Skip to content

B-Left HF: Biventricular Versus Left Univentricular Pacing With Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD) Back-Up in Heart Failure Patients

Biventricular Versus Left Univentricular Pacing With ICD Back-up in Heart Failure Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00187213
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2005-09-16
Start date
2004-12-31
Completion date
2008-01-31
Last updated
2019-02-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Diseases, Heart Failure, Ventricular Dysfunction

Keywords

Ventricular Dyssynchrony

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that biventricular pacing (BiV) and left univentricular (left ventricular \[LV\] only) pacing are safe and effective for cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients implanted with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) device. The hypothesis to be tested by this clinical investigation is that patients indicated for an ICD with cardiac resynchronization therapy respond as well to LV only pacing as to BiV pacing.

Interventions

DEVICECardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Sponsors

Abbott Medical Devices
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Have an approved indication for implantation of an ICD for treatment of a life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmia(s) * Have advanced heart failure with a New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification of III or IV, despite receiving a minimum of 30 days of stable optimal pharmacological therapy * Have a ventricular conduction delay manifested as a QRS width \>= 130 ms * Have a left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) \>= 55 mm * Have a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \<= 35%

Exclusion criteria

* Have a CRT device already implanted * Have a standard indication for bradycardia pacing * Have a history of chronic atrial fibrillation \[AF\] (continuous AF lasting \> 1 month) within 1 year prior to enrollment or have undergone cardioversion for AF in the past month) * Have the ability to walk \> 450 meters during the 6-minute walk test * Have uncorrected primary valvular disease * Have had a recent myocardial infarction, unstable angina or cardiac revascularization (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty \[PTCA\] or coronary artery bypass graft \[CABG\]) within 1 month of enrollment * Have had cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 3 months of enrollment * Have a life expectancy of less than one year * Are unable to comply with the follow-up schedule and tests * Are minors (age below 18 years) * Are pregnant or are planning for pregnancy in the next 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary objective is to demonstrate that left univentricular pacing is equivalent to biventricular pacing in improving the functional capacity and inducing reverse remodeling.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The secondary objective of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the proportion of improved patients in each group, using the Heart Failure Clinical Composite Response.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026