Skip to content

Follow-up of Patients With Curative-intent Surgical Resection for NSCLC

Follow-up of Patients With Curative-intent Surgical Resection for NSCLC : CT Scanning Versus 18 FDG Imaging.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00199615
Enrollment
73
Registered
2005-09-20
Start date
2001-04-30
Completion date
2006-12-31
Last updated
2025-07-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Keywords

lung cancer, 18 FDG, PET

Brief summary

The guidelines and institutional practices recommended more frequent visits the two years following curative-intent therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).No international consensus is published concerning follow-up of resected NSCLC patients.Recent studies have outlined that positron emission tomography (PET) scanning may be accurate in early detection of recurrences by comparison to computed tomography (CT). The aim of this study is to compare follow-up by conventional methods versus PET. Patients are randomly assigned to two arms. In the first arm, thorax CT with liver and adrenal gland sections, abdominal ultrasonography and nuclear bone scintigraphy are performed every 6 months after surgery for two years. In the second arm, PET scanning is only. For brain metastasis detection, CT is performed in the two arms. Recurrences are detected during scheduled or unscheduled procedure in asymptomatic patients. PET and CT are interpreted separately by two nuclear physicians and two radiologists. The direct cost of follow-up procedure is determined in the two groups. The calculated sample is composed of 60 patients in each arm to detect significant difference. The Ethics Committee of Universitary Hospital of Limoges approves the study.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPET

Intravenous injection of glucose labeled Fluor 18.Le patient remains fasted at least 6 hours before the start of the examination. The review lasted 1 hour, during which the patient should not move.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Limoges
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients who underwent resection for NSCLC * Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a mixed histology profile that included small cell carcinoma or neuroendocrine tumor cells. * Patients with non-resected NSCLC or with metastasis * Patients who have previous malignancy, except basal cell carcinoma of the skin -

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Disease-free survival from the date of operation to the date of recurrence or censured at the date of last follow-up visit or date of the death.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
- Overall survival from the date of the operation to the death
- Specificity, sensibility and accuracy of TEP to detect recurrence
- Direct cost of follow-up from the Frenc Healthcare insurance

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026