Skip to content

A Randomized Trial of the Ostial Versus the Extra-Ostial Ablation Strategy for Atrial Fibrillation

A Randomized Trial of the Ostial Versus the Extra-Ostial Ablation Strategy for Atrial Fibrillation (LASso Vs CARto)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00192972
Enrollment
100
Registered
2005-09-19
Start date
2002-11-30
Completion date
2005-06-30
Last updated
2005-12-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arrhythmia, Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

Catheter ablation, Atrial fibrillation

Brief summary

Both segmental, ostial and circumferential, extra-ostial pulmonary vein (PV) isolation have been proven effective in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. In this study patients with symptomatic paroxystic or persistent AF were randomised to one of the above mentioned ablation methods. The primary endpoints were recurrent AF and recurrence of left atrium-PV conduction.

Detailed description

Both segmental, ostial and circumferential, extra-ostial pulmonary vein (PV) isolation have been proven effective in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. In this study with symptomativ paroxystic or persistent AF were randomised to one of the above mentioned ablation methods. Each patient was allowed a maximum of two ablation procedures. Holter monitoring for 14-days periods will be performed at 3 months after ablation. The patiens are seen at out-patient visits at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the ablation procedure. Primary endpoints were recurrent AF and recurrence of left atrium-PV conduction. Secondary endpoints were: * safety * resumption of LA-PV conduction * alterations in neurohormones * socio-economics aspects(cost effectiveness) * changes in inflammatory markers * quality of life * alterations in signal averaged P wawe signals * evaluation of the predictive value of these variables to predict recurrence of AF

Interventions

PROCEDURECatheter ablation (pulmonary vein isolation)

Sponsors

Medtronic
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Biosense Webster, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Abbott Medical Devices
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Guidant Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
ECT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF for more than 6 months, with at least 3 episodes in 3 months and with insufficient effect of at least 2 pharmacological regimens

Exclusion criteria

* congenital heart disease * age under 18 years * significant valve disease * left atrial size \> 55 mm * prior ablation for AF * Severe heart failure (LVEF \< 20 % and/or NYHA class IV)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
overall efficacy (= freedom from symptomatic, ECG documented AF or organized LA tachycardia (with a duration of > 10 min) without receiving antiarrhythmic medication)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
- resumption of LA-PV conduction
- neurohormones
- socio-economics (cost effectiveness)
- safety
- quality of life
- signal averaged P wave signals-
- inflammatory markers

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026