Skip to content

A Study of Relapse Prevention and the Effectiveness of Long-acting Injectable Risperidone and Quetiapine Tablets in the Treatment of Patients With Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder

CONSTATRE: Risperdal Consta Trial Of Relapse Prevention And Effectiveness

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00216476
Enrollment
753
Registered
2005-09-22
Start date
2004-10-31
Completion date
2007-11-30
Last updated
2014-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia

Keywords

Schizophrenia, relapse prevention, Antipsychotic agents, Long-acting risperidone, Quetiapine, Aripiprazole

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether a long-acting injectable formulation of risperidone provides better effectiveness over 2 years, as measured by the time to relapse, compared with quetiapine tablets in a routine psychiatric care setting. Aripiprazole will be investigated in a descriptive manner.

Detailed description

Although many schizophrenia patients currently take oral antipsychotic medications, it is estimated that up to 75% of them have difficulty adhering to the daily oral regimen. Long-acting injectable formulations may eliminate the need for daily medication and enhance patient compliance with the treatment regimen. This is an open-label (all people involved know the identity of the intervention), randomized (study drug assigned by chance) study of a formulation of risperidone (coated microspheres) injected into the muscle at 2 week intervals over 104 weeks in stable patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, who are being treated with oral risperidone, olanzapine, or other conventional antipsychotic agents. A comparator group will receive tablets of quetiapine to be taken 2 or 3 times daily, depending on the optimal dosage. In countries where aripiprazole is available, aripiprazole was also included in a descriptive manner. Reasons for switching symptomatically stable patients from their current antipsychotic treatment include insufficient effectiveness of the medication on symptoms, adverse events, or a patient's request. The principal measure of effectiveness of the drug is the time to relapse. Assessments of effectiveness also include: Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), which measures the symptoms of schizophrenia; overall severity of illness measured by the Clinical Global Impression subscale (CGI-S); patient's condition measured by the Clinical Global Impression condition subscale (CGI-C); quality of life assessed by the SF-12 survey. Safety evaluations include incidence of adverse events, Extrapyramidal Symptoms Rating Scale (ESRS), clinical laboratory tests (biochemistry, haematology, and urinalysis), and vital signs (pulse, blood pressure). The study hypothesis is that treatment with long-acting risperidone injected intramuscularly every 2 weeks provides better effectiveness than quetiapine, as measured by time to relapse, in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Risperidone injections 25mg biweekly for 104 weeks, increasing or decreasing (increments of 12.5mg) at investigator's discretion. Risperidone tablets (2mg daily for 2 days) for patients starting on risperidone. Quetiapine and Aripiprazole used according to package insert.

Interventions

DRUGAripiprazole

10-30 mg oral once daily for 104 weeks

25 mg injection every 2 weeks until week 104. Dosage may be increased or decreased in steps of 12.5 mg. Additional oral risperidone can be administered as required until a dose increase becomes effective.

DRUGQuetiapine

Oral tablets are titrated from 50 mg daily to 300-400 mg daily in first 4 days. Subsequently treatment is maintained for 104 weeks and dosage can be adjusted with increments or decrements of 25 to 50 mg.

Sponsors

Janssen-Cilag International NV
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Diseases, 4th edition (DSM-IV) * Patients currently treated with oral risperidone, olanzapine or a conventional neuroleptic monotherapy at doses not exceeding 6 mg risperdal, 20 mg olanzapine, or a conversion dose of 10 mg haloperidol for oral conventional agents * Patients who are stable (judged clinically stable by the investigator and on a stable dose of medication for 4 weeks or longer) but not optimally treated (non-satisfactory treatment regarding symptoms or adverse events)

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosis other than schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder by DSM-IV Axis I criteria * Patients being treated with antipsychotic agents other than oral risperidone, olanzapine or conventional oral neuroleptic agents * Patients with known hypersensitivity to oral risperidone, quetiapine, aripiprazole, or who are known non-responders to oral risperidone, quetiapine, aripiprazole or to previous treatment with at least 2 antipsychotic agents * Patients treated with mood stabilizers or antidepressants who are not on stable dose for at least 3 months before study initiation * Pregnant or nursing females, or those lacking adequate contraception

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Relapse Free Period(Risperidone LAI Versus Quetiapine)Assessed at each visit from the moment the subject was randomized to a treatment arm (baseline visit) until the end of treatment (Week 104 or earlier)Relapse was defined as meeting any of the predefined criteria (adapted from Csernansky et al., 2002) on 2 consecutive evaluations during treatment, 3 to 5 days apart. The relapse rate in each treatment arm was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Relapse Free Period (Exploratory/Aripiprazole)Assessed at each visit from the moment the subject was randomized to a treatment arm (baseline visit) until the end of treatment (Week 104 or earlier)As for risperidone and quetiapine, relapse was defined as meeting any of the predefined criteria (adapted from Csernansky et al., 2002) on 2 consecutive evaluations during treatment, 3 to 5 days apart. Since aripiprazole was new on the market at the time the study was conducted, this aripiprazole analysis was exploratory.
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) ScoreAssessed at each visit from the moment the subject was randomized to a treatment arm (baseline visit) until the end of treatment (Week 104 or earlier)The neuropsychiatric symptoms of schizophrenia were assessed by means of the 30-item PANSS scale. The PANSS scale provides a total score (sum of the scores of all 30 items) and scores for 3 subscales, i.e., the positive subscale (7 items), the negative subscale (7 items), and the general psychopathology subscale (16 items). Each item of the scale is to be scored on a scale of 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme).
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) ScoreAssessed at each visit from the moment the subject was randomized to a treatment arm (baseline visit) until the end of treatment (Month 24 or earlier)The 7-point CGI scale of Severity (CGI-S) was used to assess the severity of a subject's psychotic condition (0= normal, not at all ill, 1= borderline, etc. and 6= among the most extremely ill subjects).
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Short-Form Health Survey 12 (SF-12) ScoresAssessed at the moment the subject was randomized to a treatment arm (baseline visit) and after 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of treatmentQuality of life was assessed by means of the 12-item SF-12® survey. Two parameters, i.e., PCS (physical component summary) and MCS (mental component summary) were calculated. Both components scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better QOL.

Countries

Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects had a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - 4th edition \[DSM-IV\]) and were treated with oral risperidone, olanzapine, or conventional oral neuroleptic monotherapy at screening. They were to be symptomatically stable but not optimally treated.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Risperidone LAI
intramuscular injection, dose of 25, 37.5, or 50 mg every 2 weeks
329
Quetiapine
oral, target dose of 300-400 mg b.i.d. or t.i.d.
337
Total666

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdministrative Reasons110
Overall StudyAdverse Event6101
Overall StudyDeath200
Overall StudyHigher dose/Extra Medication Required202
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy430
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1091
Overall StudyNo Further Need for Treatment341
Overall StudyNon-compliance041
Overall StudyOther001
Overall StudyPatient Moved220
Overall StudyPregnancy011
Overall StudyProtocol Deviation510
Overall StudyRefuses Injection1100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject59729

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRisperidone LAIQuetiapineTotal
Age, Continuous40.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.48
42.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.14
41.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.85
Body Mass Index (BMI)27.6 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.23
27.0 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.32
27.3 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.28
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Arab
5 participants4 participants9 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
320 participants330 participants650 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
2 participants0 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Oriental
1 participants2 participants3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Pakistani
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
134 Participants146 Participants280 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
195 Participants191 Participants386 Participants
Weight80.4 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.93
79.0 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.75
79.7 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.35

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
201 / 329213 / 33728 / 45
serious
Total, serious adverse events
63 / 32977 / 3377 / 45

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Relapse Free Period(Risperidone LAI Versus Quetiapine)

Relapse was defined as meeting any of the predefined criteria (adapted from Csernansky et al., 2002) on 2 consecutive evaluations during treatment, 3 to 5 days apart. The relapse rate in each treatment arm was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: Assessed at each visit from the moment the subject was randomized to a treatment arm (baseline visit) until the end of treatment (Week 104 or earlier)

Population: Efficacy analysis set, defined as all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication and who had at least 1 efficacy assessment after baseline. This excluded 2 subjects of the risperidone LAI arm and 11 of the quetiapine arm.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Risperidone LAIMean Relapse Free Period(Risperidone LAI Versus Quetiapine)607 daysStandard Deviation 11.4
QuetiapineMean Relapse Free Period(Risperidone LAI Versus Quetiapine)533 daysStandard Deviation 15.6
Comparison: Null hypothesis was that there is no difference in treatment effect between risperidone LAI and quetiapine by mean relapse free period; given a estimated relapse rate of 30% for risperidone LAI and 42% for quetiapine, with 80% power and 5% 2-tailed significance level, 251 subjects were needed per treatment arm. To adjust for an estimated 20% discontinuations for reasons other than relapse, 628 subjects in total were needed. Actual relapse rates were 17% (risperidone LAI) and 31% (quetiapine).p-value: <0.0001Log Rank
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) Score

The 7-point CGI scale of Severity (CGI-S) was used to assess the severity of a subject's psychotic condition (0= normal, not at all ill, 1= borderline, etc. and 6= among the most extremely ill subjects).

Time frame: Assessed at each visit from the moment the subject was randomized to a treatment arm (baseline visit) until the end of treatment (Month 24 or earlier)

Population: Efficacy analysis set, defined as all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 efficacy assessment after baseline. This excluded 2 subjects of the risperidone LAI arm, 11 of the quetipaine arm, and 1 of the aripiprazole arm. One additional subject in the risperidone LAI arm did not have CGI data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Risperidone LAIChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) Score-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.25
QuetiapineChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) Score0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.24
AripiprazoleChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) Score-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.32
Comparison: Between-group comparison of the change from baseline to endpoint in CGI-S score. The endpoint of the study was based on the LOCF principle.p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Within-group comparison of the change from baseline to endpoint in CGI-S score. The endpoint of the study was based on the LOCF principle.p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon signed-rank test
Comparison: Within-group comparison of the change from baseline to endpoint in CGI-S score. The endpoint of the study was based on the LOCF principle.p-value: 0.0446Wilcoxon signed-rank test
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Short-Form Health Survey 12 (SF-12) Scores

Quality of life was assessed by means of the 12-item SF-12® survey. Two parameters, i.e., PCS (physical component summary) and MCS (mental component summary) were calculated. Both components scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better QOL.

Time frame: Assessed at the moment the subject was randomized to a treatment arm (baseline visit) and after 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of treatment

Population: Efficacy analysis set, defined as all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 efficacy assessment after baseline. This excluded 2 subjects of the risperidone LAI, 11 of the quetipaine, and 1 of the aripiprazole arm. An additional 32, 32, and 2 subjects in the respective arms did not have SF-12 data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Risperidone LAIChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Short-Form Health Survey 12 (SF-12) ScoresPCS score2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.04
Risperidone LAIChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Short-Form Health Survey 12 (SF-12) ScoresMCS score3.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.43
QuetiapineChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Short-Form Health Survey 12 (SF-12) ScoresPCS score1.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.31
QuetiapineChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Short-Form Health Survey 12 (SF-12) ScoresMCS score2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.88
AripiprazoleChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Short-Form Health Survey 12 (SF-12) ScoresPCS score2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.36
AripiprazoleChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Short-Form Health Survey 12 (SF-12) ScoresMCS score4.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.1
Comparison: Within-group comparison of the change from baseline to endpoint in PCS score. The endpoint of the study was based on the LOCF principle.p-value: 0.1146Wilcoxon signed-rank test
Comparison: Between-group comparison of the change from baseline to endpoint in PCS score. The endpoint of the study was based on the LOCF principle.p-value: 0.0941Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Within-group comparison of the change from baseline to endpoint in PCS score. The endpoint of the study was based on the LOCF principle.p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon signed-rank test
Comparison: Between-group comparison of the change from baseline to endpoint in MCS score. The endpoint of the study was based on the LOCF principle.p-value: 0.5589Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Within-group comparison of the change from baseline to endpoint in MCS score. The endpoint of the study was based on the LOCF principle.p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon signed-rank test
Comparison: Within-group comparison of the change from baseline to endpoint in MCS score. The endpoint of the study was based on the LOCF principle.p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon signed-rank test
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Score

The neuropsychiatric symptoms of schizophrenia were assessed by means of the 30-item PANSS scale. The PANSS scale provides a total score (sum of the scores of all 30 items) and scores for 3 subscales, i.e., the positive subscale (7 items), the negative subscale (7 items), and the general psychopathology subscale (16 items). Each item of the scale is to be scored on a scale of 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme).

Time frame: Assessed at each visit from the moment the subject was randomized to a treatment arm (baseline visit) until the end of treatment (Week 104 or earlier)

Population: Efficacy analysis set, defined as all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 efficacy assessment after baseline. This excluded 2 subjects of the risperidone LAI, 11 of the quetipaine, and 1 of the aripiprazole arm. One additional subject in each the risperidone LAI and quetiapine arm did not have PANSS data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Risperidone LAIChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Score-9.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.65
QuetiapineChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Score-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.28
AripiprazoleChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Score-7.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.99
Comparison: Between-group comparison of the change from baseline to endpoint in total PANSS score. The endpoint of the study was based on the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) principle, i.e., it was defined as the last available visit during the study with non-missing data for a parameter (excluding the baseline value).p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Within-group comparison of the change from baseline to endpoint in total PANSS score. The endpoint of the study was based on the LOCF principle.p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon signed-rank test
Comparison: Within-group comparison of the change from baseline to endpoint in total PANSS score. The endpoint of the study was based on the LOCF principle.p-value: 0.1026Wilcoxon signed-rank test
Secondary

Mean Relapse Free Period (Exploratory/Aripiprazole)

As for risperidone and quetiapine, relapse was defined as meeting any of the predefined criteria (adapted from Csernansky et al., 2002) on 2 consecutive evaluations during treatment, 3 to 5 days apart. Since aripiprazole was new on the market at the time the study was conducted, this aripiprazole analysis was exploratory.

Time frame: Assessed at each visit from the moment the subject was randomized to a treatment arm (baseline visit) until the end of treatment (Week 104 or earlier)

Population: Efficacy analysis set, defined as all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication and who had at least 1 efficacy assessment after baseline. This excluded 1 subject of the aripiprazole arm.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Risperidone LAIMean Relapse Free Period (Exploratory/Aripiprazole)314 daysStandard Error 20.4

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026