Skip to content

Safety Study With the Antibody, cG250, and Isotope, 124-Iodine, to Diagnose Patients With Renal Masses.

Pilot Study of Iodine-124 Labeled Chimeric G250 (124I-cG250) in Presurgical Patients With Renal Masses

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00199888
Enrollment
26
Registered
2005-09-20
Start date
2005-06-30
Completion date
2009-05-29
Last updated
2022-10-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer of Kidney, Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma, Kidney Cancer, Neoplasms, Kidney, Renal Cancer, Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC), Renal Neoplasms

Keywords

Kidney Cancer, Renal Cancer, Neoplasms, Kidney, cG250, antibody, Iodine 124

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to see if an antibody (cG250) attached to a radioactive substance (Iodine-124) safely detects clear cell renal cancer in patients with kidney tumors scheduled for surgery.

Detailed description

Antibodies are proteins made by the immune system. They fight things that the body sees as foreign, such as bacteria and viruses. The body can also see cancer cells as foreign. When the body sees a foreign invader, it sends out antibodies that tag the invader. Once this happens, the immune system can work to destroy whatever the antibody has tagged. Monoclonal antibodies are antibodies that can be made in the lab. They tag a portion of a cancer cell. Early monoclonal antibodies were made from antibodies grown in mice. They caused an antibody response in humans after one dose. Now they are more like human antibodies, and thus, do not produce the same reactions on repeated doses. These are called chimeric antibodies. The antibody we will use in this study is called chimeric G250 (cG250). Recent research has shown that some antibodies can attach themselves to cancer cells, and that they bind to very few normal cells. This could help cancer treatment in two ways. One is that the body's own immune system might work to destroy tagged cancer cells. The other is that we can attach chemotherapy drugs or radioactive chemicals to the antibodies. These can then deliver treatment when the antibodies attach to the cancer cells. This study is being done to test the tagging ability of cG250 to cancer cells. After you receive cG250, you will have a scan. The picture the scan produces will show where the antibody has collected inside the body. From this, it is possible to measure how well cG250 can detect kidney cancer. This is NOT a treatment for renal cancer. After your surgery, we will examine the tumor and other tissue to see how much of the antibody has attached to the tumor.

Interventions

Sponsors

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Presence of a renal mass. 2. Scheduled for surgical resection of renal mass. 3. Expected survival of at least 3 months. 4. Karnofsky performance scale ≥70. 5. The following laboratory results should be within the following limits within the last 4 weeks prior to study day 1: * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 x 10E9/L * Platelet count ≥ 100 x 10E9/L * Serum bilirubin ≤ 2.0 mg/dL * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≤ 2.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤ 2.5 x ULN * Serum creatinine ≤ 2.0 mg/dL 6. Pregnancy Test to be performed on female patients of childbearing potential within 24-48 hours before administration of radioactive material. 7. Recovered from toxicity of any prior therapy. 8. Able and willing to give valid written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Intercurrent medical condition that may limit the amount of antibody to be administered. 2. Intercurrent medical condition that renders the patient ineligible for surgery. 3. New York Heart Association Class III/IV cardiac disease. 4. History of autoimmune hepatitis. 5. Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or immunotherapy within 4 weeks prior to the first cG250 dose. 6. Mental impairment that may compromise the ability to give informed consent and comply with the requirements of the study. 7. Lack of availability for immunological and clinical follow-up assessments. 8. Participation in any other clinical trial involving another investigational agent within 4 weeks prior to enrollment. 9. Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding. 10. Allergy to iodine.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of 124I-cG250 Based on Positron-Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) Imaging in the Detection of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Compared to Pathology of Tumor Mass at Surgical Resection.8 daysPatients were listed as PET-positive based on a tumor to nontumor radioactive uptake ratio of \> 3 and PET-negative if less than or equal to 3. The resected renal mass (tumor) was subjected to pathological evaluation, and a diagnosis of clear cell RCC or non-clear cell RCC was made. PPV is the proportion of patients with a positive PET scan who actually have the disease based on pathology. Patients who have a positive PET scan on imaging and clear cell RCC on pathology will be considered true-positives. Patients who have negative PET scans on imaging and non-clear cell RCC on pathology will be considered true-negatives. Patients with positive PET scans on imaging and non-clear cell RCC on pathology will be considered false positives and those with clear cell RCC on pathology but negative PET scans on imaging will be considered false negatives.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of 124I-cG250 Based on Positron-Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) Imaging in the Detection of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Compared to Pathology of Tumor Mass at Surgical Resection.8 daysPatients were listed as PET-positive based on a tumor to nontumor radioactive uptake ratio of \> 3 and PET-negative if less than or equal to 3. The resected renal mass (tumor) was subjected to pathological evaluation, and a diagnosis of clear cell RCC or non-clear cell RCC was made. NPV is the ratio of participants who do not have clear cell RCC to all those who had negative PET scans. Patients who have a positive PET scan on imaging and clear cell RCC on pathology will be considered true-positives. Patients who have a negative PET scan on imaging and do not have clear cell RCC on pathology will be considered true-negatives. Patients with a positive PET scan on imaging and do not have clear cell RCC on pathology will be considered false positives and those with clear cell RCC on pathology but negative PET scans on imaging will be considered false negatives.
Sensitivity of 124I-cG250 Based on Positron-Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) Imaging in the Detection of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Compared to Pathology of Tumor Mass at Surgical Resection.8 daysPatients were listed as PET-positive based on a tumor to nontumor radioactive uptake ratio of \> 3 and PET-negative if less than or equal to 3. The resected renal mass (tumor) was subjected to pathological evaluation, and a diagnosis of clear cell RCC or non-clear cell RCC was made. Sensitivity is defined as the ratio of the proportion of the patients who have clear cell RCC based on pathology and whose PET scans are positive over the number of patients with clear cell RCC. Patients who have a positive PET scan on imaging and clear cell RCC on pathology will be considered true-positives. Patients who have a negative PET scan on imaging and do not have clear cell RCC on pathology will be considered true-negatives. Patients with a positive PET scan on imaging and do not have clear cell RCC on pathology will be considered false positives and those with clear cell RCC on pathology but negative PET scans on imaging will be considered false negatives.
Specificity of 124I-cG250 Based on Positron-Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) Imaging in the Detection of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Compared to Pathology of Tumor Mass at Surgical Resection.8 daysPatients were listed as PET-positive based on a tumor to nontumor radioactive uptake ratio of \> 3 and PET-negative if less than or equal to 3. The resected renal mass (tumor) was subjected to pathological evaluation, and a diagnosis of clear cell RCC or non-clear cell RCC was made. Specificity is defined as the number of patients with non-clear cell RCC correctly classified divided by all non-clear cell RCC patients. Patients who have a positive PET scan on imaging and clear cell RCC on pathology will be considered a true-positive. Patients who have a negative PET scan on imaging and do not have clear cell RCC on pathology will be considered true negatives. Patients with a positive PET scan on imaging and do not have clear cell RCC on pathology will be considered false positives and those with clear cell RCC on pathology but negative PET scans on imaging will be considered false negatives.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
124-Iodine-cG250 (124I-cG250)
Patients who were scheduled for surgical resection of renal masses received a single intravenous (IV) dose of 10 mg of 5 mCi/10 mg 124I-cG250. Patients underwent PET/CT imaging of the whole body on at least 2 occasions: once following injection and once prior to surgical resection. Patients were scheduled for surgical resection of their renal masses on day 8.
26
Total26

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic124-Iodine-cG250 (124I-cG250)
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
7 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
19 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
26 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
24 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
26 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 26
other
Total, other adverse events
26 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of 124I-cG250 Based on Positron-Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) Imaging in the Detection of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Compared to Pathology of Tumor Mass at Surgical Resection.

Patients were listed as PET-positive based on a tumor to nontumor radioactive uptake ratio of \> 3 and PET-negative if less than or equal to 3. The resected renal mass (tumor) was subjected to pathological evaluation, and a diagnosis of clear cell RCC or non-clear cell RCC was made. PPV is the proportion of patients with a positive PET scan who actually have the disease based on pathology. Patients who have a positive PET scan on imaging and clear cell RCC on pathology will be considered true-positives. Patients who have negative PET scans on imaging and non-clear cell RCC on pathology will be considered true-negatives. Patients with positive PET scans on imaging and non-clear cell RCC on pathology will be considered false positives and those with clear cell RCC on pathology but negative PET scans on imaging will be considered false negatives.

Time frame: 8 days

Population: All patients who enrolled in the study, received 124I-cG250, had evaluable PET scans, had tissue samples analyzed and were PET-positive. One patient was excluded because the immunoreactivity of the 124I-cG250 administered was \< 25% and considered immunologically inactive. Fifteen patients were PET-positive.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
124-Iodine-cG250 (124I-cG250)Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of 124I-cG250 Based on Positron-Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) Imaging in the Detection of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Compared to Pathology of Tumor Mass at Surgical Resection.100 percent of PET-positive patients
Secondary

Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of 124I-cG250 Based on Positron-Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) Imaging in the Detection of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Compared to Pathology of Tumor Mass at Surgical Resection.

Patients were listed as PET-positive based on a tumor to nontumor radioactive uptake ratio of \> 3 and PET-negative if less than or equal to 3. The resected renal mass (tumor) was subjected to pathological evaluation, and a diagnosis of clear cell RCC or non-clear cell RCC was made. NPV is the ratio of participants who do not have clear cell RCC to all those who had negative PET scans. Patients who have a positive PET scan on imaging and clear cell RCC on pathology will be considered true-positives. Patients who have a negative PET scan on imaging and do not have clear cell RCC on pathology will be considered true-negatives. Patients with a positive PET scan on imaging and do not have clear cell RCC on pathology will be considered false positives and those with clear cell RCC on pathology but negative PET scans on imaging will be considered false negatives.

Time frame: 8 days

Population: All patients who enrolled in the study, received 124-Iodine-cG250 (124I-cG250), had evaluable PET/CT scans, tissue samples taken and were PET-negative. One patient was excluded because the immunoreactivity of the 124I-cG250 administered was \< 25% and considered immunologically inactive. Ten patients were PET-negative.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
124-Iodine-cG250 (124I-cG250)Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of 124I-cG250 Based on Positron-Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) Imaging in the Detection of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Compared to Pathology of Tumor Mass at Surgical Resection.90 percent of PET-negative patients
Secondary

Sensitivity of 124I-cG250 Based on Positron-Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) Imaging in the Detection of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Compared to Pathology of Tumor Mass at Surgical Resection.

Patients were listed as PET-positive based on a tumor to nontumor radioactive uptake ratio of \> 3 and PET-negative if less than or equal to 3. The resected renal mass (tumor) was subjected to pathological evaluation, and a diagnosis of clear cell RCC or non-clear cell RCC was made. Sensitivity is defined as the ratio of the proportion of the patients who have clear cell RCC based on pathology and whose PET scans are positive over the number of patients with clear cell RCC. Patients who have a positive PET scan on imaging and clear cell RCC on pathology will be considered true-positives. Patients who have a negative PET scan on imaging and do not have clear cell RCC on pathology will be considered true-negatives. Patients with a positive PET scan on imaging and do not have clear cell RCC on pathology will be considered false positives and those with clear cell RCC on pathology but negative PET scans on imaging will be considered false negatives.

Time frame: 8 days

Population: All patients who enrolled in the study, received 124-Iodine-cG250 (124I-cG250), had evaluable PET/CT scans, tissue samples taken and had a pathological diagnosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. One patient was excluded because the immunoreactivity of the 124I-cG250 administered was \< 25% and considered immunologically inactive. Sixteen patients had clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
124-Iodine-cG250 (124I-cG250)Sensitivity of 124I-cG250 Based on Positron-Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) Imaging in the Detection of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Compared to Pathology of Tumor Mass at Surgical Resection.94 percent of clear cell RCC patients
Secondary

Specificity of 124I-cG250 Based on Positron-Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) Imaging in the Detection of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Compared to Pathology of Tumor Mass at Surgical Resection.

Patients were listed as PET-positive based on a tumor to nontumor radioactive uptake ratio of \> 3 and PET-negative if less than or equal to 3. The resected renal mass (tumor) was subjected to pathological evaluation, and a diagnosis of clear cell RCC or non-clear cell RCC was made. Specificity is defined as the number of patients with non-clear cell RCC correctly classified divided by all non-clear cell RCC patients. Patients who have a positive PET scan on imaging and clear cell RCC on pathology will be considered a true-positive. Patients who have a negative PET scan on imaging and do not have clear cell RCC on pathology will be considered true negatives. Patients with a positive PET scan on imaging and do not have clear cell RCC on pathology will be considered false positives and those with clear cell RCC on pathology but negative PET scans on imaging will be considered false negatives.

Time frame: 8 days

Population: All patients who enrolled in the study, received 124-Iodine-cG250 (124I-cG250), had evaluable PET/CT scans, tissue samples taken and did not have clear cell renal cell carcinoma. One patient was excluded because the immunoreactivity of the 124I-cG250 administered was \< 25% and considered immunologically inactive. Nine patients did not have clear cell RCC.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
124-Iodine-cG250 (124I-cG250)Specificity of 124I-cG250 Based on Positron-Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) Imaging in the Detection of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Compared to Pathology of Tumor Mass at Surgical Resection.100 percent of non clear cell RCC patients

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 7, 2026