Skip to content

SONICS - Effectiveness of Specialist Oncology Nursing

A Study of the Effectiveness of Specialist Oncology Nursing Case Management in Improving Continuity of Supportive Cancer Care in the Community (SONICS)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00182234
Enrollment
183
Registered
2005-09-16
Start date
2005-12-31
Completion date
2009-03-31
Last updated
2009-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Continuity of Care, Quality of Life

Keywords

unmet supportive care needs

Brief summary

This research project will address the issue of gaps in continuity of supportive care for cancer patients during the early phases of the disease trajectory that result in unmet needs and unnecessary morbidity. The investigators intend to study the impact of a specialized cancer-nursing program, Interlink Community Cancer Nurses (Interlink) on patient outcomes. Impact will be assessed directly using a validated measure of continuity of care from the patients' perspective and validated measures of key supportive care patient outcomes including unmet needs, distress, uncertainty in illness, and quality of life, in a randomized trial.

Detailed description

Main Research Question: Does community-based specialist oncology nursing case management improve continuity of cancer care and lead to fewer unmet cancer patient needs? Why this research is important: This research proposal addresses the issue of gaps in continuity of supportive care for cancer patients during the early phases of the disease trajectory that result in unmet needs and unnecessary morbidity, prior to entry into a formalized cancer care system (e.g., a regional cancer centre or hospital with a cancer treatment program). This initial diagnostic period of cancer is associated with significant stress, anxiety and uncertainty that can impact upon overall quality of life for all types of cancer. These problems are further exacerbated by waiting times of up to 16 weeks between diagnosis and attendance in a formalized cancer treatment system. During this time patients will face a fragmented supportive care service system resulting in a substantial number of patients reporting unmet needs and distress. These care gaps have significant implications considering that 38% of women and 41% of men will develop cancer during their lifetime and that cancer incidence continues to rise with an estimated 139,000 new cases in Canada (over 54,000 of these in Ontario) in 2003. There has been growing interest in nursing models to address these gaps in supportive cancer care but at this time there is not sufficient high quality evidence upon which to base policy decisions to support the widespread introduction of this type of model. The results of this study will be very important for policy development for community cancer care in Ontario and in other provinces in Canada. What is being studied: We will study the impact of a specialized nursing intervention (Interlink) on patient outcomes early in the disease trajectory. Impact will be assessed directly using validated measures in a randomized controlled trial design. These measures will include: continuity of care, unmet needs, psychological distress, uncertainty in illness, and quality of life.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCommunity Interlink Program

The study intervention is a referral to a specialized oncology nursing program. The standardized care provided by this program includes comprehensive assessment and care planning specific to breast and colorectal cancers during the initial phases of treatment, with a minimum of two home visits. Through consultation with the patient, nurses either provide direct (non-medical) care to address needs identified and/or coordinate linkage to services in the community.

Sponsors

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
McMaster University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically confirmed breast or colorectal cancer. * In the initial stages of surgical consultation within the randomized surgical practices. * Not had previous or concomitant malignancies (except for: non-melanoma skin cancer, or carcinoma in situ of the cervix). * Have been informed of cancer diagnosis by the surgical office. * Reside in the Interlink adult program service area. * Legally able to provide informed consent (18 years of age or older). * Able to speak and read English. * Patients from an intervention designated practice, must agree to referral to Interlink and to receiving an in-home needs assessment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Difference in unmet supportive care needs between intervention and control group2 to 3 weeks after baseline; 8 to 10 weeks after baseline
Difference in continuity of care between intervention and control group2 to 3 weeks after baseline; 8 to 10 weeks after baseline
Difference in quality of life between intervention and control group2 to 3 weeks after baseline; 8 to 10 weeks after baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Difference in uncertainty in illness between intervention and control group2 to 3 weeks after baseline; 8 to 10 weeks after baseline
Difference in use of resources between intervention and control group2 to 3 weeks after baseline; 8 to 10 weeks after baseline
Acute stress following surgery8 to 10 weeks after baseline

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026