Skip to content

Physician Uncertainty Reduction for Hypertension

Physician Uncertainty Reduction for Hypertension

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00201084
Enrollment
670
Registered
2005-09-20
Start date
2004-09-30
Completion date
2009-07-31
Last updated
2014-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases, Hypertension

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to test the theory that a major factor in poor blood pressure (BP) control is that physicians fail to intensify antihypertensive therapy for their patients.

Detailed description

BACKGROUND: A large amount of literature suggests that the majority of uncontrolled hypertensives are under medical care, and that lack of control is largely explained by physicians not intensifying treatment to achieve the BP targets recommended in the national guidelines. Traditional physician education, feedback, and reminders have a limited effect in promoting a rapid rate of guideline implementation. The theoretical framework of diffusion of innovations suggests that providing physicians with tools to reduce uncertainty about the attributes of a guideline may accelerate the adoption process. The presumed barriers to treatment intensification for uncontrolled hypertension are: 1) uncertainty over the patient's true BP; 2) uncertainty over whether the patient is adherent to medications already prescribed; and 3) uncertainty over the benefits of adding medications when patients express preference for lifestyle modification. DESIGN NARRATIVE: This cluster randomized trial in 10 primary care clinics (5 intervention and 5 control) will test the hypothesis that an intervention based on diffusion of innovations theory, and targeting provider treatment actions, will increase the prevalence of BP control to Joint National Committee-7(JNC-7) recommended levels in African American patients (greater than 140/90 mm Hg or greater 130/80 mm Hg if the patient has diabetes). The uncertainty reduction tools in the Uncertainty Reduction to Accelerate Diffusion (URAD) practices will include: 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring, electronic bottle-cap monitoring of medication adherence, and medication and lifestyle counseling. The Usual Practice (UP) physicians will receive education about the guidelines and a placebo chart form indicating the patient is being followed in a BP control study. The 10 participating clinics represent a large, multi-site private group practice and a public health care system. Sixty-seven patients per clinic (670 total) will be enrolled when the intervention is initiated, and their BP and self-reported medication and lifestyle adherence will be monitored for two years. Sixty percent of the sample will be African American, and the study will have 90% power to detect a difference of 20% in the prevalence of hypertension control in the African Americans as a result of the intervention (50% control in URAD clinics vs. 30% control UP clinics). Secondary endpoints will include BP measurements by study staff under standardized conditions, physician treatment intensification actions, patient adherence, characteristics of doctor-patient communication associated with treatment action, use of the URAD components, and physician knowledge and beliefs about the JNC 7 guidelines and their relationship to BP control. Analysis of secondary endpoints will include race. The research team has collaborated with both health systems in previous studies, and is experienced in conducting hypertension control and behavioral intervention studies in the target population.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALUncertainty reduction

At physician discretion, 24 hour ambulatory BP monitoring and/or electronic bottle cap monitoring and/or lifestyle counseling

Sponsors

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
CollaboratorOTHER
Kelsey Research Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Baylor College of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Kept appointment on index visit day (see patient sampling and recruitment methods below) * Had one previous visit to the setting within the past year and identified the setting as his/her usual source of care * Average clinic BP on index visit and one most recent previous visit was equal to or greater than 140 mm Hg systolic or 90 mm Hg diastolic (130/80 mm Hg if diabetic) * Acknowledges understanding of the study goals and methods and gives informed consent to participate in study measurements and other procedures

Exclusion criteria

* Cognitive or other functional impairment sufficient to limit patient's ability to give informed consent, keep follow-up appointments, and participate actively in adherence to his or her treatment regimen * Renal insufficiencies or renal failure based on a recent serum creatinine greater than 2.0 or chart diagnosis * Planning to leave the Houston area within the next two years * Severe, life-threatening illness that makes hypertension treatment a secondary priority

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Expressed as the proportion of patients with average clinic BP less than 140/90 mm Hg in the previous two visits (130/80 mm Hg if the patient also has diabetes)24 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Actual measure clinic systolic and diastolic BP, patient physician communication patterns24 months
Patient adherence to medication and healthy lifestyle24 months
Physician knowledge, attitude, and beliefs about JNC-7 goals and barriers to achievement of the treatment goals and cost24 months

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026