Skip to content

Etanercept and Gemcitabine in Patients With Advanced, Chemotherapy Naive Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

A Phase I/II Study of Etanercept and Gemcitabine in Patients With Advanced Stage and Chemotherapy Naive Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00201838
Enrollment
38
Registered
2005-09-20
Start date
2001-07-31
Completion date
2007-05-31
Last updated
2017-11-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adenocarcinoma, Pancreatic Neoplasms

Keywords

Advanced Stage, Chemotherapy Naive

Brief summary

The aims of this protocol are: 1. To study the safety and tolerability of the combination of etanercept and gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: 2. To estimate the anti-tumor effect as measured by the proportion of patients free of disease-progression at six months after treatment initiation.

Detailed description

Rationale: The standard treatment for pancreatic cancer is gemcitabine. This study combines gemcitabine with etanercept, a drug that binds with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) molecules and blocks their activity through inhibiting their interaction with cell surface TNF receptors. TNF is the name for a protein in the body that often helps fight foreign substances. However, research suggests that pancreatic tumors develop resistance to TNF and then use it to support cancer growth. Combining etanercept, a TNF inhibitor, with gemcitabine is a novel approach to advanced pancreatic cancer. Because etanercept has not been tested in combination with gemcitabine, a Phase I study will be conducted first to identify the safest dosage of etanercept, and then a Phase II study will evaluate the efficacy of this combination. Purpose: This study is evaluating the safety of etanercept and gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer in Phase I, and the efficacy of etanercept and gemcitabine for this condition in Phase II. TNF and other inflammatory markers will also be measured in the study. Treatment: Patients in this study will receive gemcitabine and etanercept. Gemcitabine will be administered through an intravenous infusion weekly for seven weeks followed by one week of rest. Additional treatments with gemcitabine will be given for three weeks followed by one week of rest. Patients will administer etanercept to themselves through a small injection underneath the skin twice each week. Six patients will initially be enrolled in Phase I. If severe side effects appear in at least two patients in Phase I, then additional patients will be enrolled and treated with lower dosages of gemcitabine. When the treatments do not produce unacceptable side effects, the Phase I portion of the study will end and Phase II will begin enrolling patients. Patients in the Phase II portion of the study will also receive gemcitabine and etanercept at the safest dosages identified in Phase I. Several tests and exams will be given throughout both portions of the study to closely monitor patients. Treatments will be discontinued due to disease growth or unacceptable side effects.

Interventions

DRUGGemcitabine

The starting dose will be 1000mg/m2 IV, weekly x 7 with a one week rest followed by weekly x 3 with one week rest for the remainder of treatment.

DRUGEtanercept

Etanercept will be self administered subcutaneously by patients with injections 11 prepared by the investigational pharmacy, beginning 7 days prior to the first dose of gemcitabine and continued twice weekly for the duration of the study.

Sponsors

Immunex Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Must have pathological diagnosis recurring or metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma * No prior chemotherapy, immunology treatments or hormonal treatments * Measurable disease * Must be \>18 years old * ONLY CONTROL ARM IS OPEN TO ACCRUAL Inclusion Criteria: * Pregnant and nursing mothers. * Psychiatric disorders that would interfere with consent ability. * Patients with known brain or leptomeningeal disease. * Patients with history of myocardial infarction with in six previous months. * Any concurrent illness that would constitute a hazard to participation in study. * Known sensitivity to gemcitabine or etanercept. * Prior treatment with etanercept.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Anti-tumor Effect as Measured by the Proportion of Patients Free of Disease-progression at Six Months After Treatment Initiationup to 6 monthsProgression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. Percentages were calculated by a Kaplan Meier analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With Responseup to 12 monthsPer Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
Percentage of Patients With Clinical Benefit ResponseUp to 12 monthsA clinical benefit was defined by the improvement of at least one parameter over at least 4 weeks, without worsening of any other parameter (change in weight, ECOG performance status, Quality of life).
Median Overall Survival Rates for Patientsup to 1 yearMedian survival is defined as the time of initiation of the first dose of intervention to the date of death
Serial Levels of TNF (Tumor Necrosis Factor) and Other Inflammatory Cytokinesup to 6 months

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Interventional Arm
Patients received Etanercept with gemcitabine
30
Control Arm
Patients received Gemcitabine alone
8
Total38

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicInterventional ArmControl ArmTotal
Age, Continuous59 years59 years59 years
ECOG Performance Status (PS)
PS 0 (Fully active)
7 patients3 patients10 patients
ECOG Performance Status (PS)
PS 1 (Restricted in physical activity)
21 patients5 patients26 patients
ECOG Performance Status (PS)
PS 2 (Ambulatory and capable of selfcare)
2 patients0 patients2 patients
Metastatic Site
Liver only
16 patients0 patients16 patients
Metastatic Site
Liver + other
10 patients6 patients16 patients
Metastatic Site
other site
4 patients2 patients6 patients
Region of Enrollment
United States
30 participants8 participants38 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants5 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants3 Participants19 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
29 / 298 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 290 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Anti-tumor Effect as Measured by the Proportion of Patients Free of Disease-progression at Six Months After Treatment Initiation

Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. Percentages were calculated by a Kaplan Meier analysis.

Time frame: up to 6 months

Population: 5 patients of the experimental group were non evaluable and 2 patients in the control group were non evaluable for disease progression.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Experimental GroupAnti-tumor Effect as Measured by the Proportion of Patients Free of Disease-progression at Six Months After Treatment Initiation28 percent of patients with PFS
Control GroupAnti-tumor Effect as Measured by the Proportion of Patients Free of Disease-progression at Six Months After Treatment Initiation14 percent of patients with PFS
Secondary

Median Overall Survival Rates for Patients

Median survival is defined as the time of initiation of the first dose of intervention to the date of death

Time frame: up to 1 year

Population: all evaluable patients

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Experimental GroupMedian Overall Survival Rates for Patients5.43 months
Control GroupMedian Overall Survival Rates for Patients8.1 months
Secondary

Number of Patients With Response

Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.

Time frame: up to 12 months

Population: 2 patients in the control group were non evaluable for disease response due to patient withdrawal and another no baseline imaging for comparison.~5 patients in experimental group were non evaluable for response.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Experimental GroupNumber of Patients With ResponsePartial Response12 percentage of patients
Experimental GroupNumber of Patients With ResponseStable Disease32 percentage of patients
Control GroupNumber of Patients With ResponsePartial Response17 percentage of patients
Control GroupNumber of Patients With ResponseStable Disease50 percentage of patients
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Clinical Benefit Response

A clinical benefit was defined by the improvement of at least one parameter over at least 4 weeks, without worsening of any other parameter (change in weight, ECOG performance status, Quality of life).

Time frame: Up to 12 months

Population: All evaluable patients

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Experimental GroupPercentage of Patients With Clinical Benefit Response33 percentage of patients
Control GroupPercentage of Patients With Clinical Benefit Response0 percentage of patients
Secondary

Serial Levels of TNF (Tumor Necrosis Factor) and Other Inflammatory Cytokines

Time frame: up to 6 months

Population: Compare CBR with responders and non responders with available blood samples.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupSerial Levels of TNF (Tumor Necrosis Factor) and Other Inflammatory CytokinesIL-1028.04 delta Ct valuesStandard Deviation 1.93
Experimental GroupSerial Levels of TNF (Tumor Necrosis Factor) and Other Inflammatory CytokinesIL-1b16.2 delta Ct valuesStandard Deviation 7.29
Experimental GroupSerial Levels of TNF (Tumor Necrosis Factor) and Other Inflammatory CytokinesNFkB6.03 delta Ct valuesStandard Deviation 4.62
Experimental GroupSerial Levels of TNF (Tumor Necrosis Factor) and Other Inflammatory CytokinesIL-1235.66 delta Ct valuesStandard Deviation 1.86
Experimental GroupSerial Levels of TNF (Tumor Necrosis Factor) and Other Inflammatory CytokinesTNF26.66 delta Ct valuesStandard Deviation 3.84
Experimental GroupSerial Levels of TNF (Tumor Necrosis Factor) and Other Inflammatory CytokinesIFN28.7 delta Ct valuesStandard Deviation 2.13
Experimental GroupSerial Levels of TNF (Tumor Necrosis Factor) and Other Inflammatory CytokinesIL-629.25 delta Ct valuesStandard Deviation 1.31
Control GroupSerial Levels of TNF (Tumor Necrosis Factor) and Other Inflammatory CytokinesNFkB4.38 delta Ct valuesStandard Deviation 3.13
Control GroupSerial Levels of TNF (Tumor Necrosis Factor) and Other Inflammatory CytokinesIL-1026.85 delta Ct valuesStandard Deviation 1.38
Control GroupSerial Levels of TNF (Tumor Necrosis Factor) and Other Inflammatory CytokinesTNF27.26 delta Ct valuesStandard Deviation 4.82
Control GroupSerial Levels of TNF (Tumor Necrosis Factor) and Other Inflammatory CytokinesIL-1b13.07 delta Ct valuesStandard Deviation 7.44
Control GroupSerial Levels of TNF (Tumor Necrosis Factor) and Other Inflammatory CytokinesIL-629.29 delta Ct valuesStandard Deviation 1.39
Control GroupSerial Levels of TNF (Tumor Necrosis Factor) and Other Inflammatory CytokinesIFN28.63 delta Ct valuesStandard Deviation 1.55
Control GroupSerial Levels of TNF (Tumor Necrosis Factor) and Other Inflammatory CytokinesIL-1236.11 delta Ct valuesStandard Deviation 1.24

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 23, 2026