Skip to content

SALT - Success of Active Versus Passive Lead Fixation of Atrial Pacing/Sensing Electrodes

Scandinavian Atrial Lead Trial

Status
Suspended
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00180570
Acronym
SALT
Enrollment
385
Registered
2005-09-16
Start date
1997-01-31
Completion date
2006-01-31
Last updated
2015-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bradycardia

Brief summary

Randomised Comparison with regards to complication rate and electrical measurements of atrial leads with different fixation mechnism

Detailed description

This investigation will study and compare 3 types of electrically identical, commercially available FineLine II Sterox leads with different fixation mechanisms. This trial has been designed to primarily study the difference in repositioning rate between active and passive fixation (straight and J-shaped) leads, if any. It will also monitor and document the behavior of the study leads, with special reference to electrical parameters and handling. Normal measurements are taken at pre-dicharge, 1-month 3-month and 12-month follow-up

Interventions

DEVICEFineLine II Sterox, FineLine II Sterox, FineLine II Sterox EZ

Sponsors

Guidant Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients selected for participation in this investigation should be candidates for permanent pacemaker implantation chosen from the investigator's general patient population without regard for race or sex. Furthermore, these patients should, in the physician's general opinion, benefit from permanent pacemaker implantation with one of the study leads. Patients should be geographically stable and available for routine follow-up visits throughout the duration of the study. Patients must also be able and willing to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who previously went through heart surgery should be excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary objective of this study is to compare repositioning rate due to threshold > 3.0 V @ 0.5 ms or P-wave < 0.8 mV between FineLine II Sterox 4480 and 4470, and between 4456 and 4470.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Other complications (Safety). To compare other lead related complication rates such as perforation, lead fracture and failure to implant. 2. Electrical properties

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026