Skip to content

Tight Glycemic Control With Intensive Insulin Therapy in PICU

KULeuven Intensive Insulin Study in Pediatric Intensive Care Patients

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00214916
Enrollment
700
Registered
2005-09-22
Start date
2004-10-31
Completion date
2023-06-30
Last updated
2022-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Critical Illness

Keywords

Tight glycemic control with, intensive insulin treatment, versus conventional glycemic control, in infant or child in ICU

Brief summary

In a previous study, the investigators showed that tight blood glucose control with insulin during intensive care reduced morbidity and mortality in adult intensive care patients. Whether this intervention also improves prognosis of pediatric intensive care patients remains unknown. The current prospective, randomized, controlled study will asses the impact of intensive insulin therapy on outcome of patients in a pediatric intensive care unit. On admission patients will be randomly assigned to either strict normalization of blood glucose according age adjusted values or the conventional approach, in which insulin infusion is initiated only when blood glucose exceeds 215 mg/dl to maintain blood glucose levels between 180-200 mg/dl.

Detailed description

Study type: Interventional study Study design: single centre, prospective, randomized, active control, parallel assignment, efficacy study

Interventions

DRUGintensive insulin therapy (Actrapid IV to normoglycemia)

intensive insulin therapy (Actrapid IV in continuous infusion to age-dependent normoglycemia)

DRUGconventional insulin therapy (Actrapid IV only for excessive hyperglycemia)

conventional insulin therapy (Actrapid IV in continuous infusion only to treat blood glucose levels exceeding 220 mg/dl)

Sponsors

Greet Van den Berghe
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Days to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit and anticipated to require intensive care for at least 24 hours

Exclusion criteria

* Expected stay \< 24 hours * Therapy restriction upon admission * No informed consent * Other study enrollment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Reduction of inflammationduring ICU stay to day 5
duration of dependency on intensive care (days in ICU)time in ICU

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
long-term follow-up study : focus on neurocognitive development (ethical approval granted)3 years (+/- 6 months) after randomization
Duration mechanical ventilationduring time in ICU
Organ failure/need for organ supportduring time in ICU
mortality (safety endpoint)during time in ICU

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 3, 2026