Skip to content

Efficacy of Metronidazole Versus Metronidazole and Rifampin in CDAD Treatment

Prospective, Randomized Study of Oral Metronidazole vs. Oral Metronidazole and Rifampin for Treatment of Clostridium Difficile-associated Diarrhea (CDAD)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00182429
Enrollment
100
Registered
2005-09-16
Start date
2004-02-29
Completion date
2005-12-31
Last updated
2018-08-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea, Clostridium Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous Colitis, Pseudomembranous Enteritis, Pseudomembranous Enterocolitis

Keywords

Antibiotic associated diarrhea, C. difficile, Metronidazole, Rifampin

Brief summary

What is the difference between the use of one drug (Oral Metronidazole) versus the use of this same drug combined with another drug (Rifampin) in treatment of bacteria and infection-associated diarrhea in patients? This infection is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in both the community and hospitals, and the leading cause of hospital and chronic facility-acquired diarrhea. Research is important for the treatment of this infection. Patient care with use of two medication treatment regimens will be studied.

Detailed description

Clostridium difficile infection contributes to both community and hospital acquired morbidity and mortality. Metronidazole alone is usually considered the drug of choice, however, frequent relapses occur at a rate of 10-40%. The purpose of this study is to address the use of a combined drug regimen treatment (Metronidazole and Rifampin) for the treatment of CDAD. These drugs used together have been successful. Objectives are to determine the time (days) to resolution of symptoms in each treatment arm; to measure clinical relapse rates; and to assess adverse reactions related to treatment.

Interventions

DRUGMetronidazole and Rifampin

Sponsors

The Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
McMaster University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Inpatients + outpatients diagnosed with CDAD based on SHEA definition \[Laboratory confirmation for presence of C.difficile toxin using enzyme immunoassay and no other etiology for diarrhea + Presence of 1 or more of the following: diarrhea (6 watery stool over 36 hours or 3 unformed stools in 24 hours for at least 2days), pseudomembranes at endoscopy\].

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 14 yr * Known hypersensitivity to metronidazole, rifampin * Receiving medication(s) with potential significant drug interaction with rifampin * Active liver disease as indicated by ALT \> 200 U/L * Adynamic ileus * Toxic megacolon * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Resolution of symptoms in each treatment arm (in days) up to 40 days (measured using daily stool and symptom diary).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical relapse rate in each group (time to relapse in days) up to 40 days after initial diagnosis (measured by repeating C. difficile toxin assay and analyzing daily stool and symptom diary).
Adverse reactions related to treatment within 40 days (measured using daily symptom diary and interviewing patient).
Occurrance of metronidazole resistance in the organism (C. difficile) in relapse cases.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026