Skip to content

A Randomised Multi-centre Study to Compare the Long-term Performance of the Future Hip to 3 Other Implants in Primary Total Hip Replacement

A Multi-centre, Randomised, Parallel Group, Controlled Study to Compare the Performance of the Future Hip Against Three Currently Used Implants in Total Hip Replacement

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00208468
Enrollment
317
Registered
2005-09-21
Start date
2000-02-29
Completion date
2015-03-31
Last updated
2016-10-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Avascular Necrosis, Collagen Disorders, Congenital Hip Dysplasia, Nonunion of Femoral Fractures, Osteoarthritis, Perthes Disease, Post-traumatic Arthritis, Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis, Traumatic Femoral Fractures

Keywords

Hip, Cementless

Brief summary

This post-market clinical follow-up study was designed to compare hip replacement outcomes of the European Hip against 3 controls (Omniflex, Zweymuller, and Spotorno), however Omniflex did not end up being used. The first patient had surgery on February 18, 2000 and the final patient had surgery on September 2, 2005. There were 317 subjects consented but only 301 had hip replacement surgery (subjects received: 220 European hips, 33 Zweymuller, and 48 Spotorno). The study took place at three sites. Each site used their standard device as the control. The Austrian site enrolled 69 European hips and 33 Zweymuller hips. 92 European hips and 48 Spotorno hips were enrolled in Germany. Finally, the site in Italy enrolled 59 European hips. Although the study protocol intended collecting DEXA and RSA outcomes, the data collected by the sites did not include these outcomes.

Interventions

DEVICEEuropean Hip

A cementless femoral component for use in total hip replacement

DEVICEZweymüller

A cementless femoral component for use in total hip replacement

DEVICECLS Spotorno

A cementless femoral component for use in total hip replacement

Sponsors

DePuy International
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

i) Administrative - The subject is able to understand the study, is willing to give voluntary, written, informed consent, will co-operate with assessment procedures and is geographically able to comply with the post-operative follow-up regime. ii) Age - The subject's age is between 18 and 75 years inclusive. iii) Sex - Male or female subjects may be recruited to the study. iv) Diagnosis -Subjects must be undergoing primary THR surgery for non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, post-traumatic arthritis, fractured neck of femur and non-union of fractured neck of femur, SUFE or Perthes disease. v) Suitability - Subjects who in the opinion of the Investigator are considered to be suitable for treatment with the devices involved in the study.

Exclusion criteria

i) Subjects undergoing revision procedure to the operative hip. ii) Subjects who have had a previous femoral osteotomy to the operative hip. iii) Subjects who have a history of active sepsis in the joint. iv) Subjects who have been diagnosed with primary or secondary carcinomas in the last five years (excluding basal cell carcinoma or cervical carcinoma). v) Subjects with any condition which may, in the opinion of the Investigator, interfere with the total hip replacement's survival or outcome, e.g. Paget's disease, Charcot's disease. vi) Subjects with psycho-social disorders which, in the opinion of the Investigator would limit rehabilitation. vii) Subject's whose weight is \> 100kg. viii) Subjects with femoral head necrosis on the non-operated side (RSA and DEXA subjects only). ix) Subjects who have a fracture of the femur \> 6 months old (RSA and DEXA subjects only). x) Subjects diagnosed as having ankylosing spondylitis (RSA and DEXA subjects only) xi) Subjects with a known history of poor compliance to medical treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To Compare Survivorship estimates between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices through the 2 year follow-up period.2yrs post-surgeryKaplan Meier survivorship analysis estimates the proportion of a population that will survive past a certain time avoiding a certain event. In this study, the event is removal of any component for any reason, also known as revision for any reason.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Migration - Acetabular: To compare Progressive Migration between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices3 months post-opComponent moves away, continuously over time, from its immediate post-operative position.
Migration - Femoral: To compare Progressive Migration incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices3 months post-opComponent moves away, continuously over time, from its immediate post-operative position.
Implant survivorship at 5 and 10 years.5 & 10 year post-opThis post market study was terminated early; therefore the 5 and 10 year data was not collected.
To Compare Harris Hip Scores between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices.3 Months post-opThe Harris Hip score is a 0-100 point score (where 100 indicates excellent hip condition) assessing pain, function, range of motion, and absence of deformity, of the affected hip.
To Compare Harris Hip scores between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices6 Months post-opThe Harris Hip score is a 0-100 point score (where 100 indicates excellent hip condition) assessing pain, function, range of motion, and absence of deformity, of the affected hip.
To Compare Harris Hip Scores between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices12 months post-opThe Harris Hip score is a 0-100 point score (where 100 indicates excellent hip condition) assessing pain, function, range of motion, and absence of deformity, of the affected hip.
To Compare Oxford Hip Scores between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices3 months post-opThe Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a 12 to 60 patient recorded outcome (PRO) score (where 12 indicates the best outcome) that evaluates pain and function of the affected hip.
To compare Acetabular Socket Wear between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices3 months post-opLinear wear, measured in millimeters (mm) of the femoral head into the acetabular socket.
Progressive Radiolucent Zone(s) - Acetabulum: To compare Progressive Radiolucent Zone(s) incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices3 months post-opWidth of lucency increases over time or expands lengthwise (into neighboring zones).
Progressive Osteolysis - Femur: To compare Progressive Osteolysis incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices3 months post-opComponent moves away, continuously over time, from its immediate post-operative position.
Progressive Osteolysis - Acetabulum: To compare Progressive Osteolysis incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices3 months post-opComponent moves away, continuously over time, from its immediate post-operative position.
Trochanteric Non-Union - Femur: To compare Trochanteric Non-union incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices3 months post-opTrochanter portion of the bone does not heal correctly to proximal portion of the femoral shaft. Typically, after 6 months the lack of correct healing is classified as a 'non-union'.
To compare Femoral Stem Orientation between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices.3 months post-opAlignment is classified into 1 of 3 categories - Neutral, Varus (distal tip of stem lateral to mid-line of femur), or Valgus (distal tip of stem medial to mid-line of femur).
To compare Brooker Ectopic Ossification between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices.3 months post-opPresented by Brooker in JBJS 55a: 1629-1632 (1973). Soft tissue or bone bridging causing immobilization in severe cases; categorized into classes I to IV with I being islands of bone around soft tissue, and IV representing ankylosis of the hip.
Progressive Radiolucent Zone(s) - Femur: To compare Progressive Radiolucent Zone(s) incidence between subjects receiving the European, Spotorno, and Zweymuller hip devices3 months post-opWidth of lucency increases over time or expands lengthwise (into neighboring zones).

Countries

Austria, Germany, Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026