Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Restenosis, Coronary Artery Stenosis, Myocardial Ischemia, Stents, Stent Thrombosis, Total Coronary Occlusion, Vascular Disease
Conditions
Keywords
Everolimus
Brief summary
This study is divided into 5 arms: 1. Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT): Prospective, randomized, active-controlled, single blind, parallel two-arm multi-center clinical trial in the United States (US) comparing XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (CSS) (2.5, 3.0, 3.5 mm diameter stents) to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved commercially available active control TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent (TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ PECS) System 2. US 2.25 mm non-randomized arm using 2.25 mm diameter XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting CSS 3. US 4.0 mm non-randomized arm using 4.0 mm diameter XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting CSS 4. US 38 mm non-randomized arm using 38 mm in length XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting CSS 5. Japanese non-randomized arm using XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting CSS (2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 mm diameter stents) in Japan The TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System is Manufactured by Boston Scientific.
Detailed description
The purpose of the SPIRIT III clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (XIENCE V® EECSS). The XIENCE V® EECS (XIENCE V® arm) will be compared to an active control group represented by the FDA approved commercially available Boston Scientific TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent (TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ PECS) System (TAXUS® arm). The SPIRIT III clinical trial consists of a randomized clinical trial (RCT) in the US which will enroll approximately 1,002 subjects (2:1 randomization XIENCE V® EECS : TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ PECS) with a maximum of two de novo native coronary artery lesion treatment within vessel sizes \>= 2.5 mm and \<= 3.75 mm. The SPIRIT III clinical trial also consists of three concurrent US non-randomized arms (2.25 mm diameter stent, 4.0 mm diameter stent and 38 mm length stent arms) and one Japanese non-randomized arm as follows: 1. 105 subjects with a maximum of two de novo native coronary artery lesion within vessel sizes \> 2.25 mm and \< 2.5 mm and lesion length \<= 22 mm will be enrolled concurrently in the US 2.25 mm non-randomized treatment arm 2. 80 subjects with a maximum of two de novo native coronary artery lesion within vessel sizes \> 3.75 mm and \>= 4.25 mm and lesion length \<= 28 mm will be enrolled concurrently in the US 4.0 mm non-randomized treatment arm 3. 105 subjects with a maximum of two de novo native coronary artery lesion within vessel sizes \> 3.0 mm and \< 4.25 mm and lesion length \> 24 mm and \< 32 mm will be enrolled concurrently in the US 38 mm non-randomized treatment arm. 4. 88 Japanese subjects with a maximum of two de novo native coronary artery lesions within vessel sizes \>= 2.5 mm and \<= 4.25 mm and lesion length \<= 28 mm will be enrolled concurrently in the non-randomized Japanese arm. All subjects in the RCT and the four non-randomized arms will be screened per the protocol required inclusion/exclusion criteria. The data collected will be compared to data from the subjects enrolled into the TAXUS® arm of US RCT. Subjects enrolled in the US RCT will be sub-grouped based on whether they will have an angiographic and/or an intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) follow-up at 240 days as follows: Group A: Angiographic and IVUS follow-up at 240 days (N=240) Group B: Angiographic follow-up at 240 days (N=324) Group C: No angiographic or IVUS follow-up (N=438) All subjects will have clinical follow-up at 30, 180, 240 and 270 days (Data collected through 270 days will be submitted as the primary data set for US and Japanese market approval), and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years (for annual reports). All subjects enrolled into three US non-randomized arms (N=105 for 2.25 mm arm, N=80 for 4.0 mm arm and N=105 for 38 mm stent arm) will have clinical follow-up at 30, 180, 240, and 270 days, and angiographic follow-up at 240 days. No IVUS follow-up is required for subjects enrolled in these arms. All subjects enrolled into the Japanese non-randomized arm (N=88) will have clinical follow-up at 30, 180, 240, and 270 days, and angiographic and IVUS follow-up at 240 days. All subjects who receive a bailout stent will be assigned to Group A follow-up subgroup (angiographic and IVUS follow-up at 240 days after the index procedure), regardless of their primary assignment at randomization. At sites without IVUS capability, subjects receiving bailout stent will be assigned to Group B follow-up subgroup (angiographic follow-up at 240 days after the index procedure). Angiographic follow-up is required for all bailout subjects at 240 days. Data from the US RCT will be submitted to the FDA as the primary data set for product approval for RVD \>= 2.5 mm and \<= 3.75 mm (2.5 mm, 3.0 mm and 3.5 mm stents). Combined data of the US trial/Japanese non-randomized arm will be submitted to the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW) for Japanese approval for RVD\>=2.5 mm and \<= 4.25 mm (2.5 mm, 3.0 mm 3.5 mm and 4.0 mm stents). Data from the Japanese non-randomized arm will be submitted to the FDA as additional safety data. Data from the US non-randomized arms of the trial will be the primary data sets for approval for 2.25 mm diameter stent (RVD \> 2.25 mm and \< 2.5 mm), 4.0 mm diameter stent (RVD \> 3.75 mm and \<= 4.25 mm) and 38 mm length stent (RVD \> 3.0 mm and \<= 4.25 mm and lesion length \> 24 mm and \<= 32 mm), respectively in the US. A pharmacokinetic substudy will be carried out in a minimum of 5 pre-determined sites in the US and a minimum of 5 pre-determined sites in Japan. In the US, the pharmacokinetics (PK) of everolimus, as delivered by the XIENCE V® EECS will be analyzed in a subset of 15 subjects (minimum) with single vessel/lesion treatment, and up to 20 subjects with dual vessel/lesion treatment, respectively. In Japan, a minimum of 10 subjects with single vessel/lesion treatment and up to 20 subjects with dual vessel/lesion treatment will have a PK measurements performed. These subsets will include subjects receiving overlapping stents.
Interventions
Drug eluting stent implantation stent in the treatment of coronary artery disease.
Drug eluting stent implantation stent in the treatment of coronary artery disease.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Target lesion(s) must be located in a native epicardial vessel with visually estimated diameter between \>= 2.25 mm and \<= 4.25 mm and a lesion length \<= 32 mm * The target lesion(s) must be in a major artery or branch with a visually estimated stenosis of \>= 50% and \< 100% with a thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow of \>= 1 * Non-study, percutaneous intervention for lesions in a non-target vessel is allowed if done \>= 90 days prior to the index procedure (subjects who received brachytherapy will be excluded from the trial)
Exclusion criteria
* Located within an arterial or saphenous vein graft or distal to a diseased (vessel irregularity per angiogram and \> 20% stenosed lesion by visual estimation) arterial or saphenous vein graft * Lesion involving a bifurcation \>= 2 mm in diameter or ostial lesion \> 50% stenosed by visual estimation or side branch requiring predilatation * Located in a major epicardial vessel that has been previously treated with brachytherapy * Located in a major epicardial vessel that has been previously treated with percutaneous intervention \< 9 months prior to index procedure * Total occlusion (TIMI flow 0), prior to wire passing * The target vessel contains thrombus * Another significant lesion (\> 40% diameter stenosis \[DS\]) is located in the same epicardial vessel as the target lesion
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Endpoint: In-segment Late Loss (LL) | 240 days | In-segment minimal lumen diameter (MLD) post-procedure minus (-) in segment MLD at 240 day follow-up and 5 mm proximal and 5mm distal to the stent equals Late Loss. MLD defined: The average of two orthogonal views (when possible) of the narrowest point within the area of assessment. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Target Vessel Failure (TVF) | 30 days | The composite endpoint comprised of: * Cardiac death (death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded) * Myocardial infarction (MI, classified as Q-wave and non-Q wave) * Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) by CABG or PCI * Ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR) by CABG or PCI |
| Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR) | 30 days | Revascularization @ target lesion associated w/ any of following: (+) functional ischemia study Ischemic symptoms & angiographic diameter stenosis ≥50% by core lab quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) Revascularization of a target lesion w/ angiographic diameter stenosis ≥70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or (+) functional study |
| Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR) | 30 days | Revascularization at the target vessel associated with any of the following * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and angiographic diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory QCA * Revascularization of a target vessel with angiographic diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or positive functional study Derived from Non-Hierarchical Subject Counts of Adverse Events |
| Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) | 30 days | The composite endpoint comprised of: * Cardiac death * Myocardial infarction (MI, classified as Q-wave and non-Q wave) * Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) by CABG or PCI |
| Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event(MACE) | 2 years | The composite endpoint comprised of: * Cardiac death * Myocardial infarction (MI, classified as Q-wave and non-Q wave) * Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) by CABG or PCI |
| In-stent % Angiographic Binary Restenosis (% ABR) Rate | at 240 days | Percent of subjects with a follow-up in-stent percent diameter stenosis of ≥ 50% per quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) |
| In-segment % Angiographic Binary Restenosis (% ABR) Rate | 240 days | Percent of subjects with a follow-up in-segment percent diameter stenosis of ≥ 50% per QCA |
| Persisting Incomplete Stent Apposition, Late-acquired Incomplete Stent Apposition, Aneurysm, Thrombosis, and Persisting Dissection | at 240 days | Incomplete Apposition (Persisting & Late acquired): Failure to completely appose vessel wall w/ ≥1 strut separated from vessel wall w/ blood behind strut per ultrasound. Aneurysm: Abnormal vessel expansion ≥ 1.5 of reference vessel diameter. Thrombus: Protocol & ARC definition. Persisting dissection @ follow-up, present post-procedure. |
| Major Secondary Endpoint: Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Failure (ID-TVF) | 270 days | The composite endpoint comprised of: * Cardiac death (death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded) * Myocardial infarction (MI, classified as Q-wave and non-Q wave) * Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) by CABG or PCI * Ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR) by CABG or PCI |
| Acute Success: Clinical Procedure | In-hospital | Successful delivery and deployment of study stent/s @ the intended target lesion and successful withdrawal of the stent delivery system with final residual stenosis \< 50%. |
| Proximal Late Loss | at 240 days | Proximal Minimum Lumen Diameter (MLD) post-procedure minus proximal MLD at follow-up (proximal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue proximal to stent placement) |
| Distal Late Loss | 240 days | Distal MLD post-procedure minus distal MLD at follow-up (distal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue distal to stent placement) |
| In-stent Late Loss | at 240 days | In-stent MLD post-procedure minus in-stent MLD at follow-up (in-stent defined as within the margins of the stent) |
| % Volume Obstruction (% VO) | at 240 days | Defined as stent intimal hyperplasia and calculated as 100\*(Stent Volume - Lumen Volume)/Stent Volume by IVUS. |
| In-stent % Diameter Stenosis (% DS) | at 240 days | In-stent: Within the margins of the stent, the value calculated as 100 \* (1 - in-stent MLD/RVD) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by QCA. |
| In-segment % Diameter Stenosis (% DS) | 240 days | Within the margins of the stent, 5 mm proximal and 5 mm distal to the stent, the value calculated as 100 \* (1 - in-segment MLD/RVD) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by QCA. |
| Acute Success: Clinical Device | In-hospital | Successful delivery and deployment of 1st implanted study stent/s @ the intended target lesion and successful withdrawal of the stent delivery system with final residual stenosis \< 50%. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
1002 subjects were recruited at 65 sites. Eligible subjects invited to participate either in-hospital or in-clinic prior to first procedure and required to provide signed informed consent prior to enrollment. Final eligibility based on angiogram before the intended procedure. Dates of recruitment: 6/22/05 through 3/15/06.
Pre-assignment details
Subjects were randomized via telephone randomization and stratified by single and dual lesion/vessel treatment, diabetes mellitus status, and study sites. Randomization only occurred after verification of the inclusion/exclusion criteria and successful pre-dilatation. See the Eligibility Criteria (inclusion/exclusion criteria) for details.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System | 669 |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System. 1 patient randomized never signed consent, therefore no data collected. Taxus analysis group = 332. | 333 |
| Total | 1,002 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 4 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Informed consent not signed | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 9 | 7 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 3 | 3 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | XIENCE V® EECSS | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age Categorical <=18 years | 0 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants |
| Age Categorical >=65 years | 141 participants | 293 participants | 434 participants |
| Age Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 191 participants | 376 participants | 567 participants |
| Age Continuous | 62.80 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.24 | 63.23 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.53 | 63.08 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.43 |
| Gender Female | 114 participants | 200 participants | 314 participants |
| Gender Male | 218 participants | 469 participants | 687 participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 333 participants | 669 participants | 1002 participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 71 / — | 55 / — |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 219 / — | 126 / — |
Outcome results
Primary Endpoint: In-segment Late Loss (LL)
In-segment minimal lumen diameter (MLD) post-procedure minus (-) in segment MLD at 240 day follow-up and 5 mm proximal and 5mm distal to the stent equals Late Loss. MLD defined: The average of two orthogonal views (when possible) of the narrowest point within the area of assessment.
Time frame: 240 days
Population: Only a certain number of patients were required to have angiographic follow-up to provide this endpoint information.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Primary Endpoint: In-segment Late Loss (LL) | 0.14 millimeters | Standard Deviation 0.41 |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Primary Endpoint: In-segment Late Loss (LL) | 0.28 millimeters | Standard Deviation 0.48 |
Acute Success: Clinical Device
Successful delivery and deployment of 1st implanted study stent/s @ the intended target lesion and successful withdrawal of the stent delivery system with final residual stenosis \< 50%.
Time frame: In-hospital
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Acute Success: Clinical Device | 98.3 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Acute Success: Clinical Device | 98.7 percentage of participants |
Acute Success: Clinical Procedure
Successful delivery and deployment of study stent/s @ the intended target lesion and successful withdrawal of the stent delivery system with final residual stenosis \< 50%.
Time frame: In-hospital
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Acute Success: Clinical Procedure | 98.5 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Acute Success: Clinical Procedure | 97.3 percentage of participants |
Distal Late Loss
Distal MLD post-procedure minus distal MLD at follow-up (distal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue distal to stent placement)
Time frame: 240 days
Population: Only a certain number of patients were required to have angiographic or IVUS follow-up. The analysis population for these follow-ups may have changed due to patient's not completing an angiographic or IVUS follow-up procedure. Patients may also have missed the follow-up visits due to early termination from the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Distal Late Loss | 0.09 millimeters | Standard Deviation 0.36 |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Distal Late Loss | 0.10 millimeters | Standard Deviation 0.37 |
In-segment % Angiographic Binary Restenosis (% ABR) Rate
Percent of subjects with a follow-up in-segment percent diameter stenosis of ≥ 50% per QCA
Time frame: 240 days
Population: Only a certain number of patients were required to have angiographic or IVUS follow-up. The analysis population for these follow-ups may have changed due to patient's not completing an angiographic or IVUS follow-up procedure. Patients may also have missed the follow-up visits due to early termination from the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | In-segment % Angiographic Binary Restenosis (% ABR) Rate | 4.7 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | In-segment % Angiographic Binary Restenosis (% ABR) Rate | 8.9 percentage of participants |
In-segment % Diameter Stenosis (% DS)
Within the margins of the stent, 5 mm proximal and 5 mm distal to the stent, the value calculated as 100 \* (1 - in-segment MLD/RVD) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by QCA.
Time frame: 240 days
Population: Only a certain number of patients were required to have angiographic or IVUS follow-up. The analysis population for these follow-ups may have changed due to patient's not completing an angiographic or IVUS follow-up procedure. Patients may also have missed the follow-up visits due to early termination from the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | In-segment % Diameter Stenosis (% DS) | 18.77 percent of in-segment diameter stenosis | Standard Deviation 14.43 |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | In-segment % Diameter Stenosis (% DS) | 22.82 percent of in-segment diameter stenosis | Standard Deviation 16.35 |
In-stent % Angiographic Binary Restenosis (% ABR) Rate
Percent of subjects with a follow-up in-stent percent diameter stenosis of ≥ 50% per quantitative coronary angiography (QCA)
Time frame: at 240 days
Population: Only a certain number of patients were required to have angiographic or IVUS follow-up. The analysis population for these follow-ups may have changed due to patient's not completing an angiographic or IVUS follow-up procedure. Patients may also have missed the follow-up visits due to early termination from the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | In-stent % Angiographic Binary Restenosis (% ABR) Rate | 2.3 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | In-stent % Angiographic Binary Restenosis (% ABR) Rate | 5.7 percentage of participants |
In-stent % Diameter Stenosis (% DS)
In-stent: Within the margins of the stent, the value calculated as 100 \* (1 - in-stent MLD/RVD) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by QCA.
Time frame: at 240 days
Population: Only a certain number of patients were required to have angiographic or IVUS follow-up. The analysis population for these follow-ups may have changed due to patient's not completing an angiographic or IVUS follow-up procedure. Patients may also have missed the follow-up visits due to early termination from the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | In-stent % Diameter Stenosis (% DS) | 5.92 percent diameter stenosis | Standard Deviation 16.4 |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | In-stent % Diameter Stenosis (% DS) | 10.30 percent diameter stenosis | Standard Deviation 21.43 |
In-stent Late Loss
In-stent MLD post-procedure minus in-stent MLD at follow-up (in-stent defined as within the margins of the stent)
Time frame: at 240 days
Population: Only a certain number of patients were required to have angiographic or IVUS follow-up. The analysis population for these follow-ups may have changed due to patient's not completing an angiographic or IVUS follow-up procedure. Patients may also have missed the follow-up visits due to early termination from the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | In-stent Late Loss | 0.16 millimeters | Standard Deviation 0.41 |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | In-stent Late Loss | 0.30 millimeters | Standard Deviation 0.53 |
Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)
The composite endpoint comprised of: * Cardiac death * Myocardial infarction (MI, classified as Q-wave and non-Q wave) * Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) by CABG or PCI
Time frame: 3 year
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for the secondary endpoints. The analysis population at clinical follow-up visits may have changed due to early termination from the study by the patient or physician.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) | 9.7 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) | 16.4 percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)
The composite endpoint comprised of: * Cardiac death * Myocardial infarction (MI, classified as Q-wave and non-Q wave) * Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) by CABG or PCI
Time frame: 30 days
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for the secondary endpoints. The analysis population at clinical follow-up visits may have changed due to early termination from the study by the patient or physician.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) | 1.3 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) | 3.0 percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)
The composite endpoint comprised of: * Cardiac death * Myocardial infarction (MI, classified as Q-wave and non-Q wave) * Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) by CABG or PCI
Time frame: 180 days
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for the secondary endpoints. The analysis population at clinical follow-up visits may have changed due to early termination from the study by the patient or physician.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) | 2.9 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) | 5.2 percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)
The composite endpoint comprised of: * Cardiac death * Myocardial infarction (MI, classified as Q-wave and non-Q wave) * Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) by CABG or PCI
Time frame: 270 days
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for the secondary endpoints. The analysis population at clinical follow-up visits may have changed due to early termination from the study by the patient or physician.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) | 5.0 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) | 8.8 percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)
The composite endpoint comprised of: * Cardiac death * Myocardial infarction (MI, classified as Q-wave and non-Q wave) * Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) by CABG or PCI
Time frame: 1 year
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for the secondary endpoints. The analysis population at clinical follow-up visits may have changed due to early termination from the study by the patient or physician.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) | 6.0 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) | 10.3 percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)
The composite endpoint comprised of: * Cardiac death * Myocardial infarction (MI, classified as Q-wave and non-Q wave) * Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) by CABG or PCI
Time frame: 4 year
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for the secondary endpoints. The analysis population at clinical follow-up visits may have changed due to early termination from the study by the patient or physician.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) | 12.8 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) | 18.5 percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)
The composite endpoint comprised of: * Cardiac death * Myocardial infarction (MI, classified as Q-wave and non-Q wave) * Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) by CABG or PCI
Time frame: 5 years
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for the secondary endpoints. The analysis population at clinical follow-up visits may have changed due to early termination from the study by the patient or physician.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) | 14.4 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) | 22.0 percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event(MACE)
The composite endpoint comprised of: * Cardiac death * Myocardial infarction (MI, classified as Q-wave and non-Q wave) * Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) by CABG or PCI
Time frame: 2 years
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for the secondary endpoints. The analysis population at clinical follow-up visits may have changed due to early termination from the study by the patient or physician.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event(MACE) | 7.7 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event(MACE) | 13.8 percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)
Revascularization @ target lesion associated w/ any of following: (+) functional ischemia study Ischemic symptoms & angiographic diameter stenosis ≥50% by core lab quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) Revascularization of a target lesion w/ angiographic diameter stenosis ≥70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or (+) functional study
Time frame: 180 days
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for the secondary endpoints. The analysis population at clinical follow-up visits may have changed due to early termination from the study by the patient or physician.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR) | 1.5 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR) | 2.1 percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)
Revascularization @ target lesion associated w/ any of following: (+) functional ischemia study Ischemic symptoms & angiographic diameter stenosis ≥50% by core lab quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) Revascularization of a target lesion w/ angiographic diameter stenosis ≥70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or (+) functional study
Time frame: 4 year
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for the secondary endpoints. The analysis population at clinical follow-up visits may have changed due to early termination from the study by the patient or physician.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR) | 8.0 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR) | 10.6 percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)
Revascularization @ target lesion associated w/ any of following: (+) functional ischemia study Ischemic symptoms & angiographic diameter stenosis ≥50% by core lab quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) Revascularization of a target lesion w/ angiographic diameter stenosis ≥70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or (+) functional study
Time frame: 30 days
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for the secondary endpoints. The analysis population at clinical follow-up visits may have changed due to early termination from the study by the patient or physician.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR) | 0.4 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR) | 0.3 percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)
Revascularization @ target lesion associated w/ any of following: (+) functional ischemia study Ischemic symptoms & angiographic diameter stenosis ≥50% by core lab quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) Revascularization of a target lesion w/ angiographic diameter stenosis ≥70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or (+) functional study
Time frame: 1 years
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for the secondary endpoints. The analysis population at clinical follow-up visits may have changed due to early termination from the study by the patient or physician.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR) | 3.4 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR) | 5.6 percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)
Revascularization @ target lesion associated w/ any of following: (+) functional ischemia study Ischemic symptoms & angiographic diameter stenosis ≥50% by core lab quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) Revascularization of a target lesion w/ angiographic diameter stenosis ≥70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or (+) functional study
Time frame: 270 days
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for the secondary endpoints. The analysis population at clinical follow-up visits may have changed due to early termination from the study by the patient or physician.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR) | 2.7 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR) | 5.0 percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)
Revascularization @ target lesion associated w/ any of following: (+) functional ischemia study Ischemic symptoms & angiographic diameter stenosis ≥50% by core lab quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) Revascularization of a target lesion w/ angiographic diameter stenosis ≥70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or (+) functional study
Time frame: 3 year
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for the secondary endpoints. The analysis population at clinical follow-up visits may have changed due to early termination from the study by the patient or physician.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR) | 5.7 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR) | 9.2 percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)
Revascularization @ target lesion associated w/ any of following: (+) functional ischemia study Ischemic symptoms & angiographic diameter stenosis ≥50% by core lab quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) Revascularization of a target lesion w/ angiographic diameter stenosis ≥70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or (+) functional study
Time frame: 5 years
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for the secondary endpoints. The analysis population at clinical follow-up visits may have changed due to early termination from the study by the patient or physician.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR) | 8.9 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR) | 12.9 percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)
Revascularization @ target lesion associated w/ any of following: (+) functional ischemia study Ischemic symptoms & angiographic diameter stenosis ≥50% by core lab quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) Revascularization of a target lesion w/ angiographic diameter stenosis ≥70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or (+) functional study
Time frame: 2 years
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for the secondary endpoints. The analysis population at clinical follow-up visits may have changed due to early termination from the study by the patient or physician.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR) | 5.7 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR) | 9.2 percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)
Revascularization at the target vessel associated with any of the following * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and angiographic diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory QCA * Revascularization of a target vessel with angiographic diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or positive functional study Derived from Non-Hierarchical Subject Counts of Adverse Events
Time frame: 180 days
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for the secondary endpoints. The analysis population at clinical follow-up visits may have changed due to early termination from the study by the patient or physician.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR) | 1.2 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR) | 1.8 percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)
Revascularization at the target vessel associated with any of the following * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and angiographic diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory QCA * Revascularization of a target vessel with angiographic diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or positive functional study Derived from Non-Hierarchical Subject Counts of Adverse Events
Time frame: 2 years
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for the secondary endpoints. The analysis population at clinical follow-up visits may have changed due to early termination from the study by the patient or physician.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR) | 4.9 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR) | 6.6 percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)
Revascularization at the target vessel associated with any of the following * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and angiographic diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory QCA * Revascularization of a target vessel with angiographic diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or positive functional study Derived from Non-Hierarchical Subject Counts of Adverse Events
Time frame: 270 days
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for the secondary endpoints. The analysis population at clinical follow-up visits may have changed due to early termination from the study by the patient or physician.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR) | 2.9 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR) | 4.1 percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)
Revascularization at the target vessel associated with any of the following * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and angiographic diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory QCA * Revascularization of a target vessel with angiographic diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or positive functional study Derived from Non-Hierarchical Subject Counts of Adverse Events
Time frame: 1 year
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for the secondary endpoints. The analysis population at clinical follow-up visits may have changed due to early termination from the study by the patient or physician.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR) | 3.1 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR) | 4.7 percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)
Revascularization at the target vessel associated with any of the following * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and angiographic diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory QCA * Revascularization of a target vessel with angiographic diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or positive functional study Derived from Non-Hierarchical Subject Counts of Adverse Events
Time frame: 3 years
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for the secondary endpoints. The analysis population at clinical follow-up visits may have changed due to early termination from the study by the patient or physician.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR) | 6.7 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR) | 8.9 percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)
Revascularization at the target vessel associated with any of the following * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and angiographic diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory QCA * Revascularization of a target vessel with angiographic diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or positive functional study Derived from Non-Hierarchical Subject Counts of Adverse Events
Time frame: 4 years
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for the secondary endpoints. The analysis population at clinical follow-up visits may have changed due to early termination from the study by the patient or physician.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR) | 7.8 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR) | 9.6 percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)
Revascularization at the target vessel associated with any of the following * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and angiographic diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory QCA * Revascularization of a target vessel with angiographic diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or positive functional study Derived from Non-Hierarchical Subject Counts of Adverse Events
Time frame: 5 years
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for the secondary endpoints. The analysis population at clinical follow-up visits may have changed due to early termination from the study by the patient or physician.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR) | 8.8 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR) | 11.9 percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)
Revascularization at the target vessel associated with any of the following * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and angiographic diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory QCA * Revascularization of a target vessel with angiographic diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or positive functional study Derived from Non-Hierarchical Subject Counts of Adverse Events
Time frame: 30 days
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for the secondary endpoints. The analysis population at clinical follow-up visits may have changed due to early termination from the study by the patient or physician.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR) | 0.3 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR) | 0.9 percentage of participants |
Major Secondary Endpoint: Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Failure (ID-TVF)
The composite endpoint comprised of: * Cardiac death (death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded) * Myocardial infarction (MI, classified as Q-wave and non-Q wave) * Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) by CABG or PCI * Ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR) by CABG or PCI
Time frame: 270 days
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for this endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Major Secondary Endpoint: Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Failure (ID-TVF) | 7.2 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Major Secondary Endpoint: Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Failure (ID-TVF) | 9.0 percentage of participants |
Persisting Incomplete Stent Apposition, Late-acquired Incomplete Stent Apposition, Aneurysm, Thrombosis, and Persisting Dissection
Incomplete Apposition (Persisting & Late acquired): Failure to completely appose vessel wall w/ ≥1 strut separated from vessel wall w/ blood behind strut per ultrasound. Aneurysm: Abnormal vessel expansion ≥ 1.5 of reference vessel diameter. Thrombus: Protocol & ARC definition. Persisting dissection @ follow-up, present post-procedure.
Time frame: at 240 days
Population: Only a certain number of patients were required to have angiographic or IVUS follow-up. The analysis population for these follow-ups may have changed due to patient's not completing an angiographic or IVUS follow-up procedure. Patients may also have missed the follow-up visits due to early termination from the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Persisting Incomplete Stent Apposition, Late-acquired Incomplete Stent Apposition, Aneurysm, Thrombosis, and Persisting Dissection | 24.4 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Persisting Incomplete Stent Apposition, Late-acquired Incomplete Stent Apposition, Aneurysm, Thrombosis, and Persisting Dissection | 14.0 percentage of participants |
Proximal Late Loss
Proximal Minimum Lumen Diameter (MLD) post-procedure minus proximal MLD at follow-up (proximal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue proximal to stent placement)
Time frame: at 240 days
Population: Only a certain number of patients were required to have angiographic or IVUS follow-up. The analysis population for these follow-ups may have changed due to patient's not completing an angiographic or IVUS follow-up procedure. Patients may also have missed the follow-up visits due to early termination from the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Proximal Late Loss | 0.12 millimeters | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Proximal Late Loss | 0.20 millimeters | Standard Deviation 0.41 |
Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
The composite endpoint comprised of: * Cardiac death (death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded) * Myocardial infarction (MI, classified as Q-wave and non-Q wave) * Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) by CABG or PCI * Ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR) by CABG or PCI
Time frame: 4 year
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for the secondary endpoints. The analysis population at clinical follow-up visits may have changed due to early termination from the study by the patient or physician.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Target Vessel Failure (TVF) | 18.5 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Target Vessel Failure (TVF) | 22.5 percentage of participants |
Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
The composite endpoint comprised of: * Cardiac death (death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded) * Myocardial infarction (MI, classified as Q-wave and non-Q wave) * Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) by CABG or PCI * Ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR) by CABG or PCI
Time frame: 5 years
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for the secondary endpoints. The analysis population at clinical follow-up visits may have changed due to early termination from the study by the patient or physician.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Target Vessel Failure (TVF) | 20.3 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Target Vessel Failure (TVF) | 26.6 percentage of participants |
Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
The composite endpoint comprised of: * Cardiac death (death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded) * Myocardial infarction (MI, classified as Q-wave and non-Q wave) * Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) by CABG or PCI * Ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR) by CABG or PCI
Time frame: 3 year
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for the secondary endpoints. The analysis population at clinical follow-up visits may have changed due to early termination from the study by the patient or physician.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Target Vessel Failure (TVF) | 14.3 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Target Vessel Failure (TVF) | 20.0 percentage of participants |
Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
The composite endpoint comprised of: * Cardiac death (death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded) * Myocardial infarction (MI, classified as Q-wave and non-Q wave) * Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) by CABG or PCI * Ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR) by CABG or PCI
Time frame: 1 year
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for the secondary endpoints. The analysis population at clinical follow-up visits may have changed due to early termination from the study by the patient or physician.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Target Vessel Failure (TVF) | 8.6 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Target Vessel Failure (TVF) | 11.6 percentage of participants |
Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
The composite endpoint comprised of: * Cardiac death (death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded) * Myocardial infarction (MI, classified as Q-wave and non-Q wave) * Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) by CABG or PCI * Ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR) by CABG or PCI
Time frame: 180 days
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for the secondary endpoints. The analysis population at clinical follow-up visits may have changed due to early termination from the study by the patient or physician.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Target Vessel Failure (TVF) | 4.1 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Target Vessel Failure (TVF) | 5.5 percentage of participants |
Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
The composite endpoint comprised of: * Cardiac death (death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded) * Myocardial infarction (MI, classified as Q-wave and non-Q wave) * Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) by CABG or PCI * Ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR) by CABG or PCI
Time frame: 2 year
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for the secondary endpoints. The analysis population at clinical follow-up visits may have changed due to early termination from the study by the patient or physician.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Target Vessel Failure (TVF) | 11.3 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Target Vessel Failure (TVF) | 16.4 percentage of participants |
Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
The composite endpoint comprised of: * Cardiac death (death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded) * Myocardial infarction (MI, classified as Q-wave and non-Q wave) * Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) by CABG or PCI * Ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR) by CABG or PCI
Time frame: 30 days
Population: All patients in the study underwent clinical follow up to provide the information needed for the secondary endpoints. The analysis population at clinical follow-up visits may have changed due to early termination from the study by the patient or physician.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | Target Vessel Failure (TVF) | 1.6 percentage of participants |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | Target Vessel Failure (TVF) | 3.3 percentage of participants |
% Volume Obstruction (% VO)
Defined as stent intimal hyperplasia and calculated as 100\*(Stent Volume - Lumen Volume)/Stent Volume by IVUS.
Time frame: at 240 days
Population: Only a certain number of patients were required to have angiographic or IVUS follow-up. The analysis population for these follow-ups may have changed due to patient's not completing an angiographic or IVUS follow-up procedure. Patients may also have missed the follow-up visits due to early termination from the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| XIENCE V® EECSS | % Volume Obstruction (% VO) | 6.91 percent of volume obstruction | Standard Deviation 6.35 |
| TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ ECSS | % Volume Obstruction (% VO) | 11.21 percent of volume obstruction | Standard Deviation 9.86 |