Skip to content

Study of CAP1-6D in Patients With Locally Advanced or Surgically Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

A Randomized Pilot Phase II Study of Immunization With Modified CEA (CAP1-6D) Peptide In Patients With Locally Advanced Or Surgically Resected Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00203892
Enrollment
23
Registered
2005-09-20
Start date
2003-04-30
Completion date
2012-05-31
Last updated
2014-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Keywords

Adenocarcinoma, Pancreas

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the experimental vaccine modified CEA peptide CAP 1 -6D (mCEA) can produce an immune response in patients with pancreatic cancer who have received chemotherapy and radiation therapy.

Detailed description

PC has a dismal prognosis. Despite surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, most patients with PC will die of distant metastatic disease. Peptide vaccine approaches offer an attractive potential treatment option. Since CEA is expressed in \>90% of PC, it would make an attractive target for a vaccination approach. Several different vaccination approaches have been tested using CEA as a TAA. Although some investigators suggest that DC-based approaches are the most active, they are limited by the need to obtain patient-specific DCs. One attractive approach would be to add GM-CSF to the peptide to recruit endogenous DC to the site of vaccination. There are data on the use of tumor vaccines in advanced PC. Gjerertsen et al. used a K Ras peptide and GM-CSF in 48 patients with advanced PC. 50% of patients showed a peptide specific CTL response (Gjertsen, Buanes et al. 2001). Those that had an immune response had an increased overall survival, The data from phase I and II clinical trials was based on heavily pretreated patients with metastatic disease. The majority of clinical responses have been disease stabilization. The data in B cell lymphoma vaccines suggests that immune responses are more likely to be generated in minimum disease states (Bendandi, Gocke et al. 1999). For patients that have had a complete resection and treatment with adjuvant chemoradiation, and for patients with locally advanced nonresectable disease treated with standard chemoradiation, there is presently no therapy available to decrease the chance of disease reoccurrence. Our hypothesis is that immunization with a modified CEA peptide in Montanide/GM-CSF can lead to expansion of CEA-reactive CTL and result in control of CEA expressing pancreatic carcinomas.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALmodified CEA peptide (10mcg)

Vaccine contained the modified CEA peptide (10mcg), Montanide ISA-51, and sargramostim (GM-CSF) 250mcg. Vaccine was administered on Day 1 of each 14 day cycle until progressive disease or dose-limiting toxicity for a maximum of 24 cycles. Vaccine administration site was the proximal thigh.

BIOLOGICALmodified CEA peptide (100mcg)

Vaccine contained the modified CEA peptide (100mcg), Montanide ISA-51, and sargramostim (GM-CSF) 250mcg. Vaccine was administered on Day 1 of each 14 day cycle until progressive disease or dose-limiting toxicity for a maximum of 24 cycles. Vaccine administration site was the proximal thigh.

BIOLOGICALmodified CEA peptide (1000mcg)

Vaccine contained the modified CEA peptide (1000mcg), Montanide ISA-51, and sargramostim (GM-CSF) 250mcg. Vaccine was administered on Day 1 of each 14 day cycle until progressive disease or dose-limiting toxicity for a maximum of 24 cycles. Vaccine administration site was the proximal thigh.

Sponsors

University of Chicago
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients must express HLA-A2 * Patients must have histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the pancreas that expresses CEA either by IHC or serology. * Patients prior chemotherapy must have been completed at least 28 days prior to the start of treatment Patients must have completely resected disease or unresectable locally advanced disease. * Patients with resected disease who had a pancreaticoduodenectomy with negative margins. * Patients with locally advanced disease or metastatic disease * Patients must have completed 5FU based chemoradiation\>4 weeks, but no more than 12 weeks prior to study registration. * Age \>18 years. * ECOG performance status 0-1 * Life expectancy greater than 3 months * Patients must have normal organ and marrow function * Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who have had chemotherapy, biologic therapy, radiotherapy, or an experimental (investigational) agent within 4 weeks (6 weeks for nitrosoureas or mitomycin C) prior to starting treatment or those who have not recovered from adverse events due to agents administered more than 4 weeks earlier. * Patients may not have received a previous CEA vaccine. * History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to CEA, Montanide ISA-51, or GM-CSF. * Patients must not have known autoimmune disorders (SLE, Rheumatoid Arthritis), conditions of immunosuppression (such as HIV), or treatment with immunosuppressive drugs (including oral steroids, continuous use of topical steroids, steroid inhalers). Replacement doses of steroids for patients with adrenal insufficiency are allowed. * Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, active GI bleeding, inflammatory bowel disease or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements. * Pregnant or breast-feeding women are excluded from this study because peptide vaccines and/or GM-CSF have an unknown effect on a fetus. Breastfeeding should be discontinued if the mother is gong to be treated on this clinical trial. * Because the risk to patients with immune deficiency treated with peptide vaccine is unknown, HIV-positive patients are excluded from the study. Appropriate studies will be undertaken in patients with intrinsic immunosuppression when indicated. * Patients with a currently active second malignancy other than non-melanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix are not to be registered. Patients are not considered to have a currently active malignancy if they have completed therapy and have no evidence of recurrence for at least 5 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximum T Cell Response From Baselinebaseline and every 4 weeks on treatmentT cell frequency (spots per 10\^4 CD8+ cells) was measured by ELISPOT (Enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot) assay. Blood was collected for this assay at baseline and every 4 weeks for the first 8 cycles. After the eighth cycle, a blood sample was collected at the time of disease progression. The maximum T cell response was calculated as: peak value on treatment - baseline value. A positive value indicates an increase from baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evidence of Dose Limiting Toxicities of Immunization With Modified CEA (Carcinoembryonic Antigen) Peptide.participants were followed while they were on study treatment, a median of 8 weeksDose-limited toxicity included Grade 2 or higher hemorrhage or allergic reaction or clinical evidence of autoimmune disease. Toxicities were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v2.0.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

66 patients screened between August 2004 and September 2009

Participants by arm

ArmCount
A: CEA Peptide 10mcg
Vaccine contained the modified CEA peptide (10mcg), Montanide ISA-51, and sargramostim (GM-CSF) 250mcg. Vaccine was administered on Day 1 of each 14 day cycle until progressive disease or dose-limiting toxicity for a maximum of 24 cycles. Vaccine administration site was the proximal thigh.
5
B: CEA Peptide 100 mcg
Vaccine contained the modified CEA peptide (100mcg), Montanide ISA-51, and sargramostim (GM-CSF) 250mcg. Vaccine was administered on Day 1 of each 14 day cycle until progressive disease or dose-limiting toxicity for a maximum of 24 cycles. Vaccine administration site was the proximal thigh.
8
C: CEA Peptide 1000mcg
Vaccine contained the modified CEA peptide (1000mcg), Montanide ISA-51, and sargramostim (GM-CSF) 250mcg. Vaccine was administered on Day 1 of each 14 day cycle until progressive disease or dose-limiting toxicity for a maximum of 24 cycles. Vaccine administration site was the proximal thigh.
6
Total19

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyDeath100
Overall StudyPhysician Decision120

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicA: CEA Peptide 10mcgB: CEA Peptide 100 mcgC: CEA Peptide 1000mcgTotal
Age, Continuous51 years57.5 years61.5 years60 years
Performance Status
0
2 participants4 participants4 participants10 participants
Performance Status
1
3 participants4 participants2 participants9 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
5 participants8 participants6 participants19 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants4 Participants5 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants4 Participants1 Participants6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 52 / 82 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 50 / 80 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Maximum T Cell Response From Baseline

T cell frequency (spots per 10\^4 CD8+ cells) was measured by ELISPOT (Enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot) assay. Blood was collected for this assay at baseline and every 4 weeks for the first 8 cycles. After the eighth cycle, a blood sample was collected at the time of disease progression. The maximum T cell response was calculated as: peak value on treatment - baseline value. A positive value indicates an increase from baseline.

Time frame: baseline and every 4 weeks on treatment

Population: The analysis population for the primary outcome included the 14 patients who received at least 3 doses of the CEA vaccine and had a ELISPOT at least at baseline and after the 3rd cycle.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
A: CEA Peptide 10mcgMaximum T Cell Response From Baseline10.5 spots per 10^4 CD8+ cells
B: CEA Peptide 100 mcgMaximum T Cell Response From Baseline51.75 spots per 10^4 CD8+ cells
C: CEA Peptide 1000mcgMaximum T Cell Response From Baseline270.625 spots per 10^4 CD8+ cells
p-value: 0.028Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Evidence of Dose Limiting Toxicities of Immunization With Modified CEA (Carcinoembryonic Antigen) Peptide.

Dose-limited toxicity included Grade 2 or higher hemorrhage or allergic reaction or clinical evidence of autoimmune disease. Toxicities were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v2.0.

Time frame: participants were followed while they were on study treatment, a median of 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
A: CEA Peptide 10mcgEvidence of Dose Limiting Toxicities of Immunization With Modified CEA (Carcinoembryonic Antigen) Peptide.0 participants
B: CEA Peptide 100 mcgEvidence of Dose Limiting Toxicities of Immunization With Modified CEA (Carcinoembryonic Antigen) Peptide.0 participants
C: CEA Peptide 1000mcgEvidence of Dose Limiting Toxicities of Immunization With Modified CEA (Carcinoembryonic Antigen) Peptide.0 participants
p-value: >0.99Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 23, 2026