Skip to content

Lenalidomide Versus Placebo in Myelodysplastic Syndromes With a Deletion 5q[31] Abnormality

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 3-Arm Study of the Efficacy and Safety of 2 Doses of Lenalidomide Versus Placebo in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion-Dependent Subjects With Low- or Intermediate-1-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes Associated With a Deletion (Del) 5q[31] Cytogenetic Abnormality

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00179621
Enrollment
205
Registered
2005-09-16
Start date
2005-07-31
Completion date
2010-06-30
Last updated
2011-04-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Keywords

MDS, transfusion dependent, anaemia, cytogenetic abnormality 5q-, erythroid response, leukaemia, CC-5013, Celgene, revlimid, lenalidomide

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to compare 2 doses (10 mg and 5 mg) of lenalidomide to that of placebo in subjects with red blood cell (RBC) transfusion-dependent low- or intermediate-1-risk IPSS MDS associated with a deletion (del) 5q\[31\] cytogenetic abnormality. Study participants were randomized to one of the two treatment groups or to placebo and took the study drug for 16 weeks. At this timepoint, participants were evaluated for erythroid response. If participants did not achieve at least a minor erythroid response, they were discontinued from the Double-Blind phase and entered into the Open-Label phase. All erythroid responders at Week 16 were to continue in the Double-Blind phase for up to 52 weeks. For participants that were still responding at the end of Double-Blind phase, they could then rollover into the Open-Label phase for an additional two years. Participants could remain on study for up to a total of 3 years. All participants who discontinued from the study were followed every 4 months for overall survival and progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Detailed description

MDS-004 was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-arm study of 2 doses of lenalidomide versus placebo administered to RBC transfusion-dependent adults with low- or intermediate-1 risk MDS associated with a del 5q\[31\] cytogentetic abnormality. Potential participants that had a del 5q\[31\] cytogenetic abnormality plus other additional cytogenetic abnormalities were also eligible for enrollment. Transfusion-dependent anemia was defined as documentation that a participant with anemia due to MDS did not have any consecutive 56 days (8 weeks) that were RBC transfusion free during at least the 112 days (16 weeks) prior to Day 1 of the Pre-Randomization Phase. This study was conducted in three phases: 1. a Pre-Randomization Phase 2. a Double-Blind Treatment Phase 3. an Open-Label Extension Phase Potentially protocol-eligible participants entered the Pre-Randomization Phase and were evaluated for the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the Double-Blind Treatment Phase. The Pre-Randomization Phase was not to last for more than 56 days (8 weeks). When the participant's baseline RBC transfusion requirement was calculated, and it had been determined that all eligibility criteria had been met, the participant could be randomized for treatment in the Double-Blind Treatment Phase at the time of their next RBC transfusion. This RBC transfusion had to occur within 56 days of the participant's last previous RBC transfusion. Participants meeting eligibility criteria were randomized (1:1:1 ratio) to receive either lenalidomide 10 mg/day on days 1-21, lenalidomide 5 mg/day on days 1-28, or placebo on days 1-28; all on a 28-day cycle. Randomization was performed using a validated interactive voice response system. Participants were stratified according to karyotype (IPSS karyotype score: 0 vs \> 0; i.e., isolated del 5q\[31\] vs del 5q\[31\] plus ≥ 1 additional cytogenetic abnormality). A complete blood count (CBC), serum or plasma ferritin, and EPO levels were measured to determine baseline levels. Participants who achieved at least a minor erythroid response (i.e. 50% decrease in transfusion requirements) by week 16 could continue treatment in the Double-Blind phase for up to 52 weeks, unless there was evidence of erythroid relapse, disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity. Those who did not achieve at least a minor erythroid response by week 16 were discontinued from the Double-Blind phase for lack of therapeutic efficacy, and unblinded and were potentially eligible for Open-Label treatment. All participants who completed the double-blind treatment phase (the first 52 weeks of the trial) without disease progression or erythroid relapse were unblinded and entered the Open-Label extension phase at their current lenalidomide dose. Participants in the placebo or lenalidomide 5 mg arms who failed to achieve at least a minor erythroid response by week 16 or who had an erythroid relapse could cross over to lenalidomide 5 mg or 10 mg, respectively, in the Open-Label Extension phase. Lenalidomide treatment could be continued in the Open-label Extension phase for up to 3 years (156 weeks) of total study participation. Participants with disease progression at any time and participants in the lenalidomide 10 mg group who did not achieve at least a minor erythroid response by week 16 were withdrawn from the study and were ineligible for Open-Label treatment. Serial measurements for efficacy and safety were performed every 28 days. In addition, CBCs were monitored weekly for the first 8 weeks, every 2 weeks for the next 8 weeks, and every 4 weeks thereafter. Bone marrow aspirate (BMA) and standard cytogenetic studies were performed at baseline, weeks 12, week 24, and every 24 weeks thereafter and when clinically indicated for assessment of disease progression. BMAs were submitted for central pathology review and sent to a central cytogenetics laboratory for processing and review. All participants were followed for overall survival (OS) and progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Lenalidomide or placebo dosing was reduced for dose-limiting toxicities according to the following dose reduction schedule: * Lenalidomide 5 mg (starting dose) * dose level -1 (5 mg every other day) * dose level -2 (5 mg twice a week) * dose level -3 (5 mg weekly) * Lenalidomide 10 mg (starting dose) * dose level -1 (5 mg daily) * dose level -2 (5 mg every other day) * dose level -3 (5 mg twice a week) Participants who could not tolerate dose level -3 discontinued treatment. For grade 4 neutropenia, lenalidomide was required per protocol to be interrupted and resumed at a decreased dose level when the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovered to ≥ 500/μL. For grade 4 thrombocytopenia, lenalidomide was interrupted and then resumed at a decreased dose level when the platelet count recovered to: between ≥ 25,000/μL and \< 50,000/μL on at least 2 occasions for ≥ 7 days; or ≥ 50,000 at any time, respectively. Prophylactic and therapeutic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) or granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factors (GM-CSF) was allowed.

Interventions

DRUGLenalidomide 5 mg

Lenalidomide 5 mg daily 28/28 days

Lenalidomide 10 mg daily 21/28 days

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo, matching to active study drug arms

Sponsors

ICON Clinical Research
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Celgene Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Must understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form * Age 18 years at the time of signing the informed consent form * Documented diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) that meets International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) criteria for low to intermediate-1-risk disease and has an associated del 5q(31) cytogenetic abnormality * Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion dependent anaemia defined as not having any 56 days without a RBC transfusion within at least the immediate 112 days * Must be able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements * Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test prior to inclusion

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or lactating females * Prior therapy with lenalidomide * Proliferative (white blood cell (WBC)= 12,000/mL) chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) * Prior \>= grade-2 (using the National Cancer Institute (NCI)'s Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE) (v 3.0)) allergic reaction to thalidomide * Prior desquamating (blistering) rash while taking thalidomide * Prior history of malignancy other than MDS (except basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma or carcinoma in situ of the cervix or breast) unless the subject has been free of disease for \>3 years * Use of cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents or experimental agents (agents that are not commercially available) for the treatment of MDS within 28 days * Less than 6 months since prior allogeneic bone marrow transplantation * Less than 3 months since prior autologous bone marrow or stem cell transplantation * Less than 28 days since prior myelosuppressive anticancer biologic therapy * Recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) therapy received within 28 days * Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) positivity * Any serious medical condition or psychiatric illness that will prevent the subject from signing the informed consent form or will place the subject at unacceptable risk if he or she participates in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participants Who Achieved Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence for >= 26 Weeks (182 Days)Up to 52 weeksThe count of study participants who had no RBC transfusions for 26 consecutive weeks or more during the double-blind period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence for Participants Who Became RBC Transfusion Independent for at Least 182 Daysup to 3 yearsMean number of weeks that participants who achieved RBC transfusion independence for at least 182 days were able to maintain RBC transfusion independence. Both double-blind and open-label periods are included.
Maximum Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin During the Double-blind Period for Participants Who Became Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independent for at Least 182 DaysBaseline, up to 52 weeksFor participants who became RBC transfusion independent for at least 182 days during the double-blind study period, the mean maximum change from baseline in hemoglobin is summarized.
Participants' Response in Platelet Counts as Defined by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind Periodup to 52 weeksThe International MDS Working Group (IWG) defines a major platelet response for participants with a pre-treatment platelet count of \<100,000/mm\^3 as an absolute increase of ≥30,000/mm\^3 whereas a minor response is defined as a ≥50% increase in platelet count with a net increase greater than 10,000/mm\^3 but less than 30,000/mm\^3.
Participants' Response in Absolute Neutrophil Counts as Defined by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind Periodup to week 52A major neutrophil response is defined by the International MDS Working Group (IWG) criteria as at least a 100% increase, or an absolute increase of ≥500/mm\^3 for participants with absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) of less than 1,500/mm\^3 before therapy, whichever is greater. A minor response for such participants is defined as an ANC increase of at least 100%, but absolute increase \<500/mm\^3.
Participants' Response Based on Bone Marrow Samples by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind Periodup to 52 weeksThe IWG criteria for bone marrow improvement: a complete remission is bone marrow sampling showing less than 5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines, with no evidence for dysplasia. A partial remission is ≥ 50% decrease in blasts over pre-treatment. Bone marrow progression is a ≥ 50% increase in blasts that exceed the top range of the pretreatment percentile range: a) \<5% blasts b) 5-10% blasts c) 10-20% blasts d) 20-30% blasts. For example, a participant with \<5% blasts pretreatment with an on study blast increase of 50% which is now \>5% showed bone marrow progression.
Participants Showing Cytogenetic Response by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind Period as Evaluated by Central Reviewup to 52 weeksThe IWG criteria for evaluating cytogenetic response require a minimum of 20 baseline and post-baseline analyzable metaphases using conventional cytogenetic techniques. A major cytogenetic response is defined as no detectable cytogenetic abnormality if preexisting abnormality was present whereas a minor response requires ≥50% reduction in abnormal metaphases. Progression could be concluded based on as few as 3 metaphases if there were additional abnormalities. The best response is represented.
Participants Who Achieved Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence for 56 DaysUp to 52 weeksCount of study participants who had no RBC transfusions during any 56 or more consecutive study days during the double-blind period.
Kaplan Meier Estimates of Overall Survival by Randomized Groupup to 3 yearsKaplan Meier estimate for median length of survival for study participants as they were randomized at the start of the study.
Participant Count of Deaths During Double-blind and Open-label by Randomized Groupup to 3 yearsCount of participant deaths throughout the entire study and reported by the original treatment assignment.
Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An) Endpoints at Week 12Baseline, Week 12The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An) questionnaire (Yellen, 1997) was used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL). In addition to general HRQoL, the FACT-An measures the impact of fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms on patient functioning. The overall score range for the FACT-An is 0-188. Higher scores indicate better HRQoL.
Change From Baseline in the Trial Outcome Index-Anemia (TOI-An) Endpoints at Week 12Baseline, Week 12The Trial Outcome Index-Anemia (TOI-An) composed of the physical and functional subscales of the FACT-G along with the Anemia subscale was used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The overall score range for the TOI-An is 0-136. Higher scores indicate better HRQoL.
Change From Baseline in the Trial Outcome Index-Fatigue (TOI-F) Endpoints at Week 12Baseline, Week 12The Trial Outcome Index-Fatigue(TOI-F) composed of the physical and functional subscales of the FACT-G along with the fatigue items from the Anemia subscale was used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The overall score range for the TOI-F is 0-108. Higher scores indicate better HRQoL.
Summary of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AE) During the Double-blind Periodup to week 52Counts of study participants who had adverse events (AEs) during the double-blind period by MedDRA System Organ Class (SOC) and preferred term. A participant with multiple occurrences of an adverse event within a category is counted only once in that category. Adverse events were evaluated by the investigator. The National Cancer Institute (NCI)'s Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE) was used to grade AE severity. Severity grade 3= severe and undesirable AE. Severity grade 4= life-threatening or disabling AE.
Participants Who Progressed to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) During the Studyup to 3 yearsNumber of participants who progressed to acute myeloid leukemia during the study, summarized at three different timepoints: first 16 weeks of the double-blind study, week 52 of the double-blind study, and up to 36 months which includes the double-blind and open-label periods of the study. The counts are cumulative by timeframe.

Countries

Belgium, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 263 potential participants were screened. Potentially protocol-eligible participants were then entered into the Pre-Randomization Phase (up to 56 days) to ensure eligibility criteria were met prior to entering the Double-Blind Phase. A total of 205 participants were randomized into the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo matching to active study arms.
67
Lenalidomide 5 mg
Lenalidomide 5 mg daily for 28 days
69
Lenalidomide 10 mg
Lenalidomide 10 mg daily for 21 of 28 days
69
Total205

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Double-Blind PeriodAdverse Event2740
Double-Blind PeriodDeath0120
Double-Blind PeriodLack of Therapeutic Effect5935190
Double-Blind PeriodOther0220
Double-Blind PeriodProtocol Violation1000
Double-Blind PeriodWithdrawal by Subject2130
Open-Label PeriodAdverse Event0656
Open-Label PeriodDeath0012
Open-Label PeriodLack of Therapeutic Effect0191931
Open-Label PeriodOther0112
Open-Label PeriodWithdrawal by Subject0222

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPlaceboLenalidomide 5 mgLenalidomide 10 mg
5q- (31-33) Chromosomal Abnormality
Missing
10 Participants3 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
5q- (31-33) Chromosomal Abnormality
No
4 Participants1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
5q- (31-33) Chromosomal Abnormality
Yes
191 Participants63 Participants64 Participants64 Participants
Age Continuous68.0 years69.9 years66.0 years68.0 years
French-American-British (FAB) Classification
Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML)
1 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants
French-American-British (FAB) Classification
Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML)
3 participants1 participants2 participants0 participants
French-American-British (FAB) Classification
Other or missing
7 participants4 participants2 participants1 participants
French-American-British (FAB) Classification
RAEB in transformation
1 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants
French-American-British (FAB) Classification
Refractory anemia (RA)
107 participants37 participants38 participants32 participants
French-American-British (FAB) Classification
Refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB)
22 participants4 participants9 participants9 participants
French-American-British (FAB) Classification
Refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts (RARS)
24 participants8 participants7 participants9 participants
French-American-British (FAB) Classification
Specimen not adequate from diagnosis
40 participants12 participants11 participants17 participants
International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS)
High Risk (≥ 2.5)
1 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants
International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS)
Intermediate-1 (0.5 - 1.0)
74 participants22 participants29 participants23 participants
International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS)
Intermediate-2 (1.5 - 2.0)
10 participants2 participants5 participants3 participants
International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS)
Low risk (0)
70 participants30 participants20 participants20 participants
International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS)
Missing data
50 participants13 participants15 participants22 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
3 participants1 participants2 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
202 participants66 participants67 participants69 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
156 Participants54 Participants53 Participants49 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
49 Participants13 Participants16 Participants20 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
64 / 6769 / 6969 / 6956 / 56
serious
Total, serious adverse events
14 / 6742 / 6942 / 6933 / 56

Outcome results

Primary

Participants Who Achieved Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence for >= 26 Weeks (182 Days)

The count of study participants who had no RBC transfusions for 26 consecutive weeks or more during the double-blind period.

Time frame: Up to 52 weeks

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all participants with centrally-confirmed Low- or Int-1-risk MDS with del 5q\[31\] and documented RBC transfusion dependence who had received ≥ 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieved Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence for >= 26 Weeks (182 Days)3 Participants
Lenalidomide 5 mgParticipants Who Achieved Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence for >= 26 Weeks (182 Days)20 Participants
Lenalidomide 10 mgParticipants Who Achieved Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence for >= 26 Weeks (182 Days)23 Participants
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An) Endpoints at Week 12

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An) questionnaire (Yellen, 1997) was used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL). In addition to general HRQoL, the FACT-An measures the impact of fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms on patient functioning. The overall score range for the FACT-An is 0-188. Higher scores indicate better HRQoL.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Participants who had both Baseline and Week 12 FACT-An data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An) Endpoints at Week 12-2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.5
Lenalidomide 5 mgChange From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An) Endpoints at Week 125.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.26
Lenalidomide 10 mgChange From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An) Endpoints at Week 125.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.17
p-value: <0.05ANOVA
p-value: <0.05ANOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Trial Outcome Index-Anemia (TOI-An) Endpoints at Week 12

The Trial Outcome Index-Anemia (TOI-An) composed of the physical and functional subscales of the FACT-G along with the Anemia subscale was used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The overall score range for the TOI-An is 0-136. Higher scores indicate better HRQoL.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Participants who had both Baseline and Week 12 TOI-An data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Trial Outcome Index-Anemia (TOI-An) Endpoints at Week 12-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.13
Lenalidomide 5 mgChange From Baseline in the Trial Outcome Index-Anemia (TOI-An) Endpoints at Week 125.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.56
Lenalidomide 10 mgChange From Baseline in the Trial Outcome Index-Anemia (TOI-An) Endpoints at Week 124.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.16
p-value: 0.054ANOVA
p-value: 0.08ANOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Trial Outcome Index-Fatigue (TOI-F) Endpoints at Week 12

The Trial Outcome Index-Fatigue(TOI-F) composed of the physical and functional subscales of the FACT-G along with the fatigue items from the Anemia subscale was used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The overall score range for the TOI-F is 0-108. Higher scores indicate better HRQoL.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Participants who had both Baseline and Week 12 TOI-F data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Trial Outcome Index-Fatigue (TOI-F) Endpoints at Week 12-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.76
Lenalidomide 5 mgChange From Baseline in the Trial Outcome Index-Fatigue (TOI-F) Endpoints at Week 124.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.21
Lenalidomide 10 mgChange From Baseline in the Trial Outcome Index-Fatigue (TOI-F) Endpoints at Week 123.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.47
p-value: 0.062ANOVA
p-value: 0.113ANOVA
Secondary

Duration of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence for Participants Who Became RBC Transfusion Independent for at Least 182 Days

Mean number of weeks that participants who achieved RBC transfusion independence for at least 182 days were able to maintain RBC transfusion independence. Both double-blind and open-label periods are included.

Time frame: up to 3 years

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all participants who achieved RBC transfusion independence for at least 182 days.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboDuration of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence for Participants Who Became RBC Transfusion Independent for at Least 182 Days61.4 WeeksStandard Deviation 10.93
Lenalidomide 5 mgDuration of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence for Participants Who Became RBC Transfusion Independent for at Least 182 Days107.7 WeeksStandard Deviation 52.35
Lenalidomide 10 mgDuration of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence for Participants Who Became RBC Transfusion Independent for at Least 182 Days108.6 WeeksStandard Deviation 40.63
Secondary

Kaplan Meier Estimates of Overall Survival by Randomized Group

Kaplan Meier estimate for median length of survival for study participants as they were randomized at the start of the study.

Time frame: up to 3 years

Population: Safety population: All randomized participants who received any Lenalidomide or placebo.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboKaplan Meier Estimates of Overall Survival by Randomized Group42.4 Months
Lenalidomide 5 mgKaplan Meier Estimates of Overall Survival by Randomized GroupNA Months
Lenalidomide 10 mgKaplan Meier Estimates of Overall Survival by Randomized Group44.5 Months
Secondary

Maximum Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin During the Double-blind Period for Participants Who Became Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independent for at Least 182 Days

For participants who became RBC transfusion independent for at least 182 days during the double-blind study period, the mean maximum change from baseline in hemoglobin is summarized.

Time frame: Baseline, up to 52 weeks

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all participants with centrally-confirmed Low- or Int-1-risk MDS with del 5q\[31\] and documented RBC transfusion dependence who had received ≥ 1 dose of study drug. MITT participants who were transfusion independent for \>= 182 study days are included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMaximum Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin During the Double-blind Period for Participants Who Became Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independent for at Least 182 Days2.0 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.61
Lenalidomide 5 mgMaximum Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin During the Double-blind Period for Participants Who Became Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independent for at Least 182 Days5.5 g/dLStandard Deviation 1.79
Lenalidomide 10 mgMaximum Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin During the Double-blind Period for Participants Who Became Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independent for at Least 182 Days6.0 g/dLStandard Deviation 1.97
Secondary

Participant Count of Deaths During Double-blind and Open-label by Randomized Group

Count of participant deaths throughout the entire study and reported by the original treatment assignment.

Time frame: up to 3 years

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboParticipant Count of Deaths During Double-blind and Open-label by Randomized Group35 Participants
Lenalidomide 5 mgParticipant Count of Deaths During Double-blind and Open-label by Randomized Group32 Participants
Lenalidomide 10 mgParticipant Count of Deaths During Double-blind and Open-label by Randomized Group34 Participants
Secondary

Participants' Response Based on Bone Marrow Samples by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind Period

The IWG criteria for bone marrow improvement: a complete remission is bone marrow sampling showing less than 5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines, with no evidence for dysplasia. A partial remission is ≥ 50% decrease in blasts over pre-treatment. Bone marrow progression is a ≥ 50% increase in blasts that exceed the top range of the pretreatment percentile range: a) \<5% blasts b) 5-10% blasts c) 10-20% blasts d) 20-30% blasts. For example, a participant with \<5% blasts pretreatment with an on study blast increase of 50% which is now \>5% showed bone marrow progression.

Time frame: up to 52 weeks

Population: Intent to treat population. Participants represented in the treatment groups to which they were randomized. Placebo response is limited to the double-blind phase. There were 10 responders in the placebo group who achieved their response under lenalidomide treatment after crossover to open-label.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboParticipants' Response Based on Bone Marrow Samples by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind PeriodComplete remission0 Participants
PlaceboParticipants' Response Based on Bone Marrow Samples by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind PeriodPartial remission0 Participants
PlaceboParticipants' Response Based on Bone Marrow Samples by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind PeriodStable Disease37 Participants
PlaceboParticipants' Response Based on Bone Marrow Samples by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind PeriodProgression3 Participants
Lenalidomide 5 mgParticipants' Response Based on Bone Marrow Samples by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind PeriodProgression4 Participants
Lenalidomide 5 mgParticipants' Response Based on Bone Marrow Samples by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind PeriodComplete remission7 Participants
Lenalidomide 5 mgParticipants' Response Based on Bone Marrow Samples by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind PeriodStable Disease35 Participants
Lenalidomide 5 mgParticipants' Response Based on Bone Marrow Samples by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind PeriodPartial remission5 Participants
Lenalidomide 10 mgParticipants' Response Based on Bone Marrow Samples by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind PeriodProgression3 Participants
Lenalidomide 10 mgParticipants' Response Based on Bone Marrow Samples by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind PeriodPartial remission1 Participants
Lenalidomide 10 mgParticipants' Response Based on Bone Marrow Samples by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind PeriodStable Disease33 Participants
Lenalidomide 10 mgParticipants' Response Based on Bone Marrow Samples by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind PeriodComplete remission12 Participants
Secondary

Participants' Response in Absolute Neutrophil Counts as Defined by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind Period

A major neutrophil response is defined by the International MDS Working Group (IWG) criteria as at least a 100% increase, or an absolute increase of ≥500/mm\^3 for participants with absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) of less than 1,500/mm\^3 before therapy, whichever is greater. A minor response for such participants is defined as an ANC increase of at least 100%, but absolute increase \<500/mm\^3.

Time frame: up to week 52

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all participants with centrally-confirmed Low- or Int-1-risk MDS with del 5q\[31\] and documented RBC transfusion dependence who had received ≥ 1 dose of study drug. Additionally, the participant must have had a baseline absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) \< 1,000/mm\^3.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboParticipants' Response in Absolute Neutrophil Counts as Defined by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind PeriodMinor0 Participants
PlaceboParticipants' Response in Absolute Neutrophil Counts as Defined by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind PeriodMajor1 Participants
PlaceboParticipants' Response in Absolute Neutrophil Counts as Defined by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind PeriodNone9 Participants
Lenalidomide 5 mgParticipants' Response in Absolute Neutrophil Counts as Defined by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind PeriodMinor0 Participants
Lenalidomide 5 mgParticipants' Response in Absolute Neutrophil Counts as Defined by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind PeriodMajor3 Participants
Lenalidomide 5 mgParticipants' Response in Absolute Neutrophil Counts as Defined by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind PeriodNone15 Participants
Lenalidomide 10 mgParticipants' Response in Absolute Neutrophil Counts as Defined by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind PeriodMajor2 Participants
Lenalidomide 10 mgParticipants' Response in Absolute Neutrophil Counts as Defined by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind PeriodNone14 Participants
Lenalidomide 10 mgParticipants' Response in Absolute Neutrophil Counts as Defined by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind PeriodMinor1 Participants
Secondary

Participants' Response in Platelet Counts as Defined by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind Period

The International MDS Working Group (IWG) defines a major platelet response for participants with a pre-treatment platelet count of \<100,000/mm\^3 as an absolute increase of ≥30,000/mm\^3 whereas a minor response is defined as a ≥50% increase in platelet count with a net increase greater than 10,000/mm\^3 but less than 30,000/mm\^3.

Time frame: up to 52 weeks

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all participants with centrally-confirmed Low- or Int-1-risk MDS with del 5q\[31\] and documented RBC transfusion dependence who had received ≥ 1 dose of study drug. Additionally, the participant must have had a baseline platelet count of \<100,000/mm\^3 to be included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboParticipants' Response in Platelet Counts as Defined by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind PeriodMinor0 Participants
PlaceboParticipants' Response in Platelet Counts as Defined by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind PeriodMajor0 Participants
PlaceboParticipants' Response in Platelet Counts as Defined by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind PeriodNone3 Participants
Lenalidomide 5 mgParticipants' Response in Platelet Counts as Defined by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind PeriodMinor0 Participants
Lenalidomide 5 mgParticipants' Response in Platelet Counts as Defined by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind PeriodMajor1 Participants
Lenalidomide 5 mgParticipants' Response in Platelet Counts as Defined by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind PeriodNone5 Participants
Lenalidomide 10 mgParticipants' Response in Platelet Counts as Defined by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind PeriodMajor1 Participants
Lenalidomide 10 mgParticipants' Response in Platelet Counts as Defined by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind PeriodNone3 Participants
Lenalidomide 10 mgParticipants' Response in Platelet Counts as Defined by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind PeriodMinor0 Participants
Secondary

Participants Showing Cytogenetic Response by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind Period as Evaluated by Central Review

The IWG criteria for evaluating cytogenetic response require a minimum of 20 baseline and post-baseline analyzable metaphases using conventional cytogenetic techniques. A major cytogenetic response is defined as no detectable cytogenetic abnormality if preexisting abnormality was present whereas a minor response requires ≥50% reduction in abnormal metaphases. Progression could be concluded based on as few as 3 metaphases if there were additional abnormalities. The best response is represented.

Time frame: up to 52 weeks

Population: Modified intent to treat population, which is defined as participants with centrally-confirmed Low- or Int-1-risk MDS with del 5q\[31\] and documented RBC transfusion dependence who had received ≥ 1 dose of study drug. Participants had to have had more than 1 post-baseline assessment in order to be evaluable for cytogenetic response.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboParticipants Showing Cytogenetic Response by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind Period as Evaluated by Central ReviewMajor response0 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Showing Cytogenetic Response by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind Period as Evaluated by Central ReviewMinor response0 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Showing Cytogenetic Response by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind Period as Evaluated by Central ReviewCytogenetic progression5 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Showing Cytogenetic Response by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind Period as Evaluated by Central ReviewNot evaluable/data not available10 Participants
Lenalidomide 5 mgParticipants Showing Cytogenetic Response by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind Period as Evaluated by Central ReviewNot evaluable/data not available10 Participants
Lenalidomide 5 mgParticipants Showing Cytogenetic Response by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind Period as Evaluated by Central ReviewMajor response5 Participants
Lenalidomide 5 mgParticipants Showing Cytogenetic Response by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind Period as Evaluated by Central ReviewCytogenetic progression10 Participants
Lenalidomide 5 mgParticipants Showing Cytogenetic Response by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind Period as Evaluated by Central ReviewMinor response3 Participants
Lenalidomide 10 mgParticipants Showing Cytogenetic Response by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind Period as Evaluated by Central ReviewNot evaluable/data not available1 Participants
Lenalidomide 10 mgParticipants Showing Cytogenetic Response by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind Period as Evaluated by Central ReviewMinor response7 Participants
Lenalidomide 10 mgParticipants Showing Cytogenetic Response by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind Period as Evaluated by Central ReviewCytogenetic progression8 Participants
Lenalidomide 10 mgParticipants Showing Cytogenetic Response by the International MDS Working Group (IWG 2000) During Double-blind Period as Evaluated by Central ReviewMajor response10 Participants
Secondary

Participants Who Achieved Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence for 56 Days

Count of study participants who had no RBC transfusions during any 56 or more consecutive study days during the double-blind period.

Time frame: Up to 52 weeks

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all participants with centrally-confirmed Low- or Int-1-risk MDS with del 5q\[31\] and documented RBC transfusion dependence who had received ≥ 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboParticipants Who Achieved Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence for 56 Days4 Participants
Lenalidomide 5 mgParticipants Who Achieved Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence for 56 Days24 Participants
Lenalidomide 10 mgParticipants Who Achieved Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence for 56 Days25 Participants
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Participants Who Progressed to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) During the Study

Number of participants who progressed to acute myeloid leukemia during the study, summarized at three different timepoints: first 16 weeks of the double-blind study, week 52 of the double-blind study, and up to 36 months which includes the double-blind and open-label periods of the study. The counts are cumulative by timeframe.

Time frame: up to 3 years

Population: Intent to treat population. Participants represented in the treatment groups to which they were randomized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboParticipants Who Progressed to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) During the StudyDouble-Blind (52 weeks)4 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Progressed to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) During the StudyDouble-Blind (first 16 weeks)2 Participants
PlaceboParticipants Who Progressed to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) During the StudyDouble-Blind + Open-Label21 Participants
Lenalidomide 5 mgParticipants Who Progressed to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) During the StudyDouble-Blind (52 weeks)7 Participants
Lenalidomide 5 mgParticipants Who Progressed to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) During the StudyDouble-Blind (first 16 weeks)2 Participants
Lenalidomide 5 mgParticipants Who Progressed to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) During the StudyDouble-Blind + Open-Label16 Participants
Lenalidomide 10 mgParticipants Who Progressed to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) During the StudyDouble-Blind (first 16 weeks)0 Participants
Lenalidomide 10 mgParticipants Who Progressed to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) During the StudyDouble-Blind + Open-Label15 Participants
Lenalidomide 10 mgParticipants Who Progressed to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) During the StudyDouble-Blind (52 weeks)2 Participants
Secondary

Summary of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AE) During the Double-blind Period

Counts of study participants who had adverse events (AEs) during the double-blind period by MedDRA System Organ Class (SOC) and preferred term. A participant with multiple occurrences of an adverse event within a category is counted only once in that category. Adverse events were evaluated by the investigator. The National Cancer Institute (NCI)'s Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE) was used to grade AE severity. Severity grade 3= severe and undesirable AE. Severity grade 4= life-threatening or disabling AE.

Time frame: up to week 52

Population: Safety population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboSummary of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AE) During the Double-blind PeriodAt least one related NCI CTCAE grade 3-4 AE13 participants
PlaceboSummary of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AE) During the Double-blind PeriodDeaths within 30 days of last dose of study drug4 participants
PlaceboSummary of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AE) During the Double-blind PeriodAt least one serious AE related to study drug1 participants
PlaceboSummary of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AE) During the Double-blind PeriodAt least one serious AE14 participants
PlaceboSummary of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AE) During the Double-blind PeriodAt least one AE64 participants
PlaceboSummary of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AE) During the Double-blind PeriodAn AE leading to dose reduction or interruption5 participants
PlaceboSummary of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AE) During the Double-blind PeriodAt least one NCI CTCAE grade 3-4 AE29 participants
PlaceboSummary of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AE) During the Double-blind PeriodAt least one AE related to study drug34 participants
PlaceboSummary of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AE) During the Double-blind PeriodAn AE leading to discontinuation of study drug3 participants
Lenalidomide 5 mgSummary of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AE) During the Double-blind PeriodAt least one serious AE31 participants
Lenalidomide 5 mgSummary of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AE) During the Double-blind PeriodAt least one AE69 participants
Lenalidomide 5 mgSummary of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AE) During the Double-blind PeriodAt least one AE related to study drug68 participants
Lenalidomide 5 mgSummary of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AE) During the Double-blind PeriodAt least one NCI CTCAE grade 3-4 AE62 participants
Lenalidomide 5 mgSummary of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AE) During the Double-blind PeriodAt least one related NCI CTCAE grade 3-4 AE61 participants
Lenalidomide 5 mgSummary of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AE) During the Double-blind PeriodAt least one serious AE related to study drug17 participants
Lenalidomide 5 mgSummary of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AE) During the Double-blind PeriodAn AE leading to discontinuation of study drug12 participants
Lenalidomide 5 mgSummary of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AE) During the Double-blind PeriodAn AE leading to dose reduction or interruption44 participants
Lenalidomide 5 mgSummary of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AE) During the Double-blind PeriodDeaths within 30 days of last dose of study drug2 participants
Lenalidomide 10 mgSummary of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AE) During the Double-blind PeriodAt least one NCI CTCAE grade 3-4 AE65 participants
Lenalidomide 10 mgSummary of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AE) During the Double-blind PeriodAt least one AE69 participants
Lenalidomide 10 mgSummary of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AE) During the Double-blind PeriodAn AE leading to discontinuation of study drug6 participants
Lenalidomide 10 mgSummary of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AE) During the Double-blind PeriodAt least one AE related to study drug66 participants
Lenalidomide 10 mgSummary of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AE) During the Double-blind PeriodDeaths within 30 days of last dose of study drug4 participants
Lenalidomide 10 mgSummary of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AE) During the Double-blind PeriodAt least one serious AE32 participants
Lenalidomide 10 mgSummary of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AE) During the Double-blind PeriodAt least one related NCI CTCAE grade 3-4 AE61 participants
Lenalidomide 10 mgSummary of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AE) During the Double-blind PeriodAn AE leading to dose reduction or interruption51 participants
Lenalidomide 10 mgSummary of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AE) During the Double-blind PeriodAt least one serious AE related to study drug13 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 28, 2026