Skip to content

Comparison of MR Enteroclysis and MRI With Per Oral Contrast Using a 6 % Mannitol Solution.

MRI of the Small Bowel. Comparison of Different Techniques and Contrast.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00204165
Enrollment
40
Registered
2005-09-20
Start date
2004-11-30
Completion date
2005-06-30
Last updated
2006-09-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Intestine Small, Crohn Disease.

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare MRI enteroclysis with MRI of the small bowel with a per oral 6%mannitol solution.Our hypothesis is that the peroral technique preform the same way as MRI Enteroclysis.

Interventions

PROCEDUREMRI of the small bowel

Sponsors

University of Oslo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* above 18 years * known Crohns disease or strong suspicion. * need of a small bowel examination

Exclusion criteria

* pregnant * electrolyte disturbances. * Any MRI contraindications.

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026