Skip to content

Community Hypertension Assessment Trial (CHAT)

A Pragmatic Trial of Community Pharmacy Blood Pressure Clinics Linked With Family Medicine Practices to Improve the Monitoring and Management of High Blood Pressure Among Older Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00217334
Enrollment
28
Registered
2005-09-22
Start date
2002-11-30
Completion date
2005-01-31
Last updated
2005-09-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypertension

Keywords

Hypertension, Cardiovascular diseases, Randomized controlled trial, Cluster randomization, Primary care

Brief summary

The Community Hypertension Assessment Trial (CHAT) is an investigation of the effect of community pharmacy based blood pressure (BP) monitoring sessions led by peer health educators, with feedback to family physicians, on the monitoring and management of blood pressure among older adults.

Detailed description

Hypertension affects about 22% of Canadian adults and is a modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Most countries have increasing older adult populations and hypertension prevalence increases with age. However, the rule of halves still applies in many primary health care settings: half of the hypertensive patients are undiagnosed, half of the diagnosed patients are untreated, and half of the treated patients are uncontrolled. Family physicians were randomly selected and approached to participate in CHAT. Paired cluster randomization was used, with practices as the unit of randomization. Data on blood pressure (BP) readings in the last year, diagnosis of hypertension, diagnosis of diabetes and/or target organ damage, and a current antihypertensive profile was extracted from the health records of 55 patients randomly selected in each practice. In practices allocated to the Intervention group, physicians sent a letter, with assistance from research staff, to invite all of their eligible patients 65 years and older to attend one or two BP sessions in nearby pharmacies. Inclusion criteria required that patients be regular patients in the practice, community-dwelling, and mobile/well enough to attend community sessions. Public health authorities trained older adult volunteer peer health educators to assist patients at the sessions to accurately measure their BP using a validated automated device, and record BP readings and cardiovascular risk factors. The volunteers provided education about hypertension but did not perform a clinical function. A recommendation protocol ensured that the pharmacist and, if necessary, the physician was notified if patients had a very high BP or a very low BP accompanied by symptoms. A public health nurse was 'on-call' during the sessions in case clinical advice was needed. A volunteer coordinator facilitated the transfer of readings and patient-reported cardiovascular risk factors to physicians. Accurate BP readings were obtained from the BPM-100 automated BP measuring device. Questionnaires were used to obtain self-report data on cardiovascular disease risk factors from patients, knowledge and attitudes about BP control from physicians, and attitudes and satisfaction with the program from peer health educators, pharmacists, and public health nurses. The primary outcome measure followed an 'intention to treat' approach. The primary endpoint was the difference in the change from 12 months pre- to 12 months post-intervention in the proportion of eligible patients with a BP reading recorded in their health record with mean systolic \<=140 mm Hg or mean diastolic \<=90 mmHg; \<=130 or \<=80 if target organ damage or diabetes is present. This trial is a collaboration by the Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University and the Elisabeth Bruyère Research Institute, a University of Ottawa and SCO Service Partnership.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALVolunteer-led pharmacy sessions with feedback to physicians

Sponsors

University of Ottawa
CollaboratorOTHER
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

28 family physicians were recruited; all eligible patients in practices allocated to the intervention arm were invited to the program. A randomly selected set of 50 charts per practice were audited, regardless of session attendance. Physician Practices Inclusion Criteria: * Non-academic (none of its members are full-time faculty members) * Full-time * Regular family practice in terms of size and case-mix * Able to provide an electronic roster that includes a mailing address of their patients 65 years and older

Exclusion criteria

* work in walk-in clinics or emergency departments * about to retire * work part-time * fewer than 50 patients 65 years or older * specialized practice profile Patients Inclusion Criteria: * Community-dwelling * 65 years or older * Visited the practice at least once in the last year * Considered regular patients by the physician

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Difference in the change from baseline to 12 months exit
Assessment in the mean percent of patients with adequate
Assessment / blood pressure (BP) control in intervention compared to control practices

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Percent of patients with mean BP 140-159 / 90-99
Percent of patients with mean BP 160-179 / 100-110
Percent of patients with mean BP >180 / >110

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026