Skip to content

Use of the Paradigm 722 System to Improve Glycemic Control in Adult and Adolescent Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes

Use of the Paradigm 722 System to Improve Glycemic Control in Adult and Adolescent Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes: A Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00211510
Acronym
STAR1
Enrollment
146
Registered
2005-09-21
Start date
2005-06-30
Completion date
2007-02-28
Last updated
2017-06-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 1 Diabetes

Keywords

Diabetes, Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Glycemic Control

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether Type 1 Diabetic subjects using the Paradigm 722 System, which is a glucose sensor-augmented insulin pump, can improve glycemic control when compared to subjects using the Paradigm 715 insulin pump only.

Detailed description

Glycemic control remains a significant challenge for both adult and adolescent Type 1 diabetics. Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGMS) is currently used by clinicians to record continuous, retrospective glucose measurements which aid in identification of glycemic excursion patterns. This data is then used to make therapy change recommendations for the future. The Paradigm 722 System transmits real-time glucose measurements to the insulin pump every 5 minutes, allowing users to view their current glucose values, as well as to review glycemic excursions and trends over a 24-hour period. This System will alert users to high and low glucose levels, and will allow subjects and their clinicians to treat to a therapeutic target HbA1c under monitored conditions. Subjects wearing the Paradigm 722 System will be compared to subjects wearing the Paradigm 715 Insulin Pump over a 6 month period to evaluate changes in glycemic control (HbA1c).

Interventions

DEVICEParadigm 722 sensor augmented pump

Subjects use the Paradigm 722 sensor augmented pump

DEVICEParadigm 715 insulin pump

Subjects use the Paradigm 715 insulin pump

Sponsors

Medtronic Diabetes
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 12 - 80 years * Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus diagnosed at least 1 year ago * Using insulin infusion pump for past 6 months minimum * Performing minimum 4 blood glucose tests per day * Agree to treat to A1c targets * Read and understand English

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or planning pregnancy * History of unresolved tape allergy or skin conditions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in A1c From Baseline to 26 WeeksBaseline and 26 weeksChange is defined as A1c at Week 26 minus A1c at Baseline in each study arm. The difference between the change in each group will then be analyzed. A1c measure is defined as the percent of glycated hemoglobin using one standardized assay for all subjects.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in Frequency of Severe Hypoglycemia From Baseline to Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksSevere Hypoglycemia as defined by hypoglycemic events requiring the assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrates, glucagon or other resuscitative actions, as reported by subject. The frequency evaluates the total number of events. This will be analyzed and compared between the two study arms from baseline to week 26.
Changes in Hypoglycemia Area Under the Curve (AUC) From Baseline to Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksHypoglycemia is defined as a recorded blood glucose event \<70mg/dL. The amount of time spent below this parameter will be analyzed and compared between groups from Baseline to Week 26
Changes in Hyperglycemia Area Under the Curve (AUC) From Baseline to Week 26Baseline and 26 weeksHyperglycemia is defined as a recorded blood glucose event \> 180 mg/dL. The amount of time spent above this parameter will be analyzed and compared between groups from Baseline to Week 26
Glucose Sensor Accuracy as Measured in the 722 GroupBaseline and 26 weeksPercent comparative sensor glucose reading to blood glucose meter in agreement within +/- 20% (Clark Error Grid zone A + zone B).
Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Questionnaire Assessed and Compared Between GroupsBaseline and 26 weeksQuestionnaire evaluating subjects'potential fear of hypoglycemia events. Change assessed at Baseline and Week 26 and compared between groups. Likert scale scored with 4 being the worst and 0 being no problem.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Paradigm 722 Sensor Augmented Pump
subjects will use the Paradigm 722 sensor augmented pump for insulin infusion and continuous glucose monitoring
72
Paradigm 715 Insulin Pump
subjects will use the Paradigm 715 insulin pump for insulin infusion
74
Total146

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyPhysician Decision31
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject31

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicParadigm 715 Insulin PumpParadigm 722 Sensor Augmented PumpTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
23 Participants20 Participants43 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
51 Participants52 Participants103 Participants
Age, Continuous32.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.3
32 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6
32.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.4
Region of Enrollment
United States
74 participants72 participants146 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
46 Participants38 Participants84 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
28 Participants34 Participants62 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
25 / 727 / 74
serious
Total, serious adverse events
14 / 728 / 74

Outcome results

Primary

Change in A1c From Baseline to 26 Weeks

Change is defined as A1c at Week 26 minus A1c at Baseline in each study arm. The difference between the change in each group will then be analyzed. A1c measure is defined as the percent of glycated hemoglobin using one standardized assay for all subjects.

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Paradigm 722 Sensor Augmented PumpChange in A1c From Baseline to 26 Weeks-0.72 Percent glycated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.69
Paradigm 715 Insulin PumpChange in A1c From Baseline to 26 Weeks-0.58 Percent glycated hemoglobinStandard Deviation 0.73
Secondary

Changes in Hyperglycemia Area Under the Curve (AUC) From Baseline to Week 26

Hyperglycemia is defined as a recorded blood glucose event \> 180 mg/dL. The amount of time spent above this parameter will be analyzed and compared between groups from Baseline to Week 26

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Paradigm 722 Sensor Augmented PumpChanges in Hyperglycemia Area Under the Curve (AUC) From Baseline to Week 26-10.2 mmol/dl*minStandard Deviation 18.6
Paradigm 715 Insulin PumpChanges in Hyperglycemia Area Under the Curve (AUC) From Baseline to Week 26-9.2 mmol/dl*minStandard Deviation 16.2
Secondary

Changes in Hypoglycemia Area Under the Curve (AUC) From Baseline to Week 26

Hypoglycemia is defined as a recorded blood glucose event \<70mg/dL. The amount of time spent below this parameter will be analyzed and compared between groups from Baseline to Week 26

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Paradigm 722 Sensor Augmented PumpChanges in Hypoglycemia Area Under the Curve (AUC) From Baseline to Week 26-0.07 mmol/dl*minStandard Deviation 0.581
Paradigm 715 Insulin PumpChanges in Hypoglycemia Area Under the Curve (AUC) From Baseline to Week 260.281 mmol/dl*minStandard Deviation 1.023
Secondary

Difference in Frequency of Severe Hypoglycemia From Baseline to Week 26

Severe Hypoglycemia as defined by hypoglycemic events requiring the assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrates, glucagon or other resuscitative actions, as reported by subject. The frequency evaluates the total number of events. This will be analyzed and compared between the two study arms from baseline to week 26.

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Paradigm 722 Sensor Augmented PumpDifference in Frequency of Severe Hypoglycemia From Baseline to Week 2611 hypoglycemic events
Paradigm 715 Insulin PumpDifference in Frequency of Severe Hypoglycemia From Baseline to Week 263 hypoglycemic events
Secondary

Glucose Sensor Accuracy as Measured in the 722 Group

Percent comparative sensor glucose reading to blood glucose meter in agreement within +/- 20% (Clark Error Grid zone A + zone B).

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Paradigm 722 Sensor Augmented PumpGlucose Sensor Accuracy as Measured in the 722 Group95.9 percent of agreement
Paradigm 715 Insulin PumpGlucose Sensor Accuracy as Measured in the 722 GroupNA percent of agreement
Secondary

Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Questionnaire Assessed and Compared Between Groups

Questionnaire evaluating subjects'potential fear of hypoglycemia events. Change assessed at Baseline and Week 26 and compared between groups. Likert scale scored with 4 being the worst and 0 being no problem.

Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Paradigm 722 Sensor Augmented PumpProblem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Questionnaire Assessed and Compared Between Groups-0.07 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
Paradigm 715 Insulin PumpProblem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) Questionnaire Assessed and Compared Between Groups-0.22 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.66

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 9, 2026