Skip to content

Study Evaluating Refacto For Pharmacovigilance

Pharmacovigilance Evaluation Of Refacto In Usual Care Settings

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00195442
Enrollment
288
Registered
2005-09-19
Start date
1999-07-31
Completion date
2010-01-31
Last updated
2011-02-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemophilia A

Keywords

Hemophilia A

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of treatment with ReFacto under conditions of routine therapy. Furthermore a continuous benefit/risk assessment will be done.

Detailed description

Non-interventional study: subjects to be selected according to the usual clinical practice of their physician

Interventions

Patients will be treated in accordance with the requirements of the labeling of ReFacto (Moroctocog alfa) in Germany. The dosage and duration of therapy is to be determined by the physician to meet the patients' individual needs for treatment.

Sponsors

Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Proven diagnosis of Hemophilia A

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications according to Summary of Product Characteristics

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Number of Bleeding Episodes Per Patient YearBaseline up to a mean duration of 54 monthsParticipants with hemophilia A suffer from a hereditary lack of blood clotting factor VIII. As a consequence, the ability of the blood to coagulate is reduced and bleedings at any site or organ of the body may occur after minor injury or even spontaneously. Predominantly, joints, muscles, and internal organs are affected by bleeding complications. Participants reported the occurrence of each bleeding episode while on study. The bleeding rate for each participant was calculated by number of reported episodes per years on study.
Mean Number of Bleeding-related Exposure Days Per Patient YearBaseline up to a mean duration of 54 monthsExposure days are the number of days of treatment with ReFacto.
Mean Number of Exposure Days Per Patient YearBaseline up to a mean duration of 54 monthsExposure days are the number of days of treatment with ReFacto.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With de Novo Inhibitor FormationBaseline up to a mean duration of 54 monthsThe applied criteria of clinical relevance for de novo inhibitor formation was defined as normal Factor VIII dosage was ineffective to control a bleeding, control of bleeding episodes required increasing Factor VIII dosage, change of concentrate type (administration of activated Prothrombin-Complex Concentrate \[aPCC\] or recombinant Factor VII \[rFVII \]) was needed to stop a bleeding, or change of therapy strategy (intensive prophylaxis or Immune Tolerance Induction \[ITI\]) was required.
Mean Annual ReFacto Consumption Per Patient YearBaseline up to a mean duration of 54 monthsReFacto administered as International Units (IU) according to the physician's decision following the drug's summary of product characteristics (SPC) and according to usual care principles.
Number of Participants for Physicians' Assessment of Satisfaction With Treatment SuccessBaseline up to a mean duration of 54 monthsSubjective assessment by the physician to evaluate treatment success (i.e., control of bleeding, Factor VIII consumption, treatment efficacy and tolerance, handling of preparation, and days missing from work or school). Physician rated assessment could be categorized as Very satisfied, Satisfied, Unsatisfied, or Very unsatisfied; no criteria was pre-specified for the assessment categories in this observational study.
Number of Participants for Physicians' Assessment of EfficacyBaseline up to a mean duration of 54 monthsSubjective assessment by the physician to evaluate control of bleeding. Physician rated assessment could be categorized as Very good, Good, Moderate, or Poor; no criteria was pre-specified for the assessment categories in this observational study.
Number of Participants for Patients' Assessment of Handling of ReFactoBaseline up to a mean duration of 54 monthsSubjective assessment by the participant on handling (preparation and administration) of ReFacto. Patient rated assessment could be categorized as Very good, Good, Moderate, Poor, or No specification; no criteria was pre-specified for the assessment categories in this observational study.
Number of Participants for Physicians' Assessment of ToleranceBaseline up to a mean duration of 54 monthsSubjective assessment by the physician to evaluate the participants' tolerance of treatment with ReFacto (i.e., dose, administration method, or adverse effects). Physician rated assessment could be categorized as Very good, Good, Moderate, or Poor; no criteria was pre-specified for the assessment categories in this observational study.
Number of Participants for Patients' Assessment of ToleranceBaseline up to a mean duration of 54 monthsSubjective assessment by the participant to evaluate tolerance of treatment with ReFacto (i.e., dose, administration method, or adverse effects). Patient rated assessment could be categorized as Very good, Good, Moderate, Poor, or No specification; no criteria was pre-specified for the assessment categories in this observational study.
Number of Participants for Physicians' Assessment of Handling of ReFactoBaseline up to a mean duration of 54 monthsSubjective assessment by the physician to evaluate the participants' handling (preparation and administration) of ReFacto. Physician rated assessment could be categorized as Very good, Good, Moderate, or Poor; no criteria was pre-specified for the assessment categories in this observational study.
Number of Participants for Patients' Assessment of EfficacyBaseline up to a mean duration of 54 monthsSubjective assessment by the participant to evaluate control of bleeding. Patient rated assessment could be categorized as Very good, Good, Moderate, Poor, or No specification; no criteria was pre-specified for the assessment categories in this observational study.
Number of Participants for Days of Sick Leave Per MonthBaseline up to a mean duration of 54 monthsDays of sick leave (missing work or school) per month categorized as No days of absence, Number of days of absence, Long-term inability to work or study, Not employed or at school, or No specification.
Number of Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline up to a mean duration of 54 monthsAEs are any undesired side effect which occurred in a participant undergoing study treatment independent of whether a correlation with study treatment was suspected or not. SAEs are undesired events which were lethal or life-threatening, made hospitalization or extension of hospital stay necessary, lead to permanent damage with handicap (inability to work), as well as congenital anomalies, malignant disease, or overdosing. Also presence of inhibitors, thrombotic events, erythrocyte agglutination, allergic reactions, less than therapeutic effect, and inhibitor development were considered SAEs.

Countries

Austria, Germany

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 288 participants were observed during the study in 48 centers (44 Germany and 4 Austria) from time of First subject first visit May 1999 to Last subject last visit January 2010.

Pre-assignment details

The study was terminated January 2010 due to the introduction of a successor product ReFacto® AF.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)
B-domain deleted, recombinant factor VIII (BDDrFVIII) for participants with Hemophilia A in usual health care settings.
288
Total288

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath7
Overall StudyIntermittent product shortage21
Overall StudyLess than expected therapeutic effect38
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up27
Overall StudyNo reason specified4
Overall StudyOther14
Overall StudyPoor cooperation2
Overall StudySwitch to other Factor VIII preparation23

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)
Age, Customized
Adults ≥ 18 years of age
182 participants
Age, Customized
Children < 18 years of age
106 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
288 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
118 / 288
serious
Total, serious adverse events
141 / 288

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Number of Bleeding Episodes Per Patient Year

Participants with hemophilia A suffer from a hereditary lack of blood clotting factor VIII. As a consequence, the ability of the blood to coagulate is reduced and bleedings at any site or organ of the body may occur after minor injury or even spontaneously. Predominantly, joints, muscles, and internal organs are affected by bleeding complications. Participants reported the occurrence of each bleeding episode while on study. The bleeding rate for each participant was calculated by number of reported episodes per years on study.

Time frame: Baseline up to a mean duration of 54 months

Population: Total population for efficacy analysis included all participants with submitted diary cards and severe haemophilia.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Mean Number of Bleeding Episodes Per Patient Year13.41 episodes per yearStandard Deviation 14.67
Primary

Mean Number of Bleeding-related Exposure Days Per Patient Year

Exposure days are the number of days of treatment with ReFacto.

Time frame: Baseline up to a mean duration of 54 months

Population: Total population for efficacy analysis included all participants with submitted diary cards and severe haemophilia.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Mean Number of Bleeding-related Exposure Days Per Patient Year20.58 days per yearStandard Deviation 21.39
Primary

Mean Number of Exposure Days Per Patient Year

Exposure days are the number of days of treatment with ReFacto.

Time frame: Baseline up to a mean duration of 54 months

Population: Total population for efficacy analysis included all participants with submitted diary cards and severe haemophilia.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Mean Number of Exposure Days Per Patient Year126.76 days per yearStandard Deviation 68.81
Secondary

Mean Annual ReFacto Consumption Per Patient Year

ReFacto administered as International Units (IU) according to the physician's decision following the drug's summary of product characteristics (SPC) and according to usual care principles.

Time frame: Baseline up to a mean duration of 54 months

Population: Total population for efficacy analysis included all participants with submitted diary cards and severe haemophilia.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Mean Annual ReFacto Consumption Per Patient Year204509 International units per yearStandard Deviation 221723
Secondary

Number of Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

AEs are any undesired side effect which occurred in a participant undergoing study treatment independent of whether a correlation with study treatment was suspected or not. SAEs are undesired events which were lethal or life-threatening, made hospitalization or extension of hospital stay necessary, lead to permanent damage with handicap (inability to work), as well as congenital anomalies, malignant disease, or overdosing. Also presence of inhibitors, thrombotic events, erythrocyte agglutination, allergic reactions, less than therapeutic effect, and inhibitor development were considered SAEs.

Time frame: Baseline up to a mean duration of 54 months

Population: Safety population includes all subjects with a baseline visit; (n)=number of participants with events.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Non-serious Adverse Events (n=118)668 events
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Serious Adverse Events (n=141)291 events
Secondary

Number of Participants for Days of Sick Leave Per Month

Days of sick leave (missing work or school) per month categorized as No days of absence, Number of days of absence, Long-term inability to work or study, Not employed or at school, or No specification.

Time frame: Baseline up to a mean duration of 54 months

Population: Safety population includes all subjects with a baseline visit. N=participants with evaluable data; last measurement available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Days of Sick Leave Per MonthNo days of absence87 participants
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Days of Sick Leave Per Month<6 days of absence32 participants
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Days of Sick Leave Per Month6 to 10 days of absence4 participants
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Days of Sick Leave Per Month>10 days of absence8 participants
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Days of Sick Leave Per MonthLong-term inability to work or study0 participants
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Days of Sick Leave Per MonthNot employed or at school36 participants
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Days of Sick Leave Per MonthNo specification2 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants for Patients' Assessment of Efficacy

Subjective assessment by the participant to evaluate control of bleeding. Patient rated assessment could be categorized as Very good, Good, Moderate, Poor, or No specification; no criteria was pre-specified for the assessment categories in this observational study.

Time frame: Baseline up to a mean duration of 54 months

Population: Safety population includes all subjects with a baseline visit. N=participants with evaluable data; last measurement available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Patients' Assessment of EfficacyModerate35 participants
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Patients' Assessment of EfficacyPoor11 participants
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Patients' Assessment of EfficacyVery good103 participants
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Patients' Assessment of EfficacyGood116 participants
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Patients' Assessment of EfficacyNo specification4 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants for Patients' Assessment of Handling of ReFacto

Subjective assessment by the participant on handling (preparation and administration) of ReFacto. Patient rated assessment could be categorized as Very good, Good, Moderate, Poor, or No specification; no criteria was pre-specified for the assessment categories in this observational study.

Time frame: Baseline up to a mean duration of 54 months

Population: Safety population includes all subjects with a baseline visit. N=participants with evaluable data; last measurement available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Patients' Assessment of Handling of ReFactoVery good99 participants
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Patients' Assessment of Handling of ReFactoGood154 participants
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Patients' Assessment of Handling of ReFactoModerate11 participants
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Patients' Assessment of Handling of ReFactoPoor1 participants
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Patients' Assessment of Handling of ReFactoNo specification4 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants for Patients' Assessment of Tolerance

Subjective assessment by the participant to evaluate tolerance of treatment with ReFacto (i.e., dose, administration method, or adverse effects). Patient rated assessment could be categorized as Very good, Good, Moderate, Poor, or No specification; no criteria was pre-specified for the assessment categories in this observational study.

Time frame: Baseline up to a mean duration of 54 months

Population: Safety population includes all subjects with a baseline visit. N=participants with evaluable data; last measurement available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Patients' Assessment of ToleranceVery good131 participants
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Patients' Assessment of ToleranceGood132 participants
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Patients' Assessment of ToleranceModerate1 participants
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Patients' Assessment of TolerancePoor1 participants
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Patients' Assessment of ToleranceNo specification4 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants for Physicians' Assessment of Efficacy

Subjective assessment by the physician to evaluate control of bleeding. Physician rated assessment could be categorized as Very good, Good, Moderate, or Poor; no criteria was pre-specified for the assessment categories in this observational study.

Time frame: Baseline up to a mean duration of 54 months

Population: Safety population includes all subjects with a baseline visit. N=participants with evaluable data; last measurement available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Physicians' Assessment of EfficacyVery good111 participants
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Physicians' Assessment of EfficacyGood111 participants
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Physicians' Assessment of EfficacyModerate38 participants
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Physicians' Assessment of EfficacyPoor9 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants for Physicians' Assessment of Handling of ReFacto

Subjective assessment by the physician to evaluate the participants' handling (preparation and administration) of ReFacto. Physician rated assessment could be categorized as Very good, Good, Moderate, or Poor; no criteria was pre-specified for the assessment categories in this observational study.

Time frame: Baseline up to a mean duration of 54 months

Population: Safety population includes all subjects with a baseline visit. N=participants with evaluable data; last measurement available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Physicians' Assessment of Handling of ReFactoGood154 participants
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Physicians' Assessment of Handling of ReFactoVery good109 participants
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Physicians' Assessment of Handling of ReFactoModerate6 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants for Physicians' Assessment of Satisfaction With Treatment Success

Subjective assessment by the physician to evaluate treatment success (i.e., control of bleeding, Factor VIII consumption, treatment efficacy and tolerance, handling of preparation, and days missing from work or school). Physician rated assessment could be categorized as Very satisfied, Satisfied, Unsatisfied, or Very unsatisfied; no criteria was pre-specified for the assessment categories in this observational study.

Time frame: Baseline up to a mean duration of 54 months

Population: Safety population includes all subjects with a baseline visit. N=participants with evaluable data; last measurement available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Physicians' Assessment of Satisfaction With Treatment SuccessVery satisfied92 participants
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Physicians' Assessment of Satisfaction With Treatment SuccessSatisfied73 participants
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Physicians' Assessment of Satisfaction With Treatment SuccessUnsatisfied3 participants
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Physicians' Assessment of Satisfaction With Treatment SuccessVery unsatisfied1 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants for Physicians' Assessment of Tolerance

Subjective assessment by the physician to evaluate the participants' tolerance of treatment with ReFacto (i.e., dose, administration method, or adverse effects). Physician rated assessment could be categorized as Very good, Good, Moderate, or Poor; no criteria was pre-specified for the assessment categories in this observational study.

Time frame: Baseline up to a mean duration of 54 months

Population: Safety population includes all subjects with a baseline visit. N=participants with evaluable data; last measurement available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Physicians' Assessment of ToleranceVery good130 participants
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Physicians' Assessment of ToleranceGood137 participants
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants for Physicians' Assessment of ToleranceModerate2 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With de Novo Inhibitor Formation

The applied criteria of clinical relevance for de novo inhibitor formation was defined as normal Factor VIII dosage was ineffective to control a bleeding, control of bleeding episodes required increasing Factor VIII dosage, change of concentrate type (administration of activated Prothrombin-Complex Concentrate \[aPCC\] or recombinant Factor VII \[rFVII \]) was needed to stop a bleeding, or change of therapy strategy (intensive prophylaxis or Immune Tolerance Induction \[ITI\]) was required.

Time frame: Baseline up to a mean duration of 54 months

Population: Safety population includes all subjects with a baseline visit.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ReFacto (Moroctocog Alfa)Number of Participants With de Novo Inhibitor Formation7 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026