Skip to content

An Efficacy and Safety Study of CNTO 148 Subcutaneous Injection Compared With Placebo in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

A Randomized, Double-blind, Dose-ranging Trial of CNTO 148 Subcutaneous Injection Compared With Placebo in Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Treatment With Methotrexate

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00207714
Enrollment
172
Registered
2005-09-21
Start date
2003-11-30
Completion date
2006-02-28
Last updated
2012-10-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

Rheumatoid Arthritis, CNTO 148, Methotrexate, Joint pain, Arthritis

Brief summary

Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 5-arm, dose-ranging study to assess the efficacy of subcutaneous injections of Golimumab (CNTO 148), 50 or 100 mg, at either 2- or 4- week intervals in subjects with active RA despite MTX therapy.

Detailed description

This is an experimental medical research study. The purpose of this study is to determine if Golimumab is safe and effective in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Subjects will receive subcutaneous injections of either 50 or 100 mg Golimumab or placebo every two or four weeks or an infusion of infliximab at week 20, 22, 28, 36, 44 for 48 weeks

Interventions

DRUGGolimumab

Type=exact, unit=mg/ml, number= 50 to 100 , form=powder for solution for infusion, route=sub cutaneous.

DRUGMTX

Type=exact, unit=mg/ml, number= 10, form=powder for solution for infusion, route=sub cutaneous

DRUGPlacebo

Type=exact, unit=mg/ml, form=powder for solution for infusion, route=sub cutaneous

DRUGInfliximab

Type=exact, unit=mg/ml number= 10, form=powder for solution for infusion, route=sub cutaneous

Sponsors

Centocor BV
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Centocor, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of RA according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria for at least 3 months prior to screening * Have active Rheumatoid Arthritis at the time of screening and at baseline, as defined by 6 or more swollen joints and 6 or more tender joints and additional laboratory criteria

Exclusion criteria

* Have other inflammatory diseases, including but not limited to ankylosing spondylitis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Lyme disease * Received disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (\[DMARDs\] eg, D penicillamine, hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, oral or parenteral gold, interleukin \[IL\]-1 receptor antagonist \[anakinra\], azathioprine, sulphasalazine, agents other than MTX) within 4 weeks prior to the first study dose

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR 20) Response at Week 16Week 16ACR 20 response is a decrease of at least 20 per cent in both tender and swollen joint count and in 3 to 5 assessments (participant's assessment of pain visual analog scale \[VAS\] with 0, no pain to 10, worst pain; patient's and physician's global assessment of disease activity VAS scales: overall disease activity \[0, very well to 10, very poor and 0, no arthritis activity to 10, extremely active, respectively\]; Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\]: 20-questions on life activities \[0, no difficulty to 3, inability to perform a task\]; C-reactive protein\[CRP\]).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Summary of ACR-N, Index of Improvement at Week 16Week 16The ACR-N index of improvement is the minimum of the following: 1) the percent decrease from baseline in tender joint counts; 2) the percent decrease from baseline in swollen joint counts; 3) the median percent decrease from baseline for the following: a. Patient's assessment of pain as measured on a 10 cm visual assessment scale (0-10, 10 worst pain) Patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 0-10); c. Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 0-10) d. Physical function as measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire; e. C-Reactive Protein measurement.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 172 participants were randomly assigned to treatments at 33 sites: 16 in North America (13 in the US and 3 in Canada), 12 in Europe (3 in Belgium, 4 in the UK, 5 in Germany), and 5 in Australia. The study period extended from 01 Dec 2003 to 21 Feb 2006.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group I: Placebo Crossover to Infliximab
Placebo subcutaneous (SC) injections every 2 weeks (Wks) from Week (Wk) 0 thru Wk 18 plus Methotrexate (MTX) (Wks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, and 18); after all study evaluations at Wk 20, open-label infliximab intravenous (IV) infusions: 3 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) at Wks 20, 22, 28 and then every 8 Wks thru Wk 44. Continue stable dose of MTX throughout the study.
35
Group II: Golimumab 50 mg Every 4 Weeks
Golimumab (CNTO148) 50 milligram (mg) SC injections every 4 Wks from Wk 0 thru Wk 18 plus MTX (Wks 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16); Placebo SC injections were to be administered at interim visits (Wks 2, 6, 10, 14, and 18) plus MTX. Participants continued at 50 mg of golimumab at Wk 20, and then every 4 Wks thru Wk 48. Continue stable dose of MTX throughout the study. Participants remained blinded thru the end of study. Also referred to as Group II: golimumab 50 mg plus placebo every 4 Wks.
35
Group III: Golimumab 50 mg Every 2 or 4 Weeks
Golimumab 50 mg SC injections every 2 Wks from Wk 0 thru Wk 18 plus MTX (Wks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, and 18); Participants continued at 50 mg of golimumab at Wk 20, and then every 4 Wks through Wk 48. Continue stable dose of MTX throughout the study. Participants remained blinded thru the end of study. Also referred to as GroupIII: Golimumab 50 mg every 2 or 4 Wks.
34
Group IV: Golibumab 100 mg Every 4 Weeks
Golimumab 100 mg SC injections every 4 Wks thru Wk 18 plus MTX (Wks 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16); Placebo SC injections were to be administered at interim visits (Wks 2, 6, 10, 14, and 18) plus MTX. Participants continued at 100 mg of golimumab at Wk 20, and then every 4 Wks through Wk 48. Continue stable dose of MTX throughout the study. Participants remained blinded through the end of study. Also referred to as Group IV: golimumab 100 mg plus placebo every 4 Wks.
34
Group V: Golimumab 100 mg Every 2 or 4 Weeks
Golimumab 100 mg SC injections every 2 Wks from Wk 0 thru Wk 18 plus MTX (Wks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, and 18); Participants continued at 100 mg of golimumab at Wk 20, and then every 4 Wks through Wk 48. Continue stable dose of MTX throughout the study. Participants remained blinded thru the end of study. Also referred to as Group V: Golimumab 100 mg every 2 or 4 Wks.
34
Total172

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Overall StudyAdverse Event62431
Overall StudyOther32510
Overall StudyUnsatisfactory therapeutic effect53144

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup I: Placebo Crossover to InfliximabGroup II: Golimumab 50 mg Every 4 WeeksGroup III: Golimumab 50 mg Every 2 or 4 WeeksGroup IV: Golibumab 100 mg Every 4 WeeksGroup V: Golimumab 100 mg Every 2 or 4 WeeksTotal
Age Continuous53.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
56.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
50.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
56.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
54.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1
54.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants30 Participants23 Participants26 Participants27 Participants132 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants5 Participants11 Participants8 Participants7 Participants40 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
28 / 3434 / 3729 / 3229 / 3333 / 35
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 347 / 375 / 325 / 335 / 35

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR 20) Response at Week 16

ACR 20 response is a decrease of at least 20 per cent in both tender and swollen joint count and in 3 to 5 assessments (participant's assessment of pain visual analog scale \[VAS\] with 0, no pain to 10, worst pain; patient's and physician's global assessment of disease activity VAS scales: overall disease activity \[0, very well to 10, very poor and 0, no arthritis activity to 10, extremely active, respectively\]; Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\]: 20-questions on life activities \[0, no difficulty to 3, inability to perform a task\]; C-reactive protein\[CRP\]).

Time frame: Week 16

Population: Intent to treat (ITT). Participants considered non-responder if used any pre-specified prohibited medications or discontinued subcutaneous (SC) study agent due to lack of efficacy. Missing ACR components were imputed by Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) unless all ACR components are missing in which case considered non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group I: Placebo Crossover to InfliximabNumber of Participants Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR 20) Response at Week 1613 Participants
Group II: Golimumab 50 mg Every 4 WeeksNumber of Participants Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR 20) Response at Week 1621 Participants
Group III: Golimumab 50 mg Every 2 or 4 WeeksNumber of Participants Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR 20) Response at Week 1617 Participants
Group IV: Golibumab 100 mg Every 4 WeeksNumber of Participants Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR 20) Response at Week 1619 Participants
Group V: Golimumab 100 mg Every 2 or 4 WeeksNumber of Participants Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR 20) Response at Week 1627 Participants
Combined: Groups II, III, IV & VNumber of Participants Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR 20) Response at Week 1684 Participants
Comparison: Null hypothesis: No difference in ACR 20 response at Week 16 between combined golimumab groups and Placebo +MTX group. Sample of 35 participants per treatment groups (140 in combined golimumab group and 35 in Placebo +MTX group) provides greater than 90% power assuming 60% golimumab response and 25 % response in Placebo +MTX.p-value: 0.01Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Null hypothesis: No difference in ACR 20 response at Wk 16 between golimumab 50 mg every 4 weeks and Placebo + MTX. Sample of 35 participants per treatment groups (140 in combined golimumab group and 35 in Placebo +MTX group) provides greater than 90% power assuming 60% golimumab response and 25% response in placebo.p-value: 0.056Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Null hypothesis: No difference in ACR 20 response at Wk 16 between Golimumab 50 mg every 2 or 4 Weeks and Placebo + MTX. Sample of 35 participants per treatment groups (140 in combined golimumab group and 35 in Placebo +MTX group) provides greater than 90% power assuming 60% golimumab response and 25% response in placebo.p-value: 0.281Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Null hypothesis: No difference in ACR 20 response at Wk 16 between Golimumab 100 mg every 4 weeks and Placebo + MTX. Sample of 35 participants per treatment groups (140 in combined golimumab group and 35 in Placebo +MTX group) provides greater than 90% power assuming 60% golimumab response and 25% response in placebo.p-value: 0.119Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Null hypothesis: No difference in ACR 20 response at Wk 16 between Golimumab 100 mg every 2 or 4 Weeks and Placebo + MTX. Sample of 35 participants per treatment groups (140 in combined golimumab group and 35 in Placebo +MTX group) provides greater than 90% power assuming 60% golimumab response and 25% response in placebo.p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Summary of ACR-N, Index of Improvement at Week 16

The ACR-N index of improvement is the minimum of the following: 1) the percent decrease from baseline in tender joint counts; 2) the percent decrease from baseline in swollen joint counts; 3) the median percent decrease from baseline for the following: a. Patient's assessment of pain as measured on a 10 cm visual assessment scale (0-10, 10 worst pain) Patient's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 0-10); c. Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS 0-10) d. Physical function as measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire; e. C-Reactive Protein measurement.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) and missing ACR components were imputed by LOCF unless all ACR components are missing in which case considered non-responders. The joint evaluability rules were also applied.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Group I: Placebo Crossover to InfliximabSummary of ACR-N, Index of Improvement at Week 160.0 Scores on scale
Group II: Golimumab 50 mg Every 4 WeeksSummary of ACR-N, Index of Improvement at Week 1637.4 Scores on scale
Group III: Golimumab 50 mg Every 2 or 4 WeeksSummary of ACR-N, Index of Improvement at Week 1619.4 Scores on scale
Group IV: Golibumab 100 mg Every 4 WeeksSummary of ACR-N, Index of Improvement at Week 1622.3 Scores on scale
Group V: Golimumab 100 mg Every 2 or 4 WeeksSummary of ACR-N, Index of Improvement at Week 1635.6 Scores on scale
Combined: Groups II, III, IV & VSummary of ACR-N, Index of Improvement at Week 1633.3 Scores on scale
Comparison: No difference in ACRn scores measured as percentage of improvement from baseline at Week 16 between Placebo + MTX and combined golimumab groups.p-value: 0.001ANOVA on van der Waerden normal scores.
Comparison: No difference in ACRn scores measured as percentage of improvement from baseline at Week 16 between Placebo + MTX and Golimumab 50 mg every 4 weeksp-value: 0.006ANOVA on van der Waerden normal scores.
Comparison: No difference in ACRn scores measured as percentage of improvement from baseline at Week 16 between Placebo + MTX and Golimumab 50 mg every 2 or 4 Weeksp-value: 0.095ANOVA on van der Waerden normal scores.
Comparison: No difference in ACRn scores measured as percentage of improvement from baseline at Week 16 between Placebo + MTX Golibumab 100 mg every 4 weeksp-value: 0.01ANOVA on van der Waerden normal scores.
Comparison: No difference in ACRn scores measured as percentage of improvement from baseline at Week 16 between Placebo + MTX Golimumab 100 mg every 2 or 4 Weeksp-value: <0.001ANOVA on van der Waerden normal scores.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026