Skip to content

Does Intensive Task Specific Training Improve Balance After Acute Stroke?

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Intensive Task Specific Training With Traditional Follow up Care After Discharge From a Stroke Unit.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00184431
Enrollment
62
Registered
2005-09-16
Start date
2004-04-30
Completion date
2008-04-30
Last updated
2011-10-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebrovascular Accident

Keywords

Cerebrovascular Accident, Physical Therapy Techniques, Musculoskeletal Equilibrium, Rehabilitation

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to investigate whether additional task specific physiotherapy treatment and a self administrated home training program results in better balance compared to traditional follow up care.

Detailed description

Increased risk of falling is a major problem after stroke and impaired balance is one of the main reasons for falling. Early and intensive physiotherapy seems to be beneficial for functional outcome after stroke although it is still unknown whether one specific physiotherapy technique is better than another. Comparison: Traditional follow up care by the community health care system with additional task specific physiotherapy three times a week and a daily self administrated home training program compared to traditional follow up care by the community health care system.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPhysical therapy technique and exercises

The experimental group receives task specific physical therapy three times a week for the first four weeks after discharge from hospital and one session pr week for the next eight weeks in addition to ordinary physical therapy The active comparator group receives only ordinary physical therapy during this period.

Sponsors

St. Olavs Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Norwegian Fund for Postgraduate Training in Physiotherapy
CollaboratorOTHER
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Admitted to the stroke unit with a diagnosis of stroke * Living in the city of Trondheim * Included 4 - 14 days after first sign of symptoms * Modified Rankin Scale \> 3 before admission to hospital * Scandinavian Stroke Scale (SSS) less than 58 points and more than 14 points * SSS leg item less than 6 points or SSS movement item less than 12 points * Discharged to home or a rehabilitation clinic * Mini Mental State Examination Score more than 20 points * Able and willing to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Seriously heart- and lung-diseases * Other diseases which makes it difficult to evaluate the function * Already included in the trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The Berg Balance ScaleInclusion, four weeks follow-up, twelve weeks follow-up and six months follow-up

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Scandinavian Stroke ScaleInclusion
Motor Assessment ScaleInclusion, four weeks follow-up, twelve weeks follow-up, six months follow-up
Timed Up and GoInclusion, four weeks follow-up, twelve weeks follow-up, six months follow-up
Step TestInclusion, four weeks follow-up, twelve weeks follow-up, six months follow-up
Mini Mental State ExaminationInclusion
Barthel IndexInclusion, four weeks follow-up, twelve weeks follow-up, six months follow-up
Modified Rankin ScaleInclusion, four weeks follow-up, twelve weeks follow-up, six months follow-up
Fall Efficacy ScaleInclusion, four weeks follow-up, twelve weeks follow-up, six months follow-up
Stroke Impact ScaleInclusion, four weeks follow-up, twelve weeks follow-up, six months follow-up
Walking speedInclusion, four weeks follow-up, twelve weeks follow-up, six months follow-up

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026