Skip to content

A Study of AQUAVAN® Injection in the Presence of Pre-Medication in Patients Undergoing Minor Surgical Procedures

A Phase III, Randomized, Open-label Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AQUAVAN® Injection Versus Midazolam HCl for Sedation in Patients Undergoing Minor Surgical Procedures

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00209560
Enrollment
168
Registered
2005-09-21
Start date
2004-10-31
Completion date
2005-03-31
Last updated
2015-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthroscopy, Bunionectomy, Carpal Tunnel, Osteotomy

Keywords

AQUAVAN® Injection, Midazolam, Minor surgical procedures, Sedation

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of AQUAVAN® Injection when used for mild-to-moderate sedation in patients undergoing minor surgical procedures.

Detailed description

Randomized, open label, multi-center,midazolam adaptive dose ranging study, in which several dose levels of AQUAVAN® Injection and fentanyl citrate injection will be investigated to produce a desired sedation level in patients undergoing minor surgical and/or therapeutic procedures. A desired sedative dose/dose range and dosing paradigm will be identified based on pre-set criteria using the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S). The desired sedative dose/dose range and dosing paradigm of AQUAVAN® Injection is defined as one that consistently provides mild to moderate sedation (Modified OAA/S between 2 and 4 inclusive) in majority of patients who are pre-medicated with fentanyl citrate injection. Midazolam is the most widely used i.v. agent for minimal-to-moderate sedation. The dose range of midazolam to induce minimal to moderate sedation was based on standard clinical practice. \[new paragraph\] All patients were pre-medicated with fentanyl citrate as an analgesic. The outpatient setting has become increasingly popular for various types of medical procedures requiring sedation. In outpatient minor surgical procedures, sedation agents are used to provide mild-to-moderate sedation and are used with other medicines for pain management. Surgeons have searched for alternative treatments to use in the outpatient setting that would provide a faster recovery time with minimal post-procedure amnesia. This injection is used following pretreatment with fentanyl citrate for pain management.

Interventions

Sponsors

PPD Development, LP
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Covance
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Eisai Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patient provided signed/dated Informed Consent and HIPAA Authorization after receiving a full explanation of the extent and nature of the study. 2. Patient was at least 18 years of age at the time of screening. (Prior to Amendment 1, dated 03 February 2005, this criterion restricted enrollment to patients who were ≥18 and ≤65 years of age. To ensure that safe dosing levels were administered to patients \>65 years of age, AQUAVAN and midazolam dosing levels were reduced when compared with patients between 18 and 65 years of age, inclusive. The majority of patients were enrolled prior to 03 February 2005.) 3. Female patient must have been surgically sterile, postmenopausal, or not pregnant or lactating, and must have been using an acceptable method of birth control for at least 1 month prior to dosing, with a negative urine pregnancy test result at screening and predosing periods. 4. Patient met the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification System of I to III. 5. Patient may have been an inpatient or outpatient scheduled to undergo a single minor surgical and/or therapeutic procedure.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient had a history of allergic reaction or hypersensitivity to any anesthetic agent, narcotic, or benzodiazepine. 2. Patient did not meet nils per os (NPO) status per ASA Guideline or institution's guideline. 3. Patient had condition(s) that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could interfere with appropriate airway management. 4. Patient had participated in an investigational drug study within 1 month prior to study start. 5. Patient had a history of mental or visual impairment that would not permit successful measurement of cognitive evaluations. 6. Patient was unwilling to adhere to pre- and postprocedural instructions. 7. The use of fentanyl or midazolam was contraindicated for the patient. 8. Patient had experienced multiple concurrent injuries or trauma. 9. Patient was scheduled to undergo multiple same-day procedures (eg, bunionectomies on both feet).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Successful Sedation of Subjects, Defined for a Subject as Having 3 Consecutive Scores ≤ 4 on the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale and Completing the Procedure w/o Alternative Sedative Medications/w/o Manual/Mechanical VentilationSedation success was assessed at 2 minute intervals until the end of the procedureThe Modified OAA/S (MOAA/S) scale is based on a validated, 6-point rating scale. Scores are not combined. Score 5 (alert) -- responds readily to name spoken in normal tone Score 4 -- Lethargic response to name spoken in normal tone Score 3 -- Responds only after name is called loudly and/or repeatedly Score 2 -- Responds only after mild prodding or shaking Score 1 -- Responds only after painful trapezius squeeze Score 0 -- Does not respond to painful trapezius squeeze

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Fully Alert From the End of the ProcedureAt 2-minute intervals from the end of the procedure until the subject met the criteria for Fully Alert statusTime to Fully Alert, defined as the time to the first of 3 consecutive Modified OAA/S scores of 5 from the end of the surgical procedure, was summarized.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study recruited at 18 centers in the US during the period of 29-Oct-2004 to 24 Mar 2005.

Pre-assignment details

After enrollment and before randomization all subjects, irrespective of treatment group assignment,received fentanyl citrate injection 0.5 µg/kg to 1 µg/kg(based on age)as an analgesic pretreatment 5 minutes prior to the administration of either fospropofol disodium (Also known as,LUSEDRA and formerly known as AQUAVAN) or midazolam midazolam HCl).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Fospropofol Disodium
525 mg to 980 mg (dose based on weight and age): one initial intravenous (i.v.) bolus dose. Supplemental doses of fospropofol disodium 105 mg to 140 mg (based on weight and age) were administered as needed.
121
Midazolam
0.5 to 2 mg (dose based on weight and age): one initial i.v. bolus dose. Supplemental doses of midazolam 0.25 mg to 1 mg (based on weight and age) were administered as needed.
42
Total163

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMidazolamFospropofol DisodiumTotal
Age, Continuous45.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
45.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
45.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
American Society of Anesthesiologists Status (ASA)
I (A normal healthy patient)
19 particpants48 particpants67 particpants
American Society of Anesthesiologists Status (ASA)
II (A patient with mild systemic disease)
21 particpants71 particpants92 particpants
American Society of Anesthesiologists Status (ASA)
III (A patient with severe systemic disease)
2 particpants2 particpants4 particpants
History of Adverse Reactions following a Previous Sedation
No
37 participants111 participants148 participants
History of Adverse Reactions following a Previous Sedation
No history of sedation
3 participants7 participants10 participants
History of Adverse Reactions following a Previous Sedation
Yes
2 participants3 participants5 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
10 participants19 participants29 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
3 participants14 participants17 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
More than one race
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown or Not Reported
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
28 participants87 participants115 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
24 Participants84 Participants108 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants37 Participants55 Participants
Weight (kg)
<55
0 particpants7 particpants7 particpants
Weight (kg)
55 to > 80
14 particpants41 particpants55 particpants
Weight (kg)
>80
28 particpants73 particpants101 particpants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
104 / 12131 / 42
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 1210 / 42

Outcome results

Primary

Successful Sedation of Subjects, Defined for a Subject as Having 3 Consecutive Scores ≤ 4 on the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale and Completing the Procedure w/o Alternative Sedative Medications/w/o Manual/Mechanical Ventilation

The Modified OAA/S (MOAA/S) scale is based on a validated, 6-point rating scale. Scores are not combined. Score 5 (alert) -- responds readily to name spoken in normal tone Score 4 -- Lethargic response to name spoken in normal tone Score 3 -- Responds only after name is called loudly and/or repeatedly Score 2 -- Responds only after mild prodding or shaking Score 1 -- Responds only after painful trapezius squeeze Score 0 -- Does not respond to painful trapezius squeeze

Time frame: Sedation success was assessed at 2 minute intervals until the end of the procedure

Population: The pP1 and mITT population included all subjects randomized,received either fospropofol disodium or midazolam, had at least 1 postdose clinical assessment, and were not terminated due to the Investigator's decision for nonstudy drug related findings. A 95% confidence interval for the sedation success rate was calculated for each treatment group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
Fospropofol DisodiumSuccessful Sedation of Subjects, Defined for a Subject as Having 3 Consecutive Scores ≤ 4 on the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale and Completing the Procedure w/o Alternative Sedative Medications/w/o Manual/Mechanical VentilationpPI Population Sedation Success94.2 participants95% Confidence Interval 94.2
Fospropofol DisodiumSuccessful Sedation of Subjects, Defined for a Subject as Having 3 Consecutive Scores ≤ 4 on the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale and Completing the Procedure w/o Alternative Sedative Medications/w/o Manual/Mechanical VentilationmITT Population Sedation Success94.2 participants
MidazolamSuccessful Sedation of Subjects, Defined for a Subject as Having 3 Consecutive Scores ≤ 4 on the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale and Completing the Procedure w/o Alternative Sedative Medications/w/o Manual/Mechanical VentilationpPI Population Sedation Success78.6 participants
MidazolamSuccessful Sedation of Subjects, Defined for a Subject as Having 3 Consecutive Scores ≤ 4 on the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale and Completing the Procedure w/o Alternative Sedative Medications/w/o Manual/Mechanical VentilationmITT Population Sedation Success78.6 participants
Secondary

Time to Fully Alert From the End of the Procedure

Time to Fully Alert, defined as the time to the first of 3 consecutive Modified OAA/S scores of 5 from the end of the surgical procedure, was summarized.

Time frame: At 2-minute intervals from the end of the procedure until the subject met the criteria for Fully Alert status

Population: The primary analysis for the secondary efficacy endpoint was based on the mITT population. Missing values or incomplete data were not imputed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fospropofol DisodiumTime to Fully Alert From the End of the Procedure8.4 minutesStandard Deviation 10.9
MidazolamTime to Fully Alert From the End of the Procedure4.1 minutesStandard Deviation 5.4

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026