Skip to content

Trial Comparing Cetuximab With Pemetrexed/Cetuximab Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

A Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Cetuximab With Concurrent Pemetrexed/Cetuximab Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Refractory to Primary Treatment

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00203931
Enrollment
55
Registered
2005-09-20
Start date
2005-03-31
Completion date
2009-11-30
Last updated
2014-03-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Keywords

Non-small cell lung cancer

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to determine in patients with Non Small Cell Lung Cancer refractory to previous chemotherapy whether concomitant treatment with cetuximab and pemetrexed improves progression-free survival compared with cetuximab monotherapy.

Detailed description

While EGFR inhibitors have demonstrated activity against NSCLC \[their integration into first-line therapy in combination with standard agents has yielded disappointing results\]. There are many potential reasons for the disappointing results in these first-line studies \[ A single-arm Phase I trial of cetuximab in combination with docetaxel suggested better efficacy in second-line therapy for NSCLC than docetaxel alone but this comes at the expense of some increased toxicity\]. Preliminary data indicate that cetuximab has single agent activity in this setting. The confidence intervals for this activity overlap the median time to progression of the current second-line cytotoxic therapy options compared in the Hanna study \[A clinically relevant question is- does concurrent cetuximab and pemetrexed significantly improve upon outcomes of cetuximab monotherapy followed by pemetrexed monotherapy?\]. Many patients who receive EGFR inhibitors develop an acneiform rash and the severity of the rash is associated with good outcomes from treatment. Several of these studies have demonstrated no correlation between the intensity or percentage of tumor cells staining for EFUR expression and response to therapy. However, a Phase II study, at the University of Colorado, of cetuximab added to standard first-line treatment of NSCLC revealed 6/10 responders developed the rash within 2 weeks of initiating treatment (Personal Communication, Dugan, et al. BMS). Therefore, early development of rash may be a clinically useful marker of subsequent response and novel approaches to the identification of biological markers for this phenotype prior to initiation of therapy may be helpful in subsequent determination of which patients will most likely benefit from EGFR inhibitor therapy. To address these issues we propose a phase I randomized study of concurrent pemetrexed/cetuximab compared to sequential cetuximab/pemetrexed therapy for the second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. Patients will be randomized at study entry. Regarding prospective analysis of the rapid-rash forming phenotype, all patients will receive 2 weeks of initial treatment with cetuximab and undergo formal rash evaluation, serum and skin collection. According to the initial randomization, half of the study subjects will continue with cetuximab monotherapy while the remainder will receive concurrent cetuximab and pemetrexed. The primary study endpoint of freedom from progression and secondary endpoint of objective response rate will be based on the comparison of patients in (he concurrent therapy group with patients treated with cetuximab monotherapy with Day-14 (first receipt of cetuximab) as the reference treatment start date. Overall survival will be analyzed as a secondary endpoint to assess the efficacy of concomitant treatment with cetuximab and pemetrexed compared to sequential treatment with cetuximab followed by pemetrexed upon disease progression. As patients in both treatment arms receive cetuximab, correlative studies will be performed on all enrolled patients. For serum proteomic studies designed to identify a serum polypeptide signature associated with response to cetuximab-based therapy, serum samples shall be collected at enrollment, and just prior to receiving the third dose of cetuximab therapy. To provide the opportunity to perform retrospective pharmacogenomic studies, whole blood DNA will be collected from each patient at enrollment and subsequently analyzed for candidate gene polymorphisms once outcome data is available. Finally, an alternative approach to identification of markers for responsiveness to EGFR inhibition already in progress at the University of Chicago entails collection of skin biopsies before and after treatment with an EGFR inhibitor. As in ongoing collaborations with the University of Chicago Section of Dermatology, patients in this proposed study will undergo skin biopsies at enrollment and after 2 weeks of cetuximab therapy. The investigators will extract mRNA from the fresh frozen skin specimens and perform microarray studies to test the utility of mRNA expression patterns associated with rash and responsiveness to EOFR inhibitors in currently ongoing investigations at the University of Chicago. Therefore we expect this study: 1) to identify any significant improvement of concurrent cetuximab/pemetrexed therapy for second-line treatment of NSCLC over sequential monotherapy, 2) through timely minimally invasive collection of serum and exposed skin, to provide the opportunity to test previously identified biomarkers for individual responsiveness to cetuximab therapy, and 3) to confirm prospectively whether early development of rash on cetuximab treatment predicts responsiveness to either concurrent or sequential therapy.

Interventions

DRUGCetuximab
DRUGPemetrexed

Sponsors

Bristol-Myers Squibb
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Chicago
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of locally advanced or metastatic (Stage III or IV at entry) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is not amenable to curative therapy. * ECOG performance status 0-2 * Patients must have been previously treated with one platinum-containing or taxane-containing chemotherapy regimen for locally advanced or metastatic disease. Patients are also eligible if they have received one platinum-based chemotherapy regimen as neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, but must have received an additional chemotherapy regimen upon recurrence. * No more than two prior systemic anti-cancer therapies will be allowed. * Prior radiation therapy is allowed to \<25% of the bone marrow. Prior radiation to the whole pelvis is not allowed, Prior radiotherapy must be completed at least 2 weeks before study enrollment, and the patient must have recovered from the acute toxic effects of the treatment prior to study enrollment. * Patients must have signed an approved informed consent. * Male and female patients with reproductive potential must use an approved contraceptive method if appropriate (eg, intrauterine device, birth control pills, or barrier device) during and for 3 months after the study. Female patients must either not be of child bearing potential or have a negative pregnancy test within 7 days of treatment. Patients are considered not of child bearing potential if they are surgically sterile (they have undergone a hysterectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, or bilateral oophorectomy) or they are postmenopausal. * Age\>18 * Measurable disease in accord with RECIST criteria * Bone marrow Function: absolute neutrophil count (ANC)\>/=1,500/ul, platelets \>/=l00,000, hemoglobin\> 9g/dL * Renal function: creatinine clearance (calculated by Cockcroft and Gault method) \>/= 45mL/min * Hepatic function: bilirubin \</=1.5 x ULN; ALT/AST ,/= 2.5 x ULN; Albumin \>/=2.5 g/dL

Exclusion criteria

* Prior treatment with pemetrexed * Prior therapy that targets the EGF pathway. * Active or uncontrolled infection. * Significant history of uncontrolled cardiac disease; i.e., uncontrolled hypertension, unstable angina, and congestive heart failure. * Pleural or pericardial effusions that cannot be completely evacuated prior to pemetrexed therapy. * Acute hepatitis or known HIV. * Prior severe infusion reaction to a monoclonal antibody. * Any concurrent chemotherapy not indicated in the study protocol or any other investigational agent(s). * Pregnancy or Breast-feeding. * Second primary malignancy that is clinically detectable at the time of consideration for study enrollment. * Inability to interrupt aspirin, or other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents for a 5-day period. * Inability or unwillingness to take folic acid or vitamin B12 supplementation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free SurvivalUp to 5 yearsProgression-free survival will be defined as the time from the start of treatment until progression (documented according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors \[RECIST\] criteria and defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions) or death from any cause, whichever comes first.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free Survival Based on Rash Developmentup to 5 yearsProgression-free survival in this landmark analysis looking at the utility of early rash in predicting progression-free survival will be defined as the time from day 22 of study therapy until progression (documented according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors \[RECIST\] criteria and defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions) or death from any cause, whichever comes first. Patients last known to be alive and progression-free were censored at the date of the last scan without evidence of progression.
Objective Response Rateup to 2 yearsObjective response (complete response \[CR\] + partial response \[PR\]) will be evaluated using RECIST criteria. CR is the disappearance of all target lesions. PR requires at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions.
Overall SurvivalUp to 5 yearsOverall survival will be defined as the time from the start of treatment until death from any cause.
Progression-free Survival Based on Serum Biomarker Statusup to 5 yearsProgression-free survival in this analysis looking at the association between a serum proteomic biomarker and progression-free survival will be defined as the time from the start of treatment until progression (documented according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors \[RECIST\] criteria and defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions) or death from any cause, whichever comes first.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cetuximab
Cetuximab initial dosage of 400 mg/m2 over 120 minutes, followed by weekly infusions at 250 mg/m2 over 60 minutes.
20
Cetuximab and Pemetrexed
Cetuximab initial dosage of 400 mg/m2 over 120 minutes, followed by weekly infusions at 250 mg/m2 over 60 minutes. Starting on day 15 and then subsequently on day 1 of each 21 day cycle, Pemetrexed 500 mg/m2.
23
Total43

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCetuximabCetuximab and PemetrexedTotal
Age, Continuous62 years55 years58 years
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 participants23 participants43 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants10 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants13 Participants27 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 2017 / 23
serious
Total, serious adverse events
11 / 207 / 23

Outcome results

Primary

Progression-free Survival

Progression-free survival will be defined as the time from the start of treatment until progression (documented according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors \[RECIST\] criteria and defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions) or death from any cause, whichever comes first.

Time frame: Up to 5 years

Population: Includes evaluable patients (those that received at least 3 doses of cetuximab)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
CetuximabProgression-free Survival1.6 months
Cetuximab and PemetrexedProgression-free Survival2.3 months
p-value: 0.11Log Rank
Secondary

Objective Response Rate

Objective response (complete response \[CR\] + partial response \[PR\]) will be evaluated using RECIST criteria. CR is the disappearance of all target lesions. PR requires at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions.

Time frame: up to 2 years

Population: Includes evaluable patients (those that received at least 3 doses of cetuximab).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CetuximabObjective Response Rate0 percentage of participants
Cetuximab and PemetrexedObjective Response Rate13.0 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.24Fisher Exact
Secondary

Overall Survival

Overall survival will be defined as the time from the start of treatment until death from any cause.

Time frame: Up to 5 years

Population: Includes evaluable patients (those that received at least 3 doses of cetuximab)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
CetuximabOverall Survival3.5 months
Cetuximab and PemetrexedOverall Survival10.3 months
p-value: 0.046Wilcoxon-Gehan test
Secondary

Progression-free Survival Based on Rash Development

Progression-free survival in this landmark analysis looking at the utility of early rash in predicting progression-free survival will be defined as the time from day 22 of study therapy until progression (documented according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors \[RECIST\] criteria and defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions) or death from any cause, whichever comes first. Patients last known to be alive and progression-free were censored at the date of the last scan without evidence of progression.

Time frame: up to 5 years

Population: Includes evaluable patients (those that received at least 3 doses of cetuximab), but the total number analyzed is not 43 because 2 patients died or progressed prior to day 22 of cetuximab therapy and thus were excluded from this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
CetuximabProgression-free Survival Based on Rash Development0.9 monthsStandard Error 0.1
Cetuximab and PemetrexedProgression-free Survival Based on Rash Development0.9 monthsStandard Error 0.5
p-value: 0.91Wilcoxon-Gehan test
Secondary

Progression-free Survival Based on Serum Biomarker Status

Progression-free survival in this analysis looking at the association between a serum proteomic biomarker and progression-free survival will be defined as the time from the start of treatment until progression (documented according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors \[RECIST\] criteria and defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions) or death from any cause, whichever comes first.

Time frame: up to 5 years

Population: Includes evaluable patients (those that received at least 3 doses of cetuximab), but the total number analyzed is not 43 because 10 patients did not have a pre-treatment/baseline serum marker classification and thus were excluded from this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
CetuximabProgression-free Survival Based on Serum Biomarker Status1.57 months
Cetuximab and PemetrexedProgression-free Survival Based on Serum Biomarker Status1.64 months
p-value: 0.029Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026