Cardiovascular Diseases, Insulin Resistance, Metabolic Syndrome X, Obesity
Conditions
Keywords
Inflammatory markers, oral contraceptions, obesity, metabolic syndrome X
Brief summary
Oral contraceptives (OCs) are the most widely used method of reversible birth control. However, the long-term cardiovascular safety of the widely used low-dose OCs (ethinyl-estradiol \< 50 mcg) is still debated. Although cardiovascular events are rare in young women whether they use OCs or not, the risks of myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke are increased among users of OCs who have conventional cardiovascular risk factors such as use of tobacco, diabetes or hypercholesterolemia. However, the risk of cardiovascular events in OC users with emerging cardiovascular risk factors (such as obesity and the metabolic syndrome) have not been investigated. Recently, the metabolic syndrome has been linked with the risk of cardiovascular disease. The syndrome is a clustering of risk factors in a single individual, and its underlying cause may be insulin resistance. Whether the metabolic syndrome predicts a higher cardiovascular risk in OC users has not been studied. This is a critical problem because the metabolic syndrome is prevalent in 24% of adults. Until the cardiovascular risks in users of OC are clearly defined, the appropriate use of OC with the least harm would not be possible. The investigator's long-term goal is to understand the best way to prevent and treat cardiovascular disease in women. The objective of this particular project is to obtain pilot data on the extent to which the metabolic syndrome and obesity affects glucose metabolism and cardiovascular risks in women taking OCs. The researchers hypothesize that women with metabolic syndrome and obese women will have worsened glucose metabolism and elevated cardiovascular risks associated with OC use, when compared to normal weight women without the metabolic syndrome. Results of this study will clarify the risk factors for cardiovascular events in women taking OCs, and will serve as pilot data for a National Institutes of Health (NIH) proposal. Once the cardiovascular risk factors of OC users are understood, clinicians can make better informed decisions about contraceptive choices for their patients.
Interventions
Ortho Tri Cyclen, one tablet daily, for 6 cycles
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Acceptable health based on interview, medical history, physical examination, and laboratory tests (comprehensive metabolic panel - SMA20, and complete blood count - CBC); 2. Have not taken oral contraceptives (OCs) in the past 3 months; 3. Ability to comply with the requirements of the study; 4. Ability and willingness to provide signed, witnessed informed consent. In addition, women with the metabolic syndrome must meet the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) defined criteria of the metabolic syndrome, that is, having at least 3 of the 5 factors: 1. increased waist circumference \> 35 inches, 2. hypertriglyceridemia ≥ 150 mg/dL, 3. low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol \< 50 mg/dL in women, 4. hypertension (≥ 130/≥ 85 mmHg), 5. fasting glucose ≥ 100 mg/dL. Obese women with or without the metabolic syndrome should have a Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 30 kg/m2 and lean women should have a Body Mass Index BMI \< 25 kg/m2.
Exclusion criteria
1. Diabetes mellitus by fasting glucose or a 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT); 2. Clinically significant pulmonary, cardiac (including but not limited to ischemic heart disease, stable/unstable angina, and congestive heart failure), renal, hepatic, cholestatic, neurologic, psychiatric, infectious, and malignant disease (other than melanoma skin cancer); 3. History of thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, vascular disease, known coagulopathy, prolonged immobilization, or recent major surgery (within past 6 months); 4. Systolic blood pressure greater than 160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure greater than 100 mmHg (mild hypertension is not an exclusion criterion); 5. History of breast cancer, migraine headaches, or age ≥ 35 years and smoker of ≥ 20 cigarettes/day; 6. Use of metformin, thiazolidinediones, anti-hyperlipidemic drugs, anti-hypertensive drugs, glucocorticoids, or anti-androgens (spironolactone, flutamide, etc.) within 3 months; 7. Documented or suspected illicit drug abuse or alcoholism within one year; 8. Ingestion of any investigational drugs within 3 months prior to the study onset; and 9. Pregnancy or lactation (≤ 6 weeks postpartum); 10. Hematocrit \< 33g/dL. These
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in Insulin Sensitivity Associated With Oral Contraceptive (OC) Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline and 6 months | Insulin sensitivity was assessed by frequent sampling intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIVGTT). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in Lipid Profile Compared Associated With OC Use Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline and 6 months | The lipid profile is assessed through blood sample analysis for low-density lipoprotein (LDL), Triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein (HDL). |
| Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline and 6 months | — |
| Changes in Waist-to-Hip Ratio Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline and 6 months | Waist-to-hip ratio is assessed through calculated ratio of waist and hip circumference. |
| Inflammatory Marker Changes (MCP-1) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline and 6 months | Inflammatory marker is assessed through blood analysis for Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1). |
| Inflammatory Marker Changes, High Sensitive C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) and Adiponectin, Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline and 6 months | Inflammatory markers are assessed through blood analysis for C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and adiponectin. |
| Changes in Body Mass Index (BMI) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline and 6 months | Body Mass Index is a calculation of height and weight: kg/m² |
| Changes in Waist Circumference Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline and 6 months | — |
| Inflammatory Marker Changes, Soluble Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule (sVCAM) and Soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule (sICAM), Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline and 6 months | These inflammatory markers are assessed through blood analysis of Soluble Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule (sVCAM) and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (sICAM). |
| Changes in Blood Pressure Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline and 6 months | — |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Although 46 completed informed consent, only 36 initiated the study. Among The participants who did not begin the study were lost to follow-up prior to beginning the protocol, were no shows, or withdrew from the study before beginning study procedures.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Obese Women Women with Body Mass Index (BMI) \>30 kg/m².
Note: Only two arms were analyzed for the results. Women who were candidates for taking oral contraceptive pills and had the metabolic syndrome could not be recruited. That is because some inclusion criteria for metabolic syndrome are actually exclusion criteria for safe oral contraceptive use. | 21 |
| Lean Women Women with Body Mass Index)BMI \<25 kg/m² | 15 |
| Total | 36 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Lean Women | Obese Women | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 15 Participants | 21 Participants | 36 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 21.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3 | 25.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9 | 23.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8 |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 15 participants | 21 participants | 36 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 15 Participants | 21 Participants | 36 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 2 / 21 | 2 / 15 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 1 / 21 | 0 / 15 |
Outcome results
Changes in Insulin Sensitivity Associated With Oral Contraceptive (OC) Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women
Insulin sensitivity was assessed by frequent sampling intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIVGTT).
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obese Women | Changes in Insulin Sensitivity Associated With Oral Contraceptive (OC) Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline Insulin sensitivity | 4.36 mIU/L | Standard Deviation 2.32 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Insulin Sensitivity Associated With Oral Contraceptive (OC) Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months Insulin sensitivity | 3.82 mIU/L | Standard Deviation 3.12 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Insulin Sensitivity Associated With Oral Contraceptive (OC) Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline Insulin sensitivity | 6.62 mIU/L | Standard Deviation 3.69 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Insulin Sensitivity Associated With Oral Contraceptive (OC) Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months Insulin sensitivity | 8.23 mIU/L | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
Changes in Blood Pressure Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obese Women | Changes in Blood Pressure Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline Systolic Blood Pressure | 121.1 mm Hg | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Blood Pressure Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months Systolic Blood Pressure | 123.5 mm Hg | Standard Deviation 11.7 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Blood Pressure Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure | 74.4 mm Hg | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Blood Pressure Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months Diastolic Blood Pressure | 73.4 mm Hg | Standard Deviation 6.6 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Blood Pressure Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months Diastolic Blood Pressure | 66.5 mm Hg | Standard Deviation 6.8 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Blood Pressure Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline Systolic Blood Pressure | 105.7 mm Hg | Standard Deviation 8.6 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Blood Pressure Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure | 68.0 mm Hg | Standard Deviation 3.7 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Blood Pressure Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months Systolic Blood Pressure | 106.5 mm Hg | Standard Deviation 12.2 |
Changes in Body Mass Index (BMI) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women
Body Mass Index is a calculation of height and weight: kg/m²
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obese Women | Changes in Body Mass Index (BMI) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline BMI | 37.1 kg/m² | Standard Deviation 6.7 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Body Mass Index (BMI) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months BMI | 37.6 kg/m² | Standard Deviation 4.7 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Body Mass Index (BMI) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline BMI | 21.3 kg/m² | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Body Mass Index (BMI) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months BMI | 21.4 kg/m² | Standard Deviation 4.9 |
Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obese Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months 4ME2 | 0.89 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 0.79 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline 2ME2 | 1.48 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 1.06 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline E2 | 34.11 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 15.61 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline 2ME1 | 25.92 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 11.03 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months E2 | 74.73 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 117.52 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months 2ME2 | 1.5 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 1.11 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline 2OHE1 | 101.07 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 126.04 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline 4ME1 | 5.26 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 3.58 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months 2OHE1 | 135.95 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 220.24 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline E1 | 217.23 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 170.88 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline 2OHE2 | 9.81 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 5.85 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months 16aE1 | 421.6 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 286.57 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months 2OHE2 | 11.55 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 21.74 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months E1 | 315.03 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 339.15 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline 4OHE1 | 33.78 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 16.52 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months 4ME1 | 6.1 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 3.29 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months 4OHE1 | 27.29 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 25.65 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline 4ME2 | 0.73 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 0.55 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline Total plasma | 1068 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 472.78 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months 2ME1 | 52.84 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 54.29 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months Total plasma | 1342.21 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 1166.36 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline 16aE1 | 314.76 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 179.73 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months Total plasma | 1007.89 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 977.81 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline 16aE1 | 317.47 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 159.8 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months 16aE1 | 383.39 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 452.98 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline 2ME1 | 32.39 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 9.3 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months 2ME1 | 45.58 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 23.83 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline 4ME1 | 4.45 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 3.13 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months 4ME1 | 7.42 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 8.55 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline 2ME2 | 0.91 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 0.82 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months 2ME2 | 1.74 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 2.15 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline E1 | 245.99 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 128.41 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months E1 | 227.4 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 271.6 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline 4ME2 | 0.59 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 0.54 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months 4ME2 | 1.14 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 1.41 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline E2 | 36.796 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 17.28 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months E2 | 47.32 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 61.82 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline 2OHE1 | 85.62 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 48.08 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months 2OHE1 | 57.96 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 70.02 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline 2OHE2 | 8.01 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 3.62 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months 2OHE2 | 6.05 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 4.69 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline 4OHE1 | 33.98 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 25.86 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months 4OHE1 | 29.12 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 15.08 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Estrogen Metabolites (Plasma) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline Total plasma | 1022.16 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 295.61 |
Changes in Lipid Profile Compared Associated With OC Use Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women
The lipid profile is assessed through blood sample analysis for low-density lipoprotein (LDL), Triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein (HDL).
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obese Women | Changes in Lipid Profile Compared Associated With OC Use Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline LDL | 95 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 18.4 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Lipid Profile Compared Associated With OC Use Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months LDL | 113 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 25.2 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Lipid Profile Compared Associated With OC Use Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline Triglycerides | 72 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 50.3 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Lipid Profile Compared Associated With OC Use Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months Triglycerides | 83 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 51.1 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Lipid Profile Compared Associated With OC Use Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline HDL | 51 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 10.7 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Lipid Profile Compared Associated With OC Use Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months HDL | 58 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 12.4 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Lipid Profile Compared Associated With OC Use Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline HDL | 53 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 10 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Lipid Profile Compared Associated With OC Use Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline LDL | 84 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 24.3 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Lipid Profile Compared Associated With OC Use Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months Triglycerides | 106 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 52.9 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Lipid Profile Compared Associated With OC Use Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months LDL | 104 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 26.1 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Lipid Profile Compared Associated With OC Use Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months HDL | 61 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 12.8 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Lipid Profile Compared Associated With OC Use Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline Triglycerides | 72 mg/dL | Standard Deviation 52 |
Changes in Waist Circumference Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obese Women | Changes in Waist Circumference Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline Waist circumference | 100.0 cm | Standard Deviation 14.4 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Waist Circumference Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months Waist circumference | 101.0 cm | Standard Deviation 10.5 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Waist Circumference Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline Waist circumference | 70.2 cm | Standard Deviation 4.1 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Waist Circumference Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months Waist circumference | 70.9 cm | Standard Deviation 10.7 |
Changes in Waist-to-Hip Ratio Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women
Waist-to-hip ratio is assessed through calculated ratio of waist and hip circumference.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obese Women | Changes in Waist-to-Hip Ratio Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline Waist-Hip Ratio | 0.79 ratio | Standard Deviation 0.059 |
| Obese Women | Changes in Waist-to-Hip Ratio Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months Waist-Hip Ratio | 0.81 ratio | Standard Deviation 0.057 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Waist-to-Hip Ratio Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline Waist-Hip Ratio | 0.73 ratio | Standard Deviation 0.027 |
| Lean Women | Changes in Waist-to-Hip Ratio Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months Waist-Hip Ratio | 0.73 ratio | Standard Deviation 0.057 |
Inflammatory Marker Changes, High Sensitive C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) and Adiponectin, Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women
Inflammatory markers are assessed through blood analysis for C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and adiponectin.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obese Women | Inflammatory Marker Changes, High Sensitive C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) and Adiponectin, Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline Hs-CRP | 4908.76 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 5215.07 |
| Obese Women | Inflammatory Marker Changes, High Sensitive C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) and Adiponectin, Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months Hs-CRP | 6207.76 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 4566.8 |
| Obese Women | Inflammatory Marker Changes, High Sensitive C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) and Adiponectin, Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline Adiponectin | 17568.86 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 5680.86 |
| Obese Women | Inflammatory Marker Changes, High Sensitive C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) and Adiponectin, Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months Adiponectin | 18408.43 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 4934.39 |
| Lean Women | Inflammatory Marker Changes, High Sensitive C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) and Adiponectin, Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months Adiponectin | 22221.36 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 11160.97 |
| Lean Women | Inflammatory Marker Changes, High Sensitive C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) and Adiponectin, Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline Hs-CRP | 2050.77 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 4748.75 |
| Lean Women | Inflammatory Marker Changes, High Sensitive C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) and Adiponectin, Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline Adiponectin | 21976.53 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 8322.05 |
| Lean Women | Inflammatory Marker Changes, High Sensitive C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) and Adiponectin, Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months Hs-CRP | 2266.02 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 3443.3 |
Inflammatory Marker Changes (MCP-1) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women
Inflammatory marker is assessed through blood analysis for Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1).
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obese Women | Inflammatory Marker Changes (MCP-1) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline MCP-1 | 209.56 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 125.92 |
| Obese Women | Inflammatory Marker Changes (MCP-1) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months MCP-1 | 219.86 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 159.85 |
| Lean Women | Inflammatory Marker Changes (MCP-1) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline MCP-1 | 156.14 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 36.29 |
| Lean Women | Inflammatory Marker Changes (MCP-1) Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months MCP-1 | 206.66 pg/mL | Standard Deviation 76.15 |
Inflammatory Marker Changes, Soluble Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule (sVCAM) and Soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule (sICAM), Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women
These inflammatory markers are assessed through blood analysis of Soluble Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule (sVCAM) and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (sICAM).
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obese Women | Inflammatory Marker Changes, Soluble Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule (sVCAM) and Soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule (sICAM), Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline sVCAM | 905 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 190.63 |
| Obese Women | Inflammatory Marker Changes, Soluble Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule (sVCAM) and Soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule (sICAM), Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months sVCAM | 880.14 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 180.08 |
| Obese Women | Inflammatory Marker Changes, Soluble Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule (sVCAM) and Soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule (sICAM), Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline sICAM | 163.34 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 50.44 |
| Obese Women | Inflammatory Marker Changes, Soluble Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule (sVCAM) and Soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule (sICAM), Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months sICAM | 163.2 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 27.71 |
| Lean Women | Inflammatory Marker Changes, Soluble Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule (sVCAM) and Soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule (sICAM), Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months sICAM | 160.21 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 74.88 |
| Lean Women | Inflammatory Marker Changes, Soluble Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule (sVCAM) and Soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule (sICAM), Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline sVCAM | 1139.6 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 159.57 |
| Lean Women | Inflammatory Marker Changes, Soluble Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule (sVCAM) and Soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule (sICAM), Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | Baseline sICAM | 182.11 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 91.17 |
| Lean Women | Inflammatory Marker Changes, Soluble Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule (sVCAM) and Soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule (sICAM), Associated With OC Use Compared Among (1) Obese Women and (2) Lean Women | 6 months sVCAM | 1003.29 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 256.62 |