Skip to content

Effects of a Personalized Web-based Antenatal Care Planner

Women's Web Access to Their Own Antenatal Health Record and Personalized Health Information: Effect on Pregnancy Health Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00182325
Enrollment
193
Registered
2005-09-16
Start date
2004-02-29
Completion date
2006-09-30
Last updated
2019-06-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pregnancy

Keywords

medical record, pregnancy, Internet

Brief summary

Many women are turning to the Internet to meet their health information needs, but the large amount of information available, as well as the unknown reliability and applicability of information can be overwhelming. Studies in specific patient populations have determined that patients given access to personalized, on-line medical information are more satisfied with their care than patients provided generalized information. None of these studies have looked at whether this type of patient education would be helpful for pregnant women. This study is being done to determine whether pregnant women who have access to their own health records and personalized health information over the Internet are more satisfied with their prenatal care, and if they are more compliant with health visits and tests, compared to pregnant women who receive only generic pregnancy information on the Internet and from pamphlets

Detailed description

Many women are turning to the Internet to meet their health information needs, but the large amount of information available, as well as the unknown reliability and applicability of information can be overwhelming. Studies in specific patient populations have determined that patients given access to personalized, on-line medical information are more satisfied with their care than patients provided generalized information. None of these studies have looked at whether this type of patient education would be helpful for pregnant women. This study is being done to determine whether pregnant women who have access to their own health records and personalized health information over the Internet are more satisfied with their prenatal care, and if they are more compliant with health visits and tests, compared to pregnant women who receive only generic pregnancy information on the Internet and from pamphlets Women are being randomly assigned to receive secure access to pregnancy health information links chosen by the centre's physicians, or to receive these links with access to their online personal health that includes the antenatal record and a section of their care planner, from the centre's electronic medical record

Interventions

BEHAVIORALpersonalized web prenatal information
BEHAVIORALgeneral web prenatal information

Sponsors

McMaster University
CollaboratorOTHER
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* less than 28 weeks pregnant access to Internet

Exclusion criteria

* cannot speak/read English and no translator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Information Easy to Understand11 monthsWomen were asked to rate their agreement with statements about the website from strongly agree (1) to strongly disagree (5) on a five-point scale. Results presented here are mean responses to questionnaire about the pregnancy website in the two randomized groups.
Uptake of Service11 monthsNumber of log-ins
Easy to Log on11 monthsWomen were asked to rate their agreement with statements about the website from strongly agree (1) to strongly disagree (5) on a five-point scale. Results presented here are mean responses to questionnaire about the pregnancy website in the two randomized groups.
Learned Something New11 monthsWomen were asked to rate their agreement with statements about the website from strongly agree (1) to strongly disagree (5) on a five-point scale. Results presented here are mean responses to questionnaire about the pregnancy website in the two randomized groups.
Easy to Find Information11 monthsWomen were asked to rate their agreement with statements about the website from strongly agree (1) to strongly disagree (5) on a five-point scale. Results presented here are mean responses to questionnaire about the pregnancy website in the two randomized groups.
Helped me Stay Healthy11 monthsWomen were asked to rate their agreement with statements about the website from strongly agree (1) to strongly disagree (5) on a five-point scale. Results presented here are mean responses to questionnaire about the pregnancy website in the two randomized groups.
Helped me Learn About Risks11 monthsWomen were asked to rate their agreement with statements about the website from strongly agree (1) to strongly disagree (5) on a five-point scale. Results presented here are mean responses to questionnaire about the pregnancy website in the two randomized groups.
Helped me Understand Tests11 monthsWomen were asked to rate their agreement with statements about the website from strongly agree (1) to strongly disagree (5) on a five-point scale. Results presented here are mean responses to questionnaire about the pregnancy website in the two randomized groups.
Helped me Make Decisions11 monthsWomen were asked to rate their agreement with statements about the website from strongly agree (1) to strongly disagree (5) on a five-point scale. Results presented here are mean responses to questionnaire about the pregnancy website in the two randomized groups.
Helped me Remember Appointments11 monthsWomen were asked to rate their agreement with statements about the website from strongly agree (1) to strongly disagree (5) on a five-point scale. Results presented here are mean responses to questionnaire about the pregnancy website in the two randomized groups.

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Personalized Information and Internet Access
Women in this group were given access to their own personal antenatal health record and personalized information through the clinic's antenatal care planner, as well as access to the study site website, which provided links to pregnancy information that was pre-approved by the study team.
97
General Resource Internet Access
Women in this group were given access to the study site website, which provided links to pregnancy information that was pre-approved by the study team
96
Total193

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDid not complete survey2243
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up77
Overall StudyMiscarriage53

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPersonalized Information and Internet AccessGeneral Resource Internet AccessTotal
Age, Continuous27.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3
26.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
27.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5
At least some post-secondary education58 Participants59 Participants117 Participants
Married or common-law75 Participants72 Participants147 Participants
Primiparous60 Participants64 Participants124 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
97 Participants96 Participants193 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 970 / 96
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 970 / 96
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 970 / 96

Outcome results

Primary

Easy to Find Information

Women were asked to rate their agreement with statements about the website from strongly agree (1) to strongly disagree (5) on a five-point scale. Results presented here are mean responses to questionnaire about the pregnancy website in the two randomized groups.

Time frame: 11 months

Population: The number of completed surveys was 63 (64.9%) in the personalized information and Internet access group, and 43 (44.8%) in the general resource Internet access group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Personalized Information and Internet AccessEasy to Find Information1.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
General Resource Internet AccessEasy to Find Information1.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
p-value: 0.57t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Easy to Log on

Women were asked to rate their agreement with statements about the website from strongly agree (1) to strongly disagree (5) on a five-point scale. Results presented here are mean responses to questionnaire about the pregnancy website in the two randomized groups.

Time frame: 11 months

Population: The number of completed surveys was 63 (64.9%) in the personalized information and Internet access group, and 43 (44.8%) in the general resource Internet access group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Personalized Information and Internet AccessEasy to Log on1.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
General Resource Internet AccessEasy to Log on1.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
p-value: 0.84t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Helped me Learn About Risks

Women were asked to rate their agreement with statements about the website from strongly agree (1) to strongly disagree (5) on a five-point scale. Results presented here are mean responses to questionnaire about the pregnancy website in the two randomized groups.

Time frame: 11 months

Population: The number of completed surveys was 63 (64.9%) in the personalized information and Internet access group, and 43 (44.8%) in the general resource Internet access group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Personalized Information and Internet AccessHelped me Learn About Risks1.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
General Resource Internet AccessHelped me Learn About Risks1.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
p-value: 0.46t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Helped me Make Decisions

Women were asked to rate their agreement with statements about the website from strongly agree (1) to strongly disagree (5) on a five-point scale. Results presented here are mean responses to questionnaire about the pregnancy website in the two randomized groups.

Time frame: 11 months

Population: The number of completed surveys was 63 (64.9%) in the personalized information and Internet access group, and 43 (44.8%) in the general resource Internet access group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Personalized Information and Internet AccessHelped me Make Decisions2.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
General Resource Internet AccessHelped me Make Decisions2.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
p-value: 0.26t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Helped me Remember Appointments

Women were asked to rate their agreement with statements about the website from strongly agree (1) to strongly disagree (5) on a five-point scale. Results presented here are mean responses to questionnaire about the pregnancy website in the two randomized groups.

Time frame: 11 months

Population: The number of completed surveys was 63 (64.9%) in the personalized information and Internet access group, and 43 (44.8%) in the general resource Internet access group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Personalized Information and Internet AccessHelped me Remember Appointments2.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
General Resource Internet AccessHelped me Remember Appointments3.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
p-value: 0.12t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Helped me Stay Healthy

Women were asked to rate their agreement with statements about the website from strongly agree (1) to strongly disagree (5) on a five-point scale. Results presented here are mean responses to questionnaire about the pregnancy website in the two randomized groups.

Time frame: 11 months

Population: The number of completed surveys was 63 (64.9%) in the personalized information and Internet access group, and 43 (44.8%) in the general resource Internet access group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Personalized Information and Internet AccessHelped me Stay Healthy1.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
General Resource Internet AccessHelped me Stay Healthy1.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
p-value: 0.17t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Helped me Understand Tests

Women were asked to rate their agreement with statements about the website from strongly agree (1) to strongly disagree (5) on a five-point scale. Results presented here are mean responses to questionnaire about the pregnancy website in the two randomized groups.

Time frame: 11 months

Population: The number of completed surveys was 63 (64.9%) in the personalized information and Internet access group, and 43 (44.8%) in the general resource Internet access group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Personalized Information and Internet AccessHelped me Understand Tests1.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
General Resource Internet AccessHelped me Understand Tests1.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
p-value: 0.57t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Information Easy to Understand

Women were asked to rate their agreement with statements about the website from strongly agree (1) to strongly disagree (5) on a five-point scale. Results presented here are mean responses to questionnaire about the pregnancy website in the two randomized groups.

Time frame: 11 months

Population: The number of completed surveys was 63 (64.9%) in the personalized information and Internet access group, and 43 (44.8%) in the general resource Internet access group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Personalized Information and Internet AccessInformation Easy to Understand1.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
General Resource Internet AccessInformation Easy to Understand1.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
p-value: 0.68t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Learned Something New

Women were asked to rate their agreement with statements about the website from strongly agree (1) to strongly disagree (5) on a five-point scale. Results presented here are mean responses to questionnaire about the pregnancy website in the two randomized groups.

Time frame: 11 months

Population: The number of completed surveys was 63 (64.9%) in the personalized information and Internet access group, and 43 (44.8%) in the general resource Internet access group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Personalized Information and Internet AccessLearned Something New1.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
General Resource Internet AccessLearned Something New1.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
p-value: 0.67t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Uptake of Service

Number of log-ins

Time frame: 11 months

Population: An intention-to-treat analysis was conducted. Participants were included in the analysis that started or completed the survey and excludes participants that were lost to follow-up or had a miscarriage.Intervention group: 63 completed survey + 22 partially complete survey =85). Control group: 53 completed survey + 43 partially complete survey = 96).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Personalized Information and Internet AccessUptake of Service10.4 Log-insStandard Deviation 17.8
General Resource Internet AccessUptake of Service1.8 Log-insStandard Deviation 1.4
p-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026