Skip to content

Biopace Study: Biventricular Pacing for Atrioventricular Block to Prevent Cardiac Desynchronization

Biventricular Pacing for Atrioventricular Block in Left Ventricular Dysfunction to Prevent Cardiac Desynchronization

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00187278
Enrollment
1833
Registered
2005-09-16
Start date
2003-05-31
Completion date
2014-10-31
Last updated
2021-01-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrioventricular Block, Ventricular Dysfunction

Keywords

Standard pacing indication

Brief summary

The primary purpose of the study is to evaluate if patients with a standard indication for permanent ventricular pacing, left ventricular ejection fraction without limit, or any QRS duration will profit from the prevention of ventricular desynchronisation.

Detailed description

The study will be performed as a controlled, single-blind, international, multicenter, prospective, randomized, parallel group design. In order to pragmatically examine the effectiveness of biventricular pacing in patients with an indication for ventricular pacing, the study group with biventricular pacing is compared to a control group with standard pacemakers which only allow univentricular (right ventricular) stimulation, as it has been the standard outside of clinical studies until so far.

Interventions

Biventricular Pacemaker implant

DEVICERV Pacing

Standard Pacemaker implant

Sponsors

Abbott Medical Devices
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Presence of an indication for ventricular pacing according to the actual guidelines for the implantation of cardiac pacemakers and a need for frequent (or even permanent) ventricular pacing for: 1. Permanent 3rd degree atrioventricular (AV)-block or 2. Intermittent 3rd degree AV-block in combination with 1st degree AV-block with a pQ-interval ≥ 220 ms or 3. 2nd degree AV-block type Mobitz II in combination with 1st degree AV-block with a pQ-interval ≥ 220 ms or 4. 2nd degree AV-block type Mobitz I (if indicated) in combination with 1st degree AV-block with a pQ-interval ≥ 220 ms or 5. 1st degree AV-block with a pQ-interval ≥ 220 ms and indication for ventricular pacing (includes indication for ventricular pacing based on long HV interval measured during invasive electrophysiological testing) or 6. Sick-sinus-syndrome with symptomatic sinus bradycardia or sinus arrest as primary indication for device implantation in combination with long 1st degree AV-block with a pQ-interval ≥ 220 ms or 7. Chronic (permanent) atrial fibrillation (flutter or tachycardia) with a spontaneous heart (ventricular) rate at rest ≤ 60/min or 8. Chronic (permanent) atrial fibrillation (flutter or tachycardia) with a spontaneous heart (ventricular) rate at rest ≤ 75/min, if initiation or increase of pharmacological treatment with a relevant heart rate lowering effect (negative chronotropic effect) is planned for the time after pacemaker implantation (i.e. ß-blockers for heart failure and rate control) 9. Patients scheduled for AV node ablation 2. Any QRS duration and morphology 3. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) without limit as measured by echocardiography (in at least one plane, either 4- or 2-chamber or apical long axis view) 4. Signed written informed consent of the patient or a first-degree relative for study participation after informing the patient/relative about the risks and the aim of the study 5. Willingness and ability to comply with the prescribed follow-up tests and schedule of evaluations. 6. Absence of an implanted ventricular pacing device (patients with atrial pacemakers and new need for ventricular pacing may be included)

Exclusion criteria

1. Implanted Cardioverter Defibrillator or consideration for implantation of an ICD due to arrhythmia indication. However, ICD implant for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with LVEF ≤ 35 % (in accordance with the actual guidelines for the implantation of arrhythmia devices\[LVEF \< 30%\] and in accordance with the results of the SCD-Heft study \[LVEF \< 35%) will be allowed. 2. Implanted ventricular pacing device 3. Status 1 for cardiac transplantation and likelihood to receive transplantation within 2 years (these patients would not be expected to fulfill the follow-up requirements as outlined in this protocol) 4. Evidence of acute left ventricular dysfunction and high probability for its reversibility (e.g. acute myocarditis, tachycardiomyopathy) 5. Implanted prosthetic tricuspid valve 6. Severe musculoskeletal disorder(s) 7. Age below 18 years 8. Current or planned pregnancy in the next 6 months 9. Current or recent (within the past 30 days) participation in any other clinical investigation 10. Life expectancy of less than 6 months 11. Patient's inability to independently comprehend and complete the Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaire

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total MortalityStudy duration (5.7 years mean follow-up)Number of deaths observed
Death or Heart Failure HospitalizationStudy duration (5.7 years mean follow-up)Number of subjects who experienced death or hospitalization where heart failure is a primary cause of hospitalization

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Death Due to Cardiovascular CausesStudy duration (5.7 years mean follow-up)Number of subjects who died due to cardiovascular causes, as classified by the independent Event Adjudication Committee (IEAC)
Functional Capacity as Measured by the Distance Covered in the 6-minute Walk Test12 months post-implant
Health Related Quality of Life Measured by the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire©12 months post-implantMinnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) questionnaire score at 12 months MLWHF score: the total scale is from 0 to 105, with higher scores indicating worse health status.
Incidence of Hospitalizations for Deterioration of Heart FailureStudy duration (5.7 years mean follow-up)
Incidence of Hospitalizations for Cardiovascular EventsStudy duration (5.7 years mean follow-up)
Incidence of Hospitalizations for Any ReasonStudy duration (5.7 years mean follow-up)
Cardiac Structure and Function12 & 24 months
Successful Implantation of the Left Ventricular LeadImplantation
Chronic Atrial Fibrillation (Defined as Presence of Atrial Fibrillation in Two Subsequent ECG´s/Visits)Study duration (5.7 years mean follow-up)Chronic atrial fibrillation is defined as presence of atrial fibrillation in two subsequent ECG´s/visits.
Duration of Hospitalizations for Deterioration of Heart FailureStudy Duration (5.7 years mean follow-up)
Duration of Hospitalizations for Cardiovascular EventsStudy Duration (5.7 years mean follow-up)
Duration of Hospitalizations for Any ReasonStudy duration (5.7 years mean follow-up)
Adverse Events Related to Left Ventricular LeadStudy Duration (5.7 years mean follow-up)Only serious adverse events related to the left ventricular lead are included.

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were enrolled between May 2003 and September 2007.

Pre-assignment details

1834 patients have been scheduled for randomization, while 1833 have been randomized to RV Pacing or Biventricular group. One patient could not be randomized due to organizational reasons.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
RV Pacing
Standard Pacemaker implant RV Pacing: Standard Pacemaker implant
908
Biventricular Pacing
Biventricular Pacemaker implant Biventricular Pacing: Biventricular Pacemaker implant
902
Total1,810

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation1013

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRV PacingBiventricular PacingTotal
Age, Continuous73.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
73.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
73.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
Atrial arrhythmias
Atrial arrhythmias
225 participants225 participants450 participants
Atrial arrhythmias
None
683 participants677 participants1360 participants
Body mass index27.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7
27.4 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3
27.4 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5
Cardiovascular risk factor
Diabetes mellitus
255 participants251 participants506 participants
Cardiovascular risk factor
Hypertension
696 participants666 participants1362 participants
Indications for device implantation
Intermittent bradycardia
368 participants362 participants730 participants
Indications for device implantation
Persistent bradycardia
538 participants540 participants1078 participants
Indications for device implantation
Unknown
2 participants0 participants2 participants
Left bundle branch block (LBBB)
LBBB
166 participants150 participants316 participants
Left bundle branch block (LBBB)
None
742 participants752 participants1494 participants
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)55.5 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
55.3 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
55.4 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) range
35% < LVEF ≤ 50%
221 participants198 participants419 participants
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) range
LVEF ≤ 35%
74 participants78 participants152 participants
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) range
LVEF > 50%
613 participants626 participants1239 participants
QRS duration118.8 ms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.3
118.1 ms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.8
118.4 ms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.5
QRS range
120ms < QRS ≤ 150ms
190 participants176 participants366 participants
QRS range
QRS ≤ 120ms
571 participants571 participants1142 participants
QRS range
QRS > 150ms
147 participants155 participants302 participants
Scheduled for ICD
Not scheduled for ICD
886 participants976 participants1762 participants
Scheduled for ICD
Scheduled for ICD
22 participants26 participants48 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
296 Participants278 Participants574 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
612 Participants624 Participants1236 Participants
Underlying cardiac diseases
All
572 participants571 participants1143 participants
Underlying cardiac diseases
Dlated cardiomyopathy
43 participants51 participants94 participants
Underlying cardiac diseases
Hypertensive heart disease
281 participants262 participants543 participants
Underlying cardiac diseases
Ischaemic heart disease
274 participants274 participants548 participants
Underlying cardiac diseases
Prior MI
162 participants141 participants308 participants
Underlying cardiac diseases
Valvulopathy
170 participants165 participants335 participants
Ventricular pacing at 1 month86.4 %90.2 %88.3 %

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
307 / 908305 / 902
other
Total, other adverse events
451 / 908507 / 902
serious
Total, serious adverse events
641 / 908698 / 902

Outcome results

Primary

Death or Heart Failure Hospitalization

Number of subjects who experienced death or hospitalization where heart failure is a primary cause of hospitalization

Time frame: Study duration (5.7 years mean follow-up)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RV PacingDeath or Heart Failure Hospitalization346 Participants
Biventricular PacingDeath or Heart Failure Hospitalization363 Participants
p-value: 0.088295% CI: [0.756, 1.02]Regression, Cox
Primary

Total Mortality

Number of deaths observed

Time frame: Study duration (5.7 years mean follow-up)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RV PacingTotal Mortality307 Participants
Biventricular PacingTotal Mortality305 Participants
p-value: 0.349295% CI: [0.789, 1.0088]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Adverse Events Related to Left Ventricular Lead

Only serious adverse events related to the left ventricular lead are included.

Time frame: Study Duration (5.7 years mean follow-up)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RV PacingAdverse Events Related to Left Ventricular Lead1 participants
Biventricular PacingAdverse Events Related to Left Ventricular Lead38 participants
Secondary

Cardiac Structure and Function

Time frame: 12 & 24 months

Population: Data related to cardiac structure and function can not be presented as the data was not collected and analysis provided by the core lab.

Secondary

Chronic Atrial Fibrillation (Defined as Presence of Atrial Fibrillation in Two Subsequent ECG´s/Visits)

Chronic atrial fibrillation is defined as presence of atrial fibrillation in two subsequent ECG´s/visits.

Time frame: Study duration (5.7 years mean follow-up)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RV PacingChronic Atrial Fibrillation (Defined as Presence of Atrial Fibrillation in Two Subsequent ECG´s/Visits)91 participants
Biventricular PacingChronic Atrial Fibrillation (Defined as Presence of Atrial Fibrillation in Two Subsequent ECG´s/Visits)76 participants
Secondary

Death Due to Cardiovascular Causes

Number of subjects who died due to cardiovascular causes, as classified by the independent Event Adjudication Committee (IEAC)

Time frame: Study duration (5.7 years mean follow-up)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RV PacingDeath Due to Cardiovascular Causes106 Participants
Biventricular PacingDeath Due to Cardiovascular Causes107 Participants
p-value: 0.821595% CI: [0.74, 1.27]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Duration of Hospitalizations for Any Reason

Time frame: Study duration (5.7 years mean follow-up)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RV PacingDuration of Hospitalizations for Any Reason3.72 days per patient year
Biventricular PacingDuration of Hospitalizations for Any Reason4.14 days per patient year
Secondary

Duration of Hospitalizations for Cardiovascular Events

Time frame: Study Duration (5.7 years mean follow-up)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RV PacingDuration of Hospitalizations for Cardiovascular Events1.52 Days per patient year
Biventricular PacingDuration of Hospitalizations for Cardiovascular Events1.50 Days per patient year
Secondary

Duration of Hospitalizations for Deterioration of Heart Failure

Time frame: Study Duration (5.7 years mean follow-up)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RV PacingDuration of Hospitalizations for Deterioration of Heart Failure0.40 days per patient year
Biventricular PacingDuration of Hospitalizations for Deterioration of Heart Failure0.39 days per patient year
Secondary

Functional Capacity as Measured by the Distance Covered in the 6-minute Walk Test

Time frame: 12 months post-implant

Population: This analysis includes all enrolled patients who completed the 6-minute walk test both at the baseline and 12-month visits. Due to that reason, the overall number of participants analyzed is different from the participant module.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RV PacingFunctional Capacity as Measured by the Distance Covered in the 6-minute Walk Test371.3 metersStandard Deviation 128.8
Biventricular PacingFunctional Capacity as Measured by the Distance Covered in the 6-minute Walk Test371.2 metersStandard Deviation 129.1
Secondary

Functional Capacity as Measured by the Distance Covered in the 6-minute Walk Test

Time frame: 24 months post-implant

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RV PacingFunctional Capacity as Measured by the Distance Covered in the 6-minute Walk Test369.3 metersStandard Deviation 127.2
Biventricular PacingFunctional Capacity as Measured by the Distance Covered in the 6-minute Walk Test376.5 metersStandard Deviation 132
Secondary

Health Related Quality of Life Measured by the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire©

Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) questionnaire score at 12 months MLWHF score: the total scale is from 0 to 105, with higher scores indicating worse health status.

Time frame: 12 months post-implant

Population: This analysis includes all enrolled patients who completed the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure questionnaire both at the baseline and 12-month visits. Due to that reason, the overall number of participants analyzed is different from the participant module.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RV PacingHealth Related Quality of Life Measured by the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire©16.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.4
Biventricular PacingHealth Related Quality of Life Measured by the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire©15.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.5
Secondary

Health Related Quality of Life Measured by the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire©

Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) questionnaire score at 24 months. MLWHF score: the total scale is from 0 to 105, with higher scores indicating worse health status.

Time frame: 24 months post-implant

Population: This analysis includes all enrolled patients who completed the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure questionnaire both at the baseline and 24-month visits. Due to that reason, the overall number of participants analyzed is different from the participant module.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RV PacingHealth Related Quality of Life Measured by the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire©17.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.6
Biventricular PacingHealth Related Quality of Life Measured by the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire©17.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.6
Secondary

Incidence of Hospitalizations for Any Reason

Time frame: Study duration (5.7 years mean follow-up)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RV PacingIncidence of Hospitalizations for Any Reason0.392 Hospitalization per patient year
Biventricular PacingIncidence of Hospitalizations for Any Reason0.432 Hospitalization per patient year
Secondary

Incidence of Hospitalizations for Cardiovascular Events

Time frame: Study duration (5.7 years mean follow-up)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RV PacingIncidence of Hospitalizations for Cardiovascular Events0.162 hospitalizations per patient year
Biventricular PacingIncidence of Hospitalizations for Cardiovascular Events0.161 hospitalizations per patient year
Secondary

Incidence of Hospitalizations for Deterioration of Heart Failure

Time frame: Study duration (5.7 years mean follow-up)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RV PacingIncidence of Hospitalizations for Deterioration of Heart Failure0.043 hospitalization per patient year
Biventricular PacingIncidence of Hospitalizations for Deterioration of Heart Failure0.037 hospitalization per patient year
Secondary

Successful Implantation of the Left Ventricular Lead

Time frame: Implantation

Population: There was an attempt of left ventricular lead implantation only for subjects from Biventricular Pacing group.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Biventricular PacingSuccessful Implantation of the Left Ventricular Lead760 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026