Malaria
Conditions
Keywords
Malaria, Efficacy, Pharmacokinetic, Gametocyte, Molecular markers, Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, Artesunate, Artemisinin
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to study the efficacy of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine on its own and compare this with efficacy of a new combination antimalarial therapy, either sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine plus artesunate or artemether-lumefantrine.
Detailed description
The resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to anti-malarial drugs is a serious impediment to the control of malaria. In the South East African Combination Anti-malarial Therapy (SEACAT) evaluation, there will be a comprehensive evaluation of phased introduction of combination anti-malarials (CAT) in Mozambique, Swaziland and South Africa. In order to facilitate formulation of an effective regional drug policy and provide a database for decision-making on the implementation of combination therapy, it is essential that the in vivo response to CAT in all three countries be investigated. An SP therapeutic efficacy study will be conducted according to this modified World Health Organization (WHO) protocol to guide the selection of CAT. After CAT is introduced an in vivo CAT efficacy study will then be conducted to evaluate the efficacy of artesunate plus SP (or artemether-lumefantrine in KwaZulu Natal and Limpopo). In areas of low intensity malaria transmission the CAT in vivo study results will be compared across sites and with those found at baseline with monotherapy, for each site.
Interventions
DRUGSulfadoxine-pyrimethamine
DRUGArtemether-lumefantrine
Sponsors
World Health Organization
Medical Research Council, South Africa
Global Fund
University of Cape Town
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Months to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Male or female, older than 12 months. * Weight \> 10 kg. * Diagnoses of uncomplicated acute P. falciparum malaria parasitaemia of up to 250 000 asexual parasite/mcl blood with axillary temperature of greater than and equal to 37.5 or history of fever * Documented informed consent * Lives close enough to the health centre for reliable follow up
Exclusion criteria
* Has received anti-malarial treatment in the past 7 days. * Severely ill (based on WHO Criteria for severe malaria ) or if patient is considered, in the opinion of the investigator or designee, to have moderately severe malaria (e.g. prostrate, repeated vomiting, dehydrated). * Has received cotrimoxazole or chloramphenicol in the past 7 days. * History of Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency (not a contra-indication for artemether-lumefantrine). * Is pregnant or breastfeeding. * Has a history of allergy to any of the study drugs (including other sulphonamides e.g. cotrimoxazole, other artemisinin derivatives e.g. artemether-lumefantrine).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Parasite clearance time; | — |
| Fever clearance time. | — |
| Therapeutic efficacy defined as: | — |
| Adequate Clinical and Parasitological Response (ACPR), Early Treatment Failure (ETF), Late Treatment Failure (LTF), defined as Late Clinical Failure (LCF) and Late Parasitological Failure (LPF); | — |
| Sensitive or parasitological failure (RI, early and late, RII, RIII) | — |
| Parasitological failures will be classified as recrudescence or re-infection (or indeterminate) using glutamate-rich protein (GLURP) and merozoite surface protein (MSP) I & II markers; | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Pharmacokinetics by measurement of whole blood levels of Sulfadoxine and Pyrimethamine, and lumefantrine should a reliable assay become available | — |
| Correlation of frequency of dihydropteroate synthase (DHFR) and dihydrofolate reductase (DHPS) mutations with parasitological outcome | — |
| Tolerability by describing adverse events and changes in haematological parameters | — |
| Capacity by describing the training and development of study teams and their subsequent skills attained | — |
| Association between study treatment and gametocyte carriage | — |
Countries
Eswatini, Mozambique, South Africa
Outcome results
None listed