Skip to content

Antiepileptic Drug Carbamazepine in Treatment of Bronchial Asthma

Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Double Blind Study of Carbamazepine in Treatment of Bronchial Asthma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00207428
Enrollment
65
Registered
2005-09-21
Start date
1999-08-31
Completion date
2000-04-30
Last updated
2006-05-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bronchial Asthma

Keywords

Bronchial asthma, Carbamazepine, Efficacy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was evaluation the efficacy of antiepileptic drug carbamazepine in the treatment of mild-to-severe bronchial asthma.

Detailed description

Effective therapy of asthma still remains quite serious problem. According current opinion of leading specialists, asthma is an inflammatory disorder. But asthma also is a paroxysmal disorder: many specialists underline paroxysmal clinical picture of asthma. According to some authors, neurogenic inflammation may play important role in asthma mechanism. But migraine and trigeminal neuralgia are also neurogenic inflammatory paroxysmal diseases, and some antiepileptic drugs, like carbamazepine and valproates, are very effective in therapy of these diseases - more than in 80% of cases. If bronchial asthma also is paroxysmal inflammatory disease, we can suppose a possibility that some antiepileptic drugs also may show high efficacy in asthma therapy. Taken in consideration this hypothesis, we performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled 3-month trial for evaluation of carbamazepine efficacy in treatment of patients with mild-to-severe bronchial asthma. Comparison: Patients received investigational drug in addition to their usual routine antiasthmatic treatment, compared to patients received placebo in addition to their usual routine antiasthmatic treatment.

Interventions

DRUGCarbamazepine

Sponsors

Rea Rehabilitation Centre, Georgia
CollaboratorOTHER
Centre of Chinese Medicine, Georgia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Out patients * Bronchial asthma has been known at least for 1 year * Absence of long-term remissions of asthma (lasting more than 1 month) * Poorly controlled asthma, due to various reasons * Non-smokers

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of concomitant acute or chronic severe diseases * Abnormal baseline haematology, blood chemistry or urinalysis * Allergy or adverse reactions to investigational drug * Age younger than 16 years old * Long-term history of smoking * Pregnancy or lactating

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
At 3 months of treatment: Change from baseline of the PEFR (also %predicted); Number of patients without asthma symptoms

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
At 3 months of treatment: PEFR before and after salbutamol inhalation;
Difference in PEFR pm-am (in %); The daily (daytime and night-time) symptoms scores; Use of other antiasthmatic medication

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026