Skip to content

Comparison of Adalimumab and Infliximab Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Randomised, Multicenter, Open-label, Parallel-group Study Comparing Adalimumab 40 mg s.c. Eow Versus Infliximab 3 mg/kg i.v. Every 6 Weeks in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients With Unsustainable Clinical Response to Infliximab 3 mg/kg Every 8 Weeks

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00216177
Enrollment
112
Registered
2005-09-22
Start date
2005-09-30
Completion date
2009-06-30
Last updated
2009-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to establish whether RA patients with moderate to severe disease activity with unsustainable response to infliximab 3 mg/kg every 8 weeks have better efficacy with adalimumab 40 mg s.c. eow compared to infliximab 3 mg/kg i.v. every 6 weeks.

Interventions

DRUGInfliximab

Remicade

DRUGAdalimumab

Humira

Sponsors

University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen
CollaboratorOTHER
Hvidovre University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ACR criteria fulfilled,DAS28-3(CRP \> 3.2 * \> 6 months prior treatment with infliximab 3 mg/kg i.v. every 8 week with initial response * Fading clinical response to infliximab * Negative pregnancy test (women with childbearing potential) * Use of reliable method of contraception (women with childbearing potential) * Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Age less than 18 years * Lack of co-operability * Positive serology for hepatitis B or C * History of positive HIV status * History of TB or untreated latent TB * Histoplasmosis or Listeriosis * Pregnancy or breastfeeding * Persistent or recurrent infections * History of cancer * Uncontrolled diabetes * Ischaemic heart disease * Congestive heart failure (NYHA 3-4) * Active inflammatory bowel disease * Recent stroke (within 3 months) * History of or current inflammatory joint disease other than RA * Previous diagnosis or signs of central nervous system demyelinating disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of patients achieving combined good or moderate EULAR responses at week 24six months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
ACR20/50/70 response at week 2, 6, 12, 18 and 24six months

Countries

Denmark

Contacts

Primary ContactHenrik Skjodt, MD, PhD
hskj@dadlnet.dk3632 3311
Backup ContactMikkel Ostergaard, MD, DMedSci
mo@dadlnet.dk

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026