Skip to content

A Prospective, Open Label Comparison of Ezetimibe, Niacin, and Colestipol as Adjunct Therapy in Lipid Reduction

A Prospective, Open Label Comparison of Ezetimibe, Niacin, and Colestipol as Adjunct Therapy in Lipid Reduction

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00203476
Enrollment
30
Registered
2005-09-20
Start date
2005-05-31
Completion date
2008-01-31
Last updated
2014-08-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hyperlipidemia, Hypercholesterolemia

Keywords

ezetimibe, niacin, colestipol, hyperlipidemia, adjunct therapy, zetia

Brief summary

To compare LDL reduction compared to baseline in patients using maximum tolerated HMG CoA Reductase inhibitor (statin) therapy with adjunctive therapy with ezetimibe, colestipol, or niacin. The patient's cardiovascular risks are assessed to determine if National Cholesterol Education Program's Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) guidelines for low density lipoprotein (LDL) reduction were achieved between the three groups. Secondary measures examine the safety issues with liver function test (LFT) monitoring and rhabdomyolysis. High-density lipoproteins (HDL) elevations are monitored between the three groups to determine efficacy as a secondary outcome.

Detailed description

: Patients with hyperlipidemia who sign consent and who are currently at maximum tolerated dose of a statin and are not meeting NCEP ATPIII treatment goals for LDL cholesterol are enrolled in 12-week open label, prospective trial. Patients are randomized into one of three groups to receive ezetimibe, niacin, or colestipol in addition to current statin therapy. Patients are titrated as tolerated to therapeutic doses of study medications (ezetimibe 10mg/day, niacin 1500mg/day, and colestipol 20gm/day). At baseline, informed consent; a laboratory admission profile (Chem20); weight; height; blood pressure; concomitant medications; cholesterol medication history; and grapefruit juice consumption data are gathered. At weeks 6 and 12, patients have their cholesterol panels and liver function tests assessed. Patients are also interviewed regarding side effects (including rhabdomyolysis), tolerance, changes in concomitant medications, and grapefruit juice consumption, along with weight and blood pressure measurements.

Interventions

DRUGNiacin
DRUGEzetimibe

Sponsors

American Society of Health-System Pharmacists Research and Education Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Tuscaloosa Research & Education Advancement Corporation
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Veterans eligible for treatment at the Tuscaloosa VA Medical Center * 50 years of age * Male or female * Any race or ethnic group * Signed informed consent * Hyperlipidemia despite current maximum tolerated dose of an HMG CoA Reductase inhibitor (statin) for \> 6 weeks * Currently not meeting NCEP ATPIII treatment goals for LDL cholesterol

Exclusion criteria

* Known hypersensitivity or intolerance to ezetimibe, niacin, or colestipol * Previous failed adequate trial of adjunctive ezetimibe, niacin, or colestipol * Consumes more than 8oz. grapefruit juice daily * Significant medical condition that would impact safety evaluations (i.e. significantly elevated LFT, hepatitis, severe dermatitis, uncontrolled diabetes, severe GI disease, fibromyalgia, renal failure, recent CVA or MI, pancreatitis, etc.) * Receiving medications that would be contraindicated to use in combination with ezetimibe, niacin, or colestipol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
LDL Goal Attainment12 weeksEach participant had his LDL goal calculated based on the NCEP ATPIII guidelines.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
LFT Elevation12 weeks
Incidents of Rhabdomyolysis12 weeks
Change in HDL From Baseline to 12 Weeks.baseline and 12 weeks

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were recruited from 2005-2007 from primary care medical clinics.

Pre-assignment details

Patients had to be on max tolerated dose of a statin and need additional LDL lowering.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Niacin
Niacin added to max tolerated dose of statin
10
Colestipol
Colestipol added to max dose statin
10
Ezetimibe
Ezetimibe added to max tolerated dose statin
10
Total30

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNiacinColestipolEzetimibeTotal
Age, Customized
Age =>50
10 participants10 participants10 participants30 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 participants10 participants10 participants30 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants10 Participants10 Participants30 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 103 / 103 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 100 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

LDL Goal Attainment

Each participant had his LDL goal calculated based on the NCEP ATPIII guidelines.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: intention to treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
NiacinLDL Goal Attainment6 participants
ColestipolLDL Goal Attainment6 participants
EzetimibeLDL Goal Attainment9 participants
Secondary

Change in HDL From Baseline to 12 Weeks.

Time frame: baseline and 12 weeks

Population: Change in HDL

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
NiacinChange in HDL From Baseline to 12 Weeks.baseline42.33 mg/dlStandard Deviation 11.2
NiacinChange in HDL From Baseline to 12 Weeks.12 weeks43.00 mg/dlStandard Deviation 11.62
ColestipolChange in HDL From Baseline to 12 Weeks.baseline39.22 mg/dlStandard Deviation 14.22
ColestipolChange in HDL From Baseline to 12 Weeks.12 weeks37.56 mg/dlStandard Deviation 7.83
EzetimibeChange in HDL From Baseline to 12 Weeks.baseline32.90 mg/dlStandard Deviation 5.15
EzetimibeChange in HDL From Baseline to 12 Weeks.12 weeks34.70 mg/dlStandard Deviation 10.39
Secondary

Incidents of Rhabdomyolysis

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
NiacinIncidents of Rhabdomyolysis0 participants 30.55
ColestipolIncidents of Rhabdomyolysis0 participants 12.97
EzetimibeIncidents of Rhabdomyolysis0 participants 20.07
Secondary

LFT Elevation

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
NiacinLFT Elevation1 participants
ColestipolLFT Elevation1 participants
EzetimibeLFT Elevation2 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026