Skip to content

Lantus in the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes Children

Conventional Insulin Therapy Vs Intensive Insulin Management In Children With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00206401
Enrollment
60
Registered
2005-09-21
Start date
2004-11-30
Completion date
2006-10-31
Last updated
2016-07-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 1 Diabetes

Keywords

Adolescents, Lantus

Brief summary

In this study, we plan to examine the difference in effect on blood glucose control in patients who will be on either conventional insulin therapy (i.e. using NPH and Humalog twice daily, injected separately) or on intensive insulin management (IIM-several shots of short acting and Glargine insulin). Those on IIM will be mixing the insulin Glargine with the short-acting insulin analog prior to injecting. The Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) results will be used to monitor blood glucose control over a 6 month period. Twice during the course of the study, a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS-a device the size of a pager that records blood sugar readings every 5 minutes) will be used to record all the changes in the blood glucose levels occurring over a 72-hour period.

Detailed description

The landmark report of the diabetes control and complications trial (DCCT) trial has shown that intensive management delays and/or prevents complications in small vessels associated with Type 1 diabetes (T1DM). To achieve the goals of the DCCT, a number of new insulin analogs( man-made insulins ) are now being incorporated into the management of patients with T1DM. These insulin analogs are gaining importance with their ability to overcome the major obstacle to intensive insulin therapy, namely low blood glucose. In particular, insulin Glargine, considered a basal insulin, is being extensively used for management as an alternative to continuous insulin therapy injected into the tissue just below the skin. The major drawback to using insulin Glargine is that it has to be given as a separate injection and cannot be mixed with other insulins. This results in the undesirable administration of multiple insulin injections to a child with diabetes making the therapeutic plan more complex and adhering to the treatment plan more difficult. In a previous study, (now accepted for publication in a leading diabetes journal, Diabetes Care), we have demonstrated, using continuous glucose monitoring system, that there is no significant difference in glucose concentrations (ie. high and low blood glucose episodes) when insulin Glargine is administered either mixed with a short-acting insulin analog or when giving it as a separate injection.

Interventions

DRUGLantus and short acting analogs Vs NPH and short acting analogs

Sponsors

Baylor College of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age greater than 6 years of age but less than 25 years of age (Insulin glargine has been approved for use in children 6 years and older). * Patients newly diagnosed with T1DM within the past 3 months. * Have an HgbA1c of less than 9.0%, after the initial run-in period of 3 months. * Have a BMI of less than the 90th percentile for age. * Randomization of subjects willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Any chronic disease (leukemia, asthma, inflammatory bowel disease, cystic fibrosis, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, etc) that directly, or as a result of treatment, directly or indirectly affect glucose homeostasis. * Lack of supportive family. * Evidence or history of chemical abuse. * Age less than 6 years or greater than 25 years. * HbA1c level of greater than 9.0%, after the initial run-in period of 3 months. * Have a BMI greater than the 90th percentile for age. * Patients who are not newly diagnosed with T1DM.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
HbA1C

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Glucose excursions

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026