Skip to content

A Study of Safety and Efficacy of CNTO 148 in Patients With Severe Persistent Asthma

A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Dose-ranging Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of CNTO 148 Administered Subcutaneously in Symptomatic Subjects With Severe Persistent Asthma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00207740
Enrollment
309
Registered
2005-09-21
Start date
2004-08-31
Completion date
2007-07-31
Last updated
2012-08-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Keywords

Asthma, Severe Persistent Asthma, Subcutaneous injections, Immunology disorder, Breathlesness

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of CNTO 148 (golimumab) in patients with severe persistent asthma.

Detailed description

This is a multicenter, randomized (the study medication is assigned by chance), double-blind (neither physician nor patient knows the treatment that the patient receives), placebo-controlled (an inactive substance that is compared with a drug to test whether the drug has a real effect in a clinical study), parallel-group (each group of patients will be treated at the same time), dose-ranging study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CNTO 148. The study will consists of run-in phase (2 weeks), treatment period (52 weeks) and follow up period (24 weeks). The patients inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) medication will be standardized in the run-in phase and the treatment period contains first 24 weeks of treatment, the patients are required to remain on stable doses of concomitant corticosteroids (CS) medication (steroid stable phase). The steroid stable phase is followed by a 28-week steroid taper phase, during which a reduction of concomitant CS medication will be attempted. After completion of the study treatment, patients are to be followed for an additional 24 weeks. Patients will receive subcutaneous injections of 75, 150, or 300 mg of CNTO 148 or placebo every 4 weeks for 52 weeks followed 50,100, or 200 mg every 4 weeks through week 52. The safety of the patient will be monitored throughout the study.

Interventions

DRUGCNTO148

Type=exact type, unit=mg, number=50, 75, 100, 150, 200 and 300, form=injection, route=subcutaneous. Every 4 weeks partciapnts will receive injections in 4 parallel treatment arms

DRUGPlacebo

Type=exact type, unit=mg, form=injection, route=subcutaneous. Placebo will be given from from Week 0 through Week 52.

Sponsors

Centocor BV
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Centocor, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Physician diagnosis of asthma for greater than or equal to 3 years and a diagnosis of severe persistent asthma forgreater than or equal to 1 year prior to screening * Continuous treatment with high dose Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long acting beta-agonist for at least 3 months prior to screening * Have evidence of at least 1 of the following in the 5 years prior to screening or during screening, reversible airway obstruction greater than or equal to 12 percentage change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) postbronchodilator; Diurnal variation in peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) greater than or equal to 30 percentage change) and airway hyperresponsiveness * Estimated frequency of symptoms on more than one-third of days for at least 3 months prior to screening (eg, wheezing, breathlessness, chest tightness, cough, nocturnal awakening) despite treatment with high dose ICS and long-acting β2-agonist (LABA), with or without continuous oral corticosteroids * Score of greater than or equal to 2 points on the asthma control questionnaire at screening.

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmoanry disease (COPD), cystic fibrosis, or other significant respiratory disorder * Worsening of asthma symptoms that required treatment with an addition or increase in oral corticosteroids dose (steroid burst) in the 4-week period prior to the screening visit * Life-threatening asthma attack requiring cardiopulmonary support (eg, intubation) in the 6-month period prior to screening * Have ever used alkylating agents (eg, chlorambucil or cyclophosphamide) * Concomitant diagnosis or any history of congestive heart failure (CHF), including medically controlled CHF.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Prebronchodilator Clinic-Measured, Percent-Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 SecondBaseline and Week 24The endpoint is change from baseline in prebronchodilator clinic-measured percent predicted Percent-Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) with Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) at 6 months. The baseline visit starts at the end of 2 weeks run in phase.
Number of Severe Asthma Exacerbations Per Patient From Baseline Through 6 MonthsBaseline to Week 24The endpoint is the average number of severe asthma exacerbations per patient from baseline through 6 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Severe Asthma Exacerbations Per Patient From Week 24 Through Week 52; Randomized Patients Who Did Not Discontinue Study Participation Prior to Week 24Week 24 to Week 52The endpoint is the average number of severe asthma exacerbations per patient from Week (Wk) 24 through Wk 52 for the patients who did not discontinue study participation prior to Wk 24
Change From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire Score at 6 Months; Randomized PatientsBaseline to Week 24The endpoint is the change from baseline in the overall Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) score at 6 months. The AQLQ is a validated and self-administered questionnaire to evaluate symptoms and Quality of Life (QOL) in subjects with asthma and it has 32 questions in 4 domains (symptoms, activity limitations, emotional function, and environmental stimuli). Participants were asked to score the importance of each of the positively identified problems on a 7-point scale (7 = not impaired at all - 1 = severely impaired).
Change From Baseline in Domiciliary Morning Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) at 6 Months; Randomized SubjectsBaseline to Week 24The endpoint is the change from baseline in domiciliary morning PEFR at Week 24. PEFR- Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR): A measure of the speed of exhalation. The data were collected in the eDiary which was issued to each participant at screening. PEFR was collected morning and evening each day of the study.
Change From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroids Dose at Week 52; Randomized Patients Who Received Oral Corticosteroids at BaselineBaseline and Week 52The endpoint is the change from baseline at Week (Wk) 52 in oral corticosteroids (OCS) dose for the randomized patients who received OCS at baseline.
Change From Baseline in Rescue Medication Use at 6 Months; Randomized PatientsBaseline to Week 24The endpoint is change from baseline in rescue medication use at Wk 24 where the rescue medication use was based on the average over 7 days prior to visit.

Countries

Belgium, Bulgaria, Czechia, France, Germany, Hungary, Netherlands, Poland, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 309 patients were randomized into 4 parallel treatment groups at 53 sites (134 patients at 27 sites in the US and 175 patients at 26 sites in Europe). The first patient was consented on 31 Aug 2004, and the last patient completed the study on 17 Jul 2007.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group I: Placebo
Placebo subcutaneous (SC) injections every 4 weeks (Wks) from week (Wk) 0 to Wk 52
78
Group II: Golimumab 50 mg
Golimumab (CNTO148) 75 mg SC injection at Wk 0 followed by 50 mg SC injections every 4 Wks to Wk 52
77
Group III: Golimumab 100 mg
Golimumab 150 mg SC injection at Wk 0 followed by 100 mg SC injections every 4 Wks to Wk 52
76
Group IV: Golimumab 200 mg
Golimumab 300 mg SC injection at Wk 0 followed by 200 mg SC injections every 4 Wks to Wk 52
78
Total309

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event4141411
Overall StudyDeath0001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up0211
Overall StudyOther21075
Overall StudySponsor Directive22151621
Overall StudyUnsatisfactory therapeutic effect1024

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup I: PlaceboGroup II: Golimumab 50 mgGroup III: Golimumab 100 mgGroup IV: Golimumab 200 mgTotal
Age Continuous49.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.03
49.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.26
49.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.85
52.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.26
50.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.14
Sex: Female, Male
Female
42 Participants46 Participants39 Participants46 Participants173 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
36 Participants31 Participants37 Participants32 Participants136 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
75 / 7868 / 7575 / 7875 / 78
serious
Total, serious adverse events
16 / 7824 / 7524 / 7822 / 78

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Prebronchodilator Clinic-Measured, Percent-Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second

The endpoint is change from baseline in prebronchodilator clinic-measured percent predicted Percent-Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) with Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) at 6 months. The baseline visit starts at the end of 2 weeks run in phase.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

Population: The analysis of this endpoint uses intent-to-treat population. Missing data were imputed using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF).

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Group I: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Prebronchodilator Clinic-Measured, Percent-Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second2.44 Percent predicted
Group II: Golimumab 50 mgChange From Baseline in Prebronchodilator Clinic-Measured, Percent-Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second0.48 Percent predicted
Group III: Golimumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in Prebronchodilator Clinic-Measured, Percent-Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second3.22 Percent predicted
Group IV: Golimumab 200 mgChange From Baseline in Prebronchodilator Clinic-Measured, Percent-Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second2.59 Percent predicted
Combined: Group III & IVChange From Baseline in Prebronchodilator Clinic-Measured, Percent-Predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second2.91 Percent predicted
Comparison: The null hypothesis was that the endpoint for placebo is the same as that for combined 100 mg and 200 mg golimumab. Assuming a standard deviation of 23%, there is 86% power to detect a 10% difference at a 0.05 significance level.p-value: 0.802ANCOVA
Comparison: This is a secondary analysis.p-value: 0.945ANCOVA
Comparison: This is a secondary analysis.p-value: 0.717ANCOVA
Comparison: This is a secondary analysis.p-value: 0.357ANCOVA
Primary

Number of Severe Asthma Exacerbations Per Patient From Baseline Through 6 Months

The endpoint is the average number of severe asthma exacerbations per patient from baseline through 6 months.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: The analysis of this endpoint uses intent-to-treat population. For the dropouts, the worst case in similar patients was used as the number of severe exacerbations.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group I: PlaceboNumber of Severe Asthma Exacerbations Per Patient From Baseline Through 6 Months0.5 Events per patient through week (Wk) 24Standard Deviation 1.07
Group II: Golimumab 50 mgNumber of Severe Asthma Exacerbations Per Patient From Baseline Through 6 Months0.7 Events per patient through week (Wk) 24Standard Deviation 1.18
Group III: Golimumab 100 mgNumber of Severe Asthma Exacerbations Per Patient From Baseline Through 6 Months0.4 Events per patient through week (Wk) 24Standard Deviation 0.85
Group IV: Golimumab 200 mgNumber of Severe Asthma Exacerbations Per Patient From Baseline Through 6 Months0.5 Events per patient through week (Wk) 24Standard Deviation 1.08
Combined: Group III & IVNumber of Severe Asthma Exacerbations Per Patient From Baseline Through 6 Months0.5 Events per patient through week (Wk) 24Standard Deviation 0.97
Comparison: The null hypothesis was that the number of severe exacerbations per patient from baseline through week 24 for placebo is the same as that in the combined 100 mg and 200 mg golimumab. Assuming 1 severe exacerbation over 6 months per patient in the placebo group, there is 79% power to detect a 35% reduction in the combined 100 mg and 200 mg golimumab group at a 0.05 significance level.p-value: 0.718Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: This is a secondary analysis.p-value: 0.779Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: This is a secondary analysis.p-value: 0.649Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: This is a secondary analysis.p-value: 0.256Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire Score at 6 Months; Randomized Patients

The endpoint is the change from baseline in the overall Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) score at 6 months. The AQLQ is a validated and self-administered questionnaire to evaluate symptoms and Quality of Life (QOL) in subjects with asthma and it has 32 questions in 4 domains (symptoms, activity limitations, emotional function, and environmental stimuli). Participants were asked to score the importance of each of the positively identified problems on a 7-point scale (7 = not impaired at all - 1 = severely impaired).

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: The analysis of this endpoint uses intent-to-treat population. Missing data were imputed using last observation carried forward.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Group I: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire Score at 6 Months; Randomized Patients0.42 Points on scale
Group II: Golimumab 50 mgChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire Score at 6 Months; Randomized Patients0.53 Points on scale
Group III: Golimumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire Score at 6 Months; Randomized Patients0.86 Points on scale
Group IV: Golimumab 200 mgChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire Score at 6 Months; Randomized Patients0.55 Points on scale
Combined: Group III & IVChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire Score at 6 Months; Randomized Patients0.66 Points on scale
Comparison: The null hypothesis was that the endpoint for placebo is the same as that in the combined 100 mg and 200 mg golimumab.p-value: 0.286Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.742Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.128Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.946Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Domiciliary Morning Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) at 6 Months; Randomized Subjects

The endpoint is the change from baseline in domiciliary morning PEFR at Week 24. PEFR- Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR): A measure of the speed of exhalation. The data were collected in the eDiary which was issued to each participant at screening. PEFR was collected morning and evening each day of the study.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: The analysis of this endpoint uses intent-to-treat population. Missing data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group I: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Domiciliary Morning Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) at 6 Months; Randomized Subjects4.730 L/minStandard Deviation 60.9136
Group II: Golimumab 50 mgChange From Baseline in Domiciliary Morning Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) at 6 Months; Randomized Subjects8.102 L/minStandard Deviation 58.0602
Group III: Golimumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in Domiciliary Morning Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) at 6 Months; Randomized Subjects3.488 L/minStandard Deviation 60.1336
Group IV: Golimumab 200 mgChange From Baseline in Domiciliary Morning Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) at 6 Months; Randomized Subjects2.475 L/minStandard Deviation 59.7923
Combined: Group III & IVChange From Baseline in Domiciliary Morning Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) at 6 Months; Randomized Subjects2.975 L/minStandard Deviation 59.7668
Comparison: The null hypothesis was that the endpoint for placebo is the same as that in the combined 100 mg and 200 mg golimumab.p-value: 0.833ANOVA
p-value: 0.814ANOVA
p-value: 0.897ANOVA
p-value: 0.726ANOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroids Dose at Week 52; Randomized Patients Who Received Oral Corticosteroids at Baseline

The endpoint is the change from baseline at Week (Wk) 52 in oral corticosteroids (OCS) dose for the randomized patients who received OCS at baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: Analysis of this endpoint includes only pts who received OCS at baseline.Wk 52 OCS dose is the daily OCS dose in the last period, defined as between 2 consecutive visits, in which no change in total daily dose of OCS occurred, prior to Wk 52 visit.Data from Wk 24-52 must be interpreted with caution as study agent was stopped at various timepoints.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Group I: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroids Dose at Week 52; Randomized Patients Who Received Oral Corticosteroids at Baseline-5.000 mg/day P. Eq.
Group II: Golimumab 50 mgChange From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroids Dose at Week 52; Randomized Patients Who Received Oral Corticosteroids at Baseline0.000 mg/day P. Eq.
Group III: Golimumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroids Dose at Week 52; Randomized Patients Who Received Oral Corticosteroids at Baseline-4.550 mg/day P. Eq.
Group IV: Golimumab 200 mgChange From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroids Dose at Week 52; Randomized Patients Who Received Oral Corticosteroids at Baseline-3.750 mg/day P. Eq.
Combined: Group III & IVChange From Baseline in Oral Corticosteroids Dose at Week 52; Randomized Patients Who Received Oral Corticosteroids at Baseline-4.550 mg/day P. Eq.
Comparison: The null hypothesis was that the endpoint for placebo is the same as that in the combined 100 mg and 200 mg golimumab.p-value: 0.986Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.82Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.858Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.021Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Rescue Medication Use at 6 Months; Randomized Patients

The endpoint is change from baseline in rescue medication use at Wk 24 where the rescue medication use was based on the average over 7 days prior to visit.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

Population: The analysis of this endpoint uses intent-to-treat population. Missing data were imputed using last observation carried forward.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Group I: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Rescue Medication Use at 6 Months; Randomized Patients-0.54 Puffs/day
Group II: Golimumab 50 mgChange From Baseline in Rescue Medication Use at 6 Months; Randomized Patients-0.71 Puffs/day
Group III: Golimumab 100 mgChange From Baseline in Rescue Medication Use at 6 Months; Randomized Patients-0.29 Puffs/day
Group IV: Golimumab 200 mgChange From Baseline in Rescue Medication Use at 6 Months; Randomized Patients-0.14 Puffs/day
Combined: Group III & IVChange From Baseline in Rescue Medication Use at 6 Months; Randomized Patients-0.21 Puffs/day
Comparison: The null hypothesis was that the endpoint for placebo is the same as that in the combined 100 mg and 200 mg golimumab.p-value: 0.894Kruskal-Wallis
p-value: 0.572Kruskal-Wallis
p-value: 0.731Kruskal-Wallis
p-value: 0.856Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

Number of Severe Asthma Exacerbations Per Patient From Week 24 Through Week 52; Randomized Patients Who Did Not Discontinue Study Participation Prior to Week 24

The endpoint is the average number of severe asthma exacerbations per patient from Week (Wk) 24 through Wk 52 for the patients who did not discontinue study participation prior to Wk 24

Time frame: Week 24 to Week 52

Population: Analysis of this endpoint only includes patients (pts) who did not discontinue study participation prior to Wk 24. For the dropouts during the period between Wks 24- 52, worst case in similar pts was used as the number of severe exacerbations. Data from Wk 24-52 must be interpreted with caution as study agent was stopped at various study timepoints

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group I: PlaceboNumber of Severe Asthma Exacerbations Per Patient From Week 24 Through Week 52; Randomized Patients Who Did Not Discontinue Study Participation Prior to Week 240.6 Events per patient from Wk 24 thru Wk 52Standard Deviation 1.02
Group II: Golimumab 50 mgNumber of Severe Asthma Exacerbations Per Patient From Week 24 Through Week 52; Randomized Patients Who Did Not Discontinue Study Participation Prior to Week 240.8 Events per patient from Wk 24 thru Wk 52Standard Deviation 1.23
Group III: Golimumab 100 mgNumber of Severe Asthma Exacerbations Per Patient From Week 24 Through Week 52; Randomized Patients Who Did Not Discontinue Study Participation Prior to Week 240.9 Events per patient from Wk 24 thru Wk 52Standard Deviation 1.18
Group IV: Golimumab 200 mgNumber of Severe Asthma Exacerbations Per Patient From Week 24 Through Week 52; Randomized Patients Who Did Not Discontinue Study Participation Prior to Week 240.8 Events per patient from Wk 24 thru Wk 52Standard Deviation 1.01
Combined: Group III & IVNumber of Severe Asthma Exacerbations Per Patient From Week 24 Through Week 52; Randomized Patients Who Did Not Discontinue Study Participation Prior to Week 240.9 Events per patient from Wk 24 thru Wk 52Standard Deviation 1.09
Comparison: The null hypothesis was that the endpoint for placebo is the same as that in the combined 100 mg and 200 mg golimumab.p-value: 0.273Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.382Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.35Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.341Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 3, 2026