timepoint. |
| Number of Patients Dead Within 30 Days Post-transplant | Up to 30 days post-transplant | Mortality, defined as any death occurring in the first 30 days post-transplant, regardless of hospital discharge. |
| Pulmonary Function Tests (FEV1=Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second and FVC=Forced Vital Capacity) at Month 1, 6 and 12 Post-transplant Evaluated According to Estenne et al.(2002). | At months 1, 6 and 12 post-transplant | Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) measured the amount/ volume, exhaled by a patient in the first second of the expiration after a full inspiration. Average values in healthy patients aged 20-60 range from 4.5 to 3.5 liters in males and from 3.25 to 2.5 liters in females. Forced vital capacity (FVC) was the volume of air that a patient could exhale with a maximal forced expiration effort after a deep inhaling, simply put, how much air a patient could breathe out by blowing as fast as possible. Average values in healthy patients aged 20-60 range from 5.5 to 4.75 liters in males and from 3.75 to 3.25 liters in females. The lower the values fo both parameters, the worse the outcome. |
| PaO2/FiO2 Ratio (ICU Admission Then 24 Hours up to Extubation or up to 72 Hours) | At ICU admission (T0), 24, 48 and 72 hours post-ICU admission | Time profile of oxygenation was a comparison of the sequential measurements of the ratios of arterial PaO2 to inspired oxygen fractions FiO2. Herein repeated measurements analysis of PaO2/FiO2 ratio corrected after ICU admission using a one-sided test excluding missing data. |
| Number of Patients With at Least One Acute Rejection Episode at Months 1, 6 and 12 Post-transplant | At months 1, 6 and 12 post-transplant | Acute rejection was diagnosed according to Yousem et al. (1996). Histopathologic assessment of transbronchial biopsies first required confirmation of the diagnosis of mild (ACR; A2) using criteria defined in the Working Formulation for Lung Allograft Rejection. Morphological variables assessed included: one or more perivascular infiltrates in the total transbronchial biopsy fragments obtained at one bronchoscopy session, the presence of large or small airway inflammation, endothelialitis, eosinophils, plasma cells, intra-airway and intra-airspace granulation tissue, and alveolar hemosiderosis. The Working Formulation for grading of acute rejection of lung allografts contains five acute rejection grades: A0, none; A1, minimal; A2, mild; A3, moderate; and A4, severe; and is based on the intensity of perivascular mononuclear infiltrates and their extension into alveolar septa. |
| Patient Survival up to 12 Months Post-transplant | at Months 3, 6, 9 and 12 post-transplant | Patient survival is derived from the date of ICU admission untile the date of death or study completion/withdrawal. Here this parameter is expressed as the cumulative number of events (death) at different timepoints till month 12, per arm. |
| Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events Within the First Month | to month 1 | An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. |
| Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events From Month 1 to Month 12 | from month 1 to month 12 | An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. |
| Number of Patients With Different Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) Scores (0-3) Assessed at Months 6 and 12 Post-transplant | At Months 6 and 12 post-transplant | BOS is defined as an irreversible decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of at least 20% from baseline. Spirometric measurements must be made with equipment that conforms to the American Thoracic Society standards for spirometric testing. Here the classification where stage 3 is the worst: BOS 0 FEV1 \>90% of baseline and FEF25-75 \>75% of baseline. BOS 0-p FEV1 \>81% to 90% of baseline and/or FEF25-75 \> 75% of baseline. BOS 1 FEV1 \>66% to 80% of baseline. BOS 2 FEV1 \>51% to 65% of baseline BOS 3 FEV1 \>50% or less of baseline. CRF data are reported. |
Countries
Canada, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
A total of 233 subjects were screened, of whom 114 were randomised and 119 were screen failures.
Pre-assignment details
In total 114 subjects were randomised 1:1 to Repertaxin or Placebo, with slightly more assigned to the Placebo group (59 compared to 55 Repertaxin). 101 patients received study drug and were included in the ITT and safety population (46 on Repertaxin; 55 on placebo).
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Repertaxin (SAF) Both repertaxin and placebo were aqueous solutions packaged into identical clear glass Type I ampoule single dose units. Each ampoule contained 10 mL of either repertaxin or placebo.The dosing solution for infusion was prepared aseptically at the designated Pharmacy within each center and dispensed as 12.65 mg/mL solution in appropriate size infusion bags. An initial 'loading dose' of Repertaxin of 4.488 mg/kg body weight/hour was administered over 30 minutes followed by a maintenance dose of 2.772 mg/kg body weight/hour lasting 47.5 hours.The loading and maintenance doses were administered using the same dosing solution (Repertaxin 12.65 mg/ml), but with the pump rate altered to provide an infusion rate of approximately 0.35 mUkg/hour and 0.22 ml/kg/hour, respectively.
Repertaxin: An initial 'loading dose' of repertaxin was administered over 30 minutes by intravenous infusion followed by a maintenance dose lasting 47.5 hours.The infusion was to start approximately 2 hours prior to the anticipated time of reperfusion and was to continue during the ICU/hospital stay. The study medication was administered as a continuous intravenous infusion into a (high flow) central vein, by an infusion pump adequate to provide reliable infusion rates , as per treatment schedule. Total infusion volume was not to exceed 500 mL/24 hours. | 46 |
| Placebo (SAF) Both repertaxin and placebo were aqueous solutions packaged into identical clear glass Type I ampoule single dose units. The dosing solution for infusion was prepared aseptically at the designated Pharmacy within each center and dispensed as 12.65 mg/mL solution in appropriate size infusion bags. ampoule contained 10 mL of either repertaxin or placebo. An initial 'loading dose' of 9 mg/ml sodium chloride (NaCl) solution was administered over 30 minutes, followed by a maintenance dose lasting 47.5 hours.
Placebo: An initial 'loading dose' of placebo was administered over 30 minutes by intravenous infusion followed by a maintenance dose lasting 47.5 hours.The infusion was to start approximately 2 hours prior to the anticipated time of reperfusion and was to continue during the ICU/hospital stay. The placebo was administered as a continuous intravenous infusion into a (high flow) central vein, by an infusion pump adequate to provide reliable infusion rates , as per treatment schedule. Total infusion volume was not to exceed 500 mL/24 hours. | 55 |
| Total | 101 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Drug not delivered | 2 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Other | 4 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Re-transplant | 0 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Transplant cancelled | 0 | 4 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Repertaxin (SAF) | Placebo (SAF) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | 4 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 46 Participants | 50 Participants | 96 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 46.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5 | 50.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2 | 48.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 45 Participants | 55 Participants | 100 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Canada | 16 participants | 17 participants | 33 participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 30 participants | 38 participants | 68 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 23 Participants | 27 Participants | 50 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 23 Participants | 28 Participants | 51 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 1 / 46 | 6 / 55 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 46 / 46 | 55 / 55 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 14 / 46 | 14 / 55 |
Outcome results
PaO2/FiO2 Ratio at ICU Admission (Time 0) and 24 Hours
The PaO2/FiO2 ratio was calculated to assess the severity of hypoxemia, or low blood oxygen levels. A low PaO2/FiO2 value has been associated with increased mortality and hospital stay in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). It was calculated by dividing the partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2) by the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2). A normal P/F ratio was typically above 300, and a lower ratio indicates a greater severity of hypoxemia. As the Pa02/Fi02 ratio was dependent on altitude, data were corrected for altitude in the analyses of corrected data. The correction factor is defined as (Pressure at Denver)/(Pressure at sea level) = 633/760 = 0.8329; PaO2 values were corrected as follows: Corrected value = measured value/0.8329
Time frame: At T0 (time of ICU admission) and 24 hours post-ICU admission
Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized patients who received any study medication and a lung transplant.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Repertaxin (ITT) | PaO2/FiO2 Ratio at ICU Admission (Time 0) and 24 Hours | ICU Admission (Time 0) | 346.3 ratio of PaO2/FiO2 | Standard Deviation 125.5 |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | PaO2/FiO2 Ratio at ICU Admission (Time 0) and 24 Hours | 24 Hours Post ICU Admission | 320.1 ratio of PaO2/FiO2 | Standard Deviation 119.5 |
| Placebo (ITT) | PaO2/FiO2 Ratio at ICU Admission (Time 0) and 24 Hours | ICU Admission (Time 0) | 337.9 ratio of PaO2/FiO2 | Standard Deviation 143 |
| Placebo (ITT) | PaO2/FiO2 Ratio at ICU Admission (Time 0) and 24 Hours | 24 Hours Post ICU Admission | 307.3 ratio of PaO2/FiO2 | Standard Deviation 111.3 |
Number of Patients Dead Within 30 Days Post-transplant
Mortality, defined as any death occurring in the first 30 days post-transplant, regardless of hospital discharge.
Time frame: Up to 30 days post-transplant
Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized patients who received any study medication and a lung transplant.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients Dead Within 30 Days Post-transplant | 0 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients Dead Within 30 Days Post-transplant | 1 Participants |
Number of Patients With at Least One Acute Rejection Episode at Months 1, 6 and 12 Post-transplant
Acute rejection was diagnosed according to Yousem et al. (1996). Histopathologic assessment of transbronchial biopsies first required confirmation of the diagnosis of mild (ACR; A2) using criteria defined in the Working Formulation for Lung Allograft Rejection. Morphological variables assessed included: one or more perivascular infiltrates in the total transbronchial biopsy fragments obtained at one bronchoscopy session, the presence of large or small airway inflammation, endothelialitis, eosinophils, plasma cells, intra-airway and intra-airspace granulation tissue, and alveolar hemosiderosis. The Working Formulation for grading of acute rejection of lung allografts contains five acute rejection grades: A0, none; A1, minimal; A2, mild; A3, moderate; and A4, severe; and is based on the intensity of perivascular mononuclear infiltrates and their extension into alveolar septa.
Time frame: At months 1, 6 and 12 post-transplant
Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized patients who received any study medication and a lung transplant.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Acute Rejection Episode at Months 1, 6 and 12 Post-transplant | Month 1 Post transplant | 17 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Acute Rejection Episode at Months 1, 6 and 12 Post-transplant | Month 6 Post Transplant | 35 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Acute Rejection Episode at Months 1, 6 and 12 Post-transplant | Month 12 Post Transplant | 17 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Acute Rejection Episode at Months 1, 6 and 12 Post-transplant | Month 6 Post Transplant | 33 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Acute Rejection Episode at Months 1, 6 and 12 Post-transplant | Month 1 Post transplant | 19 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Acute Rejection Episode at Months 1, 6 and 12 Post-transplant | Month 12 Post Transplant | 13 Participants |
Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events From Month 1 to Month 12
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product.
Time frame: from month 1 to month 12
Population: The safety population that consisted of all patients who received any study medication and was based on the treatment actually received.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events From Month 1 to Month 12 | Number (%) of patients reporting at least one TEAE leading to discontinuation of study drug | 0 participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events From Month 1 to Month 12 | Number (%) of patients reporting TEAEs with no relationship to study drug | 11 participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events From Month 1 to Month 12 | Number (%) of patients reporting at least one TEAE | 21 participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events From Month 1 to Month 12 | Number (%) of patients reporting TEAEs with unlikely relationship to study drug | 9 participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events From Month 1 to Month 12 | Number (%) of patients reporting at least one serious TEAE | 0 participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events From Month 1 to Month 12 | Number (%) of patients reporting TEAEs with possible relationship to study drug | 1 participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events From Month 1 to Month 12 | Number of patients with TEAEs | 46 participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events From Month 1 to Month 12 | Number (%) of patients reporting TEAEs with probable relationship to study drug | 0 participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events From Month 1 to Month 12 | Number (%) of patients reporting at least one TEAE leading to death | 0 participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events From Month 1 to Month 12 | Number (%) of patients reporting TEAEs with highly probable relationship to study drug | 0 participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events From Month 1 to Month 12 | Number (%) of patients reporting TEAEs with highly probable relationship to study drug | 0 participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events From Month 1 to Month 12 | Number of patients with TEAEs | 40 participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events From Month 1 to Month 12 | Number (%) of patients reporting at least one TEAE | 20 participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events From Month 1 to Month 12 | Number (%) of patients reporting at least one TEAE leading to discontinuation of study drug | 0 participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events From Month 1 to Month 12 | Number (%) of patients reporting at least one serious TEAE | 0 participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events From Month 1 to Month 12 | Number (%) of patients reporting at least one TEAE leading to death | 0 participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events From Month 1 to Month 12 | Number (%) of patients reporting TEAEs with no relationship to study drug | 9 participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events From Month 1 to Month 12 | Number (%) of patients reporting TEAEs with unlikely relationship to study drug | 8 participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events From Month 1 to Month 12 | Number (%) of patients reporting TEAEs with possible relationship to study drug | 3 participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events From Month 1 to Month 12 | Number (%) of patients reporting TEAEs with probable relationship to study drug | 0 participants |
Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events Within the First Month
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product.
Time frame: to month 1
Population: The safety population that consisted of all patients who received any study medication and was based on the treatment actually received.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events Within the First Month | Number (%) of patients reporting at least one TEAE | 46 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events Within the First Month | Number (%) of patients reporting at least one TEAE leading to discontinuation of study drug | 1 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events Within the First Month | Number (%) of patients reporting at least one serious TEAE | 14 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events Within the First Month | Number (%) of patients reporting at least one TEAE leading to death | 0 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events Within the First Month | Number (%) of patients reporting TEAEs with no relationship to study drug | 19 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events Within the First Month | Number (%) of patients reporting TEAEs with unlikely relationship to study drug | 18 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events Within the First Month | Number (%) of patients reporting TEAEs with possible study drug | 9 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events Within the First Month | Number (%) of patients reporting TEAEs with probable relationship to study drug | 0 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events Within the First Month | Number (%) of patients reporting TEAEs with highly probable relationship to study drug | 0 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events Within the First Month | Number (%) of patients reporting Serious TEAEs with no relationship to study drug | 5 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events Within the First Month | Number (%) of patients reporting Serious TEAEs with unlikely relationship to study drug | 5 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events Within the First Month | Number (%) of patients reporting Serious TEAEs with possible relationship to study drug | 4 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events Within the First Month | Number (%) of patients reporting Serious TEAEs with probable relationship to study drug | 0 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events Within the First Month | Number (%) of patients reporting Serious TEAEs with highly probable relationship to study drug | 0 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events Within the First Month | Number (%) of patients reporting Serious TEAEs with unlikely relationship to study drug | 6 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events Within the First Month | Number (%) of patients reporting at least one TEAE | 55 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events Within the First Month | Number (%) of patients reporting TEAEs with probable relationship to study drug | 0 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events Within the First Month | Number (%) of patients reporting at least one TEAE leading to discontinuation of study drug | 0 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events Within the First Month | Number (%) of patients reporting Serious TEAEs with probable relationship to study drug | 0 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events Within the First Month | Number (%) of patients reporting at least one serious TEAE | 14 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events Within the First Month | Number (%) of patients reporting TEAEs with highly probable relationship to study drug | 0 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events Within the First Month | Number (%) of patients reporting at least one TEAE leading to death | 0 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events Within the First Month | Number (%) of patients reporting Serious TEAEs with possible relationship to study drug | 2 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events Within the First Month | Number (%) of patients reporting TEAEs with no relationship to study drug | 26 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events Within the First Month | Number (%) of patients reporting Serious TEAEs with no relationship to study drug | 6 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events Within the First Month | Number (%) of patients reporting TEAEs with unlikely relationship to study drug | 22 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events Within the First Month | Number (%) of patients reporting Serious TEAEs with highly probable relationship to study drug | 0 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With at Least One Adverse Events Within the First Month | Number (%) of patients reporting TEAEs with possible study drug | 7 Participants |
Number of Patients With Different Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) Scores (0-3) Assessed at Months 6 and 12 Post-transplant
BOS is defined as an irreversible decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of at least 20% from baseline. Spirometric measurements must be made with equipment that conforms to the American Thoracic Society standards for spirometric testing. Here the classification where stage 3 is the worst: BOS 0 FEV1 \>90% of baseline and FEF25-75 \>75% of baseline. BOS 0-p FEV1 \>81% to 90% of baseline and/or FEF25-75 \> 75% of baseline. BOS 1 FEV1 \>66% to 80% of baseline. BOS 2 FEV1 \>51% to 65% of baseline BOS 3 FEV1 \>50% or less of baseline. CRF data are reported.
Time frame: At Months 6 and 12 post-transplant
Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized patients who received any study medication and a lung transplant. Note that Out of 101 patients who entered the trial, 46 and 52 patients completed Month 1 follow-up in the repertaxin and placebo groups, respectively, and were included in the ITT population for Month 12 analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) Scores (0-3) Assessed at Months 6 and 12 Post-transplant | Month 6 Post Transplant - BOS Missing | 0 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) Scores (0-3) Assessed at Months 6 and 12 Post-transplant | Month 6 Post Transplant - BOS 0 | 45 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) Scores (0-3) Assessed at Months 6 and 12 Post-transplant | Month 6 Post Transplant - BOS 1 | 1 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) Scores (0-3) Assessed at Months 6 and 12 Post-transplant | Month 6 Post Transplant - BOS 2 | 0 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) Scores (0-3) Assessed at Months 6 and 12 Post-transplant | Month 6 Post Transplant - BOS 3 | 0 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) Scores (0-3) Assessed at Months 6 and 12 Post-transplant | Month 12 Post Transplant - Missing | 4 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) Scores (0-3) Assessed at Months 6 and 12 Post-transplant | Month 12 Post Transplant - BOS 0 | 35 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) Scores (0-3) Assessed at Months 6 and 12 Post-transplant | Month 12 Post Transplant - BOS 1 | 1 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) Scores (0-3) Assessed at Months 6 and 12 Post-transplant | Month 12 Post Transplant - BOS 2 | 3 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) Scores (0-3) Assessed at Months 6 and 12 Post-transplant | Month 12 Post Transplant - BOS 3 | 3 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) Scores (0-3) Assessed at Months 6 and 12 Post-transplant | Month 12 Post Transplant - BOS 1 | 5 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) Scores (0-3) Assessed at Months 6 and 12 Post-transplant | Month 6 Post Transplant - BOS Missing | 4 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) Scores (0-3) Assessed at Months 6 and 12 Post-transplant | Month 12 Post Transplant - Missing | 7 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) Scores (0-3) Assessed at Months 6 and 12 Post-transplant | Month 6 Post Transplant - BOS 0 | 44 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) Scores (0-3) Assessed at Months 6 and 12 Post-transplant | Month 12 Post Transplant - BOS 3 | 2 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) Scores (0-3) Assessed at Months 6 and 12 Post-transplant | Month 6 Post Transplant - BOS 1 | 3 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) Scores (0-3) Assessed at Months 6 and 12 Post-transplant | Month 12 Post Transplant - BOS 0 | 36 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) Scores (0-3) Assessed at Months 6 and 12 Post-transplant | Month 6 Post Transplant - BOS 2 | 1 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) Scores (0-3) Assessed at Months 6 and 12 Post-transplant | Month 12 Post Transplant - BOS 2 | 2 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) Scores (0-3) Assessed at Months 6 and 12 Post-transplant | Month 6 Post Transplant - BOS 3 | 0 Participants |
Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data)
PGD after lung transplantation ranged from mild to severe depending on the level of hypoxaemia and lung injury post-transplant. PGD score was calculated according to the scoring system below: Grade 0 PaO2/FiO2 \>=300 mmHg; no radiographic infiltrates (RI); Grade 1 PaO2/FiO2 \>=300mmHg + RI consistent with pulmonary oedema; Grade 2 200 mmHg \<=PaO2/FiO2 \<=300 mm Hg + RI consistent with pulmonary oedema; Grade 3 PaO2/FiO2 \< 200 mm Hg + RI consistent with pulmonary oedema. The higher the score, the worse the outcome. Any patient with no infiltrate on chest X-rays was automatically Grade 0. If the patient was on nasal cannula for oxygen or FiO2 \<0.3, the patient was graded as 0 or 1, based on chest X-rays. Any patient on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was Grade 3. Any subject mechanically ventilated with FiO2 greater than 0.5 or requiring nitric oxide beyond 48 hours from the time of transplant was Grade 3.
Time frame: At ICU admission (T0), 24, 48 and 72 hours post-ICU admission
Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized patients who received any study medication and a lung transplant.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | 48 Hours Post ICU Admission - PGD Score Missing | 0 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | ICU Admission (Time 0) - PGD Score 1 | 9 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | 48 Hours Post ICU Admission - PGD Score 0 | 22 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | 24 Hours Post ICU Admission - PGD Score Missing | 0 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | 48 Hours Post ICU Admission - PGD Score 1 | 15 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | ICU Admission (Time 0) - PGD Score 0 | 28 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | 48 Hours Post ICU Admission - PGD Score 2 | 4 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | 24 Hours Post ICU Admission - PGD Score 0 | 22 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | 48 Hours Post ICU Admission - PGD Score 3 | 5 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | 24 Hours Post ICU Admission - PGD Score 1 | 14 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | 72 Hours Post ICU Admission - PGD Score Missing | 1 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | ICU Admission (Time 0) - PGD Score 2 | 6 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | 72 Hours Post ICU Admission - PGD Score 0 | 22 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | 24 Hours Post ICU Admission - PGD Score 2 | 5 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | 72 Hours Post ICU Admission - PGD Score 1 | 16 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | ICU Admission (Time 0) - PGD Score Missing | 0 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | 72 Hours Post ICU Admission - PGD Score 2 | 3 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | 24 Hours Post ICU Admission - PGD Score 3 | 5 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | 72 Hours Post ICU Admission - PGD Score 3 | 4 Participants |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | ICU Admission (Time 0) - PGD Score 3 | 3 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | 72 Hours Post ICU Admission - PGD Score 3 | 6 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | ICU Admission (Time 0) - PGD Score Missing | 1 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | ICU Admission (Time 0) - PGD Score 0 | 33 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | ICU Admission (Time 0) - PGD Score 1 | 8 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | ICU Admission (Time 0) - PGD Score 2 | 4 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | ICU Admission (Time 0) - PGD Score 3 | 9 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | 24 Hours Post ICU Admission - PGD Score Missing | 1 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | 24 Hours Post ICU Admission - PGD Score 1 | 12 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | 24 Hours Post ICU Admission - PGD Score 2 | 6 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | 24 Hours Post ICU Admission - PGD Score 3 | 6 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | 48 Hours Post ICU Admission - PGD Score Missing | 3 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | 48 Hours Post ICU Admission - PGD Score 0 | 24 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | 48 Hours Post ICU Admission - PGD Score 1 | 17 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | 48 Hours Post ICU Admission - PGD Score 2 | 2 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | 48 Hours Post ICU Admission - PGD Score 3 | 9 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | 72 Hours Post ICU Admission - PGD Score Missing | 3 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | 72 Hours Post ICU Admission - PGD Score 0 | 27 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | 72 Hours Post ICU Admission - PGD Score 1 | 17 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | 72 Hours Post ICU Admission - PGD Score 2 | 2 Participants |
| Placebo (ITT) | Number of Patients With Different Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Scores (0-3, and Missing Data) | 24 Hours Post ICU Admission - PGD Score 0 | 30 Participants |
PaO2/FiO2 Ratio (ICU Admission Then 24 Hours up to Extubation or up to 72 Hours)
Time profile of oxygenation was a comparison of the sequential measurements of the ratios of arterial PaO2 to inspired oxygen fractions FiO2. Herein repeated measurements analysis of PaO2/FiO2 ratio corrected after ICU admission using a one-sided test excluding missing data.
Time frame: At ICU admission (T0), 24, 48 and 72 hours post-ICU admission
Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized patients who received any study medication and a lung transplant.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Repertaxin (ITT) | PaO2/FiO2 Ratio (ICU Admission Then 24 Hours up to Extubation or up to 72 Hours) | ICU Admission (Time 0) | 346.3 ratio of PaO2/FiO2 | Standard Deviation 125.5 |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | PaO2/FiO2 Ratio (ICU Admission Then 24 Hours up to Extubation or up to 72 Hours) | 24 Hours Post ICU Admission | 320.1 ratio of PaO2/FiO2 | Standard Deviation 119.5 |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | PaO2/FiO2 Ratio (ICU Admission Then 24 Hours up to Extubation or up to 72 Hours) | 48 Hours Post ICU Admission | 266.1 ratio of PaO2/FiO2 | Standard Deviation 117.3 |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | PaO2/FiO2 Ratio (ICU Admission Then 24 Hours up to Extubation or up to 72 Hours) | 72 Hours Post ICU Admission | 275.6 ratio of PaO2/FiO2 | Standard Deviation 88.1 |
| Placebo (ITT) | PaO2/FiO2 Ratio (ICU Admission Then 24 Hours up to Extubation or up to 72 Hours) | 72 Hours Post ICU Admission | 233.9 ratio of PaO2/FiO2 | Standard Deviation 132 |
| Placebo (ITT) | PaO2/FiO2 Ratio (ICU Admission Then 24 Hours up to Extubation or up to 72 Hours) | ICU Admission (Time 0) | 337.9 ratio of PaO2/FiO2 | Standard Deviation 143 |
| Placebo (ITT) | PaO2/FiO2 Ratio (ICU Admission Then 24 Hours up to Extubation or up to 72 Hours) | 48 Hours Post ICU Admission | 279.2 ratio of PaO2/FiO2 | Standard Deviation 151.8 |
| Placebo (ITT) | PaO2/FiO2 Ratio (ICU Admission Then 24 Hours up to Extubation or up to 72 Hours) | 24 Hours Post ICU Admission | 307.3 ratio of PaO2/FiO2 | Standard Deviation 111.3 |
Patient Survival up to 12 Months Post-transplant
Patient survival is derived from the date of ICU admission untile the date of death or study completion/withdrawal. Here this parameter is expressed as the cumulative number of events (death) at different timepoints till month 12, per arm.
Time frame: at Months 3, 6, 9 and 12 post-transplant
Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized patients who received any study medication and a lung transplant.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Patient Survival up to 12 Months Post-transplant | 3 Months | 0 number of events |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Patient Survival up to 12 Months Post-transplant | 6 Months | 0 number of events |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Patient Survival up to 12 Months Post-transplant | 9 Months | 0 number of events |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Patient Survival up to 12 Months Post-transplant | 12 Months | 0 number of events |
| Placebo (ITT) | Patient Survival up to 12 Months Post-transplant | 12 Months | 7 number of events |
| Placebo (ITT) | Patient Survival up to 12 Months Post-transplant | 3 Months | 3 number of events |
| Placebo (ITT) | Patient Survival up to 12 Months Post-transplant | 9 Months | 6 number of events |
| Placebo (ITT) | Patient Survival up to 12 Months Post-transplant | 6 Months | 5 number of events |
Probability of Death During Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay at Different Timepoints
The duration of ICU stay, in term of hours, at different timepoints, in both placebo and repertaxin groups, was measured. The longer the ICU stay, the worse the outcome. mean event probability (death) and its standard error (SE) at each timepoint.
Time frame: At 24, 48, 72 hours post ICU admission
Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized patients who received any study medication and a lung transplant.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Probability of Death During Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay at Different Timepoints | At 24 h hours post ICU admission | 0.0000 event probability | Standard Error 0 |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Probability of Death During Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay at Different Timepoints | At 48 h hours post ICU admission | 0.3261 event probability | Standard Error 0.0691 |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Probability of Death During Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay at Different Timepoints | At 72 h hours post ICU admission | 0.4783 event probability | Standard Error 0.0737 |
| Placebo (ITT) | Probability of Death During Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay at Different Timepoints | At 24 h hours post ICU admission | 0.0364 event probability | Standard Error 0.0252 |
| Placebo (ITT) | Probability of Death During Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay at Different Timepoints | At 48 h hours post ICU admission | 0.2909 event probability | Standard Error 0.0612 |
| Placebo (ITT) | Probability of Death During Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay at Different Timepoints | At 72 h hours post ICU admission | 0.4962 event probability | Standard Error 0.0679 |
Pulmonary Function Tests (FEV1=Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second and FVC=Forced Vital Capacity) at Month 1, 6 and 12 Post-transplant Evaluated According to Estenne et al.(2002).
Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) measured the amount/ volume, exhaled by a patient in the first second of the expiration after a full inspiration. Average values in healthy patients aged 20-60 range from 4.5 to 3.5 liters in males and from 3.25 to 2.5 liters in females. Forced vital capacity (FVC) was the volume of air that a patient could exhale with a maximal forced expiration effort after a deep inhaling, simply put, how much air a patient could breathe out by blowing as fast as possible. Average values in healthy patients aged 20-60 range from 5.5 to 4.75 liters in males and from 3.75 to 3.25 liters in females. The lower the values fo both parameters, the worse the outcome.
Time frame: At months 1, 6 and 12 post-transplant
Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized patients who received any study medication and a lung transplant.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Pulmonary Function Tests (FEV1=Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second and FVC=Forced Vital Capacity) at Month 1, 6 and 12 Post-transplant Evaluated According to Estenne et al.(2002). | FEV1 - Month 1 post transplant | 2.20 Litres | Standard Deviation 0.74 |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Pulmonary Function Tests (FEV1=Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second and FVC=Forced Vital Capacity) at Month 1, 6 and 12 Post-transplant Evaluated According to Estenne et al.(2002). | FEV1 - Month 6 post transplant | 2.62 Litres | Standard Deviation 0.95 |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Pulmonary Function Tests (FEV1=Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second and FVC=Forced Vital Capacity) at Month 1, 6 and 12 Post-transplant Evaluated According to Estenne et al.(2002). | FEV1 - Month 12 post transplant | 2.52 Litres | Standard Deviation 1.07 |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Pulmonary Function Tests (FEV1=Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second and FVC=Forced Vital Capacity) at Month 1, 6 and 12 Post-transplant Evaluated According to Estenne et al.(2002). | FVC - Month 1 post transplant | 2.49 Litres | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Pulmonary Function Tests (FEV1=Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second and FVC=Forced Vital Capacity) at Month 1, 6 and 12 Post-transplant Evaluated According to Estenne et al.(2002). | FVC - Month 6 post transplant | 3.19 Litres | Standard Deviation 0.93 |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Pulmonary Function Tests (FEV1=Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second and FVC=Forced Vital Capacity) at Month 1, 6 and 12 Post-transplant Evaluated According to Estenne et al.(2002). | FVC - Month 12 post transplant | 3.19 Litres | Standard Deviation 1.05 |
| Placebo (ITT) | Pulmonary Function Tests (FEV1=Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second and FVC=Forced Vital Capacity) at Month 1, 6 and 12 Post-transplant Evaluated According to Estenne et al.(2002). | FVC - Month 6 post transplant | 3.11 Litres | Standard Deviation 0.99 |
| Placebo (ITT) | Pulmonary Function Tests (FEV1=Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second and FVC=Forced Vital Capacity) at Month 1, 6 and 12 Post-transplant Evaluated According to Estenne et al.(2002). | FEV1 - Month 1 post transplant | 2.05 Litres | Standard Deviation 0.84 |
| Placebo (ITT) | Pulmonary Function Tests (FEV1=Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second and FVC=Forced Vital Capacity) at Month 1, 6 and 12 Post-transplant Evaluated According to Estenne et al.(2002). | FVC - Month 1 post transplant | 2.56 Litres | Standard Deviation 1.01 |
| Placebo (ITT) | Pulmonary Function Tests (FEV1=Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second and FVC=Forced Vital Capacity) at Month 1, 6 and 12 Post-transplant Evaluated According to Estenne et al.(2002). | FEV1 - Month 6 post transplant | 2.34 Litres | Standard Deviation 0.85 |
| Placebo (ITT) | Pulmonary Function Tests (FEV1=Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second and FVC=Forced Vital Capacity) at Month 1, 6 and 12 Post-transplant Evaluated According to Estenne et al.(2002). | FVC - Month 12 post transplant | 3.07 Litres | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Placebo (ITT) | Pulmonary Function Tests (FEV1=Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second and FVC=Forced Vital Capacity) at Month 1, 6 and 12 Post-transplant Evaluated According to Estenne et al.(2002). | FEV1 - Month 12 post transplant | 2.22 Litres | Standard Deviation 0.95 |
Time to Freedom From Mechanical Ventilation
Time to freedom from mechanical ventilation was defined as time between admission to the ICU and the initial time of first extubation (breathing off mechanical ventilation without a tube) which was maintained for more than 24 hours. This number was measured in hours and was derived as (date/time of extubation-date/time of ICU admission)/3600. The longer the time, the worst the outcome.Time to freedom from mechanical ventilation, if greater than 1 month (720 hours), was censored to 720 hours. Patients re-transplanted were censored at the date/time of re-transplant. Herein differences in the time to freedom from mechanical ventilation were reported between placebo and repertaxin.
Time frame: At 24, 48, 72 hours post ICU admission
Population: The ITT population consisted of all randomized patients who received any study medication and a lung transplant.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Time to Freedom From Mechanical Ventilation | 24 Hours Post-ICU Admission | 0.5000 hours | Standard Error 0.0737 |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Time to Freedom From Mechanical Ventilation | 48 Hours Post-ICU Admission | 0.6957 hours | Standard Error 0.0678 |
| Repertaxin (ITT) | Time to Freedom From Mechanical Ventilation | 72 Hours Post-ICU Admission | 0.7391 hours | Standard Error 0.0647 |
| Placebo (ITT) | Time to Freedom From Mechanical Ventilation | 24 Hours Post-ICU Admission | 0.4909 hours | Standard Error 0.0674 |
| Placebo (ITT) | Time to Freedom From Mechanical Ventilation | 48 Hours Post-ICU Admission | 0.7273 hours | Standard Error 0.0601 |
| Placebo (ITT) | Time to Freedom From Mechanical Ventilation | 72 Hours Post-ICU Admission | 0.8052 hours | Standard Error 0.0541 |