Skip to content

Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Versus Conservative Treatment of Pain

Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Versus Conservative Treatment of Pain: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study of Osteoporotic Fractures in the Spine

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00203554
Enrollment
27
Registered
2005-09-20
Start date
2004-03-31
Completion date
2008-01-31
Last updated
2008-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fracture, Osteoporosis, Pain

Keywords

osteoporosis, vertebra, fracture, pain, percutaneous, vertebroplasty, polymethylmetacrylate

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of vertebroplasty with that of traditional medical treatment in the treatment of painful vertebral fractures in osteoporotic patients.

Detailed description

In vertebroplasty a bone cement is injected in one or more fractured vertebra. The indication is pain that needs high doses of analgesics. The cement is a well known product called poly methyl metacrylate (PMMA) normally used fixate joint prosthesis. Vertebroplasty is done in local anaesthesia. The treatment was introduced in 1984 in France and today thousands of patients have been treated worldwide, but so far no randomized controlled trials have been published.

Interventions

GENETICPoly methylmetacrylate, PMMA

Sponsors

University of Aarhus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* new pain in spine (within 6 months) * x-ray verified low energy spinal fracture(s)

Exclusion criteria

* less than 20% or more than 90% reduction of the vertebral height * lack of pain at fracture level * no need for continuous analgesic treatment * patient no able to communicate * general anaesthesia contraindicated * MRI not possible * coagulopathy (not adjustable) * spondylitis * discitis * spinal metastasis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Level of painbefore treatment and day 1, day 3, day 10 and after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Needs for analgetics, number of days at hospital, level of ADLbefore treatment and day 1, day 3, day 10 and after 1, 3, 6 and 12 months.

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026