Skip to content

Efficacy Study of Galantamine for Cognitive Impairments in Schizophrenia

Adjunctive Galantamine for Treatment of Cognitive Impairments in Patients With Schizophrenia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00176423
Enrollment
117
Registered
2005-09-15
Start date
2002-05-31
Completion date
2006-12-31
Last updated
2020-12-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Schizoaffective Disorder, Schizophrenia

Keywords

schizophrenia, acetylcholine, cognitive impairments, attention, processing speed, sensory gating, eye-tracking

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to examine whether adjunctive galantamine is effective in the treatment of cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia.

Detailed description

Patients with schizophrenia are characterized by a broad range of neurocognitive abnormalities. These include impairments in attention; eye-tracking; visual and verbal memory; working memory; processing speed; and sensory gating, as measured by P50. These impairments are major determinants of poor functional outcome in patients with schizophrenia. Conventional antipsychotics have limited effects on these impairments. Second generation antipsychotics (SGAs) may have modest benefits for cognitive function, but whether this represents a direct cognitive enhancing effect has not been established. Regardless, patients continue to exhibit pronounced cognitive impairments despite adequate new generation antipsychotic treatment. Adjunctive pharmacotherapy may offer a viable approach for the treatment of cognitive impairments. Adjunctive agents can be used to modulate specific neurotransmitter systems that are hypothesized to be involved in the pharmacology of cognitive functions. Acetylcholine acts at muscarinic and nicotinic cholinergic receptors. These receptors are broadly distributed through the brain, including the neocortex, hippocampus, and basal ganglia. Cholinergic mechanisms have been implicated in the regulation of attention, memory, processing speed, and sensory gating processes; processes which are impaired in patients with schizophrenia. Nicotine has previously been shown to improve sensory gating, as measured by P50, and eye-tracking in patients with schizophrenia. The gene for the alpha-7 nicotinic receptor, which is hypothesized to be the nicotinic receptor involved in sensory gating regulation, has also been shown to be linked to schizophrenia. Galantamine (Trade name: Reminyl) is a new FDA-approved selective acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI), which may also allosterically modulate nicotinic receptors, enhance receptor sensitivity, and increase nicotinic receptor density. Galantamine is marketed by Janssen Research Foundation. In animal models of aging, galantamine enhanced long-term potentiation, ameliorated learning impairments, and elevated the number of nicotinic receptors in the hippocampus and neocortex. In placebo-controlled studies, galantamine has been shown to not only delay deterioration but to improve cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer's disease. There is also preliminary evidence that galantamine may ameliorate positive psychotic symptoms in these patients. AChEIs have not been extensively studied in patients with schizophrenia. We have conducted a 6-week open-labeled pilot study of adjunctive donepezil in patients treated with olanzapine for a minimum of 6 months. Fifteen patients entered the study and 14 patients completed the study. One patient withdrew with a complaint of sedation. The demographic characteristics of the patients who completed the study were: mean (SD) age: 43.1 6.6; 71% male; 78% caucasian; and mean (SD) duration of illness: 24.7 7.2. The mean (SD) olanzapine dose was 25.7 11.9 mg/day. Two patients were receiving benzodiazepines, two were receiving antidepressants, and one was receiving valproic acid. Donepezil resulted in a modest improvement in sensory gating. Nine patients had abnormal P50 at baseline, which normalized for five patients following treatment. Donepezil had a more pronounced effect on neuropsychological test performance, with large and significant effect sizes observed for the visual memory (effect size (ES)=.57) and manual dexterity (ES=.93) measures. There were moderate improvements on the verbal recall memory (ES=0.46) and processing speed (ES=0.48) measures. The only cognitive measure that did not change with treatment was a measure of attention. There were no significant changes in either positive symptom (mean (SD), baseline: 9.3 3.8; week 6: 8.2 3.8; t=-1.55, df=14, p=.14) or negative symptom (mean(SD), baseline: 29.7 10.9; week 6: 30.0 12.6; t=0.15, df=14, p=.88) measures. The results of this study suggest that adjunctive AChEIs may be an effective treatment for cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Moderate to large effect size improvements were observed on verbal and visual memory, processing speed, and manual dexterity measures. Patients exhibited a greater than 20% increase in suppression of their P50 response to repeated auditory stimuli. There was no effect of donepezil on a measure of attention. Donepezil was well tolerated; only one patient dropped out of the study and nine of the remaining subjects chose to continue on the drug beyond the protocol. An important aspect of the study was that cognitive function improvement occurred in the context of concurrent olanzapine treatment, which is reported to improve P50 and cognitive function (Purdon et al, 2000; Light et al, 2000). Thus, donepezil was able to further enhance cognitive function in patients who may have already benefitted from olanzapine treatment. The primary study objectives are: 1. To examine whether adjunctive galantamine is more effective than placebo for neuropsychological measures of attention, verbal and visual memory, working memory, processing speed, and manual dexterity. 2. To examine whether adjunctive galantamine is more effective than placebo for evoked potential measures of sensory gating (i.e., P50) and attention (i.e., P300 and Gamma Band Response (GBR)) and smooth pursuit eye movement. We hypothesize that galantamine will have a significant benefit for these cognitive behaviors based on the role of acetylcholine in the regulation of these behaviors; our pilot study with donepezil which demonstrated that AChEIs may have a beneficial effect for verbal and visual memory, processing speed, and manual dexterity; and previous studies that have shown acute nicotine administration to normalize P50 and eye-tracking in patients with schizophrenia. The secondary study objectives are: 1. To examine whether adjunctive galantamine is more effective than placebo for positive symptoms and negative symptom measures. 2. To examine whether adjunctive galantamine is more likely than placebo to cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, anorexia, weight loss, or dizziness, i.e., common side effects associated with AChEI treatment. 3. To examine whether galantamine is more likely than placebo to cause an increase in either extrapyramidal symptoms or dyskinetic movements. 4. To examine whether galantamine is more effective than placebo for reducing smoking behavior. We hypothesize that there will not be a significant difference between galantamine and placebo for positive and negative symptoms based on our donepezil pilot study. We hypothesize that galantamine will be associated with an increased incidence of AChEI associated side effects. We hypothesize that there will not be a significant difference between galantamine and placebo for either extrapyramidal symptoms or dyskinetic movements. Study Design and Methods: The proposed study is a randomized, parallel group, double-blind comparison of adjunctive galantamine or placebo. The sample will consist of 90 clinically stable inpatients and outpatients with DSM-IV schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. There will be a 2-week stabilization phase, a 12-week treatment phase, and an optional 6-month open-label phase. In the 2-week stabilization phase, patients will undergo baseline symptom, medical, safety, antipsychotic level, and neurocognitive assessments. In the 12-week treatment phase, patients will be randomized to either galantamine or placebo. Patients will receive biweekly symptom, side effect, and vital sign assessments. At the end of study (12 weeks), laboratory tests, EKG, antipsychotic levels, and neurocognitive assessments will be repeated. Patients will be monitored at the 3-month and 6-month points of the open-labeled phase, during which they will receive laboratory tests, EKG, and side effect review. At the end of the 6-month open-labeled phase, patients will again be asked to participate in symptom ratings and neuropsychological tests.

Interventions

DRUGgalantamine

see arm/group description

Sponsors

Stanley Medical Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
Ortho-McNeil Neurologics, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. DSM-IV diagnosis of either schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. 2. Males and females 3. Age: 18 and 60 4. Caucasian or Non-Caucasian 5. Subjects will be currently treated with one of the following new generation antipsychotics: olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, ziprasidone, or aripiprazole. 6. Subjects will meet a priori criteria for cognitive impairment severity. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) will be used to determine the level of cognitive impairment. Patients will meet entry criteria if they have a RBANS total score of 90 or less (one standard deviation below the normal control mean).

Exclusion criteria

1. History of an organic brain disease 2. History of DSM-IV alcohol or substance abuse (within the last month), or DSM-IV alcohol or substance dependence (within the last six months). 3. Pregnant women and women taking oral contraceptives (because of the theoretical risk of breakthrough ovulation). 4. Current treatment with galantamine or other acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (e.g. donepezil) 5. History of a second or third degree atrioventricular (AV) block. 6. Persons with chronic medical conditions, which are unstable.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Cognitive Improvement Z-score12 weeksParticipants were administered an eight-test neuropsychological test battery at baseline and end-of-study. The battery included the following tests: working memory: WAIS-III Letter-Number Sequencing and Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia Number Sequencing; verbal memory: California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT); visual memory: Brief Visuospatial Memory Test (BVMT); motor speed: Grooved Pegboard; processing speed: WAIS-III Digit Symbol and WAIS-III Symbol Search; and the Gordon Diagnostic System CPT. Alternate forms of the CVLT and BVMT were used for the two test occasions. For each neuropsychological test, participant scores were converted to z-scores: z = (score - baseline mean)/baseline SD. For the primary outcome measure, an overall composite z-score was computed from the average of the individual test z-scores. A positive z-score would reflect better performance compared to baseline; a negative z-score would reflect worse performance compared to baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ECG Changes From Baseline to 12 Weeks.12 weeksThree measures were examined: PR interval, QRS interval, and QTc interval. The three measures were derived from a standard 12-lead ECG recording.
Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score12 weeks (Week 12 - Week 0)The SAS total were calculated by adding scores from scales #1-#11. Each scale ranges from 0=None/Normal to 4=Extreme/Severe. The minimum total score is 0 and the maximum score is 44. Higher scores indicate a more severe extrapyramidal side effect rating.
Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS)12 weeks (Week 12 - Week 0)Change in AIMS Total Score: Frequencies of Maximum Within-Participant Increases (worsening) from Baseline by Treatment Group. Total score calculated by adding scores from scales #1-#10. Each scale ranges from 0=None to 4=Severe. The minimum total AIMS score is 0 and the maximum score is 40. Higher scores indicate a more severe abnormal involuntary movement rating.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

The number of people who signed informed consent was 117. Thirty-one participants who signed informed consent did not complete the Evaluation Phase of the study and were not randomized. Eight-six (86) participants completed the Evaluation Phase of the study and were randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Galantamine
galantamine, 24mgs, p.o., qday galantamine: see arm/group description
42
Placebo
placebo, 3 tablets, p.o., qday galantamine: see arm/group description
44
Total86

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGalantaminePlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
42 Participants44 Participants86 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
42 participants44 participants86 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants7 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
37 Participants37 Participants74 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 422 / 44
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 420 / 44

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Cognitive Improvement Z-score

Participants were administered an eight-test neuropsychological test battery at baseline and end-of-study. The battery included the following tests: working memory: WAIS-III Letter-Number Sequencing and Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia Number Sequencing; verbal memory: California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT); visual memory: Brief Visuospatial Memory Test (BVMT); motor speed: Grooved Pegboard; processing speed: WAIS-III Digit Symbol and WAIS-III Symbol Search; and the Gordon Diagnostic System CPT. Alternate forms of the CVLT and BVMT were used for the two test occasions. For each neuropsychological test, participant scores were converted to z-scores: z = (score - baseline mean)/baseline SD. For the primary outcome measure, an overall composite z-score was computed from the average of the individual test z-scores. A positive z-score would reflect better performance compared to baseline; a negative z-score would reflect worse performance compared to baseline.

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GalantamineOverall Cognitive Improvement Z-scoreWeek 120.15 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.68
GalantamineOverall Cognitive Improvement Z-scoreWeek 00.03 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.64
PlaceboOverall Cognitive Improvement Z-scoreWeek 120.61 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.55
PlaceboOverall Cognitive Improvement Z-scoreWeek 0-0.03 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.05
p-value: <0.05Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS)

Change in AIMS Total Score: Frequencies of Maximum Within-Participant Increases (worsening) from Baseline by Treatment Group. Total score calculated by adding scores from scales #1-#10. Each scale ranges from 0=None to 4=Severe. The minimum total AIMS score is 0 and the maximum score is 40. Higher scores indicate a more severe abnormal involuntary movement rating.

Time frame: 12 weeks (Week 12 - Week 0)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GalantamineAbnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS)Week 02.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
GalantamineAbnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS)Week 122.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
PlaceboAbnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS)Week 02.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
PlaceboAbnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS)Week 121.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
p-value: <0.05ANCOVA
Secondary

ECG Changes From Baseline to 12 Weeks.

Three measures were examined: PR interval, QRS interval, and QTc interval. The three measures were derived from a standard 12-lead ECG recording.

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GalantamineECG Changes From Baseline to 12 Weeks.PR interval25.7 msecStandard Deviation 56
GalantamineECG Changes From Baseline to 12 Weeks.QRS interval11.4 msecStandard Deviation 25.1
GalantamineECG Changes From Baseline to 12 Weeks.QTc interval3.03 msecStandard Deviation 28.89
PlaceboECG Changes From Baseline to 12 Weeks.PR interval3.0 msecStandard Deviation 12
PlaceboECG Changes From Baseline to 12 Weeks.QRS interval-1.6 msecStandard Deviation 11.7
PlaceboECG Changes From Baseline to 12 Weeks.QTc interval3.03 msecStandard Deviation 27.68
p-value: <0.05ANCOVA
Secondary

Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total Score

The SAS total were calculated by adding scores from scales #1-#11. Each scale ranges from 0=None/Normal to 4=Extreme/Severe. The minimum total score is 0 and the maximum score is 44. Higher scores indicate a more severe extrapyramidal side effect rating.

Time frame: 12 weeks (Week 12 - Week 0)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GalantamineSimpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total ScoreWeek 01.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
GalantamineSimpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total ScoreWeek 121.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
PlaceboSimpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total ScoreWeek 01.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
PlaceboSimpson Angus Scale (SAS) Total ScoreWeek 121.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
p-value: <0.05ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026