Skip to content

Comparison of Atomoxetine and Placebo in Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and/or Reading Disorder (RD)

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Comparison of Atomoxetine and Placebo in Child Outpatients With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, Reading Disorder, or Comorbid Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Reading Disorder.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00191906
Enrollment
121
Registered
2005-09-19
Start date
2005-04-30
Completion date
2007-12-31
Last updated
2010-05-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Reading Disorder

Brief summary

To test the hypothesis that a 4 week treatment with atomoxetine is more effective than placebo in patients with combined type Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), patients with only Reading Disorder, and patients with combined type ADHD and Reading Disorder.

Interventions

DRUGAtomoxetine Hydrochloride

Atomoxetine, 1.2 mg/kg/day, by mouth (PO)

DRUGplacebo

Placebo, every day (QD), by mouth (PO)

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and/or Reading Disorder

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with Conduct Disorder * Patients who have a history of Bipolar I or II Disorder, psychosis, or Pervasive Development Disorder. * Patients who have a current diagnosis of Vocal Tic Disorder, Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, and certain other learning disorders.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stop Signal Reaction Time (SSRT) as Derived From the Stop Signal Reaction Time ParadigmBaseline and Week 4 of initial therapy and Week 4 of crossover therapySSRT measures response execution (go trials) and response inhibition (stop trials). Go trials consist of stimulus (airplane). Child to press response button corresponding to direction airplane is pointing. Stop trials consist of go trial and audible stop signal. Initial delay between go trial and stop signal = 250 msec. If child succeeded in inhibiting response, delay on next stop trial increased by 50 msec, otherwise, delay decreased by 50 msec. SSRT = subtract mean delay from mean go signal reaction time. Lower scores mean better ability to suppress response when presented with stop signal.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Mean Stop Signal Reaction Time Comparison of ADHD-C+RD and RD to Reading Disordered Control Group in >=10 Year Old SubsetBaseline and 4 weeks of therapySSRT measures response execution (go trials) and response inhibition (stop trials). Go trials consist of stimulus (airplane). Child to press response button corresponding to direction airplane is pointing. Stop trials consist of go trial and audible stop signal. Initial delay between go trial and stop signal = 250 msec. If child succeeded in inhibiting response, delay on next stop trial increased by 50 msec, otherwise, delay decreased by 50 msec. SSRT = subtract mean delay from mean go signal reaction time. Lower scores mean better ability to suppress response when presented with stop signal.
Lexical Decision Task Mean Reaction Time: Correct WordsBaseline and Week 4 of initial therapy and Week 4 of crossover therapyMeasure of reaction time to identify whether a word displayed on a computer is a real or correct word versus a pseudo word. During the performance of the lexical decision task that was presented on a computer, the reaction times and accuracy of responses were measured. Data presented are the mean reaction times over the 4 weeks of each therapy for identifying correct words correctly.
Lexical Decision Task Mean Reaction Time: Pseudo WordsBaseline and Week 4 of initial therapy and Week 4 of crossover therapyMeasure of reaction time to identify whether a word displayed on a computer is a pseudo word versus a real or correct word. During the performance of the lexical decision task that was presented on a computer, the reaction times and accuracy of responses were measured. Data presented are the mean reaction times over the 4 weeks of each therapy for identifying pseudo words correctly.
Working Memory by Corsi Block Tapping Test (CBTT)Baseline and Week 4 of initial therapy and Week 4 of crossover therapyMeasures the visuo-spatial working memory span, and corresponds to the longest sequence of blocks that has been reproduced correctly at least once. Scores can range from 3 to 8, with the higher score indicating better function.
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Total ScoreBaseline and Week 4 of initial therapy and Week 4 of crossover therapyMeasures the 18 symptoms contained in the DSM-IV diagnosis of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Individual item scores range from 0 (none/never or rarely) to 3 (severe/very often). Total score is the sum of the scores on the 18 items and range from 0 to 54.
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Inattention SubscaleBaseline and Week 4 of initial therapy and Week 4 of crossover therapyMeasures the degree of inattention symptoms based on answers to 9 items. Individual item scores range from 0 (none/never or rarely) to 3 (severe/very often), for a total Inattention Subscale score range of 0 to 27.
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Hyperactivity-Impulsivity SubscaleBaseline and Week 4 of initial therapy and Week 4 of crossover therapyMeasures the degree of hyperactivity-impulsivity symptoms, based on answers to 9 items. Individual item scores range from 0 (none/never or rarely) to 3 (severe/very often) for a total Hyperactivity-Impulsivity Subscale score of 0 to 27.
Change From Baseline in Mean Stop Signal Reaction Time Comparison of ADHD-C to Normal Control Group in >=10 Year Old SubsetBaseline and 4 weeks of therapySSRT measures response execution (go trials) and response inhibition (stop trials). Go trials consist of stimulus (airplane). Child to press response button corresponding to direction airplane is pointing. Stop trials consist of go trial and audible stop signal. Initial delay between go trial and stop signal = 250 msec. If child succeeded in inhibiting response, delay on next stop trial increased by 50 msec, otherwise, delay decreased by 50 msec. SSRT = subtract mean delay from mean go signal reaction time. Lower scores mean better ability to suppress response when presented with stop signal.
Clinical Global Impression-Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-Improvement Scale4 week therapy endpointMeasures total improvement (or worsening) of a patient's ADHD symptoms from the beginning of treatment (1=very much improved, 7=very much worsened).
Clinical Global Impression-Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-Severity Scale4 week therapy endpointMeasures severity of the patient's overall severity of ADHD symptoms (1=normal, not at all ill; 7=among the most extremely ill patients).
Change From Baseline in Phonological Task Mean Reaction Time Comparison of ADHD-C to Normal Control Group in >=10 Year Old Subset: PseudohomophonesBaseline and 4 weeks of therapyMeasure of reaction time in determining whether the stimulus sounds like a real word ('yes' response) or not ('no' response) using pseudohomophones and pseudo words. Data presented here are for reaction time to identifying psuedohomophones correctly.
Change From Baseline in Phonological Task Mean Reaction Time Comparison of ADHD-C to Normal Control Group in >=10 Year Old Subset: Pseudo WordsBaseline and 4 weeks of therapyMeasure of reaction time in determining whether the stimulus sounds like a real word ('yes' response) or not ('no' response) using pseudo homophones and pseudo words. Data presented here are for reaction time to identifying pseudo words correctly.
Change From Baseline in Phonological Task Mean Reaction Time Comparison of ADHD-C+RD and RD to Reading Disordered Control Group in >=10 Year Old Subset: PseudohomophonesBaseline and 4 weeks of therapyMeasure of reaction time in determining whether the stimulus sounds like a real word ('yes' response) or not ('no' response) using pseudo homophones and pseudo words. Data presented here are for reaction time to identifying psuedohomophones correctly.
Change From Baseline in Phonological Task Mean Reaction Time Comparison of ADHD-C+RD and RD to Reading Disordered Control Group in >=10 Year Old Subset: Pseudo WordsBaseline and 4 weeks of therapyMeasure of reaction time in determining whether the stimulus sounds like a real word ('yes' response) or not ('no' response) using pseudo homophones and pseudo words. Data presented here are for reaction time to indentifying pseudo words correctly.
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Total T-ScoreBaseline and Week 4 of initial therapy and Week 4 of crossover therapyMeasures the 18 symptoms contained in the DSM-IV diagnosis of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Individual item scores range from 0 (none/never or rarely) to 3 (severe/very often). Total score is computed as the sum of the scores on each of the 18 items. Total score is the sum of the scores on the 18 items and range from 0 to 54. Total T-score = (Total Score - 50)/10. Total T-score ranges from -5 (low severity) to 0.4 (high severity).

Countries

Belgium, Netherlands

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Period I: screening/washout (89 patients screened, 13 screen-failures;45 controls screened). Period II (Visits 2-5): patients received treatment for 4 weeks and then underwent 2-week washout period after which they crossed over to receive the alternate treatment for 4 additional weeks. Period III (Visits 6-12): optional open-label (1 country only).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Atomoxetine First, Then Placebo
Atomoxetine 1.2 mg/kg/day for 4 weeks, 2 week washout, and then placebo for 4 weeks
39
Placebo First, Then Atomoxetine
Placebo for 4 weeks, 2 week washout, and then atomoxetine 1.2 mg/kg/day for 4 weeks.
37
Normal Control
Untreated normal controls were children selected from the general population. The normal control was matched (have same proportion) by sex (male/female) and by age (have same age range) as the study population.
27
Reading Disordered Control
Untreated reading disordered control group was comprised of children with reading disorder who received standard remedial teaching therapy.
18
Total121

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Study Period IIAdverse Event0100
Study Period IIEntry Criteria Exclusion0010
Study Period IIParent/Caregiver Decision0100
Study Period IIWithdrawal by Subject0300
Study Period IIIAdverse Event1000
Study Period IIILack of Efficacy3300
Study Period IIILost to Follow-up0100
Study Period IIIParent/Caregiver Decision1000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAtomoxetine First, Then PlaceboPlacebo First, Then AtomoxetineNormal ControlReading Disordered ControlTotal
Age Continuous10.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.34
9.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.25
9.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.01
10.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.99
10.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
18 participants15 participants0 participants16 participants49 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
21 participants22 participants27 participants2 participants72 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants10 Participants10 Participants5 Participants38 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
26 Participants27 Participants17 Participants13 Participants83 Participants
Study Arm - Diagnosis
ADHD-Combined Type
13 participants15 participants0 participants0 participants28 participants
Study Arm - Diagnosis
ADHD-Combined Type + Reading Disorder
15 participants10 participants0 participants0 participants25 participants
Study Arm - Diagnosis
No Disorder
0 participants0 participants27 participants0 participants27 participants
Study Arm - Diagnosis
Reading Disorder
11 participants12 participants0 participants18 participants41 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
28 / 7635 / 7424 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 760 / 740 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Stop Signal Reaction Time (SSRT) as Derived From the Stop Signal Reaction Time Paradigm

SSRT measures response execution (go trials) and response inhibition (stop trials). Go trials consist of stimulus (airplane). Child to press response button corresponding to direction airplane is pointing. Stop trials consist of go trial and audible stop signal. Initial delay between go trial and stop signal = 250 msec. If child succeeded in inhibiting response, delay on next stop trial increased by 50 msec, otherwise, delay decreased by 50 msec. SSRT = subtract mean delay from mean go signal reaction time. Lower scores mean better ability to suppress response when presented with stop signal.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of initial therapy and Week 4 of crossover therapy

Population: All efficacy information is summarized and/or presented in data listings based on the Safety sample: Includes all patients who were randomized to double-blind treatment and received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AtomoxetineStop Signal Reaction Time (SSRT) as Derived From the Stop Signal Reaction Time ParadigmADHD-Combined Type299.90 milliseconds (msec)Standard Error 13.29
AtomoxetineStop Signal Reaction Time (SSRT) as Derived From the Stop Signal Reaction Time ParadigmReading Disorder265.61 milliseconds (msec)Standard Error 14.24
AtomoxetineStop Signal Reaction Time (SSRT) as Derived From the Stop Signal Reaction Time ParadigmADHD-C + Reading Disorder277.38 milliseconds (msec)Standard Error 13.8
AtomoxetineStop Signal Reaction Time (SSRT) as Derived From the Stop Signal Reaction Time ParadigmOverall280.97 milliseconds (msec)Standard Error 7.96
PlaceboStop Signal Reaction Time (SSRT) as Derived From the Stop Signal Reaction Time ParadigmOverall287.29 milliseconds (msec)Standard Error 8.84
PlaceboStop Signal Reaction Time (SSRT) as Derived From the Stop Signal Reaction Time ParadigmADHD-Combined Type308.82 milliseconds (msec)Standard Error 14.53
PlaceboStop Signal Reaction Time (SSRT) as Derived From the Stop Signal Reaction Time ParadigmADHD-C + Reading Disorder292.53 milliseconds (msec)Standard Error 15.46
PlaceboStop Signal Reaction Time (SSRT) as Derived From the Stop Signal Reaction Time ParadigmReading Disorder260.51 milliseconds (msec)Standard Error 16.02
Comparison: Least Squares Mean (LSMean) values were calculated from the measurements taken at baseline and at the end of each 4 week therapy period.p-value: 0.504Repeated Measures
Secondary

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Hyperactivity-Impulsivity Subscale

Measures the degree of hyperactivity-impulsivity symptoms, based on answers to 9 items. Individual item scores range from 0 (none/never or rarely) to 3 (severe/very often) for a total Hyperactivity-Impulsivity Subscale score of 0 to 27.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of initial therapy and Week 4 of crossover therapy

Population: All efficacy information is summarized and/or presented in data listings based on the Safety sample: Includes all patients who were randomized to double-blind treatment and received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AtomoxetineAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Hyperactivity-Impulsivity SubscaleADHD-Combined Type15.51 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.14
AtomoxetineAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Hyperactivity-Impulsivity SubscaleADHD-Combined Type + Reading Disorder10.32 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.27
AtomoxetineAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Hyperactivity-Impulsivity SubscaleOverall12.91 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.85
PlaceboAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Hyperactivity-Impulsivity SubscaleADHD-Combined Type17.24 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.96
PlaceboAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Hyperactivity-Impulsivity SubscaleADHD-Combined Type + Reading Disorder17.03 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.12
PlaceboAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Hyperactivity-Impulsivity SubscaleOverall17.13 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.73
Comparison: Least Squares Mean (LSMean) values were calculated from the measurements taken at baseline and at the end of each 4 week therapy period.p-value: <0.001Repeated Measures
Secondary

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Inattention Subscale

Measures the degree of inattention symptoms based on answers to 9 items. Individual item scores range from 0 (none/never or rarely) to 3 (severe/very often), for a total Inattention Subscale score range of 0 to 27.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of initial therapy and Week 4 of crossover therapy

Population: All efficacy information is summarized and/or presented in data listings based on the Safety sample: Includes all patients who were randomized to double-blind treatment and received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AtomoxetineAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Inattention SubscaleADHD-Combined Type15.27 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.09
AtomoxetineAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Inattention SubscaleADHD-Combined Type + Reading Disorder12.25 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.22
AtomoxetineAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Inattention SubscaleOverall13.76 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.82
PlaceboAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Inattention SubscaleADHD-Combined Type17.82 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.93
PlaceboAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Inattention SubscaleADHD-Combined Type + Reading Disorder18.28 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.09
PlaceboAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Inattention SubscaleOverall18.05 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Comparison: Least Squares Mean (LSMean) values were calculated from the measurements taken at baseline and at the end of each 4 week therapy period.p-value: <0.001Repeated Measures
Secondary

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Total Score

Measures the 18 symptoms contained in the DSM-IV diagnosis of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Individual item scores range from 0 (none/never or rarely) to 3 (severe/very often). Total score is the sum of the scores on the 18 items and range from 0 to 54.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of initial therapy and Week 4 of crossover therapy

Population: All efficacy information is summarized and/or presented in data listings based on the Safety sample: Includes all patients who were randomized to double-blind treatment and received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AtomoxetineAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Total ScoreADHD-Combined Type30.86 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.14
AtomoxetineAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Total ScoreADHD-Combined Type + Reading Disorder22.44 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.38
AtomoxetineAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Total ScoreOverall26.65 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.6
PlaceboAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Total ScoreADHD-Combined Type35.20 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.78
PlaceboAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Total ScoreADHD-Combined Type + Reading Disorder35.17 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.07
PlaceboAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Total ScoreOverall35.18 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.34
Comparison: Least Squares Mean (LSMean) values were calculated from the measurements taken at baseline and at the end of each 4 week therapy period.p-value: <0.001Repeated Measures
Secondary

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Total T-Score

Measures the 18 symptoms contained in the DSM-IV diagnosis of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Individual item scores range from 0 (none/never or rarely) to 3 (severe/very often). Total score is computed as the sum of the scores on each of the 18 items. Total score is the sum of the scores on the 18 items and range from 0 to 54. Total T-score = (Total Score - 50)/10. Total T-score ranges from -5 (low severity) to 0.4 (high severity).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of initial therapy and Week 4 of crossover therapy

Population: All efficacy information is summarized and/or presented in data listings based on the Safety sample: Includes all patients who were randomized to double-blind treatment and received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AtomoxetineAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Total T-ScoreADHD-Combined Type-1.91 T-Score of units on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
AtomoxetineAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Total T-ScoreADHD-Combined Type + Reading Disorder-2.76 T-Score of units on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
AtomoxetineAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Total T-ScoreOverall-2.34 T-Score of units on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
PlaceboAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Total T-ScoreADHD-Combined Type-1.48 T-Score of units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
PlaceboAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Total T-ScoreADHD-Combined Type + Reading Disorder-1.48 T-Score of units on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
PlaceboAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored - Total T-ScoreOverall-1.48 T-Score of units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Comparison: Least Squares Mean (LSMean) values were calculated from the measurements taken at baseline and at the end of each 4 week therapy period.p-value: <0.001Repeated Measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Stop Signal Reaction Time Comparison of ADHD-C+RD and RD to Reading Disordered Control Group in >=10 Year Old Subset

SSRT measures response execution (go trials) and response inhibition (stop trials). Go trials consist of stimulus (airplane). Child to press response button corresponding to direction airplane is pointing. Stop trials consist of go trial and audible stop signal. Initial delay between go trial and stop signal = 250 msec. If child succeeded in inhibiting response, delay on next stop trial increased by 50 msec, otherwise, delay decreased by 50 msec. SSRT = subtract mean delay from mean go signal reaction time. Lower scores mean better ability to suppress response when presented with stop signal.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks of therapy

Population: All efficacy information is summarized and/or presented in data listings based on the Safety sample: Includes all patients who were randomized to double-blind treatment and received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtomoxetineChange From Baseline in Mean Stop Signal Reaction Time Comparison of ADHD-C+RD and RD to Reading Disordered Control Group in >=10 Year Old Subset-0.25 millisecondsStandard Deviation 53.41
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mean Stop Signal Reaction Time Comparison of ADHD-C+RD and RD to Reading Disordered Control Group in >=10 Year Old Subset-34.0 millisecondsStandard Deviation 33.91
Reading Disordered ControlChange From Baseline in Mean Stop Signal Reaction Time Comparison of ADHD-C+RD and RD to Reading Disordered Control Group in >=10 Year Old Subset0.05 millisecondsStandard Deviation 24.08
Comparison: ANCOVA model with baseline value, study arm as covariates for ADHD-C+RD versus RD controls.p-value: 0.579ANCOVA
Comparison: ANCOVA model with baseline value, study arm as covariates for RD versus RD controls.p-value: 0.144ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Stop Signal Reaction Time Comparison of ADHD-C to Normal Control Group in >=10 Year Old Subset

SSRT measures response execution (go trials) and response inhibition (stop trials). Go trials consist of stimulus (airplane). Child to press response button corresponding to direction airplane is pointing. Stop trials consist of go trial and audible stop signal. Initial delay between go trial and stop signal = 250 msec. If child succeeded in inhibiting response, delay on next stop trial increased by 50 msec, otherwise, delay decreased by 50 msec. SSRT = subtract mean delay from mean go signal reaction time. Lower scores mean better ability to suppress response when presented with stop signal.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks of therapy

Population: All efficacy information is summarized and/or presented in data listings based on the Safety sample: Includes all patients who were randomized to double-blind treatment and received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtomoxetineChange From Baseline in Mean Stop Signal Reaction Time Comparison of ADHD-C to Normal Control Group in >=10 Year Old Subset7.95 millisecondsStandard Deviation 48.21
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mean Stop Signal Reaction Time Comparison of ADHD-C to Normal Control Group in >=10 Year Old Subset11.22 millisecondsStandard Deviation 62.77
Comparison: ANCOVA model with baseline value, study arm as covariates for ADHD-C versus Normal controls.p-value: 0.97ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Phonological Task Mean Reaction Time Comparison of ADHD-C+RD and RD to Reading Disordered Control Group in >=10 Year Old Subset: Pseudohomophones

Measure of reaction time in determining whether the stimulus sounds like a real word ('yes' response) or not ('no' response) using pseudo homophones and pseudo words. Data presented here are for reaction time to identifying psuedohomophones correctly.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks of therapy

Population: All efficacy information is summarized and/or presented in data listings based on the Safety sample: Includes all patients who were randomized to double-blind treatment and received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtomoxetineChange From Baseline in Phonological Task Mean Reaction Time Comparison of ADHD-C+RD and RD to Reading Disordered Control Group in >=10 Year Old Subset: Pseudohomophones-170.81 millisecondsStandard Deviation 243.33
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Phonological Task Mean Reaction Time Comparison of ADHD-C+RD and RD to Reading Disordered Control Group in >=10 Year Old Subset: Pseudohomophones-241.00 millisecondsStandard Deviation 317.47
Reading Disordered ControlChange From Baseline in Phonological Task Mean Reaction Time Comparison of ADHD-C+RD and RD to Reading Disordered Control Group in >=10 Year Old Subset: Pseudohomophones-254.86 millisecondsStandard Deviation 266.46
Comparison: ANCOVA model with baseline value, study arm as covariates for ADHD-C+RD versus RD controls.p-value: 0.302ANCOVA
Comparison: ANCOVA model with baseline value, study arm as covariate for RD versus RD controls.p-value: 0.663ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Phonological Task Mean Reaction Time Comparison of ADHD-C+RD and RD to Reading Disordered Control Group in >=10 Year Old Subset: Pseudo Words

Measure of reaction time in determining whether the stimulus sounds like a real word ('yes' response) or not ('no' response) using pseudo homophones and pseudo words. Data presented here are for reaction time to indentifying pseudo words correctly.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks of therapy

Population: All efficacy information is summarized and/or presented in data listings based on the Safety sample: Includes all patients who were randomized to double-blind treatment and received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtomoxetineChange From Baseline in Phonological Task Mean Reaction Time Comparison of ADHD-C+RD and RD to Reading Disordered Control Group in >=10 Year Old Subset: Pseudo Words-113.06 millisecondsStandard Deviation 432.68
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Phonological Task Mean Reaction Time Comparison of ADHD-C+RD and RD to Reading Disordered Control Group in >=10 Year Old Subset: Pseudo Words-213.00 millisecondsStandard Deviation 512.33
Reading Disordered ControlChange From Baseline in Phonological Task Mean Reaction Time Comparison of ADHD-C+RD and RD to Reading Disordered Control Group in >=10 Year Old Subset: Pseudo Words-368.14 millisecondsStandard Deviation 422.42
Comparison: ANCOVA model with baseline value, study arm as covariate for ADHD-C+RD versus RD controls.p-value: 0.07ANCOVA
Comparison: ANCOVA model with baseline value, study arm as covariate for RD versus RD controls.p-value: 0.179ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Phonological Task Mean Reaction Time Comparison of ADHD-C to Normal Control Group in >=10 Year Old Subset: Pseudohomophones

Measure of reaction time in determining whether the stimulus sounds like a real word ('yes' response) or not ('no' response) using pseudohomophones and pseudo words. Data presented here are for reaction time to identifying psuedohomophones correctly.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks of therapy

Population: All efficacy information is summarized and/or presented in data listings based on the Safety sample: Includes all patients who were randomized to double-blind treatment and received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtomoxetineChange From Baseline in Phonological Task Mean Reaction Time Comparison of ADHD-C to Normal Control Group in >=10 Year Old Subset: Pseudohomophones-230.40 millisecondsStandard Deviation 239.43
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Phonological Task Mean Reaction Time Comparison of ADHD-C to Normal Control Group in >=10 Year Old Subset: Pseudohomophones-339.17 millisecondsStandard Deviation 176.32
Comparison: ANCOVA model with baseline value, study arm as covariates for ADHD-C versus normal controls.p-value: 0.508ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Phonological Task Mean Reaction Time Comparison of ADHD-C to Normal Control Group in >=10 Year Old Subset: Pseudo Words

Measure of reaction time in determining whether the stimulus sounds like a real word ('yes' response) or not ('no' response) using pseudo homophones and pseudo words. Data presented here are for reaction time to identifying pseudo words correctly.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks of therapy

Population: All efficacy information is summarized and/or presented in data listings based on the Safety sample: Includes all patients who were randomized to double-blind treatment and received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtomoxetineChange From Baseline in Phonological Task Mean Reaction Time Comparison of ADHD-C to Normal Control Group in >=10 Year Old Subset: Pseudo Words-523.20 millisecondsStandard Deviation 524.36
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Phonological Task Mean Reaction Time Comparison of ADHD-C to Normal Control Group in >=10 Year Old Subset: Pseudo Words-536.00 millisecondsStandard Deviation 303.27
Comparison: ANCOVA model with baseline value, study arm as covariate for ADHD-C versus normal controlsp-value: 0.769ANCOVA
Secondary

Clinical Global Impression-Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-Improvement Scale

Measures total improvement (or worsening) of a patient's ADHD symptoms from the beginning of treatment (1=very much improved, 7=very much worsened).

Time frame: 4 week therapy endpoint

Population: All efficacy information is summarized and/or presented in data listings based on the Safety sample: Includes all patients who were randomized to double-blind treatment and received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AtomoxetineClinical Global Impression-Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-Improvement ScaleADHD-Combined Type3.69 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
AtomoxetineClinical Global Impression-Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-Improvement ScaleADHD-Combined Type + Reading Disorder2.98 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
AtomoxetineClinical Global Impression-Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-Improvement ScaleOverall3.34 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
PlaceboClinical Global Impression-Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-Improvement ScaleADHD-Combined Type3.70 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
PlaceboClinical Global Impression-Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-Improvement ScaleADHD-Combined Type + Reading Disorder3.76 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
PlaceboClinical Global Impression-Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-Improvement ScaleOverall3.73 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
p-value: 0.094Repeated Measures
Secondary

Clinical Global Impression-Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-Severity Scale

Measures severity of the patient's overall severity of ADHD symptoms (1=normal, not at all ill; 7=among the most extremely ill patients).

Time frame: 4 week therapy endpoint

Population: All efficacy information is summarized and/or presented in data listings based on the Safety sample: Includes all patients who were randomized to double-blind treatment and received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AtomoxetineClinical Global Impression-Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-Severity ScaleADHD-Combined Type4.05 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
AtomoxetineClinical Global Impression-Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-Severity ScaleADHD-Combined Type + Reading Disorder3.65 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
AtomoxetineClinical Global Impression-Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-Severity ScaleOverall3.85 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
PlaceboClinical Global Impression-Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-Severity ScaleADHD-Combined Type3.73 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
PlaceboClinical Global Impression-Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-Severity ScaleADHD-Combined Type + Reading Disorder4.34 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboClinical Global Impression-Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-Severity ScaleOverall4.04 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
p-value: 0.312Repeated Measures
Secondary

Lexical Decision Task Mean Reaction Time: Correct Words

Measure of reaction time to identify whether a word displayed on a computer is a real or correct word versus a pseudo word. During the performance of the lexical decision task that was presented on a computer, the reaction times and accuracy of responses were measured. Data presented are the mean reaction times over the 4 weeks of each therapy for identifying correct words correctly.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of initial therapy and Week 4 of crossover therapy

Population: All efficacy information is summarized and/or presented in data listings based on the Safety sample: Includes all patients who were randomized to double-blind treatment and received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AtomoxetineLexical Decision Task Mean Reaction Time: Correct WordsADHD-Combined Type1182.9 millisecondsStandard Error 50.23
AtomoxetineLexical Decision Task Mean Reaction Time: Correct WordsReading Disorder1172.4 millisecondsStandard Error 51.75
AtomoxetineLexical Decision Task Mean Reaction Time: Correct WordsADHD-C + Reading Disorder1201.9 millisecondsStandard Error 51.22
AtomoxetineLexical Decision Task Mean Reaction Time: Correct WordsOverall1185.7 millisecondsStandard Error 29.49
PlaceboLexical Decision Task Mean Reaction Time: Correct WordsOverall1265.5 millisecondsStandard Error 22.61
PlaceboLexical Decision Task Mean Reaction Time: Correct WordsADHD-Combined Type1291.9 millisecondsStandard Error 38.13
PlaceboLexical Decision Task Mean Reaction Time: Correct WordsADHD-C + Reading Disorder1305.9 millisecondsStandard Error 39.43
PlaceboLexical Decision Task Mean Reaction Time: Correct WordsReading Disorder1198.6 millisecondsStandard Error 40.24
Comparison: Least Squares Mean (LSMean) values were calculated from the measurements taken at baseline and at the end of each 4 week therapy period.p-value: 0.005Repeated Measures
Secondary

Lexical Decision Task Mean Reaction Time: Pseudo Words

Measure of reaction time to identify whether a word displayed on a computer is a pseudo word versus a real or correct word. During the performance of the lexical decision task that was presented on a computer, the reaction times and accuracy of responses were measured. Data presented are the mean reaction times over the 4 weeks of each therapy for identifying pseudo words correctly.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of initial therapy and Week 4 of crossover therapy

Population: All efficacy information is summarized and/or presented in data listings based on the Safety sample: Includes all patients who were randomized to double-blind treatment and received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AtomoxetineLexical Decision Task Mean Reaction Time: Pseudo WordsADHD-Combined Type1403.0 millisecondsStandard Error 63.72
AtomoxetineLexical Decision Task Mean Reaction Time: Pseudo WordsReading Disorder1365.0 millisecondsStandard Error 65.62
AtomoxetineLexical Decision Task Mean Reaction Time: Pseudo WordsADHD-C + Reading Disorder1426.1 millisecondsStandard Error 64.83
AtomoxetineLexical Decision Task Mean Reaction Time: Pseudo WordsOverall1398.0 millisecondsStandard Error 37.33
PlaceboLexical Decision Task Mean Reaction Time: Pseudo WordsOverall1458.2 millisecondsStandard Error 29.63
PlaceboLexical Decision Task Mean Reaction Time: Pseudo WordsADHD-Combined Type1475.4 millisecondsStandard Error 50.08
PlaceboLexical Decision Task Mean Reaction Time: Pseudo WordsADHD-C + Reading Disorder1487.0 millisecondsStandard Error 51.73
PlaceboLexical Decision Task Mean Reaction Time: Pseudo WordsReading Disorder1412.2 millisecondsStandard Error 52.9
Comparison: Least Squares Mean (LSMean) values were calculated from the measurements taken at baseline and at the end of each 4 week therapy period.p-value: 0.097Repeated Measures
Secondary

Working Memory by Corsi Block Tapping Test (CBTT)

Measures the visuo-spatial working memory span, and corresponds to the longest sequence of blocks that has been reproduced correctly at least once. Scores can range from 3 to 8, with the higher score indicating better function.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of initial therapy and Week 4 of crossover therapy

Population: All efficacy information is summarized and/or presented in data listings based on the Safety sample: Includes all patients who were randomized to double-blind treatment and received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AtomoxetineWorking Memory by Corsi Block Tapping Test (CBTT)ADHD-Combined Type5.29 blocks correctly sequencedStandard Error 0.22
AtomoxetineWorking Memory by Corsi Block Tapping Test (CBTT)Reading Disorder5.50 blocks correctly sequencedStandard Error 0.23
AtomoxetineWorking Memory by Corsi Block Tapping Test (CBTT)ADHD-C + Reading Disorder5.92 blocks correctly sequencedStandard Error 0.23
AtomoxetineWorking Memory by Corsi Block Tapping Test (CBTT)Overall5.57 blocks correctly sequencedStandard Error 0.13
PlaceboWorking Memory by Corsi Block Tapping Test (CBTT)Overall5.14 blocks correctly sequencedStandard Error 0.13
PlaceboWorking Memory by Corsi Block Tapping Test (CBTT)ADHD-Combined Type4.98 blocks correctly sequencedStandard Error 0.21
PlaceboWorking Memory by Corsi Block Tapping Test (CBTT)ADHD-C + Reading Disorder5.29 blocks correctly sequencedStandard Error 0.23
PlaceboWorking Memory by Corsi Block Tapping Test (CBTT)Reading Disorder5.14 blocks correctly sequencedStandard Error 0.23
Comparison: Least Squares Mean (LSMean) values were calculated from the measurements taken at baseline and at the end of each 4 week therapy period.p-value: 0.003Repeated Measures

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 1, 2026